View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
A 50-100% rainfall intensity decrease caused yield loss of 40-100%.
Treatment50-100% decrease in rainfall intensity e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A 50-100% decrease in rainfall intensity during the growing season caused a loss of yield s between 40-100% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1207 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In the pot experiment there was no significant decrease in tef grain yield at potassium levels above 40 mg L−1.
Directionno significant decrease e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator Outcome
Verbatim
t0 “Tef (Eragrostis tef ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–20 e0 “with no significant decrease thereafter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–927 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
East-west yield was 3.3% lower than south-north yield , a less dramatic decrease .
Treatmenteast-west direction e0 Comparatorsouth-north direction e0 Verbatim
t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–56 e0 “with merely 3.3% yield lower than the south-north direction,the yield decrease of the east-west direction was not so dramatic ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–816 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
When the curve was accompanied by cracking, yield loss and DRC decrease were more severe.
Treatmentaccompanied by cracking e5 Outcomeyield loss and the DRC decrease e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “wind damaged and one-year recovery of rubber trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–161 e5 “when the curve was accompanied by cracking, the yield loss and the DRC decrease were more severe ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1052 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Two cuts per year did not significantly decrease seed yield or quality.
Taxonpearl millet ✕ elephantgrass t0 TreatmentTwo cuts per year e0 Outcomeseed yield and seed quality e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Qualifiermid‐June and early August e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Two cuts per year (mid‐June and early August) did not decrease seed yield and seed quality significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1320 t0 “pearl millet ✕ elephantgrass ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 49–77 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Planting at the end of May caused no corresponding decrease in seed yield .
TreatmentDelaying planting until the end of May e0 Directionno corresponding decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Delaying planting until the end of May increased fibre yield s by an average of 35% with no corresponding decrease in seed yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1254 t0 “oilseed flax ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–61 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
A 20% decrease in irrigation rate had no significant effect on peach yield .
Treatment20% decrease in irrigation rate e1 Directionno_change inferred e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e6 “to investigate the behavior of peach trees under sustained deficit irrigation (SDI) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–264 e1 “However, for the 20% decrease in irrigation rate, the effect on yield was not significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1184 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield followed a trend of initial increase and then decrease or stabilization with continued nitrogen application.
Treatmentcontinued nitrogen application e1 Directioninitial increase followed by a decrease or stabilization e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “with continued nitrogen application, the yield exhibited a trend of initial increase followed by a decrease or stabilization ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1124 t0 “Maize Varieties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–27 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed cited background negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Earlier NIAB TAG work found an initial yield decrease after conversion to noninversion tillage.
Taxonwinter sown combinable crops t0 Treatmentnoninversion tillage system e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Previous work undertaken at NIAB TAG had shown an initial decrease in crop yield immediately after conversion to a noninversion tillage system ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1306 t0 “winter sown combinable crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–74 Other claims from this paper (1) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Limited irrigation II caused the smallest yield decrease compared with full irrigation.
Treatmentlimited irrigationⅡ e0 Directiondecrease degree e0 Comparatorfull irrigation treatment e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease degree of yield and grain per ear by treatment of limited irrigationⅡwere the smallest compared with the full irrigation treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–532 t0 “Upland Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.