View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Trisert CB caused no yield decrease or fruit size and grade change.
yield decrease, change in fruit size or grade e0 no yield decrease e0 conventional foliar applied low-biuret urea and liquid urea ammonium nitrate e1 Verbatim
e0 “There was no yield decrease , change in fruit size or grade with the use of the Trisert CB. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–256 t0 “Lemon Trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 e1 “Trisert CB replaced conventional foliar applied low-biuret urea and liquid urea ammonium nitrate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–96 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing 2,4-D dose before tillering caused a linear decrease in wheat grain yield .
increase of the 2,4-D doses applied before tillering e0 linear decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The increase of the 2,4-D doses applied before tillering and in the booting stage caused linear decrease in wheat grain yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1518 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
A further delay to 20 June did not decrease yield of PR-115 and RIL-1649.
PR-115 and RIL-1649 e0 delay to 20 June e0 no further decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “there was no further decrease in yield with delay to 20 June of PR-115 and RIL-1649 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1017 t0 “rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–115 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Constitutive PrDA1-1 expression in Arabidopsis decrease yield .
constitutive expression e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “PrDA1-1 was strongly expressed during both the early and late stages of seed development, and its constitutive expression in Arabidopsis reduced seed number but increased seed weight, which ultimately led to a decrease in yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–876 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At low versus high sowing density, grain yield in modern wheat cultivars did not decrease significantly.
modern cultivars e0 low sowing density e0 did not decrease e0 high sowing density e0 Verbatim
e0 “Compared to high sowing density, in modern cultivars grain yield did not decrease significantly with low sowing density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1024 t0 “common wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
By the delaying method the tea yield tends to decrease in the second season.
delaying method e2 tendency to decrease e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Extension of Tea Plucking Period by the Plant Growth Regulator ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–77 e1 “but has a tendency to decrease in the second season ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–525 e2 “By this delaying method ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–413 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Under optimal moisture, mixture yield did not decrease because spring wheat yield increased.
total yield of the mixture e0 did not decrease e0 With optimal moisture e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “With optimal moisture, they reduced the yield of the vetch sowing, but the total yield of the mixture did not decrease due to the increase in the yield of spring wheat. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–342 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield began to decrease at sulfur 6.69 mmol/L.
Chinese spring onion t0 6.69 mmol/L(S4) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the yield s begin to decrease when the sulfur concentration reaches to 6.69 mmol/L(S4) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–867 t0 “Chinese spring onion ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–90 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A 20% irrigation reduction decrease d yield to 53.1 t/ha, a 9.7% decrease .
decrease in the irrigation rate by 20 % in option 3 e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in the irrigation rate by 20 % in option 3 and by 40 % in option 4 led to a decrease in yield to 53.1 and 43.7 t/ha, respectively, but when the irrigation rate decrease s by 20 % in option 3, the yield decrease s only 9.7 % ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1585–1817 e1 “spring planted potatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–150 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain protein percentage did not decrease proportionally when grain yield per plant fell by 50% or more after defoliation at anthesis.
defoliation at anthesis e1 per cent grain protein e2 did not decrease proportionally e2 despite 50 % or more decrease in grain yield per plant e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “defoliation at anthesis in barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes grown under pot culture and non limiting nitrogen conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–216 e2 “per cent grain protein did not decrease proportionally despite 50 % or more decrease in grain yield per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–351 Other claims from this paper (2) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Citrus
Triticum aestivum
Oryza sativa
Arabidopsis
Solanum tuberosum.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Hordeum vulgare