Search claims · PlantClaims

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate formulation did not interact with yield decrease.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment: formulatione0
Outcome: formulation interaction with yield decreasee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“There was not found any formulation interaction with yield decrease.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1313

e1
“glyphosate-tolerant soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–659

Title

Glyphosate Tolerant Soybean Response to Different Management Systems

Alfredo J. P. Albrecht; Leandro P. Albrecht; Arthur A. M. Barroso; et al. Journal of Agricultural Science 2017. doi:10.5539/jas.v10n1p204

Other claims from this paper (1)

Intervention effect Post-emergent glyphosate was associated with a season-dependent 5% soybean yield reduction without visible symptoms.

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hercules close relatives had no significant decrease in oat grain yield.

Taxon: oatAvena sativae1
Material: Herculese0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: no significant decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“The cultivar Hercules enhanced the test weight of its close relatives, with no significant decrease in grain yield.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1346

e1
“oat ( Avena saliva L.) genotypes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–262

Title

Prediction of Genotype Performance from Ancestral Relationship in Oat

S. C. Beer; E. Souza; M. E. Sorrells Crop Science 1995. doi:10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183x003500010012x

Other claims from this paper (9)

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

There was no evidence for a decrease in yield caused by root-zone warming.

Taxon: Rosee0
Treatment: RZWe1
Outcome: yielde1
Direction: decreasee1

Verbatim

e0
“Rose cvs Ilona, Mercedes and Sonia”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7–41

e1
“There was no evidence for a decrease in yield caused by RZW”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1599

Title

The effects of root-zone warming on the yield and quality of roses grown in a hydroponic system

G. I. Moss Journal of Horticultural Science 1984. doi:10.1080/00221589.1984.11515231

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Root-zone warming gave Sonia 44% more blooms than ambient root temperature in Experiment 1.
Intervention effect Root-zone warming increased stem length of Sonia by 26% compared with ambient root temperature in Experiment 1.
Association Ilona gave a yield response to root-zone warming only at a night temperature of 12°C.
Association Root-zone warming resulted in 22% longer stems in Ilona.
Association Root-zone warming gave Mercedes 22% more blooms.
Association Root-zone warming produced 113% more blooms in Mercedes in the second year.
Association Root-zone warming produced 61% more blooms in Sonia in the second year.
Association Root-zone warming produced 42% more blooms in Ilona in the second year.
Observation Stem lengths of the roses increased by 6-7%.
Association Root-zone warming gave Mercedes 61% more blooms in the first-year plants of Experiment 3.
Association Root-zone warming gave Sonia 24% more blooms in the first-year plants of Experiment 3.
Association Root-zone warming gave Ilona 18% more blooms in the first-year plants of Experiment 3.
Association Ilona showed the largest increase in stem length, 24%, under root-zone warming.
Association Root-zone warming increased the amplitude of the growth flushes.
Association Root-zone warming left the frequency of growth flushes unaffected.
Association Summer yields indicate residual effects of the winter root-zone warming treatments.
Association Sonia gave significantly higher yields from root-zone warming in Experiment 1.
Association Mercedes and Sonia gave significantly higher yields from root-zone warming in Experiment 2.
Association Ilona gave a lower summer yield in Experiment 3.

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root hairs did not decrease barley yield under optimal conditions.

Taxon: barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Organ / stage: root hairse0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: did not decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“the presence of root hairs did not decrease yield under optimal conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1594

e1
“Root hairs did not confer a notable advantage to barley”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1259

Title

Significance of root hairs for plant performance under contrasting field conditions and water deficit

M Marin; D S Feeney; L K Brown; et al. Annals of Botany 2020. doi:10.1093/aob/mcaa181

Other claims from this paper (8)

Associationobservedreview summaryno effectbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Increased IVDMD generally does not decrease forage yield.

Taxon: Foraget0
Treatment: increased IVDMDe6
Outcome: forage yielde6
Direction: no_changeinferrede6

Verbatim

e6
“Because increased IVDMD generally does not decrease forage yield per se”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1278

t0
“Breeding for Increased Forage Nutritional Value”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–79

Title

Accomplishments and Impact from Breeding for Increased Forage Nutritional Value

M. D. Casler; K. P. Vogel Crop Science 1999. doi:10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183x003900010003x

Other claims from this paper (8)

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three perennial crops did not show a corresponding yield decrease with declining precipitation.

Taxon: mimosaMimosat0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: no corresponding decreasee0
Setting: precipitatione0

Verbatim

e0
“Yields of maize, cotton and soybean decreased sharply with decreasing precipitation, but there was no corresponding decrease in yield of the three perennial biomass crops”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1360

t0
“mimosa”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46

Title

Long‐term biomass yields of giant reed, mimosa and switchgrass in Alabama

Huang Ping; David I. Bransby; Edzard van Santen Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining 2013. doi:10.1002/bbb.1437

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observation Mimosa averaged 40.1 kg ha –1 annually over 16 years.
Observation Giant reed averaged 35.5 kg ha –1 annually over 11 years.
Observation Switchgrass averaged 23.5 kg ha –1 annually over 22 years.
Observation Mimosa accumulated an estimated 388 kg ha –1 of aboveground N annually.
Observation Giant reed accumulated an estimated 372 kg ha –1 of aboveground N annually.
Observation Switchgrass accumulated an estimated 163 kg ha –1 of aboveground N annually.
Association Maize, cotton and soybean yields dropped sharply as precipitation declined.
Association Biomass crop yields changed relatively little with age.
Observation Topsoil analysis suggested less P, K, Ca and Mg removal than biomass removal estimates.

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod yield under well-watered conditions did not decrease under high-temperature conditions.

Taxon: GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment: high‐temperature conditionse3
Outcome: Pod yield under well‐watered (WW) conditionse3
Direction: did not decreasee3

Verbatim

t0
“Assessment of Groundnut under Combined Heat and Drought Stress”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62

e3
“Pod yield under well‐watered (WW) conditions did not decrease under high‐temperature conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1293

Title

Assessment of Groundnut under Combined Heat and Drought Stress

F. Hamidou; O. Halilou; V. Vadez Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 2012. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037x.2012.00518.x

Other claims from this paper (10)

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased corn yield did not decrease drainage nitrate exports.

Taxon: CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
Outcome: drainage nitrate exportse0
Direction: no_changeinferrede0
Comparator: Increased corn yieldse0

Verbatim

e0
“Increased corn yields did not result in a decrease in drainage nitrate exports”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–234

t0
“Corn”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4

Title

Corn Yield Increase Under Constant Fertilizer Did Not Reduce Nitrate Export

Chelsea Connair Clifford; Emily R. Waring; Carl H. Pederson; et al. Journal of the ASABE 2023. doi:10.13031/ja.15538

Other claims from this paper (5)

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean yield did not decrease with the warming treatments in the analysis.

Taxon: Soye4
Treatment: increasing warming treatmentse4
Outcome: yielde4
Direction: did not decreasee4

Verbatim

e4
“Soy yield did not decrease with increasing warming treatments in this analysis, but experimental warming treatments did not exceed optimal soy growth temperature ranges”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1163

Title

Rising temperatures can negate CO2 fertilization effects on global staple crop yields: A meta-regression analysis

Chunwu Zhu; Julie Wolf; Jishuang Zhang; et al. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 2023. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109737

Other claims from this paper (9)

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T4 did not significantly decrease fresh yield of Chinese cabbage.

Taxon: Chinese cabbageBrassica rapa subsp. pekinensise4
Treatment: T4 (MSFLI30)e4
Outcome: fresh yielde4
Direction: without a significant decreasee4

Verbatim

e4
“However, it was clearly noted that T4 (MSFLI30) treatment could save water and nitrogen without a significant decrease in fresh yield of Chinese cabbage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–959

Title

Response of Fertigation Under Buried Straw Layer on Growth, Yield, and Water-fertilizer Productivity of Chinese Cabbage Under Greenhouse Conditions

Ghulam Rasool; Guo Xiangping; Wang Zhenchang; et al. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2019. doi:10.1080/00103624.2019.1603306

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Treatment T5 gave higher yield than all other treatments of Chinese cabbage.
Intervention effect Treatment T5 used more water and fertilizer than all other treatments of Chinese cabbage.
Intervention effect Treatments T2 and T4 saved 33% of fertilizer compared with T5.
Intervention effect Treatments T2 and T4 decreased yield by 5–10% compared with T5.
Intervention effect Treatment T4 gave the highest water and fertilizer use efficiencies of all treatments.
Association Treatment T4 could save water and nitrogen in Chinese cabbage.
Recommendation T4 (MsFLI30) is the recommended strategy to manage water and nitrogen fertilizer for leafy cabbage.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics