View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association author interpretation original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Rainfall variability and rising temperatures explain the projected maize yield decrease at Bako and Melkassa
Treatmentrainfall variability and rising temperatures e3 SettingBako and Melkassa e3 Verbatim
e0 “maize yield s will decrease by up to 43 and 24% by the end of the century at Bako and Melkassa stations ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1063 e3 “rainfall variability and rising temperatures are determining factors explaining yield decrease in Bako and Melkassa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1275 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Heavy premature heading could decrease yield by 12-14%.
TaxonRice Peiliangyou Teqing t0 Organ / stagepremature heading e0 Verbatim
e0 “Heavy premature heading could cause reduced spikelet number per panicle and 1000-grain weight,and decrease the yield by a margin of 12-14% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–695 t0 “Rice Peiliangyou Teqing ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–96 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Tolerant varieties had a lesser yield decrease under salt stress.
Materialtolerant varieties e0 Verbatim
e0 “a lesser decrease was observed in tolerant varieties. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1320 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed review summary negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Mite damage was shown to decrease cassava root yield by up to 87%.
Outcomeroot and stake yield e1 Verbatim
t0 “The cassava mites ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–17 e1 “These arthropods cause three patterns of damage and have been shown to cause a decrease in root and stake yield of up to 87% and 82% respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–333 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed review summary negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Mite damage was shown to decrease cassava stake yield by up to 82%.
Outcomeroot and stake yield e1 Verbatim
t0 “The cassava mites ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–17 e1 “These arthropods cause three patterns of damage and have been shown to cause a decrease in root and stake yield of up to 87% and 82% respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–333 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Fruit yield tended to decrease as budding height increased.
Treatmentbudding height e2 Verbatim
e0 “orange ( Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–228 e1 “Fruit yield was highest from trees budded at 15 cm height above the ground ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–359 e2 “tended to decrease as budding height increased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–410 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Eight alleles favored yield increase and ASI decrease together.
Verbatim
e0 “Eight alleles were selected for their favourable concurrent effect on yield increase and ASI decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1306 t0 “maize inbred lines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–56 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
A 0.5℃ increase produced a maximum simulated yield decrease of 13.37%, averaging 7.31%.
TreatmentLight increased 0.5℃ e0 Qualifieraverage reduction of 7.31% e0 Verbatim
e0 “Light increased 0.5℃,the highest yield decrease range reached 13.37%,with average reduction of 7.31% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1133 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–25 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Additive genetic variance did not decrease with recurrent selection for grain yield in BS13.
Treatmentrecurrent selection for grain yield e1 Outcomeadditive genetic variance e1 Directiondid not decrease e1 Verbatim
t0 “Synthetic Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–80 e1 “Estimates of additive genetic variance did not decrease with recurrent selection for grain yield in BS13 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1753–1857 Other claims from this paper (16) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease with emergence date followed a quadratic or linear trend in each growing season.
Treatmentemergence date e7 Verbatim
e0 “seedling emergence uniformity in corn (Zea mays L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–63 e7 “Yield decrease as a function of emergence date followed either a quadratic or linear trend in each growing season ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1774–1887 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.