Search claims · PlantClaims

Assessment of the nitrogen requirements of planted maize (Zea mays L.) in the semi-arid areas of Zimbabwe 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)simulated

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated maize planting could extend to early December with no nitrogen without significant yield decrease.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: early Decembere0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: without a significant decreasee0
Qualifier: no nitrogene0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“planting can be extended to early December, late December, early January and late January without a significant decrease in yield by adding no nitrogen, 15, 30 and 60 kg ha-1, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1080

t0
“maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56

Title

Assessment of the nitrogen requirements of planted maize (Zea mays L.) in the semi-arid areas of Zimbabwe

Francis T Mugabe; Dominic J Banga UNISWA Journal of Agriculture 2004. doi:10.4314/uniswa.v10i1.4602

Other claims from this paper (6)

Method / resource CERES-maize overpredicted maize grain yield by 1.5%.
Method / resource CERES-maize yield estimates had a slope coefficient of 0.89.
Method / resource CERES-maize yield estimates had an r2 of 0.81.
Intervention effect Simulated maize planting could extend to late December with 15 kg ha-1 nitrogen without significant yield decrease.
Intervention effect Simulated maize planting could extend to early January with 30 kg ha-1 nitrogen without significant yield decrease.
Intervention effect Simulated maize planting could extend to late January with 60 kg ha-1 nitrogen without significant yield decrease.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)simulated

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated maize planting could extend to late December with 15 kg ha-1 nitrogen without significant yield decrease.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: late Decembere0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: without a significant decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“planting can be extended to early December, late December, early January and late January without a significant decrease in yield by adding no nitrogen, 15, 30 and 60 kg ha-1, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1080

t0
“maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56

Title

Assessment of the nitrogen requirements of planted maize (Zea mays L.) in the semi-arid areas of Zimbabwe

Francis T Mugabe; Dominic J Banga UNISWA Journal of Agriculture 2004. doi:10.4314/uniswa.v10i1.4602

Other claims from this paper (6)

Method / resource CERES-maize overpredicted maize grain yield by 1.5%.
Method / resource CERES-maize yield estimates had a slope coefficient of 0.89.
Method / resource CERES-maize yield estimates had an r2 of 0.81.
Intervention effect Simulated maize planting could extend to early December with no nitrogen without significant yield decrease.
Intervention effect Simulated maize planting could extend to early January with 30 kg ha-1 nitrogen without significant yield decrease.
Intervention effect Simulated maize planting could extend to late January with 60 kg ha-1 nitrogen without significant yield decrease.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)simulated

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated maize planting could extend to late January with 60 kg ha-1 nitrogen without significant yield decrease.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: late Januarye0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: without a significant decreasee0
Qualifier: 60 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“planting can be extended to early December, late December, early January and late January without a significant decrease in yield by adding no nitrogen, 15, 30 and 60 kg ha-1, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1080

t0
“maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56

Title

Assessment of the nitrogen requirements of planted maize (Zea mays L.) in the semi-arid areas of Zimbabwe

Francis T Mugabe; Dominic J Banga UNISWA Journal of Agriculture 2004. doi:10.4314/uniswa.v10i1.4602

Other claims from this paper (6)

Method / resource CERES-maize overpredicted maize grain yield by 1.5%.
Method / resource CERES-maize yield estimates had a slope coefficient of 0.89.
Method / resource CERES-maize yield estimates had an r2 of 0.81.
Intervention effect Simulated maize planting could extend to early December with no nitrogen without significant yield decrease.
Intervention effect Simulated maize planting could extend to late December with 15 kg ha-1 nitrogen without significant yield decrease.
Intervention effect Simulated maize planting could extend to early January with 30 kg ha-1 nitrogen without significant yield decrease.

Impact of Brown Spot Caused by Septoria glycines on Soybean in Ohio 4

Show all 4 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flutriafol at R3 or R5 did not significantly decrease brown spot.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage: R3 or R5e0
Treatment: flutriafole0
Interactor: Septoria glycinesSeptoria glycinest0pathogene0
Outcome: levels of brown spote0
Direction: did not significantly decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Triazoles, flutriafol and tebuconazole, applied at R3 or R5 did not significantly decrease levels of brown spot or impact yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1196

t0
“Septoria glycines on Soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–59

Title

Impact of Brown Spot Caused by Septoria glycines on Soybean in Ohio

Christian D. Cruz; Dennis Mills; Pierce A. Paul; et al. Plant Disease 2010. doi:10.1094/pdis-94-7-0820

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Chlorothalonil treated and untreated plots differed in yield by 196 to 293 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Chlorothalonil applications produced significantly different brown spot levels.
Intervention effect Pyraclostrobin at R3 significantly reduced final brown spot.
Intervention effect Azoxystrobin at R3 significantly reduced final brown spot.
Intervention effect Yield increased significantly in only three of six location years under the fungicide treatments.
Intervention effect Tebuconazole at R3 or R5 did not significantly decrease brown spot.
Intervention effect Flutriafol did not significantly affect yield.
Intervention effect Tebuconazole did not significantly affect yield.
Recommendation Further timing data are required for a long term management program.
Recommendation Brown spot resistance should be monitored during soybean cultivar development.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tebuconazole at R3 or R5 did not significantly decrease brown spot.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage: R3 or R5e0
Treatment: tebuconazolee0
Interactor: Septoria glycinesSeptoria glycinest0pathogene0
Outcome: levels of brown spote0
Direction: did not significantly decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Triazoles, flutriafol and tebuconazole, applied at R3 or R5 did not significantly decrease levels of brown spot or impact yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1196

t0
“Septoria glycines on Soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–59

Title

Impact of Brown Spot Caused by Septoria glycines on Soybean in Ohio

Christian D. Cruz; Dennis Mills; Pierce A. Paul; et al. Plant Disease 2010. doi:10.1094/pdis-94-7-0820

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Chlorothalonil treated and untreated plots differed in yield by 196 to 293 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Chlorothalonil applications produced significantly different brown spot levels.
Intervention effect Pyraclostrobin at R3 significantly reduced final brown spot.
Intervention effect Azoxystrobin at R3 significantly reduced final brown spot.
Intervention effect Yield increased significantly in only three of six location years under the fungicide treatments.
Intervention effect Flutriafol at R3 or R5 did not significantly decrease brown spot.
Intervention effect Flutriafol did not significantly affect yield.
Intervention effect Tebuconazole did not significantly affect yield.
Recommendation Further timing data are required for a long term management program.
Recommendation Brown spot resistance should be monitored during soybean cultivar development.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flutriafol did not significantly affect yield.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: flutriafole0
Interactor: Septoria glycinesSeptoria glycinest0pathogene0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: no_changeinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Triazoles, flutriafol and tebuconazole, applied at R3 or R5 did not significantly decrease levels of brown spot or impact yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1196

t0
“Septoria glycines on Soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–59

Title

Impact of Brown Spot Caused by Septoria glycines on Soybean in Ohio

Christian D. Cruz; Dennis Mills; Pierce A. Paul; et al. Plant Disease 2010. doi:10.1094/pdis-94-7-0820

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Chlorothalonil treated and untreated plots differed in yield by 196 to 293 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Chlorothalonil applications produced significantly different brown spot levels.
Intervention effect Pyraclostrobin at R3 significantly reduced final brown spot.
Intervention effect Azoxystrobin at R3 significantly reduced final brown spot.
Intervention effect Yield increased significantly in only three of six location years under the fungicide treatments.
Intervention effect Flutriafol at R3 or R5 did not significantly decrease brown spot.
Intervention effect Tebuconazole at R3 or R5 did not significantly decrease brown spot.
Intervention effect Tebuconazole did not significantly affect yield.
Recommendation Further timing data are required for a long term management program.
Recommendation Brown spot resistance should be monitored during soybean cultivar development.

Effect of Deficit Irrigation and Planting Method on Maize Plants under Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt 4

Show all 4 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 65% AVSMD did not significantly decrease kernels per row, 100-kernel weight or grain yield of maize.

Taxon: MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment: Irrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD)e0
Outcome: kernels per row,100-kernel weight and grain yielde0
Direction: did not significantly decreasee0
Setting: Middle Delta Conditions of Egyptt0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Maize Plants under Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–103

e0
“Irrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD) did not significantly decrease chlorophyll content, dry matter (DM), leaf area index (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR), relative water content (RWC), osmotic potential (OP), ear length, ear diameter, rows per ear, kernels per row,100-kernel weight and grain yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–573

Title

Effect of Deficit Irrigation and Planting Method on Maize Plants under Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt

O. S. Abu-Grab; Seham M. M. Ahmed; M. A. M. EL-Ghonemy Journal of Plant Production 2019. doi:10.21608/jpp.2019.62278

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 65% AVSMD did not significantly decrease ear length, ear diameter or rows per ear of maize.

Taxon: MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment: Irrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD)e0
Outcome: ear length, ear diameter, rows per eare0
Direction: did not significantly decreasee0
Setting: Middle Delta Conditions of Egyptt0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Maize Plants under Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–103

e0
“Irrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD) did not significantly decrease chlorophyll content, dry matter (DM), leaf area index (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR), relative water content (RWC), osmotic potential (OP), ear length, ear diameter, rows per ear, kernels per row,100-kernel weight and grain yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–573

Title

Effect of Deficit Irrigation and Planting Method on Maize Plants under Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt

O. S. Abu-Grab; Seham M. M. Ahmed; M. A. M. EL-Ghonemy Journal of Plant Production 2019. doi:10.21608/jpp.2019.62278

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 65% AVSMD did not significantly decrease chlorophyll content, dry matter or leaf area index of maize.

Taxon: MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment: Irrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD)e0
Outcome: chlorophyll content, dry matter (DM), leaf area index (LAI)e0
Direction: did not significantly decreasee0
Setting: Middle Delta Conditions of Egyptt0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Maize Plants under Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–103

e0
“Irrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD) did not significantly decrease chlorophyll content, dry matter (DM), leaf area index (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR), relative water content (RWC), osmotic potential (OP), ear length, ear diameter, rows per ear, kernels per row,100-kernel weight and grain yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–573

Title

Effect of Deficit Irrigation and Planting Method on Maize Plants under Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt

O. S. Abu-Grab; Seham M. M. Ahmed; M. A. M. EL-Ghonemy Journal of Plant Production 2019. doi:10.21608/jpp.2019.62278

Other claims from this paper (12)

Compensatory Ability of Strawberries to Bud and Flower Removal: Implications for Managing the Strawberry Bud Weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) 3

Show all 3 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

For Seneca, removal of all primary, secondary or tertiary buds did not significantly decrease yield compared with control plots.

Taxon: StrawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Material: Senecae5
Treatment: removal of all primary, secondary, or tertiary budse5
Outcome: yielde5
Direction: did not significantly decreasee5
Comparator: control plotse5

Verbatim

t0
“Compensatory Ability of Strawberries to Bud and Flower Removal”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62

e5
“For ‘Seneca’ and ‘Kent’, removal of all primary, secondary, or tertiary buds did not significantly decrease yield compared with control plots”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–965

Title

Compensatory Ability of Strawberries to Bud and Flower Removal: Implications for Managing the Strawberry Bud Weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

Greg English-Loeb; Marvin Pritts; Joe Kovach; et al. Journal of Economic Entomology 1999. doi:10.1093/jee/92.4.915

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

For Kent, removal of all primary, secondary or tertiary buds did not significantly decrease yield compared with control plots.

Taxon: StrawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Material: Kente5
Treatment: removal of all primary, secondary, or tertiary budse5
Outcome: yielde5
Direction: did not significantly decreasee5
Comparator: control plotse5

Verbatim

t0
“Compensatory Ability of Strawberries to Bud and Flower Removal”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62

e5
“For ‘Seneca’ and ‘Kent’, removal of all primary, secondary, or tertiary buds did not significantly decrease yield compared with control plots”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–965

Title

Compensatory Ability of Strawberries to Bud and Flower Removal: Implications for Managing the Strawberry Bud Weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

Greg English-Loeb; Marvin Pritts; Joe Kovach; et al. Journal of Economic Entomology 1999. doi:10.1093/jee/92.4.915

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

For Jewel, removal of all primary or secondary buds did not significantly decrease yield relative to control plots.

Taxon: StrawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Material: Jewele3
Treatment: removal of all primary or secondary budse3
Outcome: yielde3
Direction: did not result in a significant decreasee3
Comparator: control plotse3

Verbatim

t0
“Compensatory Ability of Strawberries to Bud and Flower Removal”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62

e3
“For the cultivar ‘Jewel’, removal of all primary or secondary buds did not result in a significant decrease in yield relative to control plots”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–724

Title

Compensatory Ability of Strawberries to Bud and Flower Removal: Implications for Managing the Strawberry Bud Weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

Greg English-Loeb; Marvin Pritts; Joe Kovach; et al. Journal of Economic Entomology 1999. doi:10.1093/jee/92.4.915

Other claims from this paper (9)

The effect of Take Off seed treatment component on the healthiness and yield of spring barley 3

Show all 3 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Take Off with seed dressing insignificantly reduced Oculimacula infection in barley.

Taxon: spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment: Take Off seed treatment component with other seed dressinge0
Interactor: Oculimacula spp.Oculimaculae0pathogen
Outcome: barley infection by Oculimacula spp.e0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“spring barley”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–93

e0
“Application of Take Off seed treatment component with other seed dressing resulted in insignificant decrease of barley infection by Oculimacula spp. and Fusarium spp. and leaves by Drechslera teres.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–556

Title

The effect of Take Off seed treatment component on the healthiness and yield of spring barley

Bogdan Dubis; Stanisław Bielski; Urszula Wachowska; et al. Progress in Plant Protection 2015. doi:10.14199/ppp-2015-026

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Take Off with seed dressing insignificantly reduced Fusarium infection in barley.
Intervention effect Take Off with seed dressing insignificantly reduced Drechslera infection of barley leaves.
Intervention effect Take Off tended to lessen the control effectiveness of Premis Pro 080 FS against evaluated diseases.
Intervention effect Combined Premis Pro and Take Off significantly increased seed emergence.
Intervention effect Combined treatment tended to increase plant biomass.
Intervention effect Combined treatment tended to increase head number.
Intervention effect Combined treatment tended to increase grain number per head.
Intervention effect Combined treatment increased barley yield insignificantly versus untreated control.
Intervention effect Combined treatment increased barley yield insignificantly versus Premis Pro alone.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Take Off with seed dressing insignificantly reduced Drechslera infection of barley leaves.

Taxon: spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment: Take Off seed treatment component with other seed dressinge0
Interactor: Drechslera teresPyrenophora terese0pathogen
Outcome: leaves by Drechslera terese0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“spring barley”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–93

e0
“Application of Take Off seed treatment component with other seed dressing resulted in insignificant decrease of barley infection by Oculimacula spp. and Fusarium spp. and leaves by Drechslera teres.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–556

Title

The effect of Take Off seed treatment component on the healthiness and yield of spring barley

Bogdan Dubis; Stanisław Bielski; Urszula Wachowska; et al. Progress in Plant Protection 2015. doi:10.14199/ppp-2015-026

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Take Off with seed dressing insignificantly reduced Oculimacula infection in barley.
Intervention effect Take Off with seed dressing insignificantly reduced Fusarium infection in barley.
Intervention effect Take Off tended to lessen the control effectiveness of Premis Pro 080 FS against evaluated diseases.
Intervention effect Combined Premis Pro and Take Off significantly increased seed emergence.
Intervention effect Combined treatment tended to increase plant biomass.
Intervention effect Combined treatment tended to increase head number.
Intervention effect Combined treatment tended to increase grain number per head.
Intervention effect Combined treatment increased barley yield insignificantly versus untreated control.
Intervention effect Combined treatment increased barley yield insignificantly versus Premis Pro alone.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Take Off with seed dressing insignificantly reduced Fusarium infection in barley.

Taxon: spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment: Take Off seed treatment component with other seed dressinge0
Interactor: Fusarium spp.Fusariume0pathogen
Outcome: barley infection by Oculimacula spp. and Fusarium spp.e0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“spring barley”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–93

e0
“Application of Take Off seed treatment component with other seed dressing resulted in insignificant decrease of barley infection by Oculimacula spp. and Fusarium spp. and leaves by Drechslera teres.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–556

Title

The effect of Take Off seed treatment component on the healthiness and yield of spring barley

Bogdan Dubis; Stanisław Bielski; Urszula Wachowska; et al. Progress in Plant Protection 2015. doi:10.14199/ppp-2015-026

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Take Off with seed dressing insignificantly reduced Oculimacula infection in barley.
Intervention effect Take Off with seed dressing insignificantly reduced Drechslera infection of barley leaves.
Intervention effect Take Off tended to lessen the control effectiveness of Premis Pro 080 FS against evaluated diseases.
Intervention effect Combined Premis Pro and Take Off significantly increased seed emergence.
Intervention effect Combined treatment tended to increase plant biomass.
Intervention effect Combined treatment tended to increase head number.
Intervention effect Combined treatment tended to increase grain number per head.
Intervention effect Combined treatment increased barley yield insignificantly versus untreated control.
Intervention effect Combined treatment increased barley yield insignificantly versus Premis Pro alone.

Effects of irrigation and fertilization management on fiber yield and quality of kenaf 3

Show all 3 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

This irrigation schedule did not significantly decrease fiber linear density.

Taxon: kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
Treatment: Middle irrigation in seedling stage, high irrigation in vigorous growth stage and squaring and fruit stagee0
Outcome: fiber linear densitye0
Direction: did not decrease significantlye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The results showed that:(1) In low fertilization, fiber yield, fiber length and width reached the maximums, and fiber strength and fiber line density had no significant reduction.(2) All NK fertilizer as base fertilization was beneficial to improve the fiber yield and linear density, while fiber strength did not reduce significantly.(3) Middle irrigation in seedling stage, high irrigation in vigorous growth stage and…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–870

t0
“kenaf”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86

Title

Effects of irrigation and fertilization management on fiber yield and quality of kenaf

Wang Dao-b Guangdong nongye kexue 2014

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Low fertilization maximized fiber yield, length, and width.
Intervention effect Low fertilization did not significantly reduce fiber strength or line density.
Intervention effect Applying all NK fertilizer as base fertilizer improved fiber yield and linear density.
Intervention effect Applying all NK fertilizer as base fertilizer did not significantly reduce fiber strength.
Intervention effect Middle seedling irrigation followed by high irrigation gave higher fiber yield, strength and length than other treatments.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low fertilization did not significantly reduce fiber strength or line density.

Taxon: kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
Treatment: low fertilizatione0
Outcome: fiber strength and fiber line densitye0
Direction: no significant reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The results showed that:(1) In low fertilization, fiber yield, fiber length and width reached the maximums, and fiber strength and fiber line density had no significant reduction.(2) All NK fertilizer as base fertilization was beneficial to improve the fiber yield and linear density, while fiber strength did not reduce significantly.(3) Middle irrigation in seedling stage, high irrigation in vigorous growth stage and…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–870

t0
“kenaf”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86

Title

Effects of irrigation and fertilization management on fiber yield and quality of kenaf

Wang Dao-b Guangdong nongye kexue 2014

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Low fertilization maximized fiber yield, length, and width.
Intervention effect Applying all NK fertilizer as base fertilizer improved fiber yield and linear density.
Intervention effect Applying all NK fertilizer as base fertilizer did not significantly reduce fiber strength.
Intervention effect Middle seedling irrigation followed by high irrigation gave higher fiber yield, strength and length than other treatments.
Intervention effect This irrigation schedule did not significantly decrease fiber linear density.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying all NK fertilizer as base fertilizer did not significantly reduce fiber strength.

Taxon: kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
Treatment: All NK fertilizer as base fertilizatione0
Outcome: fiber strengthe0
Direction: did not reduce significantlye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The results showed that:(1) In low fertilization, fiber yield, fiber length and width reached the maximums, and fiber strength and fiber line density had no significant reduction.(2) All NK fertilizer as base fertilization was beneficial to improve the fiber yield and linear density, while fiber strength did not reduce significantly.(3) Middle irrigation in seedling stage, high irrigation in vigorous growth stage and…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–870

t0
“kenaf”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86

Title

Effects of irrigation and fertilization management on fiber yield and quality of kenaf

Wang Dao-b Guangdong nongye kexue 2014

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Low fertilization maximized fiber yield, length, and width.
Intervention effect Low fertilization did not significantly reduce fiber strength or line density.
Intervention effect Applying all NK fertilizer as base fertilizer improved fiber yield and linear density.
Intervention effect Middle seedling irrigation followed by high irrigation gave higher fiber yield, strength and length than other treatments.
Intervention effect This irrigation schedule did not significantly decrease fiber linear density.

Effect of Spraying Cobalt Sulfate on the Yield and Absorption of Trace Elements in Alfalfa 3

Show all 3 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying cobalt sulfate had no significant influence on molybdenum accumulation in alfalfa.

Taxon: AlfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment: Spraying cobalt sulfatee6
Outcome: accumulation of molybdenume7
Direction: no significant influencee7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Spraying cobalt sulfate could significantly increase dry grass yield of Alfalfa”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–480

e6
“Spraying cobalt sulfate could significantly decrease the accumulation amount of selenium”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1254

e7
“had no significant influence on the accumulation of molybdenum in Alfalfa”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1332

Title

Effect of Spraying Cobalt Sulfate on the Yield and Absorption of Trace Elements in Alfalfa

Jie Xiao-lei Anhui nongye kexue 2007

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Spraying cobalt at 300 mg/kg gave the best increase in dry grass yield of alfalfa, 27.53% above clear water control.
Intervention effect Spraying cobalt sulfate increased cobalt and zinc contents in alfalfa.
Intervention effect Spraying cobalt sulfate decreased boron and selenium contents in alfalfa.
Intervention effect Spraying cobalt sulfate had no significant influence on molybdenum, iron and manganese contents in alfalfa.
Intervention effect Spraying cobalt sulfate had no significant influence on copper contents in alfalfa.
Intervention effect Spraying cobalt sulfate increased accumulation of cobalt, boron and iron in alfalfa.
Intervention effect Spraying cobalt sulfate increased accumulation of manganese, copper and zinc in alfalfa.
Intervention effect Cobalt accumulation in alfalfa was highest at 600 mg/kg cobalt application.
Intervention effect Accumulation of other trace elements in alfalfa was highest at 300 mg/kg cobalt application.
Intervention effect Spraying cobalt sulfate significantly decreased the accumulation of selenium in alfalfa.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying cobalt sulfate had no significant influence on copper contents in alfalfa.

Taxon: AlfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment: Spraying cobalt sulfatee2
Outcome: copper contentse3
Direction: no significant influencee3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Spraying cobalt sulfate could significantly increase dry grass yield of Alfalfa”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–480

e2
“Spraying cobalt sulfate could significantly increase cobalt and zinc contents,decrease boron and selenium contents”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–714

e3
“had no significant influence on molybdenum,iron,manganese and copper contents”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–796

Title

Effect of Spraying Cobalt Sulfate on the Yield and Absorption of Trace Elements in Alfalfa

Jie Xiao-lei Anhui nongye kexue 2007

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Spraying cobalt at 300 mg/kg gave the best increase in dry grass yield of alfalfa, 27.53% above clear water control.
Intervention effect Spraying cobalt sulfate increased cobalt and zinc contents in alfalfa.
Intervention effect Spraying cobalt sulfate decreased boron and selenium contents in alfalfa.
Intervention effect Spraying cobalt sulfate had no significant influence on molybdenum, iron and manganese contents in alfalfa.
Intervention effect Spraying cobalt sulfate increased accumulation of cobalt, boron and iron in alfalfa.
Intervention effect Spraying cobalt sulfate increased accumulation of manganese, copper and zinc in alfalfa.
Intervention effect Cobalt accumulation in alfalfa was highest at 600 mg/kg cobalt application.
Intervention effect Accumulation of other trace elements in alfalfa was highest at 300 mg/kg cobalt application.
Intervention effect Spraying cobalt sulfate significantly decreased the accumulation of selenium in alfalfa.
Intervention effect Spraying cobalt sulfate had no significant influence on molybdenum accumulation in alfalfa.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying cobalt sulfate had no significant influence on molybdenum, iron and manganese contents in alfalfa.

Taxon: AlfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment: Spraying cobalt sulfatee2
Outcome: molybdenum,iron,manganesee3
Direction: no significant influencee3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Spraying cobalt sulfate could significantly increase dry grass yield of Alfalfa”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–480

e2
“Spraying cobalt sulfate could significantly increase cobalt and zinc contents,decrease boron and selenium contents”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–714

e3
“had no significant influence on molybdenum,iron,manganese and copper contents”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–796

Title

Effect of Spraying Cobalt Sulfate on the Yield and Absorption of Trace Elements in Alfalfa

Jie Xiao-lei Anhui nongye kexue 2007

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Spraying cobalt at 300 mg/kg gave the best increase in dry grass yield of alfalfa, 27.53% above clear water control.
Intervention effect Spraying cobalt sulfate increased cobalt and zinc contents in alfalfa.
Intervention effect Spraying cobalt sulfate decreased boron and selenium contents in alfalfa.
Intervention effect Spraying cobalt sulfate had no significant influence on copper contents in alfalfa.
Intervention effect Spraying cobalt sulfate increased accumulation of cobalt, boron and iron in alfalfa.
Intervention effect Spraying cobalt sulfate increased accumulation of manganese, copper and zinc in alfalfa.
Intervention effect Cobalt accumulation in alfalfa was highest at 600 mg/kg cobalt application.
Intervention effect Accumulation of other trace elements in alfalfa was highest at 300 mg/kg cobalt application.
Intervention effect Spraying cobalt sulfate significantly decreased the accumulation of selenium in alfalfa.
Intervention effect Spraying cobalt sulfate had no significant influence on molybdenum accumulation in alfalfa.

Effects of Interaction between Phosphorus Nutrition and Cultivation Methods on Grain Yield and Phosphorus Utilization of Upland Rice and Paddy Rice 3

Show all 3 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

paddy rice showed no difference in P use efficiency of grain yield production as P increased under DC.

Taxon: paddy ricee0
Treatment: increase of P levele0
Outcome: P use efficiency of grain yield productione0
Direction: no differencee0
Setting: DCe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Under DC, with the increase of P level, both upland rice and paddy rice significantly increased grain yield and P accumulation, and upland rice showed a significant decrease and paddy rice had no difference in P use efficiency of matter production and P use efficiency of grain yield production.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–830

Title

Effects of Interaction between Phosphorus Nutrition and Cultivation Methods on Grain Yield and Phosphorus Utilization of Upland Rice and Paddy Rice

Zhang Ya ACTA AGRONOMICA SINICA 2011

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect upland rice grain yield increased with P level under DC.
Intervention effect upland rice P accumulation increased with P level under DC.
Intervention effect paddy rice grain yield increased with P level under DC.
Intervention effect paddy rice P accumulation increased with P level under DC.
Intervention effect upland rice showed decrease in P use efficiency of matter production as P increased under DC.
Intervention effect paddy rice showed no difference in P use efficiency of matter production as P increased under DC.
Intervention effect Under MC grain yield, P accumulation, and P use efficiency of grain yield production did not significantly differ among P levels.
Intervention effect For upland rice under MC, HP had decrease P use efficiency of matter production than NP.
Intervention effect For upland rice under MC, HP had lower grain yield than NP.
Intervention effect For upland rice under MC, HP had lower P accumulation than NP.
Intervention effect For paddy rice under MC, HP and NP did not differ significantly in either P use efficiency measure.
Intervention effect DC had less number of adventitious roots than MC in both rice types.
Intervention effect DC had lower P accumulation amount than MC in both rice types.
Intervention effect DC had higher P use efficiency of matter production than MC in both rice types.
Intervention effect DC had lower P use efficiency of grain yield production than MC in both rice types.
Intervention effect DC had lower grain yield than MC in both rice types.
Association DC reduced grain yield more in upland than in paddy rice.
Association Upland rice had less number of adventitious roots than paddy rice.
Association Upland rice had lower P accumulation amount than paddy rice.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

paddy rice showed no difference in P use efficiency of matter production as P increased under DC.

Taxon: paddy ricee0
Treatment: increase of P levele0
Outcome: P use efficiency of matter productione0
Direction: no differencee0
Setting: DCe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Under DC, with the increase of P level, both upland rice and paddy rice significantly increased grain yield and P accumulation, and upland rice showed a significant decrease and paddy rice had no difference in P use efficiency of matter production and P use efficiency of grain yield production.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–830

Title

Effects of Interaction between Phosphorus Nutrition and Cultivation Methods on Grain Yield and Phosphorus Utilization of Upland Rice and Paddy Rice

Zhang Ya ACTA AGRONOMICA SINICA 2011

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect upland rice grain yield increased with P level under DC.
Intervention effect upland rice P accumulation increased with P level under DC.
Intervention effect paddy rice grain yield increased with P level under DC.
Intervention effect paddy rice P accumulation increased with P level under DC.
Intervention effect upland rice showed decrease in P use efficiency of matter production as P increased under DC.
Intervention effect paddy rice showed no difference in P use efficiency of grain yield production as P increased under DC.
Intervention effect Under MC grain yield, P accumulation, and P use efficiency of grain yield production did not significantly differ among P levels.
Intervention effect For upland rice under MC, HP had decrease P use efficiency of matter production than NP.
Intervention effect For upland rice under MC, HP had lower grain yield than NP.
Intervention effect For upland rice under MC, HP had lower P accumulation than NP.
Intervention effect For paddy rice under MC, HP and NP did not differ significantly in either P use efficiency measure.
Intervention effect DC had less number of adventitious roots than MC in both rice types.
Intervention effect DC had lower P accumulation amount than MC in both rice types.
Intervention effect DC had higher P use efficiency of matter production than MC in both rice types.
Intervention effect DC had lower P use efficiency of grain yield production than MC in both rice types.
Intervention effect DC had lower grain yield than MC in both rice types.
Association DC reduced grain yield more in upland than in paddy rice.
Association Upland rice had less number of adventitious roots than paddy rice.
Association Upland rice had lower P accumulation amount than paddy rice.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

For paddy rice under MC, HP and NP did not differ significantly in either P use efficiency measure.

Taxon: paddy ricee0
Treatment: HPe0
Outcome: P use efficiency of matter production and P use efficiency of grain yield productione0
Direction: no significant differencee0
Comparator: NPe0

Verbatim

e0
“There was a significant decrease in P use efficiency of matter production between HP and NP for the upland rice, but the grain yield and P accumulation at HP were lower than at NP, there was no significant difference in P use efficiency of matter production and P use efficiency of grain yield production between HP and NP for paddy rice.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1301

Title

Effects of Interaction between Phosphorus Nutrition and Cultivation Methods on Grain Yield and Phosphorus Utilization of Upland Rice and Paddy Rice

Zhang Ya ACTA AGRONOMICA SINICA 2011

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect upland rice grain yield increased with P level under DC.
Intervention effect upland rice P accumulation increased with P level under DC.
Intervention effect paddy rice grain yield increased with P level under DC.
Intervention effect paddy rice P accumulation increased with P level under DC.
Intervention effect upland rice showed decrease in P use efficiency of matter production as P increased under DC.
Intervention effect paddy rice showed no difference in P use efficiency of matter production as P increased under DC.
Intervention effect paddy rice showed no difference in P use efficiency of grain yield production as P increased under DC.
Intervention effect Under MC grain yield, P accumulation, and P use efficiency of grain yield production did not significantly differ among P levels.
Intervention effect For upland rice under MC, HP had decrease P use efficiency of matter production than NP.
Intervention effect For upland rice under MC, HP had lower grain yield than NP.
Intervention effect For upland rice under MC, HP had lower P accumulation than NP.
Intervention effect DC had less number of adventitious roots than MC in both rice types.
Intervention effect DC had lower P accumulation amount than MC in both rice types.
Intervention effect DC had higher P use efficiency of matter production than MC in both rice types.
Intervention effect DC had lower P use efficiency of grain yield production than MC in both rice types.
Intervention effect DC had lower grain yield than MC in both rice types.
Association DC reduced grain yield more in upland than in paddy rice.
Association Upland rice had less number of adventitious roots than paddy rice.
Association Upland rice had lower P accumulation amount than paddy rice.

Effects of Bulk Density on Root Growth of High Yield Maize and Their Regulation 3

Show all 3 →

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater tillage thickness reduced maize yield without a significant difference.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Treatment: thickness of tillagee0
Outcome: yields of maizee0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“With the thickness of tillage increased,plant height,stem diameter,total root length,chlorophyll a and yields of maize were decrease,but effect was not significantly distinct”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1968–2142

Title

Effects of Bulk Density on Root Growth of High Yield Maize and Their Regulation

XU Long-chao Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica 2012

Other claims from this paper (12)

Association Maize root growth indexes declined as bulk density increased.
Intervention effect Root growth parameters differed when density changed from 1.2 to 1.3 g/cm3.
Association Above 1.3 g/cm3 density had no obvious influence on root growth.
Association Root activity decreased as density rose above 1.3 g/cm3.
Intervention effect Organic fertilizer was more effective at high soil density.
Intervention effect Organic fertilizer at 4% and 5% had no obvious treatment effect.
Intervention effect Organic fertilizer reduced soil bulk density.
Intervention effect Organic fertilizer increased soil porosity, water capacity and air porosity.
Association Greater tillage thickness reduced plant height, stem diameter and total root length without a significant difference.
Association Greater tillage thickness reduced chlorophyll a without a significant difference.
Intervention effect Adjusting top-layer thickness from 30 to 40 cm did not change maize growth index.
Recommendation The authors recommend organic fertilizer and turn-over tillage for compact soil.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater tillage thickness reduced chlorophyll a without a significant difference.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Treatment: thickness of tillagee0
Outcome: chlorophyll ae0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“With the thickness of tillage increased,plant height,stem diameter,total root length,chlorophyll a and yields of maize were decrease,but effect was not significantly distinct”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1968–2142

Title

Effects of Bulk Density on Root Growth of High Yield Maize and Their Regulation

XU Long-chao Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica 2012

Other claims from this paper (12)

Association Maize root growth indexes declined as bulk density increased.
Intervention effect Root growth parameters differed when density changed from 1.2 to 1.3 g/cm3.
Association Above 1.3 g/cm3 density had no obvious influence on root growth.
Association Root activity decreased as density rose above 1.3 g/cm3.
Intervention effect Organic fertilizer was more effective at high soil density.
Intervention effect Organic fertilizer at 4% and 5% had no obvious treatment effect.
Intervention effect Organic fertilizer reduced soil bulk density.
Intervention effect Organic fertilizer increased soil porosity, water capacity and air porosity.
Association Greater tillage thickness reduced plant height, stem diameter and total root length without a significant difference.
Association Greater tillage thickness reduced maize yield without a significant difference.
Intervention effect Adjusting top-layer thickness from 30 to 40 cm did not change maize growth index.
Recommendation The authors recommend organic fertilizer and turn-over tillage for compact soil.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater tillage thickness reduced plant height, stem diameter and total root length without a significant difference.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Treatment: thickness of tillagee0
Outcome: plant height,stem diameter,total root lengthe0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“With the thickness of tillage increased,plant height,stem diameter,total root length,chlorophyll a and yields of maize were decrease,but effect was not significantly distinct”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1968–2142

Title

Effects of Bulk Density on Root Growth of High Yield Maize and Their Regulation

XU Long-chao Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica 2012

Other claims from this paper (12)

Association Maize root growth indexes declined as bulk density increased.
Intervention effect Root growth parameters differed when density changed from 1.2 to 1.3 g/cm3.
Association Above 1.3 g/cm3 density had no obvious influence on root growth.
Association Root activity decreased as density rose above 1.3 g/cm3.
Intervention effect Organic fertilizer was more effective at high soil density.
Intervention effect Organic fertilizer at 4% and 5% had no obvious treatment effect.
Intervention effect Organic fertilizer reduced soil bulk density.
Intervention effect Organic fertilizer increased soil porosity, water capacity and air porosity.
Association Greater tillage thickness reduced chlorophyll a without a significant difference.
Association Greater tillage thickness reduced maize yield without a significant difference.
Intervention effect Adjusting top-layer thickness from 30 to 40 cm did not change maize growth index.
Recommendation The authors recommend organic fertilizer and turn-over tillage for compact soil.

Effects of Nitrogen on Yield and N Use Efficiency of Super Rice Shennong 265 3

Show all 3 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing nitrogen decreased yield by 4.9%, without a significant difference.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Treatment: Nitrogent1
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 4.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“yield,effective panicles and grains per panicle decrease by 4.9%,2.4% and 2.5% respectively.The difference did not reach significant level”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–510

t0
“Rice Shennong 265”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–76

t1
“Nitrogen”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–19

Title

Effects of Nitrogen on Yield and N Use Efficiency of Super Rice Shennong 265

Sun GuoCai 2011

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Reducing nitrogen to 147kg/hm2 increased seed setting rate by 4.7%.
Intervention effect Reducing nitrogen to 147kg/hm2 increased 1000-grain weight by 2.4%.
Intervention effect Reducing nitrogen decreased effective panicles by 2.4%, without a significant difference.
Intervention effect Reducing nitrogen decreased grains per panicle by 2.5%, without a significant difference.
Observation Leaf, stem and panicle nitrogen content and accumulation decreased across growth stages.
Observation Nitrogen harvest index, physical efficiency and agronomic efficiency increased.
Observation Partial productivity increased.
Observation Nitrogen remobilization to panicles increased.
Recommendation The authors recommend reducing nitrogen fertilizer for optimal yield structure and nitrogen efficiency.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing nitrogen decreased effective panicles by 2.4%, without a significant difference.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Treatment: Nitrogent1
Outcome: effective paniclese0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 2.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“yield,effective panicles and grains per panicle decrease by 4.9%,2.4% and 2.5% respectively.The difference did not reach significant level”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–510

t0
“Rice Shennong 265”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–76

t1
“Nitrogen”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–19

Title

Effects of Nitrogen on Yield and N Use Efficiency of Super Rice Shennong 265

Sun GuoCai 2011

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Reducing nitrogen to 147kg/hm2 increased seed setting rate by 4.7%.
Intervention effect Reducing nitrogen to 147kg/hm2 increased 1000-grain weight by 2.4%.
Intervention effect Reducing nitrogen decreased yield by 4.9%, without a significant difference.
Intervention effect Reducing nitrogen decreased grains per panicle by 2.5%, without a significant difference.
Observation Leaf, stem and panicle nitrogen content and accumulation decreased across growth stages.
Observation Nitrogen harvest index, physical efficiency and agronomic efficiency increased.
Observation Partial productivity increased.
Observation Nitrogen remobilization to panicles increased.
Recommendation The authors recommend reducing nitrogen fertilizer for optimal yield structure and nitrogen efficiency.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing nitrogen decreased grains per panicle by 2.5%, without a significant difference.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Treatment: Nitrogent1
Outcome: grains per paniclee0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 2.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“yield,effective panicles and grains per panicle decrease by 4.9%,2.4% and 2.5% respectively.The difference did not reach significant level”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–510

t0
“Rice Shennong 265”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–76

t1
“Nitrogen”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–19

Title

Effects of Nitrogen on Yield and N Use Efficiency of Super Rice Shennong 265

Sun GuoCai 2011

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Reducing nitrogen to 147kg/hm2 increased seed setting rate by 4.7%.
Intervention effect Reducing nitrogen to 147kg/hm2 increased 1000-grain weight by 2.4%.
Intervention effect Reducing nitrogen decreased yield by 4.9%, without a significant difference.
Intervention effect Reducing nitrogen decreased effective panicles by 2.4%, without a significant difference.
Observation Leaf, stem and panicle nitrogen content and accumulation decreased across growth stages.
Observation Nitrogen harvest index, physical efficiency and agronomic efficiency increased.
Observation Partial productivity increased.
Observation Nitrogen remobilization to panicles increased.
Recommendation The authors recommend reducing nitrogen fertilizer for optimal yield structure and nitrogen efficiency.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

Assessment of the nitrogen requirements of planted maize (Zea mays L.) in the semi-arid areas of Zimbabwe 4

Impact of Brown Spot Caused by Septoria glycines on Soybean in Ohio 4

Effect of Deficit Irrigation and Planting Method on Maize Plants under Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt 4

Compensatory Ability of Strawberries to Bud and Flower Removal: Implications for Managing the Strawberry Bud Weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) 3

The effect of Take Off seed treatment component on the healthiness and yield of spring barley 3

Effects of irrigation and fertilization management on fiber yield and quality of kenaf 3

Effect of Spraying Cobalt Sulfate on the Yield and Absorption of Trace Elements in Alfalfa 3

Effects of Interaction between Phosphorus Nutrition and Cultivation Methods on Grain Yield and Phosphorus Utilization of Upland Rice and Paddy Rice 3

Effects of Bulk Density on Root Growth of High Yield Maize and Their Regulation 3

Effects of Nitrogen on Yield and N Use Efficiency of Super Rice Shennong 265 3