Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

cotton yield decrease decrease.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment: less than 1 me0
Outcome: yield decreasee0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 60%e0
Comparator: 2–3 me0
Setting: FESSe1

Verbatim

e0
“For cotton, a rising water table from 2–3 m to 1–2 m and less than 1 m gave a yield decrease of about 11 and 60% respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–943

e1
“Fordwah Eastern Sadiqia South (FESS)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–207

Title

Individual and combined effect of waterlogging and salinity on crop yields in the Indus basin

Muhammad Akram Kahlown; Muhammad Azam Irrigation and Drainage 2002. doi:10.1002/ird.62

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect wheat yield loss loss.
Intervention effect sugarcane yield loss loss.
Intervention effect wheat yield loss loss.
Intervention effect sugarcane yield loss loss.
Intervention effect cotton yield decrease decrease.
Intervention effect rice yield less.
Intervention effect wheat yields decreasing.
Intervention effect sugarcane yields decreasing.
Intervention effect wheat yields complete failures.
Intervention effect sugarcane yields complete failures.
Intervention effect cotton salinity tolerance higher.
Observation Cotton failed to survive high salinity with water table below 1 m.
Intervention effect rice rice crop complete failure.
Intervention effect Combined waterlogging and salinity harmed crop yields more than waterlogging alone.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Damage around tasseling-anthesis caused the greatest yield decrease in forage maize.

Organ / stage: tasseling‐anthesise0
Treatment: treatmentse0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: Decreasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Decrease of yield was the highest when treatments were applied around tasseling‐anthesis”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–335

Title

Effects of Simulated Hail Damage on the Yield of Forage Maize

G. Trappeniers; J. F. Ledent; O. Fayt; et al. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 1992. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037x.1992.tb00972.x

Other claims from this paper (2)

Intervention effect Leaf tearing alone had little effect on total dry matter yield of forage maize.
Intervention effect Simulated hail damage had small effects on forage maize dry matter content.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The evaluated herbicides did not decrease durum wheat yield.

Taxon: durum wheatTriticum turgidum subsp. durume0
Treatment: herbicides evaluatede0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: no decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“There was no decrease in durum wheat yield with the herbicides evaluated.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1294

Title

Sensitivity of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum) to various postemergence herbicides

Nader Soltani; Christy Shropshire; Peter H. Sikkema Agricultural Sciences 2011. doi:10.4236/as.2011.24058

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect dichlorprop/2,4-D produced 0 to 2.4% visible injury in durum wheat.
Intervention effect dicamba/MCPA/mecoprop produced 0 to 6% visible injury in durum wheat.
Intervention effect clopyralid produced 0 to 0.4% visible injury in durum wheat.
Intervention effect bromoxynil/MCPA produced 0 to 1.4% visible injury in durum wheat.
Intervention effect pyrasulfotole/bromoxynil produced 0 to 3.5% visible injury in durum wheat.
Intervention effect thifensulfuron/tribenuron + MCPA amine produced 0 to 5% visible injury in durum wheat.
Intervention effect fluroxypyr + MCPA ester produced 0 to 2.6% visible injury in durum wheat.
Intervention effect tralkoxydim produced 0 to 5% visible injury in durum wheat.
Intervention effect fenoxaprop-pethyl/safener produced 0.4% to 8% visible injury in durum wheat.
Intervention effect dicamba/ MCPA/mecoprop decreased durum wheat height by as much as 5%.
Intervention effect pyrasulfotole/bromoxynil decreased durum wheat height by as much as 4%.
Intervention effect fenoxaprop-pethyl/safener decreased durum wheat height by as much as 6%.
Intervention effect Other evaluated herbicides did not affect durum wheat height.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sara yield decrease on optimal sowing dates was not significant.

Taxon: Sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Material: Sarae0
Outcome: decreasee0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0
“while with the other two cultivars (Lara and Sara), the decrease was not significant.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1046

t0
“Sugar beet”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10

Title

Sugar beet root yield and quality as affected by sowing date

Branko Marinković; Jovan Crnobarać; Goran Jačimović; et al. Zbornik radova Instituta za ratarstvo i povrtarstvo 2005

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect The first sowing date gave the highest root yield across cultivars and years.
Intervention effect First-date yield exceeded other sowing dates by 8.11 tha'1 (12.2%).
Intervention effect Mara yield decreased significantly on optimal sowing dates.
Intervention effect Lara yield decrease on optimal sowing dates was not significant.
Association Sugar content variation was uncorrelated with sowing dates.
Association Root yield was the dominant contributor to sugar yield.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring paclobutrazol tended to decrease early yield.

Taxon: muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment: paclobutrazolt0
Outcome: early yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“but tended to decrease the early yield.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–600

t0
“Paclobutrazol—A Plant Growth Retardant for Increasing Yield and Fruit Quality in Muskmelon”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90

Title

Paclobutrazol—A Plant Growth Retardant for Increasing Yield and Fruit Quality in Muskmelon

Haim Nerson; Ron Cohen; Menahem Edelstein; et al. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 1989. doi:10.21273/jashs.114.5.762

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Spring transplant drench with paclobutrazol increased total fruit yield by 15% to 20%.
Intervention effect Paclobutrazol increased fruit weight rather than fruit number.
Intervention effect Paclobutrazol generally tended to improve marketable yield, yield concentration and netting index.
Intervention effect Autumn paclobutrazol reduced early leaf yellowing but was less effective than BA.
Intervention effect Autumn paclobutrazol did not affect yield or yield components.
Intervention effect Autumn paclobutrazol significantly increased soluble solids content.
Intervention effect Autumn paclobutrazol left keeping quality unaffected.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 1440 g/10 a of boron, a decrease in seeds per pod was also involved in the yield decrease.

Taxon: Kidney BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment: 1440 g/10 aの施用区e1
Outcome: 一莢内粒数e1
Direction: 低下e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“1440 g/10 aの施用区では一莢内粒数の低下も関与した”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–544

t0
“Kidney Bean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–83

Title

Effects of Boron Application on Seed Yield and Yield- Related Traits in Kidney Bean

Ichi SASAKI; Takuya KITABATAKE; Toshiki MATSUI; et al. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 2026. doi:10.1626/jcs.95.104

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect In trial 1, the FTE plot (citrate-soluble boron) raised kidney bean yield by 12% over the untreated plot (mean of cultivars and years).
Intervention effect In trial 1, the Agri-Ace plot (citrate-soluble boron and zinc) raised kidney bean yield by 9% over the untreated plot.
Intervention effect In trial 1, the water-soluble plot (water-soluble boron and zinc) raised kidney bean yield by 14% over the untreated plot.
Intervention effect Yield did not differ with or without zinc in the fertilizer materials.
Association Post-harvest soil content of boron alone showed a significant positive correlation with yield.
Mechanism The yield increase is considered to come from increased boron uptake.
Intervention effect At Ebetsu, yield peaked at boron application rates of 360-720 g/10 a.
Intervention effect At Obihiro, yield peaked at a boron application rate of 720 g/10 a.
Intervention effect Yield decreased at boron application rates of 1080 g/10 a or more.
Intervention effect The yield increase at the optimum boron rate relative to the untreated plot was mainly due to an increase in node number.
Intervention effect The yield decrease at 1080 g/10 a or more of boron was mainly due to fewer pods per node.
Observation At Ebetsu, post-harvest soil boron content exceeded the upper diagnostic limit of 1.3 ppm at 1080 g/10 a or more.
Observation At Obihiro, post-harvest soil boron content exceeded the upper diagnostic limit of 1.3 ppm at 1440 g/10 a.
Recommendation Applying about 360-720 g/10 a of boron is recommended as effective for increasing kidney bean yield.
Recommendation At this rate boron accumulation is not worrying, and continued application to kidney bean in a 3-4 year rotation is considered unproblematic.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When soil water potential continued to decrease, no longer obvious decrease in yield was observed.

Taxon: RiceOryza sativat0
Treatment: SWP continued to be decreasede6
Outcome: yielde2
Direction: no longer obvious decreasee6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Yield and Quality of Rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–52

e2
“the yield of two cultivars was decreased significantly before heading stages,especially at panicle formation stage by lower SWP”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–558

e6
“but no longer obvious decrease was observed when SWP continued to be decreased”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–637

Title

Effect of Soil Moisture on Yield and Quality of Rice

Zheng Gui 2006

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield did not decrease with increasing plant diversity.

Taxon: MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment: increasing plant diversitye0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Maize yield did not decrease with increasing plant diversity.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–921

Title

Benefits of a maize–bean–weeds mixed cropping system in Urubamba Valley, Peruvian Andes

Ernesto Gianoli; Isaías Ramos; Armando Alfaro-Tapia; et al. International Journal of Pest Management 2006. doi:10.1080/09670870600796722

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observation The main recorded maize pests were Diabrotica spp., Carpophilus sp. and Pagiocerus frontalis.
Intervention effect Overall pest abundance did not differ among crop diversity treatments.
Intervention effect Crop diversity significantly reduced maximum Carpophilus abundance.
Intervention effect Crop diversity significantly reduced maximum Pagiocerus abundance.
Observation The main beneficial arthropods were Paratriphleps sp., ladybirds and spiders.
Intervention effect Beneficial arthropod density did not differ among treatments.
Recommendation The authors recommend traditional intercropping as a valuable alternative to pesticides for resource-poor Andean farmers.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater shade tended to decrease grain yield.

Taxon: upland riceOryza sativat0
Treatment: shade levelse0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The shade levels tend to decrease grain yield and increase unfilled grain.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–741

t0
“upland rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61

Title

Grain yield and yield attributes response of four upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) promising lines to shade stress

G R Sadimantara; E Febrianti; N W S Suliartini; et al. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 2020. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/454/1/012188

Other claims from this paper (3)

Observation Shade levels affected grain yield and yield attributes.
Intervention effect Greater shade tended to increase unfilled grain.
Observation GS12-1 was a better line for panicle length and grain yield.

Intervention effectobservedreview summarynegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Under low plant density the overall soybean yield may slightly decrease.

Taxon: SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: Low plant densitye3
Outcome: overall yielde3
Direction: decreasee3
Qualifier: may slightly decreasee3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–60

e3
“Low plant density helps improve individual plant growth and nutrient use efficiency, although the overall yield may slightly decrease”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–421

Title

The Role of Plant Density and Nutrient Management in Soybean Yield Optimization

Jianhua Wang; Xin Lin; Xiaoying Li Legume Genomics and Genetics 2024. doi:10.5376/lgg.2024.15.0027

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect High plant density significantly increases soybean productivity by enhancing canopy light interception and dry matter accumulation.
Intervention effect High plant density may also lead to increased competition for resources in soybean.
Intervention effect Low plant density helps improve individual plant growth and nutrient use efficiency in soybean.
Intervention effect Proper nutrient supply and management strategies can enhance soybean adaptability to environmental stresses.
Intervention effect Proper nutrient supply and management strategies can increase soybean yield.
Intervention effect Proper nutrient supply and management strategies can reduce soybean input costs.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics