View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decrease at the tillering stage is mainly caused by a decrease in biological yield .
tillering stage e4 decrease in the yield of the rice e4 decrease in its biological yield e4 Verbatim
e4 “The decrease in the yield of the rice at tillering stage is maily caused by the decrease in its biological yield while that at ear primordial stage is due to the decrease in its harvest index(HI) ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 576–773 Other claims from this paper (5) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decrease at the ear primordial stage is due to a decrease in harvest index.
ear primordial stage e4 decrease in the yield of the rice e4 decrease in its harvest index(HI) e4 Verbatim
e4 “The decrease in the yield of the rice at tillering stage is maily caused by the decrease in its biological yield while that at ear primordial stage is due to the decrease in its harvest index(HI) ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 576–773 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Late-rice yield tended to decrease with time compared with early-rice yield .
early-rice yield e0 Not reported Treatment
Verbatim
t0 “Rice Field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 e0 “late-rice yield tended to decrease , compared with early-rice yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–440 Other claims from this paper (8) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in growth ultimately caused a decrease in wheat yield .
This decrease in growth e5 Verbatim
t0 “Wheat Germplasm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–29 e5 “This decrease in growth ultimately caused a decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–735 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Wheat yield is projected to decrease across locations.
Verbatim
e0 “wheat yield would decrease across locations. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1291 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Cultivars with the largest yield had the largest yield decrease from waterlogging.
Cultivars with the largest yield e0 largest decrease e0 Verbatim
t0 “UK wheat cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–48 e0 “Cultivars with the largest yield suffered the largest decrease due to waterlogging ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1176 Other claims from this paper (10) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in kernels per ear largely caused the decrease in maize grain yield .
decrease in grain yield e4 largely caused by the decrease in kernels per ear e4 Verbatim
t0 “Differential responses of maize yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–37 e4 “The decrease in grain yield was largely caused by the decrease in kernels per ear (r2 = 0.88, P < 0.001) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1013 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource author interpretation original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Isareg was judged appropriate for estimating grain yield decrease .
appropriate to estimate the grain yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “The Isareg model is appropriate to estimate the grain yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1028 t0 “WATER DEFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE GRAIN YIELD DECREASE IN THE CATARINENSE FAR WEST ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
The Isareg model estimated average maize grain yield decrease of 25.1%.
Verbatim
e0 “The model estimated an average grain yield decrease of 25.1%. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–755 t0 “WATER DEFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE GRAIN YIELD DECREASE IN THE CATARINENSE FAR WEST ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A 58% population decrease caused only a 12% soybean yield decrease .
58% population decrease e0 164 000 plants ha −l e0 Verbatim
e0 “A 58% population decrease from 164 000 plants ha −l resulted in a yield decrease of only 12% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–972 e1 “Soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Glyphosate formulation did not interact with yield decrease .
formulation interaction with yield decrease e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “There was not found any formulation interaction with yield decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1313 e1 “glyphosate-tolerant soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–659 Other claims from this paper (1) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in redistributed seed N correlated strongly with increased yield .
Verbatim
t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–117 e0 “this decrease strongly correlated with increased yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1218 Other claims from this paper (7)
not stated 583 Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
KCl tended to decrease yield in all cultivars.
Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In KCl treatment yield tended to decrease in all cultivars. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1030 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield tended to decrease with later planting dates.
later planting dates e0 Not reported Taxon Setting
Verbatim
e0 “yield tended to decrease with later planting dates ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–63 t0 “Short Staple Planting Dates ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–41 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Future grain yield was projected to decrease .
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “the grain yield would decrease in future ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1020 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Excessive sulfur amendment could decrease grain yield .
Excessive S-amendment e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Excessive S-amendment could even induce the decrease of grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2113–2180 t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect RCU and conventional urea did not differ significantly in plant dry matter accumulation. Intervention effect RCU and conventional urea did not differ significantly in grain yield. Intervention effect At 43.2 mg x kg(-1) available soil S, SRCU and SU did not significantly differ in post-anthesis dry matter accumulation and allocation. Intervention effect At 43.2 mg x kg(-1) available soil S, SRCU and SU did not significantly differ in grain yield. Intervention effect At the lower soil S level, SRCU and SU allocated more post-anthesis assimilates to grain than RCU. Intervention effect At the lower soil S level, SRCU and SU had a higher mid-stage grain-filling rate than RCU. Intervention effect At the lower soil S level, SRCU and SU had higher 1000-grain weight than RCU. Intervention effect At the lower soil S level, SRCU and SU had higher grain yield than RCU. Intervention effect At the higher soil S level, SRCU yield exceeded SU yield. Intervention effect At the higher soil S level, SRCU yield did not significantly differ from RCU and U. Intervention effect The authors interpreted nitrogen release from SRCU as regulating dry matter and yield like split-applied conventional urea. Intervention effect At 43.2 mg x kg(-1) soil S, released sulfur promoted post-anthesis dry matter accumulation. Intervention effect At 43.2 mg x kg(-1) soil S, released sulfur promoted grain filling. Intervention effect At 43.2 mg x kg(-1) soil S, released sulfur significantly increased grain yield. Intervention effect At 105.1 mg x kg(-1) soil S, sulfur released from SRCU did not significantly increase grain yield. Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each additional sandstorm hour during the winter wheat growing season corresponded to a 1.4% yield decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “Each additional hour of sandstorm during the winter wheat growing season corresponds to a 1.4% decrease in yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–728 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Winter wheat yield did not decrease with cover crops.
did not decrease e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e5 “Cover crops significantly increased vegetable crop yield s and decrease d the silage corn yield ; however, grain corn, soybean, and winter wheat yield did not decrease with CC ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1185 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Cluster pruning did not decrease total yield across cultivars.
unpruned control e0 Verbatim
e0 “There was no decrease in total yield , across all cultivars, between treatments and the unpruned control. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1976–2080 t0 “Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing substrate volume per plant by one third did not considerably decrease tomato yield .
Reduction of substrate volume per plant by 1/3 e0 without considerable yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Reduction of substrate volume per plant by 1/3 without considerable yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–82 t0 “TOMATO YIELD ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 Other claims from this paper (2) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Neang Tamm had minimal yield decrease at high temperature.
Verbatim
e0 “yield decrease under high temperature condition was minimal ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1096 t0 “Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 t1 “Although the local genotype, Neang Tamm, had lower yield under optimal conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–928 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
cotton yield decrease decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “For cotton, a rising water table from 2–3 m to 1–2 m and less than 1 m gave a yield decrease of about 11 and 60% respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–943 e1 “Fordwah Eastern Sadiqia South (FESS) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–207 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
cotton yield decrease decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “For cotton, a rising water table from 2–3 m to 1–2 m and less than 1 m gave a yield decrease of about 11 and 60% respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–943 e1 “Fordwah Eastern Sadiqia South (FESS) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–207 Other claims from this paper (14) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Seed cotton yield tended to decrease as weed density increased.
Goosegrass t1 weed Seed cotton yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “Seed cotton yield tended to decrease with the increase in weed density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–449 t0 “cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 t1 “Goosegrass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Early ethephon application caused less yield decrease than later application.
Early application e0 less yield decrease e0 later timings e0 Verbatim
e0 “Early application showed less yield decrease than later timings. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1185 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–51 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Larger fertilizer applications can decrease plant yield in seasons of poor rainfall.
larger applications e0 seasons of poor rainfall e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “larger applications can even decrease the plant yield in seasons of poor rainfall ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2217–2298 e1 “corn acreage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2044–2056 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In 2023 there was a decrease in yield compared with near-normal precipitation in 2021.
Verbatim
e1 “there was a decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1322 t0 “corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–39 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Captafol did not decrease potato yield .
did not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The most effective chemical was captafol, which was as effective as quintozene and, unlike quintozene, did not decrease yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–692 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The average yield decrease rate was -13.9% in the 1980s.
average yield decrease rate e0 Verbatim
e0 “The average yield decrease rate in the 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s was -13.9%, -15.4%, -9.1%, and -7.3%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1340 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The average yield decrease rate was -15.4% in the 1990s.
average yield decrease rate e0 Verbatim
e0 “The average yield decrease rate in the 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s was -13.9%, -15.4%, -9.1%, and -7.3%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1340 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 Other claims from this paper (14) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Oryza sativae4
Triticum aestivum
Zea mays
Glycine max
Solanum lycopersicum
Gossypium hirsutum
Zea mays subsp. mays
Solanum tuberosum