View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
PP333 could increase or decrease yield .
Directionincrease or decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “PP333 applied could lead to plant height reduction, leaf smaller, yield increase or decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1168 t0 “soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–56 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Cover crops showed no increase or a slight decrease in soybean seed yield in 2007 and 2009.
Directionno yield increase or slight yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “in 2007 and 2009 no yield increase or slight yield decrease was shown by the cover crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1264 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Ethephon changed husked yield from an 8% increase to an 18% decrease across rates, timings and seasons.
Value8% increase in yield to an 18% decrease e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Effects of ethephon on husked yield varied from an 8% increase in yield to an 18% decrease , depending on rate, timing, and season ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–711 e1 “sweet corn (Zea mays L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–189 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Chemical fertilization reduction did not decrease fruit yield and quality, except for the 1/3N treatment.
TreatmentChemical fertilization reduction e5 Outcomefruit yield and quality e5 Directiondid not decrease e5 Qualifierexcept for the 1/3N treatment e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t1 “Bayberry Orchard ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–137 e5 “Chemical fertilization reduction did not decrease fruit yield and quality, except for the 1/3N treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–868 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliar peptide fertilizers caused no fresh shoot yield change or a slight decrease with Zn-peptide.
TreatmentZn-peptide treatment e0 Outcomefresh shoot yield e0 Directionslight decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “lettuce ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–128 e0 “foliar treatments with peptides-based fertilizers induced no fresh shoot yield variations or a slight decrease in the case of Zn-peptide treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–574 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Delaying sowing and increasing density changed the yield of Hefeng 50 in an increase-then- decrease trend.
Treatmentsowing date delayed and density increased e1 Directionincrease-and-then-decrease trend e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “New soybean variety Hefeng 50 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 e1 “with the sowing date delayed and density increased,the yield of Hefeng 50 showed increase-and-then- decrease trend ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–426 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Bacterial inoculation changed maize seedling average yield from a 50% decrease to a 70% increase versus controls.
Treatmentbacterial inoculation e0 Interactorbacterial e0 symbiont Value50% decrease to a 70% increase e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “In vitro bacterial inoculation on maize seedlings resulted in changes of average yield ranging from a 50% decrease to a 70% increase over controls. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–487 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
The positive effect of a green manure crop could not substitute for the yield decrease from leaving 25% of the area out of production.
Treatmentgreen manure crop e1 Directioncould not substitute e1 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “The positive effect of a green manure crop could not substitute for the yield decrease from leaving 25% of the area out of produc-tion ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–908 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result mixed not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Starch yield ranged from a 5.0% decrease to a 45.1% increase after grafting, without a significant difference.
Not reported Taxon Treatment Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The starch yield increased-5.0%-45.1%,the difference was not significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–672 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil Zn application allowed a lower N rate with only a small decrease in barley grain yield .
TreatmentZn applied to the soil e0 Outcomebarley grain yield e0 Qualifierreduction in the rate of N e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The Zn applied to the soil permitted a reduction in the rate of N with only a small decrease in barley grain yield and nutritional value. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1371 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.