Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

2,294 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 814 non-evaluative

Over time

1950 ’60 ’70 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

plus 5 earlier · 1910s–1940s

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control plants had 26.00 leaves.

Taxon: Amaranthus hybridusAmaranthus hybridust0
Treatment: controlt1
Outcome: number of leavese0
Value: 26.00e0

Verbatim

e0
“number of leaves (26.00)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1478

t0
“Amaranthus Hybridus”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–59

t1
“all the treatments showed a significant increase in the soil pH, organic carbon, organic matter, NPK and Mg and a slight decrease in Ca and Na when compared to the pre-trial soil indicating an increase in residual soil nutrient status. Nutrient content N, P, K, plant height (51.13cm), number of leaves (67.80), stem girth (5.61cm), leaf area (194.87cm2) and yield (7.51 t/ha) were significantly higher in plots treated …” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1544

Title

Vegetative Growth and Yield Response of Amaranthus Hybridus to Mycorrhizal Fungi (glomus Mosseae) Inoculation, Organic and Micronutrient Fertilizer Application

Edosa, Ifeyinwa Valerie1; Ogbemudia; Imasuen E. E; et al. Nigerian Journal of Soil Science 2020. doi:10.67042/njss.2020.qkwnfqim

Other claims from this paper (17)

Observation Soil texture remained loamy sand after treatments.
Intervention effect Micronutrient application had no significant effect on treated plots.
Intervention effect Treatments significantly increased soil pH, organic carbon and organic matter compared with pretrial soil.
Intervention effect Treatments significantly increased soil NPK and Mg relative to pretrial soil.
Intervention effect Treatments slightly decreased soil Ca and Na.
Intervention effect PM produced significantly higher plant N, P and K content than the other treatments.
Intervention effect PM produced plant height of 51.13cm, significantly higher than other treatments.
Intervention effect PM produced 67.80 leaves, significantly higher than other treatments.
Intervention effect PM produced stem girth of 5.61cm, significantly higher than other treatments.
Intervention effect PM produced leaf area of 194.87cm2, significantly higher than other treatments.
Intervention effect PM produced yield of 7.51 t/ha, significantly higher than other treatments.
Observation Control plant height was 19.13 cm.
Observation Control stem girth was 2.80 cm.
Observation Control leaf area was 57.76 cm2.
Observation Control yield was 0.80 t/ha.
Intervention effect PM and PMF had significantly more spores than PCP and control.
Intervention effect PM and PMF had significantly more root arbuscules, vesicles and hyphae than PCP and control.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ability of resistance to water stress at three stages were summarized as: Booting stage flowering stagetillering stage

Taxon: hybrid riceOryza sativat0 e1
Organ / stage: Booting stage flowering stagetillering stagee0 e1
Outcome: ability of resistance to water stresse0 e1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“The ability of resistance to water stress at three stages were summarized as: Booting stage flowering stagetillering stage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1105

e1
“However,in severe water stress and followed by continuing water stress,Pn decreaded rapidly,the content ROS and the activity of SOD were higher than in light water stress,but at the 7～9 days the activity of SOD began to decrease”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–638

t0
“hybrid rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75

Title

Effect of water stress on photosynthesis and yield character of hybrid rice at different stages

Guotao Yang Ganhan diqu nongye yanjiu 2008

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect in light water stress and followed by continuing water stress,Pn decreased,ROS accumulated and the activity of SOD increased in leaves
Intervention effect in light water stress and followed by continuing water stress,Pn decreased,ROS accumulated and the activity of SOD increased in leaves
Intervention effect in light water stress and followed by continuing water stress,Pn decreased,ROS accumulated and the activity of SOD increased in leaves
Intervention effect in severe water stress and followed by continuing water stress,Pn decreaded rapidly
Intervention effect the content ROS and the activity of SOD were higher than in light water stress
Intervention effect at the 7～9 days the activity of SOD began to decrease
Intervention effect After harvest,the magnitude of yield treated with different water stress is summarized as: CKlightsevere
Observation the results showed 6 different protein bands
Intervention effect Followed by increasing water stress degree,the light of protein band increased gradually
Observation It also showed difference in two varieties
Observation B-You 827 had higher resistance to both light and severe water stress compared to Gangyou 725 at three stages

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control stem girth was 2.80 cm.

Taxon: Amaranthus hybridusAmaranthus hybridust0
Treatment: controlt1
Outcome: stem girthe0
Value: 2.80 cme0

Verbatim

e0
“stem girth (2.80 cm)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1499

t0
“Amaranthus Hybridus”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–59

t1
“all the treatments showed a significant increase in the soil pH, organic carbon, organic matter, NPK and Mg and a slight decrease in Ca and Na when compared to the pre-trial soil indicating an increase in residual soil nutrient status. Nutrient content N, P, K, plant height (51.13cm), number of leaves (67.80), stem girth (5.61cm), leaf area (194.87cm2) and yield (7.51 t/ha) were significantly higher in plots treated …” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1544

Title

Vegetative Growth and Yield Response of Amaranthus Hybridus to Mycorrhizal Fungi (glomus Mosseae) Inoculation, Organic and Micronutrient Fertilizer Application

Edosa, Ifeyinwa Valerie1; Ogbemudia; Imasuen E. E; et al. Nigerian Journal of Soil Science 2020. doi:10.67042/njss.2020.qkwnfqim

Other claims from this paper (17)

Observation Soil texture remained loamy sand after treatments.
Intervention effect Micronutrient application had no significant effect on treated plots.
Intervention effect Treatments significantly increased soil pH, organic carbon and organic matter compared with pretrial soil.
Intervention effect Treatments significantly increased soil NPK and Mg relative to pretrial soil.
Intervention effect Treatments slightly decreased soil Ca and Na.
Intervention effect PM produced significantly higher plant N, P and K content than the other treatments.
Intervention effect PM produced plant height of 51.13cm, significantly higher than other treatments.
Intervention effect PM produced 67.80 leaves, significantly higher than other treatments.
Intervention effect PM produced stem girth of 5.61cm, significantly higher than other treatments.
Intervention effect PM produced leaf area of 194.87cm2, significantly higher than other treatments.
Intervention effect PM produced yield of 7.51 t/ha, significantly higher than other treatments.
Observation Control plant height was 19.13 cm.
Observation Control plants had 26.00 leaves.
Observation Control leaf area was 57.76 cm2.
Observation Control yield was 0.80 t/ha.
Intervention effect PM and PMF had significantly more spores than PCP and control.
Intervention effect PM and PMF had significantly more root arbuscules, vesicles and hyphae than PCP and control.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control leaf area was 57.76 cm2.

Taxon: Amaranthus hybridusAmaranthus hybridust0
Treatment: controlt1
Outcome: leaf areae0
Value: 57.76 cm2e0

Verbatim

e0
“leaf area (57.76 cm2)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1500–1521

t0
“Amaranthus Hybridus”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–59

t1
“all the treatments showed a significant increase in the soil pH, organic carbon, organic matter, NPK and Mg and a slight decrease in Ca and Na when compared to the pre-trial soil indicating an increase in residual soil nutrient status. Nutrient content N, P, K, plant height (51.13cm), number of leaves (67.80), stem girth (5.61cm), leaf area (194.87cm2) and yield (7.51 t/ha) were significantly higher in plots treated …” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1544

Title

Vegetative Growth and Yield Response of Amaranthus Hybridus to Mycorrhizal Fungi (glomus Mosseae) Inoculation, Organic and Micronutrient Fertilizer Application

Edosa, Ifeyinwa Valerie1; Ogbemudia; Imasuen E. E; et al. Nigerian Journal of Soil Science 2020. doi:10.67042/njss.2020.qkwnfqim

Other claims from this paper (17)

Observation Soil texture remained loamy sand after treatments.
Intervention effect Micronutrient application had no significant effect on treated plots.
Intervention effect Treatments significantly increased soil pH, organic carbon and organic matter compared with pretrial soil.
Intervention effect Treatments significantly increased soil NPK and Mg relative to pretrial soil.
Intervention effect Treatments slightly decreased soil Ca and Na.
Intervention effect PM produced significantly higher plant N, P and K content than the other treatments.
Intervention effect PM produced plant height of 51.13cm, significantly higher than other treatments.
Intervention effect PM produced 67.80 leaves, significantly higher than other treatments.
Intervention effect PM produced stem girth of 5.61cm, significantly higher than other treatments.
Intervention effect PM produced leaf area of 194.87cm2, significantly higher than other treatments.
Intervention effect PM produced yield of 7.51 t/ha, significantly higher than other treatments.
Observation Control plant height was 19.13 cm.
Observation Control plants had 26.00 leaves.
Observation Control stem girth was 2.80 cm.
Observation Control yield was 0.80 t/ha.
Intervention effect PM and PMF had significantly more spores than PCP and control.
Intervention effect PM and PMF had significantly more root arbuscules, vesicles and hyphae than PCP and control.

Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat photosynthetic parameters acclimated considerably to drought and combined drought and growth temperature.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5
Treatment: droughte0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5
Outcome: diffusional and biochemical parameters of photosynthesise0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5
Direction: considerablye0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5

Verbatim

e0
“but acclimate considerably to drought and the combination of drought and T growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1854–1935

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–126

e1
“well‐watered conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1298

e2
“T opt for V cmax was up to 40°C under well‐watered conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1298

e3
“The decrease in photosynthesis under drought varied among T growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1392

e4
“The temperature response of photosynthetic quantum yield under drought was partly attributed to photorespiration”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1540

e5
“both diffusional and biochemical parameters of photosynthesis and their thermal sensitivity acclimate little to T growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1851

Title

Neglecting acclimation of photosynthesis under drought can cause significant errors in predicting leaf photosynthesis in wheat

Liang Fang; Pierre Martre; Kaining Jin; et al. Global Change Biology 2022. doi:10.1111/gcb.16488

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observation Wheat photosynthesis acclimated more to drought than to growth temperature.
Intervention effect Drought lowered the optimum temperature of wheat photosynthesis.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat light‐saturated net photosynthesis at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat stomatal conductance at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat mesophyll conductance at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat maximum rate of electron transport ( J max ) at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat maximum rate of carboxylation by Rubisco ( V cmax ) at the photosynthetic optimum.
Observation Optimum temperature for wheat V cmax reached 40°C when well watered.
Observation Optimum temperature for wheat V cmax was 24–34°C under drought.
Association The decrease in wheat photosynthesis under drought varied with growth temperature.
Observation The drought decrease in wheat photosynthesis was similar across genotypes.
Mechanism Photorespiration partly explained the temperature response of wheat photosynthetic quantum yield under drought.
Mechanism Alternative electron transport explained more of the wheat quantum yield response under drought.
Mechanism Changed wheat leaf nitrogen did not fully explain the biochemical parameter changes.
Observation Wheat diffusional and biochemical photosynthesis parameters acclimated little to growth temperature.
Method / resource Common models strongly overestimated wheat leaf photosynthesis under variable temperature and drought.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimum temperature for wheat V cmax reached 40°C when well watered.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5
Treatment: well‐watered conditionse0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5
Outcome: T opt for V cmaxe0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5
Value: 40°Ce0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5

Verbatim

e0
“T opt for V cmax was up to 40°C under well‐watered conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1298

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–126

e1
“well‐watered conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1298

e2
“T opt for V cmax was up to 40°C under well‐watered conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1298

e3
“The decrease in photosynthesis under drought varied among T growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1392

e4
“The temperature response of photosynthetic quantum yield under drought was partly attributed to photorespiration”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1540

e5
“both diffusional and biochemical parameters of photosynthesis and their thermal sensitivity acclimate little to T growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1851

Title

Neglecting acclimation of photosynthesis under drought can cause significant errors in predicting leaf photosynthesis in wheat

Liang Fang; Pierre Martre; Kaining Jin; et al. Global Change Biology 2022. doi:10.1111/gcb.16488

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observation Wheat photosynthesis acclimated more to drought than to growth temperature.
Intervention effect Drought lowered the optimum temperature of wheat photosynthesis.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat light‐saturated net photosynthesis at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat stomatal conductance at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat mesophyll conductance at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat maximum rate of electron transport ( J max ) at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat maximum rate of carboxylation by Rubisco ( V cmax ) at the photosynthetic optimum.
Observation Optimum temperature for wheat V cmax was 24–34°C under drought.
Association The decrease in wheat photosynthesis under drought varied with growth temperature.
Observation The drought decrease in wheat photosynthesis was similar across genotypes.
Mechanism Photorespiration partly explained the temperature response of wheat photosynthetic quantum yield under drought.
Mechanism Alternative electron transport explained more of the wheat quantum yield response under drought.
Mechanism Changed wheat leaf nitrogen did not fully explain the biochemical parameter changes.
Observation Wheat diffusional and biochemical photosynthesis parameters acclimated little to growth temperature.
Observation Wheat photosynthetic parameters acclimated considerably to drought and combined drought and growth temperature.
Method / resource Common models strongly overestimated wheat leaf photosynthesis under variable temperature and drought.

Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat diffusional and biochemical photosynthesis parameters acclimated little to growth temperature.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5
Treatment: T growthe0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5
Outcome: diffusional and biochemical parameters of photosynthesise0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5
Direction: littlee0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5

Verbatim

e0
“both diffusional and biochemical parameters of photosynthesis and their thermal sensitivity acclimate little to T growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1851

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–126

e1
“well‐watered conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1298

e2
“T opt for V cmax was up to 40°C under well‐watered conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1298

e3
“The decrease in photosynthesis under drought varied among T growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1392

e4
“The temperature response of photosynthetic quantum yield under drought was partly attributed to photorespiration”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1540

e5
“both diffusional and biochemical parameters of photosynthesis and their thermal sensitivity acclimate little to T growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1851

Title

Neglecting acclimation of photosynthesis under drought can cause significant errors in predicting leaf photosynthesis in wheat

Liang Fang; Pierre Martre; Kaining Jin; et al. Global Change Biology 2022. doi:10.1111/gcb.16488

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observation Wheat photosynthesis acclimated more to drought than to growth temperature.
Intervention effect Drought lowered the optimum temperature of wheat photosynthesis.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat light‐saturated net photosynthesis at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat stomatal conductance at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat mesophyll conductance at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat maximum rate of electron transport ( J max ) at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat maximum rate of carboxylation by Rubisco ( V cmax ) at the photosynthetic optimum.
Observation Optimum temperature for wheat V cmax reached 40°C when well watered.
Observation Optimum temperature for wheat V cmax was 24–34°C under drought.
Association The decrease in wheat photosynthesis under drought varied with growth temperature.
Observation The drought decrease in wheat photosynthesis was similar across genotypes.
Mechanism Photorespiration partly explained the temperature response of wheat photosynthetic quantum yield under drought.
Mechanism Alternative electron transport explained more of the wheat quantum yield response under drought.
Mechanism Changed wheat leaf nitrogen did not fully explain the biochemical parameter changes.
Observation Wheat photosynthetic parameters acclimated considerably to drought and combined drought and growth temperature.
Method / resource Common models strongly overestimated wheat leaf photosynthesis under variable temperature and drought.

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B-You 827 had higher resistance to both light and severe water stress compared to Gangyou 725 at three stages

Taxon: hybrid riceOryza sativat0 e1
Material: B-You 827e0 e1
Outcome: resistance to both light and severe water stresse0 e1
Direction: highere0 e1
Comparator: Gangyou 725e0 e1

Verbatim

e0
“B-You 827 had higher resistance to both light and severe water stress compared to Gangyou 725 at three stages”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1215

e1
“However,in severe water stress and followed by continuing water stress,Pn decreaded rapidly,the content ROS and the activity of SOD were higher than in light water stress,but at the 7～9 days the activity of SOD began to decrease”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–638

t0
“hybrid rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75

Title

Effect of water stress on photosynthesis and yield character of hybrid rice at different stages

Guotao Yang Ganhan diqu nongye yanjiu 2008

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect in light water stress and followed by continuing water stress,Pn decreased,ROS accumulated and the activity of SOD increased in leaves
Intervention effect in light water stress and followed by continuing water stress,Pn decreased,ROS accumulated and the activity of SOD increased in leaves
Intervention effect in light water stress and followed by continuing water stress,Pn decreased,ROS accumulated and the activity of SOD increased in leaves
Intervention effect in severe water stress and followed by continuing water stress,Pn decreaded rapidly
Intervention effect the content ROS and the activity of SOD were higher than in light water stress
Intervention effect at the 7～9 days the activity of SOD began to decrease
Intervention effect After harvest,the magnitude of yield treated with different water stress is summarized as: CKlightsevere
Observation the results showed 6 different protein bands
Intervention effect Followed by increasing water stress degree,the light of protein band increased gradually
Observation It also showed difference in two varieties
Observation The ability of resistance to water stress at three stages were summarized as: Booting stage flowering stagetillering stage

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Golden Promise leaves had less oxidized ascorbate than the other cultivars under UV-B.

Taxon: barley cultivarsHordeum vulgaret0
Material: Golden Promisee0
Treatment: supplemental UV-Be0
Outcome: oxidized ascorbatee0
Direction: lesse0
Comparator: other two cultivarse0

Verbatim

e0
“A comparison with the other two cultivars showed that under supplemental UV-B, Golden Promise leaves (i) retained a higher quantum yield of photosynthesis under photosynthetically active radiation (PAR, 400-700 nm) corresponding to growth conditions; (ii) had the smallest decrease in both electron transport rate and non-photochemical quenching under high PAR; (iii) contained less oxidized ascorbate [measured as dehyd…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–1248

t0
“barley cultivars”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–71

Title

A comparison of UV-B induced stress responses in three barley cultivars

Éva Hideg; Eva Rosenqvist; Gyula Váradi; et al. Functional Plant Biology 2006. doi:10.1071/fp05085

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observation Golden Promise was most UV-B tolerant.
Observation Prestige was slightly more UV-B sensitive than Cork.
Observation Golden Promise leaves had higher quantum yield of photosynthesis than the other cultivars under UV-B.
Observation Golden Promise leaves had smallest decrease electron transport rate and non-photochemical quenching than the other cultivars under UV-B.
Intervention effect Golden Promise had same monodehydroascorbate-reductase (MDAR) and ascorbate-peroxidase (APX) activity under highest UV-B.
Intervention effect other two cultivars had decreased MDAR activity under highest UV-B.
Intervention effect Prestige had increased APX activity under highest UV-B.
Observation Cork and Prestige accumulated monodehydroascorbate radicals under high UV-B, unlike Golden Promise.
Observation Golden Promise appeared to suffer less oxidative stress than Cork and Prestige.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infestation scores of the hybrid combinations ranged from 0 to 1.8, against 2.5 for the standard.

Taxon: white head cabbagee0
Material: hybrid combinationse7
Interactor: Plasmodiophora brassicaePlasmodiophora brassicaee0pathogen
Outcome: score of infestation of hybrid combinationse7
Value: 0 to 1.8e7
Qualifier: of the standard was 2.5e7
Comparator: the standarde7

Verbatim

e0
“Plasmodiophora brassicae Wor. is the one of the causative agent of disease of the family of Brassicaceae, that results in decrease of white head cabbage yield up to 10-60%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–171

e7
“The score of infestation of hybrid combinations varied from 0 to 1.8. The score of infestation of the standard was 2.5”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1639–1757

Title

VALUATION OF RESISTANCE TO PLASMODIOPHORA BRASSICAE OF HYBRID COMBINATIONS OF WHITE HEAD CABBAGE DEVELOPED BASED ON DOUBLED HAPLOID LINES

A. I. Mineikina; A. A. Ushakov; L. L. Bondareva VEGETABLE CROPS OF RUSSIA 2016. doi:10.18619/2072-9146-2016-2-90-93

Other claims from this paper (9)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics