View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Reduced pollen germination explained the yield decrease under high temperature.
Qualifiersignificant reduction in pollen germination e0 Verbatim
e0 “yield decrease d due to significant reduction in pollen germination. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1164 t0 “okra ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–105 Other claims from this paper (14) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The authors attributed the 18% no-till yield decrease to absent tillage and weed interference.
Qualifierlack of tillage and increased weed interference e0 Verbatim
e0 “The 18% decrease in the no-till yield was apparently the result of the lack of tillage and increased weed interference and was not due to adverse effects from the rye ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1545 t0 “Tobacco ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–109 Other claims from this paper (8) Mechanism hypothesis original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest increased yield per vine caused the decrease in skin catechin.
Qualifierincreased yield per vine e0 Verbatim
e0 “it is suggested that the decrease was caused by increased yield per vine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–673 e1 “An increase in node number linearly decrease d skin catechin ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–595 t0 “Vitis vinifera L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–106 Other claims from this paper (3) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in MNAR after densification is attributed as the cause of a significant decrease in grains per ear.
Qualifier平均净同化率(MNAR)降低 e0 Verbatim
t0 “Spring Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 e0 “增密后平均净同化率(MNAR)降低导致穗粒数显著降低 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–603 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation Ear number and grains per ear are the main factors determining population yield above 15 t per hm2 in high-yield spring maize. Observation The yield structure for populations above 15 t per hm2 has an ear number of (7.08-9.60)x10^4 ears. Observation The yield structure for populations above 15 t per hm2 has 477-654 grains per ear. Observation The yield structure for populations above 15 t per hm2 has a thousand-grain weight of 324.7-388.7 g. Observation The yield structure for populations above 15 t per hm2 has a grain weight per ear of 168.9-234.0 g. Observation A reasonable population structure has LAImax above 6.5. Observation A reasonable population structure has mean LAI of about 5. Observation A reasonable population structure has LAI at harvest above 3.5. Recommendation The ideal yield structure for tall large-ear cultivars is 67,500-75,000 ears per hm2, 610-640 grains per ear, thousand-grain weight about 380 g, 220-240 g grain weight per ear and yield above 15 t per hm2. Recommendation The ideal yield structure for medium-height small-to-medium-ear cultivars is 75,000-97,500 ears per hm2, 520-600 grains per ear, thousand-grain weight 340-355 g, 180-220 g grain weight per ear and yield above 16.5 t per hm2. Intervention effect Increased planting density increased mean crop growth rate and total grain number per unit area. Intervention effect Increased planting density thereby raised yield. Intervention effect After densification, mean net assimilation rate (MNAR) decreased. Mechanism Structural potential tapping mainly through densification, where population gains exceed the loss in individual performance, achieves high yield above 15 t per hm2 (gain-loss compensation yield increase). Recommendation The authors identify functional potential tapping, giving combined gain in population structure and individual function (differential compensation yield increase), as an important route to further raise yield. Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought-related yield decline was associated with fewer pods.
Outcomedecrease in yield e0 Qualifierdecrease in pod number e0 Verbatim
e0 “This decrease in yield is due to a decrease in pod number and seed number per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–532 e7 “flower drop of the soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) was studied ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–155 Other claims from this paper (6) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Reductions in pollen quantity and weight, tassel rachis and branch length are suggested as the main factors behind the heat-stress yield decrease in maize.
Outcomedecrease in yield e6 Qualifierreductions in pollen quantity and weight, tassel rachis, and branch length e6 Verbatim
e0 “Maize grain yield is drastically reduced by heat stress (HTS) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–61 e6 “The main factors underlying the decrease in yield caused by HTS were reductions in pollen quantity and weight, tassel rachis, and branch length ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1516 Other claims from this paper (10) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in biomass yield of perennial rye was mainly due to reduced plant height.
Qualifierreduced plant height (-45 cm) e1 Verbatim
e0 “Field trials in Austria with perennial rye cv. ‘Perenne’ ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1292 e1 “This decrease was mainly due to the reduced plant height (-45 cm) of the perennial crop in the 2nd and 3rd year compared to the first year crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1645–1788 Other claims from this paper (19) Mechanism author interpretation original result projected Claim · model-written summary
The projected yield decrease is attributed to temperature increase and later, shorter rainy seasons.
Outcomeprojected decrease e3 Qualifiertemperature increase and rainy seasons tending to start later and end earlier than the historical average e3 Verbatim
e0 “rain-fed mixed beans production in Zambia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–279 e3 “The projected decrease was attributed to the temperature increase and rainy seasons tending to start later and end earlier than the historical average ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1267 Other claims from this paper (4) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decrease under conservation tillage was mostly attributed to a decrease d ear density.
Treatmentconservation tillage e1 Outcomeyield of spring wheat grain e1 Qualifiera decreased ear density e1 Verbatim
t0 “HEALTH OF SPRING WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–100 e1 “Decrease in the yield of spring wheat grain on plots with conservation tillage, to the highest degree resulted from a decrease d ear density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1055 Other claims from this paper (13) Mechanism author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The warming-related yield decrease is partly attributed to increased heat stress and shorter growth period.
Qualifierincreased heat stresses and shorter growth period e4 Verbatim
e3 “In rice production areas with the mean growing-season temperature at 12–14°C and above 20°C, a 1°C growing-season warming decrease d rice yield by roughly 4% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–997 e4 “This decrease was partly attributed to increased heat stresses and shorter growth period under the warmer climate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1112 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.