View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Coir-based growing media can be reused for another short-cycle crop such as lettuce without yield loss or phytonutrient decrease .
without yield loss or phytonutrients decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Coir-based growing media can be reused for another short-cycle crop, like lettuce, without yield loss or phytonutrients decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1227 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cadmium application did not significantly decrease lettuce crop yield .
20 kg Cd ha(-1) application e0 did not result in a significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “20 kg Cd ha(-1) application did not result in a significant decrease in crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–511 e1 “lettuce plant and soil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–270 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliar peptide fertilizers caused no fresh shoot yield change or a slight decrease with Zn-peptide.
Zn-peptide treatment e0 fresh shoot yield e0 slight decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “lettuce ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–128 e0 “foliar treatments with peptides-based fertilizers induced no fresh shoot yield variations or a slight decrease in the case of Zn-peptide treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–574 Other claims from this paper (15) Association observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Compaction from light axle loads can both increase and decrease crop yield , depending on soil texture and growing season precipitation.
increase and decrease e1 depending on soil texture and growing season precipitation e1 Verbatim
t1 “The Effect of Soil Compaction on Crop Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–43 e1 “This compaction can both increase and decrease crop yield depending on soil texture and growing season precipitation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–424 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
A similar reduction of plant-available P would decrease crop yield by 8%.
reduction of plant-available P e7 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e7 “a similar reduction of plant-available P would lead to a decrease in crop yield by 8% with an increase in P response efficiency by 83% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1411 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result projected Claim · model-written summary
Yield variability may decrease toward the end of the 21st century.
yield variability e0 towards the end of the 21st century e0 Verbatim
e0 “yield variability will increase during the coming decades, but this may decrease towards the end of the 21st century ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1566–1682 t0 “crop production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–63 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The in vitro decrease matched the decrease in vivo during auxin-induced growth acceleration.
yield threshold obtained in vivo ( Y ) e0 auxin‐induced growth acceleration e0 Verbatim
e0 “to the same extent as the decrease of the yield threshold obtained in vivo ( Y ) with auxin‐induced growth acceleration of hypocotyl segments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–647 t0 “cowpea hypocotyl ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–121 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Heat treatment completely inhibited the acidification-induced decrease in yield threshold.
Heat treatment e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Heat treatment of the glycerinated hollow cylinder completely inhibited the decrease in y with acidification ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–757 t0 “cowpea hypocotyl ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–121 Other claims from this paper (5) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in seed yield under stress was largely due to fewer pods and seeds per pod.
The decrease in seed yield e1 largely due to reductions in pods plant −1 and seeds pod −1 e1 Verbatim
e0 “three cowpea [ Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–189 e1 “The decrease in seed yield was largely due to reductions in pods plant −1 and seeds pod −1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1921–2011 Other claims from this paper (17) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Fomesafen did not injure strawberry or decrease yield .
injure strawberry or decrease yield e2 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “provides PRE weed control in strawberry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–150 e2 “Fomesafen did not injure strawberry or decrease yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–830 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Selection for early yield would cost an 8% decrease in soluble solids, shown by a simulation.
Verbatim
e0 “The University of Florida strawberry ( Fragaria × ananassa ) breeding population ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–80 e1 “at the expense of an 8% decrease in soluble solids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1862–1912 Other claims from this paper (8) Mechanism hypothesis original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in chloride-ion concentration of strawberry plants is presumed to have contributed to the yield increment.
Verbatim
t0 “strawberry (Fragaria ananassa ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–85 e5 “It is presumable, that the decrease in the chloride-ion concentration of plants contributed to the yield increment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1575–1689 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Delayed autumn ploughing did not decrease grain yield .
delayed autumn ploughing e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Because delayed autumn ploughing did not decrease the grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–967 e1 “grain yield of spring barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–656 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Omsky 100 combined high potential yield with minimal yield decrease under adverse cultivation environments.
minimal decrease e0 adverse cultivation environments e0 Verbatim
e0 “combine high potential yield with its minimal decrease in adverse cultivation environments (homeostaticity = 0.4) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–779 e1 “spring barley cultivar ‘Omsky 100’ ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–69 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Mogilev spring barley had a climate-induced yield decrease of 22–33%.
climate-induced e1 Verbatim
e0 “In Mogilev region, this decrease was lower: spring wheat – 17–30 %, spring barley – 22–33 %, oats – 35–36 %. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–732 e1 “most of them were characterized by a climate-induced decrease in their yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–448 Other claims from this paper (13) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Susceptible Line 37-03 had 47.9% grain yield decrease .
Verbatim
t0 “Bread Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–82 e0 “susceptible Line 37-03 recording a 47.9% decrease in grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–871 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Raised bed system moderated, to some extent, the decrease in yield of bread wheat caused by drought stress.
raised bed system e5 decrease in yield due to drought stress e5 to some extent e5 Verbatim
t0 “bread wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–42 e5 “The decrease in yield due to drought stress was moderated to some extent in the raised bed system ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1082 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Selection for early heading may slightly decrease number of spikes per plant and grain yield per plant.
selection for early heading e0 number of spikes per plant and grain yield per plant e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “BREAD WHEAT (Triticum aestivum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–130 e0 “selection for early heading may slightly decrease number of spikes per plant and grain yield per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1054 Other claims from this paper (17) Mechanism observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Reduced pod number accounted for the yield decrease .
decrease in seed yield e0 decrease in number of pods per plant e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in seed yield observed in both experimentsmore » was due to a decrease in number of pods per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1275 t0 “soybeans ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–103 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed review summary basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Breeding for high protein (above 48%) enhances a decrease in oil and yield .
breed for high protein (above 48%) e0 Verbatim
t0 “soybeans ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–42 e0 “To breed for high protein (above 48%) enhances a decrease in oil and yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–908 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Loss of seed treatments would decrease soybean yield through yield losses.
The loss of seed treatments e2 decrease inferred e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e2 “The loss of seed treatments would result in yield losses to both corn and soybeans ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–285 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Se100 tended to decrease yield .
Se100 treatment e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The Se100 treatment had a tendency to decrease bulb size and yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–629 e1 “applied to onion ‘Hercules’ ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–267 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Beyond about 943 mm, onion biomass yield is projected to decrease with additional water application.
additional water application e3 Verbatim
e0 “effect of different irrigation depths on onion (Allium cepa L.) yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–234 e3 “beyond that, the biomass yield will decrease with additional water application ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1220 Other claims from this paper (8) Mechanism author interpretation review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease in onion results from reduced photosynthetic area, producing smaller bulbs of poorer quality (review statement).
due to a reduced photosynthetic area e5 Verbatim
e0 “Onion (Allium cepa L.) is one of the most important vegetable species grown worldwide ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 e5 “Yield decrease occurs due to a reduced photosynthetic area, which leads to the formation of smaller bulbs of poorer quality ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–431 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Varsha had a 13% yield decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “the minimum decrease in yield of 8 and 13% was recorded in BO-1 and Varsha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1241 t0 “okra ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–37 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
BO-1 had an 8% yield decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “the minimum decrease in yield of 8 and 13% was recorded in BO-1 and Varsha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1241 t0 “okra ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–37 Other claims from this paper (12) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The lower water use efficiency under high irrigation frequency resulted mainly from the decrease in fresh fruit yield .
high irrigation frequency e0 water use efficiency e0 decrease in fresh fruit yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “The reduction in water use efficiency under high irrigation frequency as compared to low irrigation frequency resulted primarily from decrease in fresh fruit yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1297 t0 “Okra ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–22 Other claims from this paper (3) Association author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Too high a density and more N fertilizer could decrease yield .
Too bigger density and more N fertilizer rate e1 Verbatim
t0 “Summer Maize Zhuyu 309 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–126 e1 “Too bigger density and more N fertilizer rate could decrease the yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1472 Other claims from this paper (10) Association author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing the effective irrigation rate reversed the decrease in summer maize yield .
effective irrigation rate e6 summer maize yield e6 increase inferred e6 Verbatim
e6 “The increase in the effective irrigation rate can reverse the decrease in the summer maize yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1271 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Straw returning decrease maize ET.
Straw returning e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Straw returning could decrease ET and increase the water use efficiency( WUE) and yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–927 t0 “summer maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–104 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect Straw returning significantly decreased soil evaporation, especially early. Observation Straw returning and water supply significantly affected water consumption, leaf water use efficiency, whole-period water use efficiency and yield. Observation Straw returning and water supply significantly affected photosynthetic parameters. Observation The straw returning and water supply interaction significantly affected photosynthetic parameters with an exception for net photosynthetic rate and yield. Intervention effect Straw returning increase maize water use efficiency( WUE). Intervention effect Straw returning increase maize yield. Association Increasing water supply increased maize Yield. Association Increasing water supply decreased maize WUE. Intervention effect At water supply level 1, straw returning increased maize WUE by 35. 32% relative to non-straw returning. Intervention effect At water supply level 2, straw returning increased maize WUE by 33. 74% relative to non-straw returning. Intervention effect At water supply level 3, straw returning increased maize WUE by 51. 88% relative to non-straw returning. Intervention effect At water supply level 4, straw returning increased maize WUE by 29. 69% relative to non-straw returning. Intervention effect At water supply level 1, straw returning increased maize yield by 7. 61%. Intervention effect At water supply level 2, straw returning increased maize yield by 8. 94%. Intervention effect At water supply level 3, straw returning increased maize yield by 18. 29%. Intervention effect At water supply level 4, straw returning increased maize yield by 6. 96%. Observation Straw returning with 70% field soil water capacity supply performed best jointly for ET, yield and WUE. Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Lactuca sativae0
Vigna unguiculata_single2.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Fragaria.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Hordeum vulgare
Triticum aestivum
Glycine max
Allium cepa.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Abelmoschus esculentus
Zea mays