View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Decrease d wheat bio-productivity under enhanced UV-B mainly resulted from decrease d LAI.
Outcomedecrease of bio-productivity e0 Qualifierdecrease of LAI e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease of bio-productivity mainly resulted from the decrease of LAI ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–192 e1 “the wheat bio-productivity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–74 Other claims from this paper (4) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in grain yield under simazine is attributed to increased sterility.
Qualifierincreased sterility e4 Verbatim
e1 “wetland rice (Oryza sativa L var. IR8 and MAS 2401) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–310 e3 “It however significantly decrease d grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–555 e4 “The latter can be attributed to increased sterility ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–608 Other claims from this paper (2) Mechanism hypothesis original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Limited Zn or B may be part of the reason for the severe corn yield decrease from planting too thickly.
Outcomesevere yield decrease resulting from planting corn too thickly e1 Qualifierlimited Zn or B may be part of the reason e1 Verbatim
e0 “A field experiment on corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–35 e1 “indicating that limited Zn or B may be part of the reason for the severe yield decrease resulting from planting corn too thickly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–315 Other claims from this paper (8) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Early lodging was a major factor contributing to the soybean yield decrease at higher seeding rates.
Treatmenthigher seeding rates e4 Qualifierearly lodging was a major factor e4 Verbatim
e1 “The effect of planting date, variety, row spacing, and seeding rate on lodging and seed yield of soybeans ( Glycine max (L.) Merr.) in highly productive environments was studied at Ashland and Chenoa, Illinois, in 1969. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–228 e4 “These results indicated that early lodging was a major factor contributing to the yield decrease that occurred at the higher seeding rates ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–775 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect Planting date, variety, row spacing and seeding rate had highly significant effects on lodging and yield of soybeans at both locations. Intervention effect Seed yield of soybeans was generally unaffected by seeding rate where no lodging differential occurred. Intervention effect Seed yield of soybeans tended to be significantly lower where higher seeding rates caused severe early lodging. Association Whether a lodging differential occurred between seeding rates depended on location, date, variety and row spacing. Mechanism Lodging may be an important factor in preventing soybean yield increases from earlier planting and from narrower rows. Intervention effect At Ashland, in the absence of a lodging differential between dates, the highest soybean yields were obtained from the earliest planting. Intervention effect At Chenoa, where the first two planting dates were more severely lodged than the latest planting date, earlier planting gave no soybean yield advantage. Intervention effect The yield advantage of narrow rows in soybean was greatest for the third planting date, at both locations, where lodging was essentially the same in both row spacings. Intervention effect At the earlier planting dates, soybean 17‐cm rows tended to be more severely lodged than 50‐cm rows. Mechanism The more severe lodging in 17‐cm soybean rows was attributed in part to less effective natural thinning. Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At 240 kg/ha, reduced spikes and grains per spike explained lower grain yield relative to biological yield .
Treatmentapplication of 240 kg/ha e0 Qualifierdecrease of number of spikes/m and number of grains/spike e0 Verbatim
e0 “Decrease of grain yield compared to biological yield in treatment of application of 240 kg/ha was due to decrease of number of spikes/m and number of grains/spike. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1172 e1 “three wheat cultivars in calcareous soils of western Iran ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–182 Other claims from this paper (10) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The P1 yield decrease reflected fewer seeds and pods per plant.
Qualifiernumber of seeds and pods per plant e1 Verbatim
e0 “soybean ( Glycine max [L.] Merr. cv. McCall) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–340 e1 “Yield decrease s for the P1 treatment resulted from a proportional adjustment in the number of seeds and pods per plant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1044 Other claims from this paper (14) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decrease was mainly due to fewer pods per plant.
Qualifierreduction in the number of pods per plant e0 Verbatim
e0 “due mainly to a reduction in the number of pods per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–847 e1 “Pea yield decrease d ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–749 t0 “Pisum sativum L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–72 Other claims from this paper (11) Mechanism observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decrease reflected reduced pod set and harvest index.
Outcomedecreases in pod set and harvest index e0 Qualifierbecause of decreases in pod set and harvest index e0 Verbatim
e0 “because of decrease s in pod set and harvest index ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–771 t0 “Cowpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 Other claims from this paper (9) Mechanism observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The fluorescence decrease indicated inhibition at photosystem I acceptor sites.
Outcomeinhibition at photosystem I acceptor sites e0 Qualifierdecrease in chlorophyll fluorescence yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “A decrease in chlorophyll fluorescence yield was also observed indicating an inhibition at photosystem I acceptor sites. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–781 t0 “tomato plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–105 Other claims from this paper (10) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Multiple machine passes compact topsoil and grass roots and lower water resistance and grass yield .
Outcomedecrease in the yield of grasses e0 Qualifiertopsoil compaction, compaction of the root systems of grasses, decrease in water resistance e0 Verbatim
e0 “All this leads to topsoil compaction, compaction of the root systems of grasses, decrease in water resistance and, ultimately, decrease in the yield of grasses. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–668 Other claims from this paper (1) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.