Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jointing booting water control tended to slightly decrease yield.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasinge0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“yield had a slightly decreasing tendency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–666
t0

“Rice Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47

Title

Effects of Controlled Irrigation on Rice Growth and Yield in Jointing-Booting and Flowering Stage

Haibing Wang Journal of Irrigation and Drainage 2012

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod number per plant was reduced with water deficit and mainly accounted for the yield decrease.

Outcome
pod number per plante0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The decrease was mainly due to reduced pod number per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–818
t0

“pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–15

Title

Response of pea seed yield to water deficit.

Richard J. Martin; D. R. Wilson; Matthew Riddle; et al. 2006

Other claims from this paper (6)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When N and P were applied together without K, a severe antagonism resulted, with a large yield decrease.

Taxon
Valencia orangeCitrus sinensise0
Treatment
N and P were applied together without Ke1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Valencia orange trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–92
e1

“When N and P were applied together without K, a severe antagonism resulted with large yield decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–798

Title

Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium interactions on valencia orange yields

Arthur Wallace Journal of Plant Nutrition 1990. doi:10.1080/01904169009364082

Other claims from this paper (11)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting a portfolio of soybean varieties can decrease soybean yield variability in Arkansas.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
planting a portfolio of soybean varietiese1
Outcome
yield variabilitye1
Direction
decreasee1
Setting
Arkansase1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The results showed that there are significant advantages in planting a portfolio of soybean varieties that can enhance profits and decrease yield variability for soybean producers in Arkansas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–843

Title

Enhancing Soybean Profitability Using Portfolio Theory

Osemenkhian Cynthia Onyechere Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science 2011

Other claims from this paper (1)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Use of a herbicide allowed a lower seeding rate with no decrease in sericea stand or forage yield.

Taxon
Sericea lespedezaLespedeza cuneatat0
Treatment
Use of a herbicidee3
Outcome
sericea stand or forage yielde3
Direction
no decreasee3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Establishment of Sericea Lespedeza”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–34
e3

“Use of a herbicide permitted a reduction in seeding rate with no decrease in sericea stand or forage yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–414

Title

Establishment of Sericea Lespedeza

C. S. Hoveland; G. A. Buchanan; E. D. Donnelly Weed Science 1971. doi:10.1017/s0043174500048189

Other claims from this paper (6)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling before cotton did not decrease corn yield the following year.

Treatment
in-row subsoiling conducted prior to the cotton crope0
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
no decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“in-row subsoiling conducted prior to the cotton crop provided maximum cotton yields with no decrease in corn yield the following year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1585

Title

BENEFITS OF UNIFORM ROW SPACING IN A COTTON-CORN CONSERVATION SYSTEM

R. L. Raper 2009

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield tended to decrease where lodging was absent and ethephon reduced kernel number or mass.

Treatment
ethephone0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
lodging was not a factore0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield tended to decrease in cases where lodging was not a factor and ethephon reduced kernels per spike and/or kernel mass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1690–1819
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63

Title

Environment, Cultivar, and Ethephon Rate Interactions in Barley

E. H. Stobbe; J. Moes; R. W. Bahry; et al. Agronomy Journal 1992. doi:10.2134/agronj1992.00021962008400050006x

Other claims from this paper (12)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yangambi km5 showed no yield decrease with nematodes at either harvest.

Taxon
banana (Musa spp.)Musae1
Material
Yangambi km5e0
Treatment
presence of nematodese0
Interactor
nematodesNematodae0pest
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Yangambi km5 showed no decrease in LAI and yield in the presence of nematodes at both harvests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1472
e1

“a banana (Musa spp.) field trial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–143

Title

Quantitative Digital Imaging of Banana Growth Suppression by Plant Parasitic Nematodes

Hugh Roderick; Elvis Mbiru; Danny Coyne; et al. PLoS ONE 2012. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053355

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White-sugar yield did not decrease under sodium application.

Treatment
Nae1
Outcome
white‐sugar yielde0
Direction
no decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“ultimately there was no decrease in white‐sugar yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1293
t0

“sodium in sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–46
e1

“growth and quality of sugar beet were not affected by Na application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1234

Title

Potassium substitution by sodium in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) nutrition on K‐fixing soils

Abdul Wakeel; Diedrich Steffens; Sven Schubert Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 2009. doi:10.1002/jpln.200900270

Other claims from this paper (3)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing density from 12 to six plants per meter did not decrease yield.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
six plants per metere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not decreasee0
Comparator
12e0

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction from 12 to six plants per meter did not decrease yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1293
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–35

Title

White mold intensity on common bean in response to plant density, irrigation frequency, grass mulching, Trichoderma spp., and fungicide

Trazilbo José de Paula Júnior; Rogério Faria Vieira; Paulo Roberto Ribeiro Rocha; et al. Summa Phytopathologica 2009. doi:10.1590/s0100-54052009000100007

Other claims from this paper (8)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.