View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Under scenario A1 mango yield is projected to decrease by 92.53% in future periods.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the yield of mango will decrease by 92.53% - 85.73% in the future periods under scenarios A1 and B1, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1105 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect hypothesis original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Additive dry matter gain from setaria could compensate the yield decrease in DL napiergrass caused by weed competition.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e3 “additive DM gain from setaria could compensate the yield decrease in DL napiergrass and reduce herbicide cost ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1135 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Defoliation in the reproductive stage caused a greater decrease in soybean yield components.
reproductive stage e5 yield components e5 greater decrease e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Soybean yield depends on photosynthesis generated by leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59 e5 “defoliation has a negative effect on all cultivars yield components with greater decrease when it occurs in the reproductive stage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1239 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Intercropped soybean had a 94% decrease in grain yield compared with soybean monoculture.
soybean monoculture e1 Verbatim
e1 “its competitive dominance shaded 80%–90% of incident light for intercropped soybean at canopy closure, leading to a 94% decrease in grain yield compared to soybean monoculture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1030 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Removal of 50% of the head produced the maximum seed yield decrease of 62.2%.
50% removal of the head e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The maximum decrease in seed yield (62.2%) was observed in the treatment of 50% removal of the head. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–889 t0 “Sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–48 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Basal 25% defoliation did not significantly decrease seed yield per plant.
basal 25% defoliation e0 seed yield plant-1 e0 did not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “basal 25% defoliation did not significantly decrease TDM and seed yield plant-1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–840 t0 “mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–107 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Upright leaves tended to decrease grain yield below LAI 3 or 4.
upright leaves e0 low LAI (below 3 or 4) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “At low LAI (below 3 or 4), upright leaves tended to decrease grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–633 e1 “corn ( Zea mays L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–296 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Sinai-1 showed a slight decrease in seed yield per plant under drought.
drought conditions e0 seed yield/plant e0 slight decrease e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Sinai-1 showed a slight decrease in seed yield /plant and seed proline exceed under drought conditions. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–854 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Field N applications tended to decrease cotton yield .
applications of N e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “applications of N increased soil and petiole NO 3 but tended to decrease cotton yield s. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–433 e1 “cotton petioles ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–128 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Removal of panicles with four leaves caused an even more significant decrease in yield .
removal of panicles with four leaves e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “seed maize inbred lines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–38 e0 “an even more significant decrease in yield was determined with treatment removal of panicles with four leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1346 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
_from_India.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Mangifera indica
Glycine max
Helianthus annuus.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Vigna radiata
Zea mays
Gossypium hirsutum