View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
NDSA fertilization largely decrease d celery nitrate content.
NDSA fertilization e1 largely decrease e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A pot experiment was carried out to study the effects of NDSA(nitrogen depot with saturated ammonium) fertilization on the N uptake, yield and quality of celery ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–159 e1 “NDSA fertilization could largely decrease nitrate content of celery,while DCD did not ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–759 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
A 50% base, 30% and 20% topdressing N regime decrease d celery nitrate.
N fertilizer (including 50% base fertilizer, topdressing 30%, 20%) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “N fertilizer (including 50% base fertilizer, topdressing 30%, 20%) could decrease nitrate content and increase the yield of celery ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–489 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The staged N regime increased celery yield .
N fertilizer (including 50% base fertilizer, topdressing 30%, 20%) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “N fertilizer (including 50% base fertilizer, topdressing 30%, 20%) could decrease nitrate content and increase the yield of celery ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–489 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
With a decrease in tilling depth, the yield of peas and chickpeas decrease d: for plowing - by 0.32 and 0.35 t/ha
decrease in tilling depth e0 yield of peas and chickpeas e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “With a decrease in tilling depth, the yield of peas and chickpeas decrease d: for plowing - by 0.32 and 0.35 t/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–976 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect The highest yield of legumes was noted after plowing by 20-22 cm, so when cultivating peas, it was higher than after loosening to a similar depth, by 0.39 t/ha Intervention effect The highest yield of legumes was noted after plowing by 20-22 cm, so when cultivating peas, it was higher than after loosening to a similar depth, by 0.39 t/ha, chickpea - by 0.53 t/ha, compared with the option of alternating plowing and loosening in crop rotation Intervention effect With a decrease in tilling depth, the yield of peas and chickpeas decreased: for plowing - by 0.32 and 0.35 t/ha Intervention effect The lowest yield in the experiment was noted without basic tillage Observation The best results after plowing at 20-22 cm were due to the highest yield, as well as the highest mass of 1000 grains, the yield of fodder and grain units in this variant Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen significantly decrease d mean chickpea seed weight.
mean seed weight e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Kabuli chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37 e1 “it did significantly decrease mean seed weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–512 e2 “Nitrogen did not increase seed yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–460 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Lipid peroxidation increased with decreasing water supply.
decrease in the water supply e7 Lipid peroxidation e7 Verbatim
e7 “Lipid peroxidation also increased with the decrease in the water supply ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1375 t0 “Low water supply differentially affects the growth, yield and mineral profile of kabuli and desi chickpeas (Cicer arietinum ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–124 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress decrease d coriander seed yield and essential oil yield .
seed yield and essential oil yield e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e2 “Water stress caused decrease in coriander biomass, plant height, seed yield and essential oil yield ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 932–1030 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress decrease d coriander biomass and plant height.
coriander biomass, plant height e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e2 “Water stress caused decrease in coriander biomass, plant height, seed yield and essential oil yield ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 932–1030 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing nitrogen reduced weight of 1000 fruits.
weight of 1000 fruits e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “decrease of the weight of 1000 fruits was observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–712 t0 “EFFECT OF NITROGEN AND BORON FERTILIZATION ON THE MORPHOMETRIC FEATURES AND YIELD OF CORIANDER ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Smoke exposure can decrease vineyard yield .
Verbatim
e0 “decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1167 t0 “vineyards and grapes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–91 Other claims from this paper (7) Association author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Sucking pest damage decrease s grape yield and quality.
sucking pests e0 pest yield and quality of grapes e0 Verbatim
e0 “damage by sucking pests leads to a decrease in the yield and quality of grapes. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–504 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Own-rooted cultivation tended to decrease titratable acidity.
Krasnostop AZOS e0 own rooted culture e0 titratable acidity of grapes e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “there is a tendency to an increase in sugar content, and a decrease in the titratable acidity of grapes when growing vineyards of the Krasnostop AZOS variety in their own rooted culture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1074 t0 “grapes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
N concentration tended to decrease with compost application in the second year.
compost application e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “Three varieties of kenaf ( Hibiscus cannabinus L.) were grown under dryland conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–250 e2 “Plant P concentration tended to increase and N concentration to decrease with compost application the second year ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1125 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
This irrigation schedule did not significantly decrease fiber linear density.
Middle irrigation in seedling stage, high irrigation in vigorous growth stage and squaring and fruit stage e0 fiber linear density e0 did not decrease significantly e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The results showed that:(1) In low fertilization, fiber yield , fiber length and width reached the maximums, and fiber strength and fiber line density had no significant reduction.(2) All NK fertilizer as base fertilization was beneficial to improve the fiber yield and linear density, while fiber strength did not reduce significantly.(3) Middle irrigation in seedling stage, high irrigation in vigorous growth stage and… ” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–870 t0 “kenaf ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress decrease d leaf water potential, transpiration, green leaf area, and net assimilation.
leaf water potential, transpiration rate, green leaf area and net assimilation rate e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “while a rapid decrease in leaf water potential, transpiration rate, green leaf area and net assimilation rate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–287 t0 “water stress on physiological characteristics and yield in kenaf ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–75 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease was greater with a larger b-parameter.
Verbatim
e0 “we examined the fertilizer reaction of maize hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–414 e7 “If the value of the b-parameter is other than, zero then the effect is clearly unfavorable, because with the increase of this value, the yield decrease is also greater ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2641–2808 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
More fertilizer under intense water scarcity decrease d yield .
increased fertilization e0 intense water scarcity e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Due to the intense water scarcity, increased fertilization caused decrease in the yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2475–2563 t0 “maize hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–86 Other claims from this paper (6) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Fewer grains per ear contributed to lower grain yield in the older hybrids.
less grains per ear e0 Verbatim
e0 “they set less grains per ear which contributed to decrease their grain yield and N use efficiency. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1151 t0 “maize hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–66 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Hot air stress decrease d effective quantum yield in photosystem II.
effective quantum yield of photochemical energy conversion in photosystem II (${\Phi}PSII$) e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “decrease in the effective quantum yield of photochemical energy conversion in photosystem II (${\Phi}PSII$) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1125 t0 “maize (Zea mays L.) ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 81–100 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Seed irradiation decrease d quantum yield of electron transport in maize leaves.
ultraviolet radiation and α-irradiation e0 quantum yield of electron transport (φEo) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Seed exposure to ultraviolet radiation and α-irradiation caused inhibition of reactions in photosystem II in leaves, observed as a decrease in the quantum yield of electron transport (φEo) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1344 t0 “maize (Zea mays L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–109 Other claims from this paper (12) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The altered transfer probably decrease d yield .
transfer of soluble sugar and nitrogen from stems to seeds e0 Verbatim
e0 “High Cd dose (8 and 16 mg/kg) can inhibit, or even reverse the transfer of soluble sugar and nitrogen from stems to seeds, which probably resulted in the decrease of yield and starch accumulation in the seeds. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–907 t0 “maize (Zea mays L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–119 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Transfer from low to high PPFD did not decrease orange quantum yield .
Transferring seedlings from low to high PPFD e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Transferring seedlings from low to high PPFD decrease d ø of grapefruit but not of orange leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–868 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield fell as foliar Na concentration increased.
Verbatim
e0 “yield did decrease as foliar concentrations of Na and Cl increased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1454 t0 “‘Valencia’ orange trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–71 Other claims from this paper (13) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield fell as foliar Cl concentration increased.
Verbatim
e0 “yield did decrease as foliar concentrations of Na and Cl increased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1454 t0 “‘Valencia’ orange trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–71 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Nitrate concentration tended to decline with more regulator treatments.
increasing number of treatments with growth regulator e0 concentration of nitrates in roots e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “There is a tendency to decrease the concentration of nitrates in roots with increasing number of treatments with growth regulator. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1349 t1 “commercial parsnip products ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–91 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Sowing in the 3rd ten-day period of April significantly decrease d root crop yield by 3.5 t/ha, or 7.7%, compared with the control.
3rd ten-day period of April e3 Right-Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine e1 Verbatim
t0 “parsnip plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–80 e1 “The research was carried out in the field experiment of the Department of Vegetable Growing and Closed Ground in the National Research Institute “Fruit and Vegetable Garden” of NUBiP of Ukraine within the conditions of the Right-Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine during 2015-2017 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–1090 e2 “When sowing in the following terms, a significant decrease in yield s was observed compared to the control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2427–2532 e3 “for 3rd ten-day period of April – by 3.5 t/ha, or 7.7% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2542–2596 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect Sowings in the 1st to 3rd ten-day periods of April caused a significant 21-day delay in the sowing-emergence period. Intervention effect The shortest sowing-emergence period, 16 days, occurred in variants sown in the 3rd ten-day period of May and the 1st ten-day period of June. Intervention effect The period from the beginning of root crop formation to bunch ripeness was shortest, 28 days, when sown in the 1st ten-day period of April. Intervention effect The period from the beginning of root crop formation to bunch ripeness was longest, 51 days, when sown in the 1st ten-day period of June. Observation After April sowing, root crops grew at 2.9 to 3.5 g/day in the second half of August. Observation After May sowing, the greatest root crop increase, 2.1 to 2.7 g/day, was noted in the first half of September. Observation For sowings in the 1st ten-day period of June the root crop growth figure was highest in the second half of September, 1.9 g/day. Observation The variant sown in the 1st ten-day period of April gave a high root crop yield of 50.3 t/ha. Intervention effect Root crop yield from the 1st ten-day period of April sowing was significantly higher than the control, by 11.8%. Intervention effect Sowing in the 1st ten-day period of May significantly decreased root crop yield by 8.8 t/ha, or 19.6%, compared with the control. Intervention effect Sowing in the 2nd ten-day period of May significantly decreased root crop yield by 17.4 t/ha, or 38.6%, compared with the control. Intervention effect Sowing in the 3rd ten-day period of May significantly decreased root crop yield by 23.0 t/ha, or 51.1%, compared with the control. Intervention effect Sowing in the 1st ten-day period of June significantly decreased root crop yield by 31.7 t/ha, or 70.6%, compared with the control. Association Growing season length correlated strongly and directly with yield, root mass and marketability (r = 0.74-0.99). Association Growing season length correlated strongly and directly with dry matter, dry soluble matter and sugars (r = 0.74-0.99). Association Duration of the growing season correlated inversely with nitrate content (r = -0.98). Association Leaf area, photosynthetic potential and net photosynthetic productivity were strongly and directly related to yield (r = 0.92-0.98). Association Increasing the growing season by 10 days increased yield by up to 6.9 t/ha. Association Increasing the growing season by 10 days reduced nitrate content to 8.4 mg/kg. Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Sowing in the 1st ten-day period of May significantly decrease d root crop yield by 8.8 t/ha, or 19.6%, compared with the control.
1st ten-day period of May e4 8.8 t/ha, or 19.6% e4 Right-Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine e1 Verbatim
t0 “parsnip plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–80 e1 “The research was carried out in the field experiment of the Department of Vegetable Growing and Closed Ground in the National Research Institute “Fruit and Vegetable Garden” of NUBiP of Ukraine within the conditions of the Right-Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine during 2015-2017 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–1090 e2 “When sowing in the following terms, a significant decrease in yield s was observed compared to the control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2427–2532 e4 “for 1st ten-day period of May – by 8.8 t/ha, or 19.6% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2598–2651 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect Sowings in the 1st to 3rd ten-day periods of April caused a significant 21-day delay in the sowing-emergence period. Intervention effect The shortest sowing-emergence period, 16 days, occurred in variants sown in the 3rd ten-day period of May and the 1st ten-day period of June. Intervention effect The period from the beginning of root crop formation to bunch ripeness was shortest, 28 days, when sown in the 1st ten-day period of April. Intervention effect The period from the beginning of root crop formation to bunch ripeness was longest, 51 days, when sown in the 1st ten-day period of June. Observation After April sowing, root crops grew at 2.9 to 3.5 g/day in the second half of August. Observation After May sowing, the greatest root crop increase, 2.1 to 2.7 g/day, was noted in the first half of September. Observation For sowings in the 1st ten-day period of June the root crop growth figure was highest in the second half of September, 1.9 g/day. Observation The variant sown in the 1st ten-day period of April gave a high root crop yield of 50.3 t/ha. Intervention effect Root crop yield from the 1st ten-day period of April sowing was significantly higher than the control, by 11.8%. Intervention effect Sowing in the 3rd ten-day period of April significantly decreased root crop yield by 3.5 t/ha, or 7.7%, compared with the control. Intervention effect Sowing in the 2nd ten-day period of May significantly decreased root crop yield by 17.4 t/ha, or 38.6%, compared with the control. Intervention effect Sowing in the 3rd ten-day period of May significantly decreased root crop yield by 23.0 t/ha, or 51.1%, compared with the control. Intervention effect Sowing in the 1st ten-day period of June significantly decreased root crop yield by 31.7 t/ha, or 70.6%, compared with the control. Association Growing season length correlated strongly and directly with yield, root mass and marketability (r = 0.74-0.99). Association Growing season length correlated strongly and directly with dry matter, dry soluble matter and sugars (r = 0.74-0.99). Association Duration of the growing season correlated inversely with nitrate content (r = -0.98). Association Leaf area, photosynthetic potential and net photosynthetic productivity were strongly and directly related to yield (r = 0.92-0.98). Association Increasing the growing season by 10 days increased yield by up to 6.9 t/ha. Association Increasing the growing season by 10 days reduced nitrate content to 8.4 mg/kg. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Any increase or decrease in sowing rates away from the optimum led to a decrease in amaranth yield .
increase or decrease in sowing rates e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “Any increase or decrease in sowing rates led to a decrease in the yield level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1896–1973 t0 “Amaranth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–8 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect Amaranth field uniformity fell from 70% at 0.2 million seeds/ha to 60% at 1.2 million seeds/ha, a 10% decrease. Intervention effect At the seedling stage amaranth had 14 plants at a 0.2 million seeds/ha sowing rate, rising to 72 plants/m2 at 1.2 million seeds/ha. Intervention effect Amaranth plant survival during the vegetation period fell sharply with increasing sowing density, from 86% at 0.2 million seeds/ha to 45% at 1.2 million seeds/ha. Observation Before harvesting, amaranth plant density was adjusted to 12-32 plants/m2. Observation The best combination of yield structure elements was 21 plants/m2, with a grain weight per plant of 20.4 g. Observation The best combination of yield structure elements was also found at 26 plants/m2, with a grain weight per plant of 16.1 g. Observation The highest grain yield of amaranth variety Kharkivskyi 1, 4.28 t/ha, was obtained at a sowing rate of 0.4 million seeds/ha. Observation The highest grain yield of amaranth variety Kharkivskyi 1, 4.20 t/ha, was obtained at a sowing rate of 0.6 million seeds/ha. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Sowing at 3 cm decrease d grain yield to 3.47 t/ha.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Increasing the seed covering depth to 3 cm led to a decrease in grain yield to 3.47 t/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1204 t0 “amaranth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–21 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect Field germination at 1 cm sowing depth was among the highest, at 71%. Intervention effect Field germination at 2 cm sowing depth was highest at 79%. Intervention effect Increasing sowing depth decreased field germination. Intervention effect Preharvest plant density at 1 cm was 27 plants/m2, higher than at 5 cm. Intervention effect Preharvest plant density at 2 cm was 28 plants/m2, higher than at 5 cm. Observation Plant height at 2 cm sowing depth was 211 cm. Intervention effect Deepening sowing to 5 cm reduced plant height to 181 cm. Intervention effect The longest panicle, 65 cm, occurred at 2 cm sowing depth. Observation Seed weight per plant was 14.4 g at 2 cm sowing depth. Observation Thousand-seed weight was 0.84 g at 2 cm sowing depth. Intervention effect The highest grain yield, 3.88 t/ha, occurred at 2 cm sowing depth. Intervention effect At 1 cm sowing depth, yield decreased by 0.21 t/ha. Intervention effect At 4 cm, yield decreased to 2.37 t/ha, a reduction of 1.51 t/ha. Intervention effect At 5 cm, yield was 1.62 t/ha and lower than at 2 cm by the reported 2.26 t/ha. Intervention effect The conclusion reports 74–79% germination at 1–2 cm and significant germination reduction deeper than 3 cm, even with sufficient moisture. Intervention effect The highest preharvest density at 1–3 cm was 24–28 plants/m². Intervention effect The highest height at 1–3 cm was 208–211 cm. Intervention effect Increasing depth decreased seed mass per plant and thousand-seed mass. Recommendation The authors recommend 2 cm as optimal, permit 1–3 cm including 3 cm when topsoil dries, and deem deeper than 3 cm impractical because productivity falls significantly. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Sowing deeper than the optimal depth reduced amaranth grain yield to 2.37 t/ha, a decrease of 1.51 t/ha.
or by 1.51 t/ha e0 optimal sowing depth e0 Western Forest-Steppe of Ukraine t1 Verbatim
t0 “Amaranth grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–20 t1 “in the conditions of the Western Forest-Steppe of Ukraine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–150 e0 “Compared with the optimal sowing depth, the yield decrease d to 2.37 t/ha, or by 1.51 t/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7–96 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
%2C_Elswick%2C_Northumberland_4.jpg?width=60)
Apium graveolens Dulce Groupe0
Cicer arietinum
Coriandrum sativum
Hibiscus cannabinus
Zea mays
Pastinaca sativa.JPG?width=60){kind=small}
Amaranthus caudatus