View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Cluster pruning did not decrease total yield across cultivars.
unpruned control e0 Verbatim
e0 “There was no decrease in total yield , across all cultivars, between treatments and the unpruned control. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1976–2080 t0 “Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Cocoa with cassava had a slight yield decrease .
cocoa/cassava combination e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “cocoa/cassava combination where there was a slight decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1589 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Halving insect visits caused little sunflower yield decrease .
insect visits were reduced by 50% e0 little decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “little decrease in yield when insect visits were reduced by 50% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–695 t0 “in sunflower, combining a gradient in insect pollination ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–264 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect author interpretation review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Temperatures above optimum decrease cotton yield .
increase in temperatures above optimum e0 Verbatim
e0 “In contrast, increase in temperatures above optimum decrease cotton yield due to increased boll abscission and smaller boll size. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–454 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Daily sprinkle irrigation tended to decrease pepper yield .
sprinkle irrigated daily e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Yield tended to decrease when the plants were sprinkle irrigated daily. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–434 t0 “Pepper plants ( Capsicum annuum L. cv. California Wonder) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–66 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing substrate volume per plant by one third did not considerably decrease tomato yield .
Reduction of substrate volume per plant by 1/3 e0 without considerable yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Reduction of substrate volume per plant by 1/3 without considerable yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–82 t0 “TOMATO YIELD ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
But excessive fertilization also could cause the decrease of cucumber yield and quality.
excessive fertilization e0 cucumber yield and quality e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “But excessive fertilization also could cause the decrease of cucumber yield and quality. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–776 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect under the same levels of nitrogen and potassium,increasing the ratio of organic fertilizer was helpful to the increase of cucumber yield and quality. Intervention effect The commercial quality and flavor of cucumber were improved with the increase of fertilizer Intervention effect the yield and the contents of dry matter,soluble sugar,soluble protein,VC in fruit increased too. Intervention effect the yield and the contents of dry matter,soluble sugar,soluble protein,VC in fruit increased too. Intervention effect the yield and the contents of dry matter,soluble sugar,soluble protein,VC in fruit increased too. Intervention effect At the same time,the nitrate content in cucumber also increased rapidly. Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Excessive sulfur amendment could decrease grain yield .
Excessive S-amendment e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Excessive S-amendment could even induce the decrease of grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2113–2180 t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect RCU and conventional urea did not differ significantly in plant dry matter accumulation. Intervention effect RCU and conventional urea did not differ significantly in grain yield. Intervention effect At 43.2 mg x kg(-1) available soil S, SRCU and SU did not significantly differ in post-anthesis dry matter accumulation and allocation. Intervention effect At 43.2 mg x kg(-1) available soil S, SRCU and SU did not significantly differ in grain yield. Intervention effect At the lower soil S level, SRCU and SU allocated more post-anthesis assimilates to grain than RCU. Intervention effect At the lower soil S level, SRCU and SU had a higher mid-stage grain-filling rate than RCU. Intervention effect At the lower soil S level, SRCU and SU had higher 1000-grain weight than RCU. Intervention effect At the lower soil S level, SRCU and SU had higher grain yield than RCU. Intervention effect At the higher soil S level, SRCU yield exceeded SU yield. Intervention effect At the higher soil S level, SRCU yield did not significantly differ from RCU and U. Intervention effect The authors interpreted nitrogen release from SRCU as regulating dry matter and yield like split-applied conventional urea. Intervention effect At 43.2 mg x kg(-1) soil S, released sulfur promoted post-anthesis dry matter accumulation. Intervention effect At 43.2 mg x kg(-1) soil S, released sulfur promoted grain filling. Intervention effect At 43.2 mg x kg(-1) soil S, released sulfur significantly increased grain yield. Intervention effect At 105.1 mg x kg(-1) soil S, sulfur released from SRCU did not significantly increase grain yield. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salt stress caused a linear decrease in paddy yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–110 e0 “Salt stress induced a linear decrease in biological and paddy yield and total plant biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–688 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Spraying against late blight did not significantly decrease yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The liquid spray against the late blight (Phytophthora infestans ) did not significantly decrease neither occurrence of late blight or the yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–528 t0 “BIOPOTATOES ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–36 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Solanum lycopersicum
Theobroma cacao
Helianthus annuus
Gossypium hirsutum
Cucumis sativus
Triticum aestivum
Oryza sativa
Phytophthora infestans