View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A 50% grain yield decrease occurred at about 84 mM NaCl with 1 x HS.
Outcomegrain yield decrease e0 Qualifier1,0.2, and 0.04 × HS e0 Verbatim
e0 “The salinity level associated with a 50% grain yield decrease was about 84, 72, and 31 mM NaCl for 1,0.2, and 0.04 × HS, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1199 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 Other claims from this paper (16) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Slightly damaged wheat fields had no actual yield decrease .
Settingslightly damaged field e0 Verbatim
e0 “Actual decrease in yield was not found in the slightly damaged field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1794–1862 t0 “wheat plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–35 Other claims from this paper (16) Observation author interpretation original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
A risk of severe yield decrease in CSS could not be shown in the limited experiments.
Outcomerisk of severe yield decrease e4 Qualifierin our limited experiments e4 Verbatim
e0 “such as timothy ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–167 e4 “A risk of severe yield decrease in CSS could not be shown in our limited experiments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–991 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in grain yield under water deficit was over expressed in durum wheat.
Outcomedecrease in grain yield e0 Directionover expressed e0 Verbatim
e0 “Generally, grain yield was higher in genotypes of bread wheat than that of durum wheat, but a decrease in grain yield was over expressed in durum wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1188 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Sorghum grain yield may decrease in the 2030s and 2050s under both RCP scenarios.
Outcomesorghum grain yield e0 Qualifier2030s and 2050s under both RCPs scenarios e0 Verbatim
e0 “sorghum grain yield may decrease by 2030s and 2050s under both RCPs scenarios ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2523–2600 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource Calibration RMSE was 2 days for anthesis, 2 days for maturity, 478 kg ha −1 for grain yield and 912 kg ha −1 for biomass yield. Method / resource Calibration normalized nRMSE values were 2.74%, 1.6%, 13.42% and 5.91% respectively. Method / resource Evaluation R2 values were 78% for anthesis, 99% for maturity, 98% for biomass yield and 94% for grain yield. Method / resource Evaluation d-statistics were 0.87, 0.91, 0.67 and 0.98. Method / resource Evaluation nRMSE values were 2.6%, 2.7%, 23.4% and 4.1% for the respective parameters. Method / resource The model had a strong fit between simulated and observed values. Intervention effect Optimum nitrogen fertilizer may substantially increase sorghum yield. Intervention effect Supplemental irrigation may substantially increase sorghum yield. Intervention effect Early sowing may substantially increase sorghum yield. Recommendation Suitable crop management could reduce the adverse impact of projected climate change on sorghum production. Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Salicylic acid use sometimes causes growth retardation, sterility and yield decrease .
Outcomegrowth retardation, sterility, and yield decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “the use of SA in some cases may lead to negative results – growth retardation, sterility, and yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2241–2349 t0 “plant production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–106 t1 “plant production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–106 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
The smallest maize yield decrease occurred with late January to February sowings.
Treatmentlate sowings between January and February e0 Verbatim
e0 “the smallest in the late sowings between January and February ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–885 t0 “WATER DEFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE GRAIN YIELD DECREASE IN THE CATARINENSE FAR WEST ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Uninoculated resistant lines had a small but significant yield decrease relative to susceptible lines.
Materialresistant lines e0 Comparatorsusceptible lines e0 Verbatim
e0 “A small but significant decrease in yield was observed for noninoculated resistant lines in contrast to susceptible lines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1174 t0 “Spring Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Selecting for pods per area was expected to decrease yield , seeds per pod, and seed weight.
Outcomeyield, seeds/pod and seed weight e0 Verbatim
e0 “Direct selection for pods/m 2 would decrease yield , seeds/pod and seed weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1507–1584 t0 “Phaseolus vulgaris L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–79 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Mango yield is projected to decrease by 92.53% under scenario A1.
Qualifierscenarios A1 and B1, respectively e0 Verbatim
e0 “the yield of mango will decrease by 92.53% - 85.73% in the future periods under scenarios A1 and B1, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1105 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.