View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Helianthus annuus ✕
Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Halving insect visits caused little decrease in sunflower yield .
Treatmentinsect visits were reduced by 50% e0 Directionlittle decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “little decrease in yield when insect visits were reduced by 50% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–693 e1 “in sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–220 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Halving insect visits caused little sunflower yield decrease .
Treatmentinsect visits were reduced by 50% e0 Directionlittle decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “little decrease in yield when insect visits were reduced by 50% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–695 t0 “in sunflower, combining a gradient in insect pollination ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–264 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Removal of 50% of the head produced the maximum seed yield decrease of 62.2%.
Treatment50% removal of the head e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The maximum decrease in seed yield (62.2%) was observed in the treatment of 50% removal of the head. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–889 t0 “Sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–48 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal fungi compensated grain yield decrease by 29%.
Treatmentapplying mycorrhizal fungi e0 Interactormycorrhizal fungi e0 symbiont Outcomegrain yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Results showed that seed yield reduced the by 42% under weedy conditions and applying mycorrhizal fungi compensated the grain yield decrease by 29%. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–825 t0 “Sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–124 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing N application above 60 kg N ha-1 can decrease achenes yield .
Treatmentincrease in N application above 60 kg N ha −1 e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–103 e1 “The increase in N application above 60 kg N ha −1 can decrease achenes yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1053 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
R453 grain yield tended to decrease with increased soil nitrogen.
Treatmentnitrogen availability was increased e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “R453 genotype did not show significant differences under varying nitrogen availability and exhibited a tendency to decrease grain yield when nitrogen availability was increased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1513–1689 t0 “Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–120 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The 25-30 mm lower water reserve under antierosive tillage did not decrease the yield of sunflower hybrid Zaporozhskiy 9.
Treatmentantierosive tillage e1 Directiondid not decrease e2 Comparatorconventional plowing e1 Verbatim
e1 “after antierosive tillage, the black steppe soil accumulates less water reserve than after conventional plowing ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–425 e2 “the difference which amounted to 25-30 mm, did not decrease the yield of the sunflower hybrid Zaporozhskiy 9 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–544 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Boron applied at R1-R2 at 1.5 l/ha produced the smallest yield decrease , nearly the Check level.
Treatmentboron was applied in the R1-R2 phase at a rate of 1.5 l/ha e0 Directionsmallest decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The smallest decrease was observed when boron was applied in the R1-R2 phase at a rate of 1.5 l/ha, where the yield remained almost at the Check level. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–750 t0 “Sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–67 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At 75 and 150 mM NaCl, XF-4619 shoot dry matter yield decrease d by 13% and 50% relative to the control.
Treatment75 and 150 mM NaCl e2 Outcomeshoot dry matter yield e2 Verbatim
e1 “Sunflower growth deceased drastically with increasing concentration of NaCl in root medium ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–600 e2 “XF-4619 exhibited 14 and 53% decrease in shoot fresh weight, 11 and 35% decrease in root fresh weight, 6 and 34% decrease in stem length, 12 and 34% decrease in stem diameter, 10 and 40% decrease in leaf area, 2 and 31% decrease in root dry matter and 13 and 50% decrease in shoot dry matter yield at 75 and 150 mM NaCl, respectively, as compared with the control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–1161 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Other source and sink removal treatments under optimal irrigation decrease d seed yield .
Treatmentother treatments e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “but other treatments caused a decrease in seed yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–788 t0 “Sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–48 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.