View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Omission of KSZnB did not significantly decrease yield .
omission of KSZnB nutrients e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “there was no significant (p<0.05) decrease in yield due to the omission of KSZnB nutrients ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–924 t0 “tef (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–48 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Nut yield tended to decrease above 220 kg·ha -1 K per year.
annual rate exceeded 220 kg·ha -1 K e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “nut yield tended to decrease when the annual rate exceeded 220 kg·ha -1 K ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–778 t0 “Pistachio ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–107 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Salt resistant hybrids showed no grain yield decrease under salinity.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Yield of Pioneer‐3906 was significantly reduced under salinity because of inhibited kernel setting, whereas the SR hybrids showed no decrease in grain yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–981 t0 “Enhancing maize grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–27 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
LaCl3 irrigation exacerbated the low-temperature decrease in tomato physiology and yield .
lanthanum chloride(LaCl3) e0 Pn,root activity and yield e1 exacerbated the decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Irrigation with ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid(EGTA) or lanthanum chloride(LaCl3) exacerbated the decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–665 e1 “decrease of Pn,root activity and yield of tomato under LNT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–556 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
AB1.0% produced the least decrease in yield .
least decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The highest proline (PRO), with the least decrease in yield , was found in the AB1.0% application, which is 205% more than Ck ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1584 t0 “wheat yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–146 t1 “Compared to the Ck ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1233 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reduced tillage did not decrease sugar beet yield .
reduced tillage systems e0 did not result in either a yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The reduced tillage systems in sugar beet cultivation did not result in either a yield decrease or a worse technological quality of roots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1567–1704 t0 “sugar beets ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–95 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Selection for nematode resistance did not decrease sugar beet root yield .
Selection for resistance to nematode e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Selection for resistance to nematode did not decrease root yield s. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–249 Other claims from this paper (1) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Infection beginning at tillering or grain filling caused no observed yield loss or yield -component decrease .
tillering or grain filling e0 yield loss or decrease in yield components e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “No yield loss or decrease in yield components was observed when infection started at tillering or grain filling ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1507–1618 e1 “Sheath blight (Rhizoctonia solani ) of rice (Oryza sativa ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–57 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Weak light during the seedling period caused a 28.1% decrease in guar bean yield .
seedling period e0 weak light conditions e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Guar Bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–62 e0 “Providing weak light conditions during the seedling period mainly influences the plant shape,causing a 28.1% decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–1011 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Under scenario B1 mango yield is projected to decrease by 85.73% in future periods.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the yield of mango will decrease by 92.53% - 85.73% in the future periods under scenarios A1 and B1, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1105 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Eragrostis teft0
Pistacia vera
Zea mays
Solanum lycopersicum
Triticum aestivum
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Oryza sativa
Rhizoctonia solani_from_India.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Mangifera indica