View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing phosphorus application lightened the yield decrease to some degree.
Treatmentincreasing the amount of phosphorus application e1 Qualifierto some degree e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Rice Yield Decrease Resulting from Continual Direct Sowing Culture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–91 e1 “This yield decrease could be lightened to some degree by increasing the amount of phosphorus application ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2274–2378 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield increase in Koshihikari could abundantly compensate for the yield decrease in Kanto 100 in mixed stands.
Outcomeyield decrease in Kanto 100 e7 Qualifiercould abundantly compensate e7 Verbatim
t0 “Mixed Planting of Rice Varieties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–57 e7 “the yield increase in Koshihikari could abundantly compensate for the yield decrease in Kanto 100 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1206 Other claims from this paper (13) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Each approximately 1% decrease in chalkiness accompanied approximately 1% greater head rice yield .
Verbatim
e0 “for every ∼1% decrease in chalkiness, an increase of ∼1% in head rice yield follows ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–499 t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–57 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Wheat plants did not show a yield decrease after pathogen inoculation.
Treatmentpathogen inoculation e0 Directiondon’t show a yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “in Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–126 e0 “the plants don’t show a yield decrease after pathogen inoculation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1504 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
In simulation, a 5 C decrease in maximum temperature enhanced yield by up to 19.2%.
Treatmenta −5°C decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Wheat Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 e0 “a −5°C decrease enhanced yield s by up to 19.2% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1085 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
In the model, a seasonal temperature decrease of up to 3 oC enhanced wheat yield by 12-16 per cent.
Treatmentdecrease in seasonal temperature up to 3oC e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “wheat yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–73 e0 “with decrease in seasonal temperature up to 3oC, the yield enhancement by 12-16 per cent was observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–798 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Salt resistant hybrids showed no grain yield decrease under salinity.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Yield of Pioneer‐3906 was significantly reduced under salinity because of inhibited kernel setting, whereas the SR hybrids showed no decrease in grain yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–981 t0 “Enhancing maize grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–27 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Nongda 108 maize yield did not decrease under recommended nicosulfuron.
Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the yield of the sensitive maize variety (Ditian 8) decrease d by 37.09%, whereas that of the resistant maize variety (Nongda 108) did not decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1170 t0 “nicosulfuron ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–93 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Eight alleles favored yield increase and ASI decrease together.
Verbatim
e0 “Eight alleles were selected for their favourable concurrent effect on yield increase and ASI decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1306 t0 “maize inbred lines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–56 Other claims from this paper (8)
not stated 171 Observation observed original result positive projected Claim · model-written summary
Probability of a yield decrease declined from 1.5 to 2.0 °C warming.
Outcomeprobability of a crop yield decrease e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “the probability of a crop yield decrease would decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2124–2179 Other claims from this paper (15) Recommendation author interpretation review summary positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Maintaining proper soil moisture, efficient drainage, minimizing or delaying nitrogen application and using growth regulators like CCC are effective in minimizing yield decrease due to lodging.
Outcomedecrease in yield due to lodging e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “maintaining proper soil moisture, efficient drainage, minimizing or delaying nitrogen application, and use of growth regulators like CCC are effective towards minimizing the decrease in yield due to lodging ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1096 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Water saved at 75% ETc could offset the yield decrease on an additional 0.33 ha.
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “The amount of water saved from 75% ETc could compensate the decrease in crop yield on additional 0.33 ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1220 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in redistributed seed N correlated strongly with increased yield .
Verbatim
t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–117 e0 “this decrease strongly correlated with increased yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1218 Other claims from this paper (7) Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors infer that managing the identified factors could decrease the soybean yield gap.
Outcomedecrease the yield gap e0 Verbatim
e0 “managing magnitude of these variables will decrease the yield gap in soybean crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–932 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Planting a portfolio of soybean varieties can decrease soybean yield variability in Arkansas.
Treatmentplanting a portfolio of soybean varieties e1 Outcomeyield variability e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “The results showed that there are significant advantages in planting a portfolio of soybean varieties that can enhance profits and decrease yield variability for soybean producers in Arkansas ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–843 Other claims from this paper (1) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Neang Tamm had minimal yield decrease at high temperature.
Verbatim
e0 “yield decrease under high temperature condition was minimal ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1096 t0 “Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 t1 “Although the local genotype, Neang Tamm, had lower yield under optimal conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–928 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Tomato yield improved with a proper decrease of fertilization amount compared with the local conventional amount.
Treatmentproper decrease of fertilization amount e3 Comparatorlocal conventional fertilization amount e3 Verbatim
e3 “the tomato yield was improved with the proper decrease of fertilization amount compared with the local conventional fertilization amount ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–733 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
T 1 produced higher water use efficiency without a significant decrease in yield parameters.
Outcomewater use efficiency ( WUE ) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “T 1 produced higher water use efficiency ( WUE ) with no significant decrease in yield parameters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1178 t0 “Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–35 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Captafol did not decrease potato yield .
Directiondid not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The most effective chemical was captafol, which was as effective as quintozene and, unlike quintozene, did not decrease yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–692 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Greater dry root mass was associated with a smaller decrease in tuber yield under drought.
Outcomedecrease in yield e0 Verbatim
t0 “potato cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–60 e0 “then the dry root mass with the decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1276 e1 “the higher the value of the parameter, the smaller the observed decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1393 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Japanese knotweed mulch reduced the decrease in potato yield under continuous potato cultivation.
TreatmentJapanese knotweed mulching e0 Outcomepotato yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the extent of the potato yield decrease was reduced by Japanese knotweed mulching ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1254 Other claims from this paper (2) Association author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil moisture deficit can decrease the impact of ozone on cotton yield .
Treatmentsoil moisture deficit e5 Outcomeimpact of O 3 on cotton yield e5 Verbatim
t0 “Injury and Yield Response of Cotton to Chronic Doses of Ozone and Soil Moisture Deficit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87 e5 “Results indicate that soil moisture deficit can decrease the impact of O 3 on cotton yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1238 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
BN 2 spraying tended to decrease Micronaire.
TreatmentBN-2 Regulator t0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Micronaire tends to decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–473 t0 “BN-2 Regulator on Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–34 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Colored varieties had 1.0 percent to 10.9 percent less yield decrease than white cotton.
Materialnaturally colored cotton varieties e0 Value1.0 percent to 10.9 percent e0 Verbatim
e0 “two naturally colored cotton varieties lose less bolls of 4.1 percent to 7.0 percent, yield decrease lower 1.0 percent to 10.9 percent and growing days shorten 3 d to 4 d than white one ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1206 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result positive projected Claim · model-written summary
Future drought losses around flowering decrease to about 9% of water-limited yield .
Outcomelosses from drought e0 Valueabout 9% of water limited yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “losses from drought around flowering will decrease and account for about 9% of water limited yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–478 t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–47 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Rosynka had the smallest decrease in yield under deteriorating moisture conditions.
Outcomedecrease in yield e4 Qualifierdue to deterioration of moisture conditions e4 Verbatim
e0 “the study and analysis of drought resistance of winter wheat varieties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–102 e1 “According to seven indices, the Rosynka variety stood out ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3063–3120 e4 “which was characterized by the smallest decrease in yield due to deterioration of moisture conditions, but also had low productivity under both conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3122–3276 Other claims from this paper (17) Observation Maria and Shchedrist Odeska significantly exceeded the average variety in productivity under irrigation, with yields of 7.41–7.53 t/ha. Observation Lyra Odeska significantly exceeded the average variety in productivity in stressful conditions (Ys), at 6, 25 t/ha. Observation Shchedrist Odeska reached 6.12 t/ha in stressful conditions (Ys). Observation Lyra Odeska was singled out as the most drought-resistant variety by 12 drought-resistance indices. Observation Shchedrist Odeska was distinguished by eight drought-resistance indices. Observation Rosynka was distinguished by seven drought-resistance indices. Association Yield under both moisture conditions correlated highly and positively with indices MP, YI, STI, GMP, M1STI, M2STI, MSTI and HMP (r = 0.832–1.000). Association Yield under irrigation correlated highly and positively with the TOL and SSPI indices (r = 0.715). Association Yield under irrigation correlated averagely and positively with the SSI index (r = 0.542). Association Yield under irrigation correlated averagely and negatively with the YSI, RDI and ISR indices (r = -0.499 to -0.549). Association Productivity under stress showed no dependence on yield under irrigation (r = -0.013 to 0.207). Association Yield under stress correlated highly with the DI index (r = 0.852). Association Yield under stress correlated moderately with yield under irrigation (r = 0.420). Observation In GGE biplot analysis, Lyra Odeska was the most drought-resistant winter wheat variety. Observation In GGE biplot analysis, Kokhana, Askaniyska and Shchedrist Odeska were moderately drought-resistant. Observation In GGE biplot analysis, Maria, Mudrist Odeska and Nyva Odeska were non-drought resistant. Observation Rosynka had low productivity under both moisture conditions. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The spike increase exceeded the kernel decrease and raised overall yield .
Treatmentrate of seeding e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the increase in the number of spikes per hectare was greater than the accompanying decrease in kernels per spike, resulting in a net overall increase in yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–663 t0 “WINTER WHEAT ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 28–40 t1 “RATE AND DATE OF SEEDING ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–34 e1 “Highest net yield s were obtained with rate of seeding 134 kg/ha. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–276 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Early ethephon application caused less yield decrease than later application.
TreatmentEarly application e0 Directionless yield decrease e0 Comparatorlater timings e0 Verbatim
e0 “Early application showed less yield decrease than later timings. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1185 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–51 Other claims from this paper (10) Recommendation hypothesis original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
For high- yield producers, moderate stover harvest may decrease fuel use.
Treatmentmoderate stover harvest e6 Verbatim
e6 “moderate stover harvest may actually decrease fuel use ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1476 t0 “Corn Grain, Stover Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–24 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Subsoiling before cotton did not decrease corn yield the following year.
Treatmentin-row subsoiling conducted prior to the cotton crop e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “in-row subsoiling conducted prior to the cotton crop provided maximum cotton yield s with no decrease in corn yield the following year ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1585 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.