View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Unprotected B. campestris had a significant yield decrease .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “B. campestris a significant decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–827 t0 “RESPONSE OF FOUR BRASSICA SEED CROP SPECIES TO ATTACK BY THE CRUCIFER FLEA BEETLE, PHYLLOTRETA CRUCIFERAE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–105 e1 “Nevertheless the unprotected B. juncea treatment yield ed as much as the protected; B. napus , however, suffered an apparent appreciable decrease and B. campestris a significant decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–827 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Excessive nitrogen could decrease economic coefficient.
TreatmentExcessive nitrogen e0 Outcomeeconomic coefficient e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Excessive nitrogen,however,could decrease economic coefficient,and thus decreasing pod yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–614 t0 “peanut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Decrease d carbon dioxide concentration decrease d simulated maize yield .
Treatmentdecrease carbondioxide concentration e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “decrease carbondioxide concentration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1628–1664 t0 “yield of rainfed maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–47 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher manure rates did not increase spelt yield and often tended to decrease it.
Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Higher rate didn’t increase the yield and often caused tendency for yield decreasing. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–745 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
T 1 produced higher water use efficiency without a significant decrease in yield parameters.
Outcomewater use efficiency ( WUE ) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “T 1 produced higher water use efficiency ( WUE ) with no significant decrease in yield parameters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1178 t0 “Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–35 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Excess fertilization did not significantly decrease yield .
Treatmentexcessive fertilization e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The yield is not significantly decrease d under the excessive fertilization. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1159 t0 “wheat yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–49 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Overexpression lines of OsMYBS1 showed no decrease in total grain yield per plant in rice.
Treatmentoverexpression lines e2 Outcometotal grain yield per plant e2 Directionwithout a decrease e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “agronomic performance in rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–99 e2 “overexpression lines produced more tillers and panicles, with a reduced seed-setting rate but without a decrease in total grain yield per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–810 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
A 50% reduction of plant-available N would decrease crop yield by 17%.
Treatmentreduction of plant-available N by 50% e6 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e6 “a reduction of plant-available N by 50% would lead to a decrease in crop yield by 17% and a concomitant increase in N response efficiency by 67% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1267 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Severe drought caused a greater grain yield decrease in Yangmai-16.
Treatmentsevere drought stress e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Under severe drought stress, Yangmai-16 displayed relatively less adaptability to drought, with a slower recovery after re-watering and a greater decrease in grain yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1326 t0 “wheat (Triticum aestivum ) cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–106 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Increasing harvested area by 10 hectares was forecast to decrease yield by 0.01 tons per hectare.
Treatmentincreasing area harvested by 10 hectares e0 Value0.01 tons per hectare e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “increasing area harvested by 10 hectares that would decrease the yield by 0.01 tons per hectare ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1207 t0 “Sugarcane ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–27 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.