View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) projected Claim · model-written summary
Under the Canadian model scenario, climate change reduced grain yield by 30 to 40% in Kansas and Oklahoma rainfed areas with less precipitation.
climate change e0 Kansas and Oklahoma Bread Basket regions e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “in some important rainfed production areas where precipitation was projected to decrease , such as the Kansas and Oklahoma Bread Basket regions under the Canadian Centre Climate Model scenario, climate change resulted in significant reductions of grain yield (-30 to -40%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–947 t0 “Wheat, potato, maize, and citrus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–143 Other claims from this paper (3) wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) and corn ( Zea mays L.) 1 Show all 1 → Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
A 30% decrease of CRU in the recommended N rate can be an effective measure to save N fertilizer input.
consumption input of N fertilizer e2 Verbatim
e1 “Nitrogen fertilizer is important for improving wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) and corn ( Zea mays L.) yield s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–107 e2 “can be an effective measure to save consumption input of N fertilizer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1465 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
On average over years, the yield decrease in the wheat–maize no-tillage system was 10–15% compared with traditional cultivation.
no-tillage system e4 traditional cultivation e6 Verbatim
e4 “The lowest yield s were obtained in the wheat–maize no-tillage system in comparison to the others ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–770 e6 “On the average of years the yield decrease was 10–15% as compared to the traditional cultivation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–942 Other claims from this paper (10) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Authors infer excess Mn primarily affects the CO2 reduction cycle and increases QA reduction state and thermal dissipation while decreasing steady-state PSII quantum yield .
activities of the CO 2 reduction cycle e0 leading to increases in Q A reduction state and thermal energy dissipation, and a decrease in quantum yield of PSII e0 Verbatim
e0 “excess Mn in leaves affects the activities of the CO 2 reduction cycle rather than the potential efficiency of photochemistry, leading to increases in Q A reduction state and thermal energy dissipation, and a decrease in quantum yield of PSII in the steady state ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1486 e1 “photosynthesis in white birch ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–71 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Later sowing reduced seed yield by 20–96% in 2003.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Later sowing reduces the seed yield depending on the cropyear. In our experiment, the decrease of yield was in the unfavourable year (2003) 20–96% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–769 t0 “white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–91 Other claims from this paper (4) Mechanism author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Fewer plant losses during vegetation contributed to yield gain.
increase in yield e0 decrease in plant losses during vegetation e0 Verbatim
e0 “An increase in yield was the effect of the increased pod complement of the plants in the field experiments and also of a decrease in plant losses during vegetation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1097 e1 “white lupine and the faba bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–425 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cutting did not significantly decrease stock plant yield .
no significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Importantly, stock plants showed no significant decrease in plant yield after cutting. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1144 t0 “white potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–79 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
White radish controlled 45.7% of total weed biomass compared with the control treatment.
total weed biomasses e4 decrease inferred e4 control treatment e4 Verbatim
e4 “White radish was able to control 45.7% of total weed biomasses compared to control treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1212 Other claims from this paper (13) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
After 1989 grape yield declined slightly by 0.28 kg·ar-1.
Verbatim
e0 “after this time a very slight decrease of 0.28 kg·ar-1 was observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1490 e1 “linear trend for grape yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1313 t0 “'White Riesling' ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–40 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leachate from the weed zone applied to the yam zone reduced white yam tuber yield by 42, 40 and 38% in 1978, 1979 and 1980, respectively.
leachate from the weed zone e2 decrease inferred e2 1978, 1979 and 1980, respectively e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “white yam (Dioscorea rotundata Poir) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–74 e1 “When the foliage and roots of weeds were in physical contact with the crop until harvest (full interference), tuber yield of yam was reduced by 76–79% of that obtained under weed‐free conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–297 e2 “the leachate from the weed zone caused tuber yield reductions of 42, 40 and 38% in 1978, 1979 and 1980, respectively, when it was applied to the yam zone ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–542 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Citrus
Solanum tuberosum
Triticum aestivum
Zea mayst0
Betula pendula
Lupinus albus
Vicia faba
Dioscorea cayenensis subsp. rotundata