Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More aggressive hoeing did not decrease field bean yield.

Taxon: field beant0
Treatment: increase of working speed and hoeing depth, as well as the number of treatmente0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“field bean crop”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–53

e0
“The increase of working speed and hoeing depth, as well as the number of treatment leads to proved decrease of crop density, but did not decrease the yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–802

Title

Optimizing rotary hoe weed control in field bean crop at transition to organic agriculture in Dobrudzha. I. Crop injuries.

И. Илиев; G. Milev Agricultural Science and Technology 2012

Other claims from this paper (3)

Intervention effect More aggressive hoeing reduced field bean crop density.
Intervention effect The most aggressive treatments lowered crop height and lowest pod height.
Intervention effect Rotary hoe working rate and treatment number had no significant influence on 1000 grain weight and harvest moisture.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A marginal increase in PPFD entailed a sharp decrease in the quantum yield of PS II (FPSII).

Taxon: Stellaria humifusaStellaria humifusae0
Treatment: a marginal increase in PPFDe7
Outcome: quantum yield of PS II (FPSII)e7
Direction: sharp decreasee7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“functional peculiarities of photosynthetic apparatus of Stellaria humifusa”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–152

e7
“the sharp decrease in the quantum yield of PS II (FPSII) entailed by a marginal increase in PPFD”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–862

Title

Eco-physiological peculiarities of Stellaria humifusa in West Spitsbergen

Eugenia Fedorovna Markovskaya; Elena Valentinovna Novichonok; Natalya Yurievna Shmakova Czech Polar Reports 2019. doi:10.5817/cpr2019-2-13

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical fertilization reduction did not decrease fruit yield and quality, except for the 1/3N treatment.

Taxon: Bayberryt1
Treatment: Chemical fertilization reductione5
Outcome: fruit yield and qualitye5
Direction: did not decreasee5
Qualifier: except for the 1/3N treatmente5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t1
“Bayberry Orchard”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–137

e5
“Chemical fertilization reduction did not decrease fruit yield and quality, except for the 1/3N treatment”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–868

Title

The Appropriate Reduction of NitrogenFertilization Enhances Soil Qualitywithout Compromising Fruit Yieldand Quality in a Bayberry Orchard

Yichao Chen; Lu Xiang; Fei Li; et al. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 2025. doi:10.15244/pjoes/204242

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Chemical fertilizer reduction significantly increased soil pH and organic matter in the bayberry orchard.
Intervention effect Chemical fertilizer reduction decreased available nitrogen and phosphorus contents in 2022 and 2023.
Intervention effect Reduction of chemical P fertilizer enhanced the availability of Si, S, Mn and Cu in the bayberry orchard.
Intervention effect Reduction of chemical P fertilizer had no impact on the availability of Mo, Fe and B.
Intervention effect The soil quality index was higher for the N and 2/3N treatments.
Association Soil quality index and soil pH were the most important driving factors regulating fruit yield under chemical fertilizer reduction practices.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

A 10 percent reduction in rainfall gave a small decrease in soybean yield under the climatic grid.

Taxon: Glycine maxGlycine maxe0
Treatment: 10 percent reduction in rainfalle1
Outcome: yielde1
Direction: decreasee1
Qualifier: smalle1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–32

e1
“The climatic grid of 10 percent reduction in rainfall from recent decade 1998-2008 showed small decrease in yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1774–1887

Title

Modeling impacts and adaptations of climate change on soybean (Glycine max) production in Himachal Pradesh, India

RANBIR SINGH RANA; NAVELL CHANDER; ROHIT SHARMA; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2014. doi:10.56093/ijas.v84i10.44115

Other claims from this paper (12)

Method / resource The validated InfoCrop model had an RMSE of 8.8 days for days to maturity of soybean.
Method / resource The validated InfoCrop model had an RMSE of 190.4 kg/ha for soybean crop yield.
Intervention effect Elevated carbon dioxide at 50 and 100 ppm increased simulated soybean yield by 5.0 to 10.2 percent.
Intervention effect Projected yield losses from a 1 degree C temperature rise alone were 1.3 to 3.5 percent for soybean.
Intervention effect Projected yield losses from a 2 degree C temperature rise alone were 4.5 to 6.0 percent for soybean.
Intervention effect A 1 degree C rise with 50 ppm elevated carbon dioxide increased soybean yield by up to 4.9 percent.
Intervention effect A 1 degree C rise with 50 ppm elevated carbon dioxide shortened the average growing period of soybean by up to 2 days.
Intervention effect A 2 degree C rise with 50 ppm elevated carbon dioxide increased simulated soybean yield by up to 2.3 percent compared with control conditions.
Intervention effect A 1 degree C rise with 100 ppm elevated carbon dioxide increased soybean yield by 8.8 to 10.2 percent in all planting windows.
Intervention effect A 2 degree C rise with 100 ppm elevated carbon dioxide gave a soybean yield gain 3.1 to 3.9 percent lower than a 1 degree C rise.
Intervention effect Soybean yield increased by 5.2 to 8.5 percent with 50 ppm elevated carbon dioxide and a 1 degree C rise, when coupled with the 10 percent rainfall reduction.
Association Rise of temperature with elevated carbon dioxide generally increases soybean yield in the region.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Short duration cultivar could decrease Chefa chickpea yield by 9% in baseline.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material: short duration cultivare0
Treatment: short duration cultivare0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 9%e0
Setting: Chefae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“On the other hand, the short duration cultivar at Chefa site could decrease grain yield by 9%, 3% and 3% for the respective time periods.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1422

t0
“chickpea”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–42

Title

Modeling climate change impact on chickpea production and adaptation options in the semi-arid North-Eastern Ethiopia

Adem Mohammed Ahmed; Tamado Tana; Piara Singh; et al. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2016. doi:10.12895/jaeid.2016110.510

Other claims from this paper (19)

Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 12% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 13% in the 2050s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 5% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 7% in the 2050s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 20% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 34% in the 2050s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 12% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 22% in the 2050s.
Intervention effect short duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 11% in baseline versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect short duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 10% in 2030s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect short duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 10% in 2050s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect long duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 7% in baseline versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect long duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 9% in 2030s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect long duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 10% in 2050s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect Short duration cultivar could decrease Chefa chickpea yield by 3% in 2030s.
Intervention effect Short duration cultivar could decrease Chefa chickpea yield by 3% in 2050s.
Intervention effect Supplemental irrigation could increase chickpea yield at Sirinka by 47% in baseline.
Intervention effect Supplemental irrigation could increase chickpea yield at Sirinka by 47% in 2030s.
Intervention effect Supplemental irrigation could increase chickpea yield at Sirinka by 46% in 2050s.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Short duration cultivar could decrease Chefa chickpea yield by 3% in 2030s.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material: short duration cultivare0
Treatment: short duration cultivare0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 3%e0
Setting: Chefae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“On the other hand, the short duration cultivar at Chefa site could decrease grain yield by 9%, 3% and 3% for the respective time periods.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1422

t0
“chickpea”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–42

Title

Modeling climate change impact on chickpea production and adaptation options in the semi-arid North-Eastern Ethiopia

Adem Mohammed Ahmed; Tamado Tana; Piara Singh; et al. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2016. doi:10.12895/jaeid.2016110.510

Other claims from this paper (19)

Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 12% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 13% in the 2050s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 5% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 7% in the 2050s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 20% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 34% in the 2050s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 12% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 22% in the 2050s.
Intervention effect short duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 11% in baseline versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect short duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 10% in 2030s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect short duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 10% in 2050s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect long duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 7% in baseline versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect long duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 9% in 2030s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect long duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 10% in 2050s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect Short duration cultivar could decrease Chefa chickpea yield by 9% in baseline.
Intervention effect Short duration cultivar could decrease Chefa chickpea yield by 3% in 2050s.
Intervention effect Supplemental irrigation could increase chickpea yield at Sirinka by 47% in baseline.
Intervention effect Supplemental irrigation could increase chickpea yield at Sirinka by 47% in 2030s.
Intervention effect Supplemental irrigation could increase chickpea yield at Sirinka by 46% in 2050s.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Short duration cultivar could decrease Chefa chickpea yield by 3% in 2050s.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material: short duration cultivare0
Treatment: short duration cultivare0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 3%e0
Setting: Chefae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“On the other hand, the short duration cultivar at Chefa site could decrease grain yield by 9%, 3% and 3% for the respective time periods.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1422

t0
“chickpea”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–42

Title

Modeling climate change impact on chickpea production and adaptation options in the semi-arid North-Eastern Ethiopia

Adem Mohammed Ahmed; Tamado Tana; Piara Singh; et al. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2016. doi:10.12895/jaeid.2016110.510

Other claims from this paper (19)

Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 12% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 13% in the 2050s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 5% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 7% in the 2050s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 20% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 34% in the 2050s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 12% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 22% in the 2050s.
Intervention effect short duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 11% in baseline versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect short duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 10% in 2030s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect short duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 10% in 2050s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect long duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 7% in baseline versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect long duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 9% in 2030s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect long duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 10% in 2050s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect Short duration cultivar could decrease Chefa chickpea yield by 9% in baseline.
Intervention effect Short duration cultivar could decrease Chefa chickpea yield by 3% in 2030s.
Intervention effect Supplemental irrigation could increase chickpea yield at Sirinka by 47% in baseline.
Intervention effect Supplemental irrigation could increase chickpea yield at Sirinka by 47% in 2030s.
Intervention effect Supplemental irrigation could increase chickpea yield at Sirinka by 46% in 2050s.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 had the smallest fresh-yield decrease, 15.83%, versus T5.

Taxon: Brassica ChinensisBrassica rapa subsp. chinensise0
Treatment: T4e0
Outcome: fresh yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 15.83%e0
Comparator: T5e0

Verbatim

e0
“Comparing with T5, the lowest and highest decrease in the fresh yield of Brassica Chinensis was found under T4(15.83%) and T3(41.63%) respectively.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1457

Title

Effect of Fertigation Levels on Water Consumption, Soil Total Nitrogen, and Growth Parameters of Brassica Chinensis under Straw Burial

Ghulam Rasool; Guo Xiangping; Wang Zhenchang; et al. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2020. doi:10.1080/00103624.2020.1845345

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Straw burial saved 7.34% irrigation water in SS.
Intervention effect Straw burial saved 9.50% irrigation water in WS.
Intervention effect All treatments other than T5 decreased soil TN in D10 and D30 layers in both seasons.
Intervention effect Straw burial gave the highest increase in D20 soil TN.
Intervention effect T3 produced the highest decrease in leaf number, 35.78%, versus T5.
Intervention effect T3 produced the highest decrease in leaf area index, 66.27%, versus T5.
Intervention effect T4 gave the highest increase in shoot dry biomass, 16.95%, versus T5.
Intervention effect T4 gave the highest increase in root dry biomass, 6.14%, versus T5.
Intervention effect T3 had the greatest fresh-yield decrease, 41.63%, versus T5.
Intervention effect T4 gave the greatest increase in WUEs and PFPs versus T5.
Mechanism The authors conclude straw burial can store nitrogen in the upper root zone and alleviate effects of limited nitrogen and water.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 had the greatest fresh-yield decrease, 41.63%, versus T5.

Taxon: Brassica ChinensisBrassica rapa subsp. chinensise0
Treatment: T3e0
Outcome: fresh yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 41.63%e0
Comparator: T5e0

Verbatim

e0
“Comparing with T5, the lowest and highest decrease in the fresh yield of Brassica Chinensis was found under T4(15.83%) and T3(41.63%) respectively.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1457

Title

Effect of Fertigation Levels on Water Consumption, Soil Total Nitrogen, and Growth Parameters of Brassica Chinensis under Straw Burial

Ghulam Rasool; Guo Xiangping; Wang Zhenchang; et al. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2020. doi:10.1080/00103624.2020.1845345

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Straw burial saved 7.34% irrigation water in SS.
Intervention effect Straw burial saved 9.50% irrigation water in WS.
Intervention effect All treatments other than T5 decreased soil TN in D10 and D30 layers in both seasons.
Intervention effect Straw burial gave the highest increase in D20 soil TN.
Intervention effect T3 produced the highest decrease in leaf number, 35.78%, versus T5.
Intervention effect T3 produced the highest decrease in leaf area index, 66.27%, versus T5.
Intervention effect T4 gave the highest increase in shoot dry biomass, 16.95%, versus T5.
Intervention effect T4 gave the highest increase in root dry biomass, 6.14%, versus T5.
Intervention effect T4 had the smallest fresh-yield decrease, 15.83%, versus T5.
Intervention effect T4 gave the greatest increase in WUEs and PFPs versus T5.
Mechanism The authors conclude straw burial can store nitrogen in the upper root zone and alleviate effects of limited nitrogen and water.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With a decrease in tilling depth, the yield of peas and chickpeas decreased: for plowing - by 0.32 and 0.35 t/ha

Taxon: peasLathyrus oleraceuse0
Treatment: decrease in tilling depthe0
Outcome: yield of pease0
Direction: decreasede0
Value: 0.32e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“With a decrease in tilling depth, the yield of peas and chickpeas decreased: for plowing - by 0.32 and 0.35 t/ha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–976

Title

Influence of basic tillage on the productivity of leguminous crops

T S Kiseleva; V V Rzaeva IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 2021. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/839/2/022043

Other claims from this paper (5)

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics