Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Turmeric growth, yield attributes and yield tended to decrease with pressmud levels beyond 20 t per ha.

Taxon: turmericCurcuma longae0
Treatment: higher levels of pressmud beyond 20 t pressmud ha-1e0
Outcome: growth, yield attributes and yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The growth, yield attributes and yield of turmeric rhizomes tended to decrease with higher levels of pressmud beyond 20 t pressmud ha-1”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1015

Title

Effect of sugarcane pressmud with inorganic fertilizers on growth and yield of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.

S.K. BAIRAGI Annals of Plant and Soil Research 2022. doi:10.47815/apsr.2022.10164

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Pressmud at 20 t per ha with RDF gave the highest turmeric plant height, 97.4 cm.
Intervention effect Pressmud at 20 t per ha with RDF gave the maximum turmeric leaf length, 49.4 cm.
Intervention effect Pressmud at 20 t per ha with RDF gave the highest turmeric leaf breadth, 12.9 cm.
Intervention effect RDF + 20 t pressmud per ha produced the highest number of rhizomes per plant, 21.5.
Intervention effect RDF + 20 t pressmud per ha produced the maximum fresh rhizome weight per plant, 310.3 g.
Intervention effect RDF + 20 t pressmud per ha produced the highest fresh rhizome yield, 34.5 t per ha.
Intervention effect The yield increment with RDF + 20 t pressmud per ha was 22.7% over the control (RDF only).
Intervention effect Turmeric responded significantly to pressmud application compared with the control.
Intervention effect RDF + 20 t pressmud per ha gave the maximum net return, Rs. 4,78,757 per ha, versus Rs. 3,54,677 per ha for the control.
Intervention effect RDF + 20 t pressmud per ha gave the highest B:C ratio, 2.95, versus 2.51 for the control.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Final yield of MDHAR-silenced lines showed a stronger decrease under carbon limitation.

Taxon: cherry tomatoSolanum lycopersicum var. cerasiformet0
Material: MDHAR silenced linese1
Treatment: carbon limitatione1
Outcome: final yielde1
Direction: stronger decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“final yield of MDHAR silenced lines showed a stronger decrease under carbon limitation”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1051

t0
“cherry tomato”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–44

Title

Reduction of MDHAR activity in cherry tomato suppresses growth and yield and MDHAR activity is correlated with sugar levels under high light

Vincent Truffault; Noé Gest; Cécile Garchery; et al. Plant Cell & Environment 2015. doi:10.1111/pce.12663

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Independently of the light regime, early growth of all organs was slower in MDHAR-silenced cherry tomato lines.
Intervention effect MDHAR silencing decreased final fruit yield.
Intervention effect Photosynthesis was altered in MDHAR-modified lines.
Intervention effect Accumulation of hexoses and sucrose was altered in a light-dependent manner in plantlets.
Intervention effect Sucrose accumulation was repressed in young fruits of MDHAR-silenced lines.
Intervention effect The phenotype of MDHAR-silenced lines was partially restored by reducing fruit load.
Association MDHAR activity is correlated with sugar levels under high light in cherry tomato.
Mechanism Ascorbate and MDHA appear to be involved in control of growth and sugar metabolism in cherry tomato.
Recommendation The associated enzymes could be potential targets for yield improvement.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping P. maximum cv. Mombaça caused a greater decrease in maize grain yield.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Treatment: Intercropping of P. maximum cv. Mombaça with maizee0
Outcome: maize grain yielde0
Direction: higher decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Intercropping of P. maximum cv. Mombaça with maize showed higher decrease in maize grain yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1015

Title

Yield of maize grain and tropical grass species under intercropping management system using nicosulfuron herbicide in off-season cultivation

Armindo Neivo Kichel; Luiz Carlos Ferreira de Souza; Ademar Pereira Serra; et al. Australian Journal of Crop Science 2019. doi:10.21475/ajcs.19.13.11.p1498

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Off-season intercropping with tropical forage grasses decreased maize grain yield with or without herbicide suppression.
Intervention effect Nicosulfuron suppression decreased forage grass dry matter production.
Intervention effect Intercropping P. maximum cv. Mombaça yielded higher forage grass production for livestock feed.
Intervention effect B. brizantha cv. Piatã affected maize grain yield least among the intercropped forages, even without nicosulfuron suppression.
Recommendation The authors propose off-season maize intercropping with tropical forages for degraded pasture recovery and livestock forage production.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Short-term conservation tillage did not significantly decrease corn yield.

Taxon: cornZea mays subsp. mayse0
Treatment: short-term implementation of conservation tillagee0
Outcome: corn yielde0
Direction: did not result in a significant decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“the short-term implementation of conservation tillage did not result in a significant decrease in corn yield.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1920–2029

Title

Effects of Tillage and Sowing Methods on Soil Physical Properties and Corn Plant Characters

Ying Wang; Sen Yang; Jian Sun; et al. Agriculture 2023. doi:10.3390/agriculture13030600

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect PTS lowered 10–40 cm soil penetration resistance by 11.9% to 18% versus other treatments.
Intervention effect NTS soil moisture averaged 2.7% higher than PTS.
Intervention effect NTS soil moisture averaged 1.4% higher than RTS.
Intervention effect STS lowered soil temperature by 5.6% to 8.6% during late corn growth.
Intervention effect RTS significantly reduced surface-soil bulk density.
Association High soil penetration resistance impeded early crop growth.
Association High soil penetration resistance did not impact mid-crop development.
Association Low soil temperature affected late corn growth as temperatures decreased.
Recommendation The authors regard short-term NTS sowing as feasible in Mollisol regions.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microgreen yield did not decrease under the intermittent lighting schedule.

Taxon: microgreenst0
Treatment: Intermittent LED lightingt0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: does not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“At the same time, the yield does not decrease.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–444

t0
“Intermittent LED lighting helps reduce energy costs when growing microgreens on vertical controlled environment farms”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–117

Title

Intermittent LED lighting helps reduce energy costs when growing microgreens on vertical controlled environment farms

D A Filatov; A A Vetchinnikov; S I Olonina; et al. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 2022. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/979/1/012096

Other claims from this paper (2)

Observation An 8/4-hour light/dark schedule for two periods was cost-effective for microgreen production.
Intervention effect Intermittent lighting reduced electricity costs by up to 10%.

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Each additional degree of future summer warming could decrease corn yield by 13 %.

Taxon: cornZea mays subsp. mayse0
Treatment: future warming during summer monthse0
Outcome: yieldse0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 13 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“of future warming during summer months, corn and soybean yields could potentially decrease by 13 % and 16%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–907

Title

Impacts of recent climate change on Wisconsin corn and soybean yield trends

Christopher J Kucharik; Shawn P Serbin Environmental Research Letters 2008. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/3/3/034003

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Each additional degree of future summer warming could decrease soybean yield by 16%.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment: future warming during summer monthse0
Outcome: yieldse0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 16%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“of future warming during summer months, corn and soybean yields could potentially decrease by 13 % and 16%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–907

Title

Impacts of recent climate change on Wisconsin corn and soybean yield trends

Christopher J Kucharik; Shawn P Serbin Environmental Research Letters 2008. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/3/3/034003

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea intercropping limited the weed-related maize yield decrease to 16%.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: intercropping with cowpeae0
Interactor: cowpeaVigna unguiculatae0other
Outcome: 16% decreasee0
Direction: reducede0
Value: 16%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“intercropping with cowpea reduced this to only a 16% decrease”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1031

t0
“maize ( Zea mays )”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–91

Title

Effect of cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata ) intercropping on weed biomass and maize ( Zea mays ) yield

K Jamshidi; A R Yousefi; M Oveisi New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 2013. doi:10.1080/01140671.2013.807853

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Increasing maize density reduced weed biomass by 21.5%.
Intervention effect Cowpea mulch reduced weed biomass by up to 45.5% at the lower maize density.
Intervention effect Cowpea mulch reduced weed biomass by 39.6% at the higher maize density.
Intervention effect Higher maize density raised weed-free grain yield from 8.92 to 9.40 t/ha.
Intervention effect Cowpea increased maize yield by about 4.2% under weed-free conditions.
Intervention effect Weed infestation decreased maize grain yield by up to 32%.
Intervention effect Sowing date did not affect weed-free maize grain yield.
Intervention effect Under weed infestation, maize yield was greater on the second sowing date.
Recommendation The authors recommend dense maize planting simultaneous with cowpea intercropping for weed suppression.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal fungi compensated grain yield decrease by 29%.

Taxon: SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment: applying mycorrhizal fungie0
Interactor: mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome: grain yield decreasee0
Direction: compensatede0
Value: 29%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Results showed that seed yield reduced the by 42% under weedy conditions and applying mycorrhizal fungi compensated the grain yield decrease by 29%.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–825

t0
“Sunflower”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–124

Title

Interaction Effect of Arbuscular Mycorrhiza and Redroot Pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) on Growth and Yield of Sunflower under Water Stress Conditions

Karami, Meysam; Kazemeini, Seyed Abdolreza; Zarei, Mehdi; et al. Journal of Crop production and processing 2020. doi:10.47176/jcpp.9.4.202711

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Weeds reduced sunflower seed yield by 42%.
Intervention effect Weeds reduced seed yield reductions by 35.
Intervention effect Weeds reduced seed yield reductions by 52%.
Intervention effect Mycorrhizal fungi compensated grain yield loss by 4.
Intervention effect Mycorrhizal fungi compensated grain yield loss by 51%.
Intervention effect Weeds reduced oil yield by 57.
Intervention effect Weeds reduced biological yield by 36.
Intervention effect Weeds reduced harvest index by 25%.
Intervention effect Mycorrhizal fungi compensated oil yield by 63.
Intervention effect Mycorrhizal fungi compensated biological yield by 25.
Intervention effect Mycorrhizal fungi compensated harvest index by 20%.
Recommendation Mycorrhiza may improve sunflower growth and yield under water stress and weeds.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Industrial tomato yield did not decrease at salinity up to 2.6 dS m(-1).

Taxon: industrial tomatoese0
Treatment: salinity up to 2.6 dS m(-1)e0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: without any decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“industrial tomatoes could be grown in salinity up to 2.6 dS m(-1) without any decrease in yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1022

Title

THE EFFECT OF SALINE WATER APPLICATION ON TOMATO FRUIT YIELD AND SOME QUALITY PARAMETERS

Ahmet Turhan Bursa Uludag University - AVESIS 2020

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Salinity above 2.6 dS m(-1) significantly reduced marketable yield.
Intervention effect Salinity above 2.6 dS m(-1) significantly reduced paste yield.
Intervention effect At 6.6 dS m(-1), soluble solids content significantly increased.
Intervention effect At 6.6 dS m(-1), total sugar content significantly increased.
Intervention effect At 4.6 dS m(-1), fruit water content significantly increased.
Intervention effect At 4.6 dS m(-1), lycopene content significantly increased.
Intervention effect Fruit quality values significantly decreased beyond the salinity levels at which they rose.
Association Fruit total acid content increased with salinity.
Recommendation The authors interpreted moderate salinity as improving desirable tomato fruit quality.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics