View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
At 50% ET c, yield did not decrease economically.
TaxonCabernet Sauvignon Grapevine t0 Directionwithout an economic decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “without an economic decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1253 t0 “Cabernet Sauvignon Grapevine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–151 e1 “with 50% ET c ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1281 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The four legume species did not decrease intercropped wheat grain yield .
Treatmentthe four species e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the four species did not decrease intercropped wheat grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1007 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower-third defoliation caused the smallest seed yield decrease relative to control.
Treatmentlower 1/3 defoliation e0 Directionlowest decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the lowest decrease was observed in the lower 1/3 defoliation level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1305 t0 “Safflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–128 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping caused a 2–7% yield decrease in egusi melon.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e2 “Intercropping did not significantly influence bunch yield of plantain but it caused a 2–7 and 20% yield decrease in egusi melon and water melon respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–628 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing plant density to save water may decrease rather than increase wheat yield under water-limited conditions.
Treatmentreducing the density e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “reducing the density of palnts to reduce water use may decrease rather than increase wheat yield under water limited conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1524 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield of Kanto 100 tended to decrease in mixtures.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Mixed Planting of Rice Varieties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–57 e6 “The yield of Koshihikari obviously increased in mixtures and that of Kanto 100 tended to decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1098 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Under optimal nitrogen supply grain yield does not decrease .
Treatmentoptimum nitrogen supply e0 Directiondoes not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Under conditions of optimum nitrogen supply, protein content and yield per unit area increase but grain yield does not decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–966 t0 “small grains ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–106 t1 “small grains ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–106 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Bale storage did not decrease Cistus oil yield .
Directiondoes not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The storage of mechanically harvested Cistus ladanifer does not decrease the oil yield of steam distillation on a pilot scale. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1029 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Groundnut tested with the pathogen alone showed a 57% decrease in yield .
Treatmentpathogen alone e0 Interactorpathogen e0 pathogen Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t1 “groundnut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–130 e0 “when the pathogen alone was testeds 57% decrease in yield was recorded ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1038 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit did not decrease maximum quantum yield of PSII.
Outcomemaximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm) e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “WD did not decrease the maximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1081 t0 “Styrax camporum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–91 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.