View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Traffic on extremely compacted soil caused an additional yield decrease that was not significant in the first year.
Treatmentharvest traffic e0 Qualifierextremely compacted soil e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “When harvest traffic was applied to alfalfa grown in extremely compacted soil there was an additional decrease in yield . It was not statistically significant the 1st yr ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1458 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At Manhattan in 2007, yield did not decrease significantly until the final planting date.
Treatmentdelayed planting dates t1 Directiondid not decrease e0 Qualifierfinal planting date in 2007 e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “CORN ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 e0 “yield at Manhattan, KS, did not decrease significantly until the final planting date in 2007 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1068 t1 “delayed planting dates and hybrids of varying maturity revealed that yield at Manhattan, KS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–998 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Shading at all three stages caused a significant decrease in both yield and grain weight of winter wheat.
TreatmentShading at all three stages e0 Outcomeyield and grain weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Winter Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 e0 “Shading at all three stages caused a significant decrease in both yield and grain weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–692 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Treatment with 150 mM NaCl led to a significant decrease in tomato yield .
Verbatim
t0 “tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–134 e0 “plants treated with 150Mm NaCl also produced much smaller fruits than control leading to significant decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1159 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Heating caused a smaller decrease in extracted zein yield .
Outcomeyield of zein extracted with 70% ethanol-0.5% sodium acetate e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A smaller decrease occurred in yield of zein extracted with 70% ethanol-0.5% sodium acetate. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–664 e1 “Lysine and available lysine contents were reduced slightly by heating at the highest temp. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1159 t0 “corn ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 0–4 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
RNAi suppression of cell-wall lignin biosynthesis can decrease biomass yield .
TreatmentRNAi suppression of cell-wall lignin biosynthesis e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “RNAi suppression of cell-wall lignin biosynthesis can decrease biomass yield and resistance to biotic stress in the transgenic plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–775 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
T1 caused no decrease in yield , fruit weight or quality across three years.
Outcomeyield, fruit weight or fruit quality e0 Qualifierover all three years e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Treatment Tl received about 30 cm less irrigation water than the control and showed no decrease in yield , fruit weight or fruit quality over all three years. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–598 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Red light caused a similar prolonged decrease in PSII photon yield in red- and yellow-senescing leaves.
OutcomePSII photon yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “red light induced a similar, prolonged decrease in PSII photon yield in both red-and yellow-senescing leaves. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1604 t0 “Red-Osier Dogwood ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–96 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation does not decrease the continuous soybean yield penalty.
Directionno_change inferred e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t1 “Soybean Yield Penalties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–43 e0 “irrigation decrease s the CCYP but not the CSYP ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1187 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought did not decrease PSII quantum yield in ear bracts.
Organ / stageear bracts e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Φ PSII of ear bracts did not decrease at all in response to drought ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–978 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.