View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Deep plowing tended to decrease root yield of sugarbeets.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “Deep plowing tended to decrease root yield s of sudangrass ( Sorghum sudanense ), sugarbeets, ( Beta vulgaris ), and soybeans ( Glycine max ) but had little effect on those of cabbage ( Brassica oleracea var. ‘capitata’) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–660 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Deep plowing tended to decrease root yield of soybeans.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “Deep plowing tended to decrease root yield s of sudangrass ( Sorghum sudanense ), sugarbeets, ( Beta vulgaris ), and soybeans ( Glycine max ) but had little effect on those of cabbage ( Brassica oleracea var. ‘capitata’) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–660 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Light deficit during grain filling did not significantly decrease grain yield .
Organ / stagegrain filling stage e0 TreatmentLight water deficit e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Light water deficit during the grain filling stage did not significantly decrease grain yield and was significantly associated with improved grain quality and water conservation. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1334 t0 “Winter Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–89 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Retaining leaves 6–20 while removing others did not significantly decrease total plant dry matter yield .
Treatmentremoving all leaves except 6–20 e0 Outcometotal dry matter yield of the whole plant e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “removing all leaves except 6–20 did not decrease significantly total dry matter yield of the whole plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–573 e1 “Sugar‐beet plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–25 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Spring soft wheat: yield decrease under dry years.
Comparatorthe first field after fallow e0 Verbatim
e0 “In dry years, there was a more noticeable decrease in yield in crops far from fallow compared to the first field after fallow ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–894 t0 “Spring Soft Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–75 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Winter wheat yield was projected to decrease about 6-10% under the STAR scenario due to reduced water availability.
OutcomeWinter wheat yield e0 Qualifierdue to lower water availability e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Winter wheat yield is likely to decrease by about 6-10% under the STAR scenario due to lower water availability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1459 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Wildtype potato had a 95% decrease in tuber yield at high temperature.
Materialwildtype plants e0 Treatmenthigh temperatures e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “when subjected to high temperatures, transgenic lines exhibited a significantly lower reduction in tuber yield ranging from 40% to 77%, while wildtype plants experienced a 95% decrease in tuber yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1096 t0 “Potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield of Tanbaguro in double cropping was prone to decrease by late sowing.
Outcomeyield of Tanbaguro e3 Directionprone to decrease e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “using two black soybean cultivars of Kurozukin and Tanbaguro ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–179 e3 “The yield of Tanbaguro in double cropping was prone to decrease by late sowing ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–673 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping did not decrease olive tree yield compared with olive monoculture.
Treatmentall intercropping crops e0 Outcomeolive tree yield e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The results showed that all intercropping crops did not decrease the olive tree yield compared to the olive tree in monoculture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1080 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Japanese knotweed mulch reduced the decrease in potato yield under continuous potato cultivation.
TreatmentJapanese knotweed mulching e0 Outcomepotato yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the extent of the potato yield decrease was reduced by Japanese knotweed mulching ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1254 Other claims from this paper (2) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.