View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Citrus sinensis ✕
Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Fruit yield tended to decrease as budding height increased.
budding height e2 Verbatim
e0 “orange ( Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–228 e1 “Fruit yield was highest from trees budded at 15 cm height above the ground ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–359 e2 “tended to decrease as budding height increased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–410 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
When N and P were applied together without K, a severe antagonism resulted, with a large yield decrease .
N and P were applied together without K e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Valencia orange trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–92 e1 “When N and P were applied together without K, a severe antagonism resulted with large yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–798 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect Applied individually, N fertilizer gave a response of 6 per cent in Valencia orange. Intervention effect Applied individually, P fertilizer gave a response of 5 per cent in Valencia orange. Intervention effect Applied individually, K fertilizer gave a response of 23 per cent in Valencia orange. Intervention effect The total response to N, P and K applied simultaneously was 40 per cent, compared with 37 per cent predicted by sequential additivity and 34 per cent by simple addition. Intervention effect When N, P and K were applied together, the individual response to N was 8 in Valencia orange. Intervention effect When N, P and K were applied together, the individual response to P was 7 in Valencia orange. Intervention effect When N, P and K were applied together, the individual response to K was 26 in Valencia orange. Observation The interactions of K with P and of K with N were also sequentially additive. Intervention effect Adding K to the N plus P treatment resulted in a 69 per cent yield increase. Observation Potassium was a limiting factor only for N and P together, not for N or P individually. Recommendation The authors suggest an alternative procedure to DRIS analysis. Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in yield was attributed to fewer fruits being matured
decrease in yield e4 fewer fruits being matured e4 Verbatim
e0 “navel orange trees were grown in outdoor solution cultures for a period of 11 years to measure the effect of iron deficiency on fruit production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–157 e4 “The decrease in yield was due to fewer fruits being matured ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–734 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Mild water reductions did not evidence crop mineral nutrition imbalances or yield decrease .
mild water reductions e5 crop mineral nutrition imbalances and yield decrease e5 no_change inferred e5 irrigation at the full rate of ETc e2 Verbatim
e1 “orange trees [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–367 e2 “Two different DI strategies supplying 70 and 50% of crop evapotranspiration (ETc) were compared with irrigation at the full rate of ETc ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–537 e5 “The study does not evidence crop mineral nutrition imbalances and yield decrease caused by mild water reductions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1248 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Fruit stripping did not decrease total six-year yield .
total six-year yield e0 without decreasing e0 Verbatim
e0 “without decreasing the total six-year yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–426 e1 “The control trees were left unstripped. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–286 e2 “Stripping reversed and moderated the alternate bearing cycle for six years following treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–381 e3 “Newton Valencia orange trees (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–98 Other claims from this paper (2) Association author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing fruit numbers below about 250,000 fruit per hectare at harvest is expected to decrease the number of harvested fruit sized 72 to 88 mm.
total number of harvested fruit sized 72 to 88 mm in diameter e2 below approximately 250,000 fruit per hectare at harvest e2 Verbatim
t0 “Topping and Pruning Effects on Yield and Fruit Size of Navel Orange ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–67 e2 “These results suggest that anything in this orchard that reduces fruit numbers below approximately 250,000 fruit per hectare at harvest (100,000 per acre) will result in a mathematically predictable decrease in the total number of harvested fruit sized 72 to 88 mm in diameter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1617 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Both potassium treatments decrease d juice acidity in Washington Navel orange.
Both treatments e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “Both treatments decrease juice acidity % ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1320 t0 “Washington Navel orange ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–62 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
CSD reduced fruit weight by 32% and 56%.
decrease inferred e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “fruit weight (32 and 56%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–812 t0 “Sweet Orange ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–66 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
LBU treatments reduced fruit weight relative to control.
all the treatments e0 Verbatim
e0 “Significant decrease in fruit weight, fruit diameter, and number of aborted seeds/fruit was recorded in all the treatments as compared to the highest values in control, followed by the treatments applied on 15 th of December, October and November, 2004 respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1321 t0 “SWEET ORANGES ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–98 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
LBU treatments reduced fruit diameter relative to control.
all the treatments e0 Verbatim
e0 “Significant decrease in fruit weight, fruit diameter, and number of aborted seeds/fruit was recorded in all the treatments as compared to the highest values in control, followed by the treatments applied on 15 th of December, October and November, 2004 respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1321 t0 “SWEET ORANGES ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–98 Other claims from this paper (14) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Citrus sinensis