View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Excess nitrogen decrease d yield and quality and increased lodging risk.
decrease these factors and intensify lodging risk e0 Verbatim
e0 “excessive application can decrease these factors and intensify lodging risk ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1823–1898 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–124 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result projected Claim · model-written summary
Projected climate change will decrease winter wheat yield by 2~4%.
future climate change e0 winter wheat yield e0 Not reported Qualifier
Verbatim
e0 “The results show that future climate change (temperature and precipitation changes) will decrease winter wheat yield by 2~4% and reduce total nitrogen losses by 0~5%, but in other areas, the total nitrogen losses will increase by 0~5% and the N leaching losses per unit of yield will increase by 0~10%. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1325 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
In the post-rainy season, the decrease in peanut pod yield under water stress was higher (95%) than in cowpea (70%).
post-rainy season e4 Verbatim
e4 “In the post-rainy season, the decrease in pod yield and HI under WS was higher in peanut (95% and 80%, respectively) than in cowpea (70% and 35%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1279 Other claims from this paper (16) Observation Cowpea required less water than peanut in both seasons. Observation Peanut water use under water stress was higher than that of cowpea. Observation Peanut yield was more sensitive to water stress than cowpea yield. Observation Under water stress, TE, HI and pod yield were more stable across seasons in cowpea than in peanut. Observation In the post-rainy season, the decrease in peanut HI under water stress was higher (80%) than in cowpea (35%). Observation TE was less affected by water stress in cowpea (5%) than in peanut (24%). Association In cowpea, HI explained a large part of yield variation, especially under water stress. Association In peanut, HI explained a large part of yield variation, especially under water stress. Association Under well-watered conditions, water use explained a large portion of the residual yield variation not explained by HI. Association Under well-watered conditions, TE explained a substantial part of the variation in cowpea. Association Under water stress, TE was the main determinant of residual yield variation in cowpea. Association Under water stress, TE was the main determinant of residual yield variation in peanut. Observation Genetic variation for water use, TE and HI was found in cowpea across water regimes and seasons. Observation Genetic variation for water use, TE and HI was found in peanut across water regimes and seasons. Observation Peanut water use and TE showed no variation in the rainy season. Observation Cowpea was more resilient than peanut to water-limited and high-ET conditions. Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Cane yield under DR2 decrease d 14% in the first ratoon crop due to reduced plant population.
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “with a slight decrease (14%) in RC-1 due to reduced plant population. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–858 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Average maize yield in western and central Jilin is projected to decrease at least 15% by 2050 in 90% of scenarios.
by 2050 as predicted by 90% of 120 projected scenarios e0 west and central regions e0 Verbatim
e0 “The average maize yield in the west and central regions is thus projected to decrease 15% or more by 2050 as predicted by 90% of 120 projected scenarios. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1084 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Colored plastic mulches decrease d growth and yield in some plants.
growth and yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “decrease growth and yield in some plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1541 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Aman yield decrease d in severe flood years.
Verbatim
e0 “due to the decrease of the cultivated area and yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–506 t0 “Rice Production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–49 e1 “In these severe flood years, the rainy season crop aman drastically declined in production due to the decrease of the cultivated area and yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–506 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation author interpretation review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Blight is reported to cause serious yield and quality decrease s in Abelmoschus esculentus .
yield and quality decrease e0 Not reported Interactor
Verbatim
e0 “Blight disease is one of the fungus diseases in Abelmoschus esculentus ,the occurrence of which would cause serious yield and quality decrease of Abelmoschus esculentus . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–168 Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
South of 36° N, SSP5-8.5 projected an 8.4% winter wheat yield decrease .
SSP5-8.5 scenario e0 Verbatim
e0 “with a notable 8.4% decrease in yield s south of 36° N under the SSP5-8.5 scenario. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1364 t0 “Winter Wheat Production in the 3H Plain ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–75 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
WDR varieties showed a significant 17% decrease in ratoon-crop yield .
ratoon crop yield e2 Verbatim
e0 “grain yield and quality in ratoon rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–109 e1 “WDR varieties maintained stable yield and grain quality under water-saving conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1148 e2 “but ratoon crop yield decrease d significantly by 17% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1600–1652 Other claims from this paper (19) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivumt0
Arachis hypogaea
Zea mays
Oryza sativa.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Abelmoschus esculentus