View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Mangifera indica ✕
Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Under scenario B1 mango yield is projected to decrease by 85.73% in future periods.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the yield of mango will decrease by 92.53% - 85.73% in the future periods under scenarios A1 and B1, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1105 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Under scenario A1 mango yield is projected to decrease by 92.53% in future periods.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the yield of mango will decrease by 92.53% - 85.73% in the future periods under scenarios A1 and B1, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1105 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Mango yield is projected to decrease by 92.53% under scenario A1.
Qualifierscenarios A1 and B1, respectively e0 Verbatim
e0 “the yield of mango will decrease by 92.53% - 85.73% in the future periods under scenarios A1 and B1, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1105 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Mango yield is projected to decrease by 85.73% under scenario B1.
Qualifierscenarios A1 and B1, respectively e0 Verbatim
e0 “the yield of mango will decrease by 92.53% - 85.73% in the future periods under scenarios A1 and B1, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1105 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Under moisture stress, melatonin treatment limited the yield decrease to 7.5%.
Treatmentmelatonin treatment e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Mango (Mangifera indica L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–85 e2 “Moisture stress decrease d yield by 55.94% compared to irrigated trees but only by 7.5% in melatonin treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1032 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Mean mango yield loss improved to 58% in 1990.
Verbatim
e0 “The mean yield decrease was 83 % during 1989 which relatively improved in later years and were 58% in 1990 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–793 t0 “MANGO ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Mean mango yield loss improved to 53% in 1991.
Verbatim
e0 “The mean yield decrease was 83 % during 1989 which relatively improved in later years and were 58% in 1990, 53% in 1991 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–806 t0 “MANGO ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Mean mango yield loss improved to 54% in 1992.
Verbatim
e0 “The mean yield decrease was 83 % during 1989 which relatively improved in later years and were 58% in 1990, 53% in 1991 and 54% in 1992 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–822 t0 “MANGO ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Rain covers tended to decrease the relative humidity at the flowering and fruit set phase in mango.
Organ / stageflowering and fruit set phase e0 Outcomerelative humidity e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “fruit quality in mango ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–92 e0 “rain covers tended to increase the temperature and decrease the relative humidity at flowering and fruit set phase ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–572 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Mango cultivar 'Haden' had a 27.9 decrease in potential photosystem II quantum yield at 45 mmol L-1 NaCl.
Treatment45 mmol L-1 NaCl e0 Outcomepotential quantum yield of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease s in the potential quantum yield of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) were 27.9, 18.7, 20.5, and 27.4%, for cultivars 'Haden', 'Palmer', 'Tommy Atkins', and 'Uba', respectively, when grown in 45 mmol L-1 NaCl. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–924 t0 “mango ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 Other claims from this paper (16) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.