View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Jointing booting water control tended to slightly decrease yield .
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “yield had a slightly decreasing tendency ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–666 t0 “Rice Growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Pod number per plant was reduced with water deficit and mainly accounted for the yield decrease .
Outcomepod number per plant e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease was mainly due to reduced pod number per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–818 t0 “pea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–15 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
When N and P were applied together without K, a severe antagonism resulted, with a large yield decrease .
TreatmentN and P were applied together without K e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Valencia orange trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–92 e1 “When N and P were applied together without K, a severe antagonism resulted with large yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–798 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect Applied individually, N fertilizer gave a response of 6 per cent in Valencia orange. Intervention effect Applied individually, P fertilizer gave a response of 5 per cent in Valencia orange. Intervention effect Applied individually, K fertilizer gave a response of 23 per cent in Valencia orange. Intervention effect The total response to N, P and K applied simultaneously was 40 per cent, compared with 37 per cent predicted by sequential additivity and 34 per cent by simple addition. Intervention effect When N, P and K were applied together, the individual response to N was 8 in Valencia orange. Intervention effect When N, P and K were applied together, the individual response to P was 7 in Valencia orange. Intervention effect When N, P and K were applied together, the individual response to K was 26 in Valencia orange. Observation The interactions of K with P and of K with N were also sequentially additive. Intervention effect Adding K to the N plus P treatment resulted in a 69 per cent yield increase. Observation Potassium was a limiting factor only for N and P together, not for N or P individually. Recommendation The authors suggest an alternative procedure to DRIS analysis. Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Planting a portfolio of soybean varieties can decrease soybean yield variability in Arkansas.
Treatmentplanting a portfolio of soybean varieties e1 Outcomeyield variability e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “The results showed that there are significant advantages in planting a portfolio of soybean varieties that can enhance profits and decrease yield variability for soybean producers in Arkansas ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–843 Other claims from this paper (1) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Use of a herbicide allowed a lower seeding rate with no decrease in sericea stand or forage yield .
TreatmentUse of a herbicide e3 Outcomesericea stand or forage yield e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Establishment of Sericea Lespedeza ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–34 e3 “Use of a herbicide permitted a reduction in seeding rate with no decrease in sericea stand or forage yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–414 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Subsoiling before cotton did not decrease corn yield the following year.
Treatmentin-row subsoiling conducted prior to the cotton crop e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “in-row subsoiling conducted prior to the cotton crop provided maximum cotton yield s with no decrease in corn yield the following year ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1585 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield tended to decrease where lodging was absent and ethephon reduced kernel number or mass.
Qualifierlodging was not a factor e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Grain yield tended to decrease in cases where lodging was not a factor and ethephon reduced kernels per spike and/or kernel mass. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1690–1819 t0 “Barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Yangambi km5 showed no yield decrease with nematodes at either harvest.
Treatmentpresence of nematodes e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Yangambi km5 showed no decrease in LAI and yield in the presence of nematodes at both harvests ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1472 e1 “a banana (Musa spp.) field trial ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–143 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
White-sugar yield did not decrease under sodium application.
Outcomewhite‐sugar yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “ultimately there was no decrease in white‐sugar yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1293 t0 “sodium in sugar beet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–46 e1 “growth and quality of sugar beet were not affected by Na application ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1234 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing density from 12 to six plants per meter did not decrease yield .
Treatmentsix plants per meter e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The reduction from 12 to six plants per meter did not decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1293 t0 “common bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–35 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.