View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Plant weight and thousand-seed weight variability tended to fall with density in non-determinant lines.
Materialnon-determinant lines e0 Outcomeplant weigh", "weight of 1000 seeds e0 Verbatim
e0 “The variability of the characters as "plant weigh", "weight of 1000 seeds" of non-determinant lines demonstrated the tendency to decrease if coenosis density increased. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–1027 t0 “YELLOW LUPIN ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Lack of weed control reduced seed yield of yellow lupine by 32%.
TreatmentLack of weed control e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Comparison of the competitive ability of legumes against weeds ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62 e1 “Lack of weed control of selected legume plants resulted in a proven decrease in seed yield of: edible pea by 20%, fodder pea by 23%, yellow lupine by 32%, white lupine by 23% and soybean by 77%% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1269 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield and yield contributing characters increased through 60 kg S/ha and declined beyond it.
Treatmentsulphur fertilizer up to 60 kg S/ha e0 Outcomeyield and yield contributing characters e0 Comparatordoses beyond that e0 Verbatim
e0 “The growth parameters, yield and yield contributing characters were increased with the increasing levels of sulphur fertilizer up to 60 kg S/ha and with the doses beyond that were found to decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–660 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Tillage with the combination equipment gave mean weight diameter of 2.50 mm, below the 2.83 mm before tillage.
TaxonYield of Sunflower t1 Treatmentcombination equipment e4 Outcomemean weight diameter e3 Directiondecrease inferred e3 Comparatorbefore tillage e3 Verbatim
e3 “While the mean weight diameter, which shows the durability of aggregates to water, was 2.83 mm before tillage, it was 3.96 mm in tillage with DH ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–823 e4 “1.80 mm in tillage with FC and 2.50 mm in tillage with combination equipment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–901 t1 “Yield of Sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–88 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield first rose and then declined as planting density increased.
Treatmentplanting density e0 Qualifierthen the yield started to decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “At the beginning,the yield increased along with the increment of planting density,the highest yield was 1 255.6 kg/hm2 when the density was 1.2×105 plants/hm2,and then the yield started to decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1013 t0 “Yingge Mung Bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–62 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield fell significantly with each unit decrease in seeding rate.
Treatmentrate of seeding e0 Verbatim
e0 “A significant reduction in yield existed per unit decrease on rate of seeding. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–592 t0 “YOUNG COB CORN ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–49 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Iron oxide waste at 5 or 25 g per kg soil did not significantly change the yield of young wheat in either soil.
Treatmenttreated with 0, 5 or 25 g iron oxide per kg soil e2 Outcomeyield of young wheat e2 DirectionNo significant differences e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The use of the acidic waste to decrease the pH of two sandy soils ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–348 e2 “No significant differences were observed in the yield of young wheat in either soil treated with 0, 5 or 25 g iron oxide per kg soil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–568 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
NAA spraying reduced bunch weight relative to control.
Taxon"Zaghloul" date palm t0 Verbatim
e0 “NAA spray at different concentrations tended to decrease bunch weight than the control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–436 t0 “"Zaghloul" date palm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–84 t1 “Naphthalene Acetic Acid (NAA) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–39 Other claims from this paper (5) Mechanism observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Late planting restricted vegetative growth and reduced photosynthesis, grain carbohydrate accumulation and final yield in the late maturing variety.
Outcomedecrease in yield e0 Qualifiershorter day length restricts vegetative growth and lower temperature during ripening period degresses photosynthesis and accumulation of cabohydrate in grains e0 Verbatim
e0 “In late planting, however shorter day length restricts vegetative growth and lower temperature during ripening period degresses photosynthesis and accumulation of cabohydrate in grains, and these bring decrease in yield finally. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2227–2455 t0 “Zea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–54 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing density reduced ear weight.
Treatmentincrement of plant density e0 Directiondecrease inferred e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “by increment of plant density, the ear number.m -2 and grain yield were increased in expense of ear weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1345 t0 “Zea mays var. saccharata ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–103 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.