View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Potassium deficiency can sharply decrease grain yield despite unobvious symptoms.
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “K deficiency symptoms are usually not conspicuous although grain yield is abruptly decrease d ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1930–2022 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation author interpretation review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Most such technologies decrease yield .
Verbatim
t0 “More Rice, Less Water ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–21 e0 “Most of them, however, come at the cost of decrease d yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–918 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decrease after the first barley crop on fallow land was generally accompanied by decrease d foliage N and K concentration.
Outcomefoliage N and K concentration e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in yield s after the first barley crop on fallow land was accompanied generally by a decrease in foliage N and K concentration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–616 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Continuous corn rotation on Hoytville soil had an average annual yield decrease of 880 kg ha −1 under no-tillage.
Qualifiercontinuous corn rotation treatment e0 Verbatim
e0 “The negative response to no‐tillage on the Hoytville soil was primarily due to the large decrease in yield obtained as a result of the continuous corn rotation treatment (average annual yield decrease , 880 kg ha −1 ). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1510 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The salinity yield decrease per dS m-1 for the flower crops was between 2.1 and 16.8%.
Outcomesalinity yield decrease (SYD) values e2 Value2.1 and 16.8% per dS m‐1 e2 Verbatim
t0 “Salt tolerance of flower crops grown in soilless culture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–56 e2 “the salinity yield decrease (SYD) values between 2.1 and 16.8% per dS m‐1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–700 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Yield can decrease down to 80-98% in some cases, depending on weather and crop phytosanitary condition.
Verbatim
e1 “Depending on weather conditions and the phytosanitary condition of crops, the prevalence of diseases can reach 70-80% of the total plant population, and the yield can decrease in some cases down to 80-98% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–398 Other claims from this paper (1) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
With current April sowing and unchanged management, future sorghum yield was simulated to decrease by 5% to 24%.
Outcomefuture Sorghum yield e0 Qualifiercurrent sowing window (April) e0 Verbatim
e0 “Keeping the current sowing window (April) and other management activities the same, future Sorghum yield has simulated to decrease between 5% and 24% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1358 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield fluctuated annually without systematically declining.
Directiondid not systematically decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “large yearly fluctuations in yield , which did not systematically decrease over time ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1391 t0 “grapevine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Under SSP245 and SSP585 climate scenarios, HR17 fruit yield was projected to decrease by around 1.2 Dry Ma/ha.
SettingClimate Change scenarios (SSP245 and SSP585 pathways) e0 Verbatim
e0 “Under Climate Change scenarios (SSP245 and SSP585 pathways), HR17 will decrease its fruit yield by around 1.2 Dry Ma/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1164 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Observed yield decline with salinity was not linear.
Verbatim
e0 “four perennial grass species ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–238 e1 “the observed yield decrease was not linear as suggested by the model ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–641 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.