View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
These combinations did not significantly decrease yield .
Verbatim
e0 “without a significant decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1025 t0 “Isabella grape variety ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–510 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Fomesafen did not injure strawberry or decrease yield .
injure strawberry or decrease yield e2 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “provides PRE weed control in strawberry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–150 e2 “Fomesafen did not injure strawberry or decrease yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–830 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result no effect simulated Claim · model-written summary
Simulated foliar damage alone did not decrease grain yield .
did not decrease e0 foliar damage alone e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “foliar damage alone did not decrease grain yield but decrease d straw yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–754 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The 4M:6S ratio did not decrease subsequent wheat yield .
did not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “but it did not decrease yield of wheat. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1740–1779 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Thinning treatments did not significantly decrease yield per tree.
‘Wilking’ mandarins t0 yield in kg per tree e0 without significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “without significant decrease of yield in kg per tree. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–296 t0 “‘Wilking’ Mandarins ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–74 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Although some cultivars showed initial lower growth rates, crop yield did not decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “Although some cultivars had shown initial signs of lower growth rates, there was no decrease in crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3034–3140 Other claims from this paper (19) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Relay cropping chili and watermelon showed no decrease in yield .
Verbatim
e0 “The relay cropping of chili and watermelon plants was effective simultaneously, and there was no decrease in yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1475–1590 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
I. tinctoria showed no significant relative yield decrease despite the highest shoot Pb concentration.
relative yield decrease e0 no significant e0 Verbatim
e0 “The highest shoot Pb concentration was in I. tinctoria having no significant relative yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1048 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Early-rice yield under the different treatments did not significantly increase or decrease with time.
early-rice yield e0 did not significantly increase or decrease e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Rice Field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 e0 “early-rice yield under different treatments did not significantly increase or decrease with time ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–368 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Energy yield from gasification of switchgrass did not decrease on a unit biomass basis.
Energy yield from gasification e1 did not decrease on a unit biomass basis e1 Verbatim
t0 “Biomass Yield and Biofuel Quality of Switchgrass Harvested in Fall or Spring ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 e1 “Energy yield from gasification did not decrease on a unit biomass basis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1100 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
_single2.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Fragaria
Triticum aestivum
Citrullus lanatus
Isatis tinctoria
Oryza sativa
Panicum virgatum