View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Citrus sinensis ✕
Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Mild water reductions did not evidence crop mineral nutrition imbalances or yield decrease .
mild water reductions e5 crop mineral nutrition imbalances and yield decrease e5 no_change inferred e5 irrigation at the full rate of ETc e2 Verbatim
e1 “orange trees [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–367 e2 “Two different DI strategies supplying 70 and 50% of crop evapotranspiration (ETc) were compared with irrigation at the full rate of ETc ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–537 e5 “The study does not evidence crop mineral nutrition imbalances and yield decrease caused by mild water reductions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1248 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Fruit stripping did not decrease total six-year yield .
total six-year yield e0 without decreasing e0 Verbatim
e0 “without decreasing the total six-year yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–426 e1 “The control trees were left unstripped. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–286 e2 “Stripping reversed and moderated the alternate bearing cycle for six years following treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–381 e3 “Newton Valencia orange trees (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–98 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Application of 2,4-D at full bloom had no effect on fruit diameter, fruit yield or fruit number in Citrus sinensis .
Application of 2,4-D at FB e4 fruit diameter, fruit yield, fruit number e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “‘Navel’ sweet orange [Citrus sinensis (Osbeck)] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7–54 e4 “Application of 2,4-D at FB had no effect on fruit diameter, fruit yield , fruit number, or fruit quality parameters, except for a decrease in the fruit diameter:length ratio ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1564 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect Application of 2,4-D at full bloom significantly increased the percentage of closed navel-ends in Newhall Navel sweet orange. Intervention effect Application of 2,4-D at full bloom significantly increased the percentage of closed navel-ends in Washington Navel sweet orange. Intervention effect Application of 2,4-D at full bloom significantly reduced navel-end size in Newhall Navel sweet orange. Intervention effect Application of 2,4-D at full bloom significantly reduced navel-end size in Washington Navel sweet orange. Intervention effect Timing of 2,4-D application was more important than its concentration for increasing closed navel-ends and reducing navel-end size. Intervention effect Application of 2,4-D at full bloom had no effect on fruit quality parameters in Citrus sinensis . Intervention effect Application of 2,4-D at full bloom decreased the fruit diameter:length ratio in Citrus sinensis . Intervention effect Successful 2,4-D spray treatment slightly decreased fruit juice content in Citrus sinensis . Recommendation The authors recommend a foliar 2,4-D spray at full bloom to improve the pack-out percentage of export-quality Navel sweet oranges. Intervention effect A foliar 2,4-D spray at full bloom can reduce the number of culled fruit in Citrus sinensis . Intervention effect Later 2,4-D treatments were ineffective, compared with application at full bloom, for navel-end outcomes in Citrus sinensis . Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
GA 3 did not reduce yield of current or subsequent Valencia orange crops.
foliar applied GA 3 from September to January (33 mg·L −1 for five applications) e0 yield of current and subsequent crops e0 did not cause reduction e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “For ‘Valencia’ sweet orange, although foliar applied GA 3 from September to January (33 mg·L −1 for five applications) resulted in 50% decrease in bloom the following spring (results presented in Tang et al., 2021), this treatment did not cause reduction in yield of current and subsequent crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–803 t0 “Huanglongbing-affected Sweet Orange Trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–82 e1 “Huanglongbing [HLB; Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas)] disease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–173 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Application of 2,4-D at full bloom had no effect on fruit quality parameters in Citrus sinensis .
Application of 2,4-D at FB e4 fruit quality parameters e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “‘Navel’ sweet orange [Citrus sinensis (Osbeck)] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7–54 e4 “Application of 2,4-D at FB had no effect on fruit diameter, fruit yield , fruit number, or fruit quality parameters, except for a decrease in the fruit diameter:length ratio ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1564 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect Application of 2,4-D at full bloom significantly increased the percentage of closed navel-ends in Newhall Navel sweet orange. Intervention effect Application of 2,4-D at full bloom significantly increased the percentage of closed navel-ends in Washington Navel sweet orange. Intervention effect Application of 2,4-D at full bloom significantly reduced navel-end size in Newhall Navel sweet orange. Intervention effect Application of 2,4-D at full bloom significantly reduced navel-end size in Washington Navel sweet orange. Intervention effect Timing of 2,4-D application was more important than its concentration for increasing closed navel-ends and reducing navel-end size. Intervention effect Application of 2,4-D at full bloom had no effect on fruit diameter, fruit yield or fruit number in Citrus sinensis . Intervention effect Application of 2,4-D at full bloom decreased the fruit diameter:length ratio in Citrus sinensis . Intervention effect Successful 2,4-D spray treatment slightly decreased fruit juice content in Citrus sinensis . Recommendation The authors recommend a foliar 2,4-D spray at full bloom to improve the pack-out percentage of export-quality Navel sweet oranges. Intervention effect A foliar 2,4-D spray at full bloom can reduce the number of culled fruit in Citrus sinensis . Intervention effect Later 2,4-D treatments were ineffective, compared with application at full bloom, for navel-end outcomes in Citrus sinensis . Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Citrus sinensis
Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus