View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Without adaptation options, mean maize yield would decrease by 7 to 18% in 2010-2039 relative to 1976-2005.
Outcomemean maize yield e1 Qualifierwithout considering adaptation options e1 Verbatim
e1 “without considering adaptation options, mean maize yield would decrease by 7~18% during 2010-2039 relative to 1976-2005 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–911 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
LM62 had the lowest relative decrease in grain yield despite high water use.
Outcomerelative decrease in grain yield e0 Qualifierhigh water use e0 Verbatim
e0 “the largest genotype (LM62) with high water use showed the lowest relative decrease in grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–719 t0 “Wheat Genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–126 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Under the same nitrogen rate, waterlogged GH01 had a greater yield decrease rate than ZS 9.
Outcomeyield decrease rate e0 Verbatim
e0 “The yield decrease rate of waterlogged GH01 was greater than that of ZS 9 under the same N rate. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–628 t0 “rapeseed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–76 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly decreased rapeseed seed yield. Intervention effect Nitrogen application alleviated waterlogging-related rapeseed yield loss. Intervention effect At seedling and bolting stages, more nitrogen increased leaf photosynthetic rate and Rubisco activity under the same watering conditions. Intervention effect At seedling and bolting stages, more nitrogen decreased AGPase, SuSy and SPS activities under the same watering conditions. Intervention effect At seedling and bolting stages, waterlogging decreased leaf photosynthetic rate and Rubisco activity. Intervention effect At seedling and bolting stages, waterlogging decreased starch and sucrose contents. Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased AGPase, SuSy and SPS activities at seedling stage in both varieties. Intervention effect Waterlogging increased AGPase, SuSy and SPS activities at bolting stage in both varieties. Intervention effect At flowering, more nitrogen increased photosynthetic rate, Rubisco, AGPase, SuSy and SPS activities, and sucrose and starch contents in both varieties. Intervention effect At flowering, waterlogged plants of both varieties had increased photosynthetic rate and Rubisco activity. Intervention effect At flowering, waterlogged tolerant rapeseed had higher AGPase, SuSy and SPS activities. Intervention effect At flowering, waterlogged sensitive rapeseed had significantly lower AGPase, SuSy and SPS activities. Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased starch and sucrose content in both tolerant and sensitive varieties at flowering. Association Flowering-stage AGPase, SuSy and SPS activities were highly positively correlated with yield under nitrogen and waterlogging treatments. Intervention effect After waterlogging, carbohydrate translocation from leaves to seeds was enhanced in tolerant rapeseed. Intervention effect After waterlogging, carbohydrate translocation from leaves to seeds remained inhibited in sensitive rapeseed. Mechanism The authors attributed the yield difference between waterlogged varieties mainly to different carbohydrate translocation from leaves to seeds. Mechanism The authors identified flowering as the most important stage for nitrogen to positively regulate waterlogged rapeseed growth. Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in seed yield caused by SCN was smaller in clay soil.
Qualifierin the clay soil e5 Verbatim
t0 “Soybean and Soybean Cyst Nematode ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 e5 “but the decrease was less in the clay soil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1212 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Maryot2 showed the highest seed yield decrease (21.51) under water deficit in the first season.
Outcomedecrease in seed yield e1 Qualifierin the first season e1 Verbatim
t0 “SOME FABA BEAN CULTIVARS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–72 e1 “Maryot2 cultivar recorded the highest decrease in seed yield (21.51) in the first season ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1529 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result projected Claim · model-written summary
Yield variability may decrease toward the end of the 21st century.
Outcomeyield variability e0 Qualifiertowards the end of the 21st century e0 Verbatim
e0 “yield variability will increase during the coming decades, but this may decrease towards the end of the 21st century ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1566–1682 t0 “crop production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–63 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Pod setting stage had a greater pod yield decrease .
Organ / stagepod setting stage e0 Verbatim
e0 “pod setting stage decrease d pod yield more ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–594 t0 “peanut ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 45–51 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Under RCP4.5 wheat yield is projected to decrease 9%, 15%, and 19% in 2030, 2050, and 2070.
Qualifier2030, 2050 and 2070 e0 Verbatim
e0 “For RCP4.5, the wheat yield would decrease by 9%, 15% and 19% in 2030, 2050 and 2070, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–832 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation RCP4.5 projects growing season rainfall decreases of 9%, 15%, and 19% in 2030, 2050, and 2070. Observation RCP4.5 projects temperature rises of 0.7 °C, 1.2 °C, and 1.4 °C in 2030, 2050, and 2070. Observation Under RCP8.5 wheat yield is projected to decrease 9%, 18%, and 27% across the three periods. Recommendation Short-season cultivars are projected suitable for low-rainfall environments. Recommendation Long-season cultivars are projected suitable for high-rainfall environments. Observation At a low-rainfall site in 2050 under RCP4.5, early maturing variety yield is projected to fall 11% and 31%. Observation At a high-rainfall site, the corresponding projected early variety yield changes are a 9% decrease and 1% increase. Observation At a low-rainfall site, early-sown variety yield is projected to fall 14%. Observation At a low-rainfall site, late-sown early variety yield is projected to fall 23%. Observation Late-maturing wheat is projected to have much greater yield reduction at the low-rainfall site. Observation At the higher-rainfall site, early-sown early maturing variety yield reduction is projected at 3%. Observation At the higher-rainfall site, late-sown early maturing variety yield reduction is projected at 15%. Observation At the higher-rainfall site, late-maturing wheat yield reduction is projected at 1% with early sowing. Observation At the higher-rainfall site, late-maturing wheat yield reduction is projected at 2% with late sowing. Recommendation The authors conclude changes in agronomic practices can mitigate future climate impacts on wheat yield. Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Pathogen-associated internal changes substantially decrease grape yield and quality.
Outcomegrape yield and quality e0 Verbatim
e0 “numerous qualitative and quantitative changes occur inside it, which greatly decrease s grape yield and quality ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–640 t0 “grapevine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 Title
Fungal diseases of grapevine
Goran Delibašić; Sanja Gajić; Srđan G. Aćimović AgroSpace (University of Belgrade, Faculty of Agriculture) 2006
Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result mixed projected Claim · model-written summary
Spring barley yield was simulated to stagnate or decrease .
Directionstagnation or decrements e0 Verbatim
e0 “For spring barley and maize, however, yield stagnation or decrements were simulated. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–661 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.