View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Vitis ✕
Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Grapevine decline was accompanied by a decrease in fruit yield quality.
fruit yield quality e2 Verbatim
e2 “Syndromes of declined grapevine plants included growth retardant of shoot system and root-rot as well as decrease of grapevine fruit yield quality ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–307 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Phytoplasma infection was accompanied by a large final yield decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “The phytoplasma infection also stimulated significant reductions in mRWC of the symptomatic leaves, with a final large decrease in yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1498 t0 “grapevine (Vitis vinifera ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–130 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Pathogen-associated internal changes substantially decrease grape yield and quality.
grape yield and quality e0 Verbatim
e0 “numerous qualitative and quantitative changes occur inside it, which greatly decrease s grape yield and quality ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–640 t0 “grapevine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 Title
Fungal diseases of grapevine
Goran Delibašić; Sanja Gajić; Srđan G. Aćimović AgroSpace (University of Belgrade, Faculty of Agriculture) 2006
Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Heatwaves may decrease simulated grapevine yield by up to −35% in some regions.
original unmodified runs e2 Verbatim
e1 “The results show that heatwaves can have a very strong impact on grapevine yield s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–866 e2 “the results were compared to the original unmodified runs ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–783 e3 “The highest negative impacts may result in a decrease in the yield by up to −35% in some regions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1053 Other claims from this paper (4) Recommendation author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors caution that competition for water and nutrients under hot and dry conditions can substantially decrease yield and vine capacity.
substantial decrease in yield and vine capacity e0 particularly if it occurs at sensitive stages (such as bloom and berry set) e0 hot and dry conditions e0 Verbatim
e0 “under hot and dry conditions, competition for water and nutrients, particularly if it occurs at sensitive stages (such as bloom and berry set) can lead to a substantial decrease in yield and vine capacity. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1305 t0 “Grapevine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Shoot thinning decrease d yield two-fold.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “two-fold decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2217–2243 t0 “grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–532 t1 “canopy management practices (ST) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2119–2151 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Covered inter-rows reduced vineyard yield by 10-13Â % in 2014.
covered inter-rows e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Keywords: grapevine, cover crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2255–2287 e5 “Viticultural measurements (2014) show a 10-13 % decrease of yield in case of covered inter-rows ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1886–1981 Other claims from this paper (13) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Photosynthesis tended to decrease under N deficiency but contributed little to reduced carbon gain.
photosynthesis rate e0 Verbatim
e0 “photosynthesis rate tended to decrease under N deficiency over the season, it only poorly contributed to the reduction in C gain ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2580–2708 t0 “grapevine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–30 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The highest nitrogen rate produced the largest decrease in grape soluble solids.
largest decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “with the highest rate (112 kg N/ha) resulting in the largest decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2106–2175 e1 “soluble solids over C0 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2054–2076 t0 “Grapevines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–118 Other claims from this paper (17) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Shading was associated with a decrease in vine yield and total soluble solids in the berries.
vine yield, total soluble solids in the berries e6 Verbatim
e0 “The photosynthetic activity of grapevine leaves (Sangiovese/Kober 5BB) was evaluated under field conditions on mature vines grown under three different levels of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR, 100%, 60%, and 30% sunlight) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–232 e6 “All of these modifications that occurred under shading are associated with a decrease in specific leaf dry weight, leaf soluble carbohydrates and starch content, vine yield , total soluble solids in the berries, total leaf area per vine, number of axillary shoots per cane, and winter pruning weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1776 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect Shade-grown grapevines at 60% and 30% sunlight had significantly lower Pnsat, Rd and PARc than unshaded vines at flowering and veraison. Intervention effect Shade-grown grapevines at 60% and 30% sunlight had significantly lower PARsat than unshaded vines at flowering and veraison. Intervention effect The apparent quantum yield (φi) of shade-grown grapevines was significantly higher than in unshaded vines. Intervention effect At flowering, Pnsat of grapevines grown at 60% sunlight was about 62% of that of unshaded vines (0900-1100 h). Intervention effect At flowering, Pnsat of grapevines grown at 30% sunlight was about 54% of that of unshaded vines (0900-1100 h). Intervention effect At veraison, Pnsat of grapevines grown at 60% sunlight was about 81% of that of unshaded vines (0900-1100 h). Intervention effect At veraison, Pnsat of grapevines grown at 30% sunlight was about 65% of that of unshaded vines (0900-1100 h). Association The diurnal patterns of Pn, gs and ψ in grapevine leaves were positively correlated with PAR at both phenological stages. Intervention effect Shading significantly reduced leaf transpiration rate in the early morning during flowering. Intervention effect Shading left the calculated intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) of grapevine leaves unaffected. Association Shading was associated with a decrease in specific leaf dry weight, leaf soluble carbohydrates and starch content of grapevine. Association Shading was associated with a decrease in total leaf area per vine, number of axillary shoots per cane and winter pruning weight. Mechanism The increase of φi, leaf chlorophyll content and the change to a more open canopy increased PAR trapping efficiency, indicating adaptability of the grapevine to low light. Association Vine yield and berry quality decreased linearly with increasing shade intensity in grapevine. Recommendation Grapevine management should ensure that most leaves receive approximately 700 to 900 µmol m-2 S-1 of PAR for most of the day during the crop cycle. Recommendation Factors that modify light availability at the canopy level must be evaluated to reduce risks of low photosynthesis, low yield and poorer grape quality. Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Vitis
Candidatus Phytoplasma