Search claims · PlantClaims

Salt Tolerance of Different Cultivars of Chickpea as Influenced by Zinc Fertilization 20

Show all 20 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At ESP 20.8, L550 grain yield decreased 47.45 per cent.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material: L550e0
Outcome: grain yielde1
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 47.45 per cente0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0
“47.45 per cent in L550”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–480

t0
“Chickpea”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–49

e1
“decrease in grain yield at ESP 20.8 was 82.76 per cent in Phule G5”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–456

Title

Salt Tolerance of Different Cultivars of Chickpea as Influenced by Zinc Fertilization

S.K. Misra Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 2001

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, Phule G5 grain yield decreased 82.76 per cent from normal conditions.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, GNG 146 grain yield decreased 60.38 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, ICCC 32 grain yield decreased 49.87 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, BG261 grain yield decreased 52.90 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, JG 315 grain yield decreased 52.72 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, BGM 413 grain yield decreased 80.95 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, Radhey grain yield decreased 80.31 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 24 grain yield decreased 64.46 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 70 grain yield decreased 58.73 per cent.
Intervention effect Zinc application reduced the corresponding grain yield loss for Phule G5 to 64.48 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding L550 grain yield loss was 34.28 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding GNG 146 grain yield loss was 43.13 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding ICCC 32 grain yield loss was 34.94 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BG261 grain yield loss was 36.76 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding JG 315 grain yield loss was 36.18 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BGM 413 grain yield loss was 61.85 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding Radhey grain yield loss was 61.34 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 24 grain yield loss was 44.15 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 70 grain yield loss was 41.45 per cent.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At ESP 20.8, BG261 grain yield decreased 52.90 per cent.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material: BG261e0
Outcome: grain yielde1
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 52.90 per cente0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0
“52.90 per cent in BG261”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–558

t0
“Chickpea”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–49

e1
“decrease in grain yield at ESP 20.8 was 82.76 per cent in Phule G5”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–456

Title

Salt Tolerance of Different Cultivars of Chickpea as Influenced by Zinc Fertilization

S.K. Misra Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 2001

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, Phule G5 grain yield decreased 82.76 per cent from normal conditions.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, L550 grain yield decreased 47.45 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, GNG 146 grain yield decreased 60.38 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, ICCC 32 grain yield decreased 49.87 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, JG 315 grain yield decreased 52.72 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, BGM 413 grain yield decreased 80.95 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, Radhey grain yield decreased 80.31 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 24 grain yield decreased 64.46 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 70 grain yield decreased 58.73 per cent.
Intervention effect Zinc application reduced the corresponding grain yield loss for Phule G5 to 64.48 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding L550 grain yield loss was 34.28 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding GNG 146 grain yield loss was 43.13 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding ICCC 32 grain yield loss was 34.94 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BG261 grain yield loss was 36.76 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding JG 315 grain yield loss was 36.18 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BGM 413 grain yield loss was 61.85 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding Radhey grain yield loss was 61.34 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 24 grain yield loss was 44.15 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 70 grain yield loss was 41.45 per cent.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At ESP 20.8, Radhey grain yield decreased 80.31 per cent.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material: Radheye0
Outcome: grain yielde1
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 80.31 per cente0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0
“80.31 per cent in Radhey”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–637

t0
“Chickpea”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–49

e1
“decrease in grain yield at ESP 20.8 was 82.76 per cent in Phule G5”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–456

Title

Salt Tolerance of Different Cultivars of Chickpea as Influenced by Zinc Fertilization

S.K. Misra Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 2001

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, Phule G5 grain yield decreased 82.76 per cent from normal conditions.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, L550 grain yield decreased 47.45 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, GNG 146 grain yield decreased 60.38 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, ICCC 32 grain yield decreased 49.87 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, BG261 grain yield decreased 52.90 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, JG 315 grain yield decreased 52.72 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, BGM 413 grain yield decreased 80.95 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 24 grain yield decreased 64.46 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 70 grain yield decreased 58.73 per cent.
Intervention effect Zinc application reduced the corresponding grain yield loss for Phule G5 to 64.48 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding L550 grain yield loss was 34.28 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding GNG 146 grain yield loss was 43.13 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding ICCC 32 grain yield loss was 34.94 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BG261 grain yield loss was 36.76 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding JG 315 grain yield loss was 36.18 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BGM 413 grain yield loss was 61.85 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding Radhey grain yield loss was 61.34 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 24 grain yield loss was 44.15 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 70 grain yield loss was 41.45 per cent.

ACC-Deaminase, Phosphate-Solubilizing Pseudomonas fluorescens Increase Phosphorus and Decrease Cadmium Concentration to Enhance Wheat Yield 20

Show all 20 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P0, with a reported range of 24-132%.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: P90e0
Outcome: 1000-grain weight (TGW), yield and P concentratione0
Direction: Increasede0
Value: 24-132%e0
Comparator: P0e0

Verbatim

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133

e0
“Increased 1000-grain weight (TGW), yield and P concentration of wheat was noted at P90 over P0 (24-132%) and P45 (3.7-37%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–774

Title

ACC-Deaminase, Phosphate-Solubilizing Pseudomonas fluorescens Increase Phosphorus and Decrease Cadmium Concentration to Enhance Wheat Yield

Zia-ul-Hassan; S. Khokhar; I. Rajpar; et al. Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences 2016. doi:10.6000/1927-5129.2016.12.48

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P45, with a reported range of 3.7-37%.
Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 13-57%.
Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 5.4-34%.
Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM1, with a reported range of 1.4 to 2.4-fold.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 34%.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P45 by 17%.
Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 21%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 22%.
Intervention effect SM1 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 8%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM1 by 2.7-fold.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 25%.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P45 by 18%.
Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 8%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 18%.
Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 9%.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat TGW over SM0 by 8.6.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat straw-P over SM0 by 29%.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat Grain-Cd over SM0 by 30.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat straw-Cd over SM0 by 23%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P45, with a reported range of 3.7-37%.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: P90e0
Outcome: 1000-grain weight (TGW), yield and P concentratione0
Direction: Increasede0
Value: 3.7-37%e0
Comparator: P45e0

Verbatim

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133

e0
“Increased 1000-grain weight (TGW), yield and P concentration of wheat was noted at P90 over P0 (24-132%) and P45 (3.7-37%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–774

Title

ACC-Deaminase, Phosphate-Solubilizing Pseudomonas fluorescens Increase Phosphorus and Decrease Cadmium Concentration to Enhance Wheat Yield

Zia-ul-Hassan; S. Khokhar; I. Rajpar; et al. Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences 2016. doi:10.6000/1927-5129.2016.12.48

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P0, with a reported range of 24-132%.
Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 13-57%.
Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 5.4-34%.
Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM1, with a reported range of 1.4 to 2.4-fold.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 34%.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P45 by 17%.
Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 21%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 22%.
Intervention effect SM1 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 8%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM1 by 2.7-fold.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 25%.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P45 by 18%.
Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 8%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 18%.
Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 9%.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat TGW over SM0 by 8.6.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat straw-P over SM0 by 29%.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat Grain-Cd over SM0 by 30.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat straw-Cd over SM0 by 23%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 34%.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: P90e0
Outcome: Grain-Cd concentratione0
Direction: decreasede0
Value: 34%e0
Comparator: P0e0

Verbatim

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133

e0
“Grain-Cd concentration decreased at P90 over P0 (34%) and P45 (17%), and at P45 over P0 (21%).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–966

Title

ACC-Deaminase, Phosphate-Solubilizing Pseudomonas fluorescens Increase Phosphorus and Decrease Cadmium Concentration to Enhance Wheat Yield

Zia-ul-Hassan; S. Khokhar; I. Rajpar; et al. Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences 2016. doi:10.6000/1927-5129.2016.12.48

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P0, with a reported range of 24-132%.
Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P45, with a reported range of 3.7-37%.
Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 13-57%.
Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 5.4-34%.
Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM1, with a reported range of 1.4 to 2.4-fold.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P45 by 17%.
Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 21%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 22%.
Intervention effect SM1 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 8%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM1 by 2.7-fold.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 25%.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P45 by 18%.
Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 8%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 18%.
Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 9%.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat TGW over SM0 by 8.6.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat straw-P over SM0 by 29%.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat Grain-Cd over SM0 by 30.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat straw-Cd over SM0 by 23%.

ESTIMATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN 18

Show all 18 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides did not decrease weed number.

Taxon: CORNZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment: herbicides were applied together with PGR Zeastimuline0
Outcome: number of weedse0
Direction: no decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“where herbicides were applied together with PGR Zeastimulin, no decrease in the number of weeds was observed”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1758

t0
“CORN”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–93

t1
“HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–93

e1
“the length of maize cobs increased from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm in the version of weed control by Laudis (0,5 kg/ha)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2146–2257

e2
“which gave a grain yield increase of 2,9 t/ha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2611–2656

e3
“Stellar herbicide (1,1 l/ha) - for 3,1 t/ha.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2662–2706

e4
“where herbicides were applied together with PGR Zeastimulin, no decrease in the number of weeds was observed”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1758

Title

ESTIMATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN

Svitlana Okrushko Agriculture and Forestry 2020. doi:10.37128/2707-5826-2020-2-9

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed numbers by 89,7% versus control after treatment.
Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed quantity by 94,7% at harvest.
Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed mass by 655 g/m2 at harvest.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 93,5% at the first survey.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,0% at the second survey.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,9% at the third survey.
Intervention effect Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides slightly decreased dry weed biomass.
Intervention effect Maize height was 17,3% higher on herbicidal variant 2 than control.
Intervention effect Maize height was 19,8% higher on herbicidal variant 4 than control.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin further increased maize height by 2 cm.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm with Laudis.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 18,3 cm to 19,4 cm with Stellar.
Intervention effect Weed reduction and Zeastimulin increased maize cob diameter.
Intervention effect Laudis increased maize grain yield by 2,9 t/ha.
Intervention effect Stellar increased maize grain yield by 3,1 t/ha.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,5% with Laudis.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,2% with Stellar.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides slightly decreased dry weed biomass.

Taxon: CORNZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment: PGR Zeastimuline4
Outcome: above-ground air-dry mass of weed plantse0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“only a slight decrease in the above-ground air-dry mass of weed plants was observed.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1764–1848

t0
“CORN”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–93

t1
“HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–93

e1
“the length of maize cobs increased from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm in the version of weed control by Laudis (0,5 kg/ha)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2146–2257

e2
“which gave a grain yield increase of 2,9 t/ha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2611–2656

e3
“Stellar herbicide (1,1 l/ha) - for 3,1 t/ha.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2662–2706

e4
“where herbicides were applied together with PGR Zeastimulin, no decrease in the number of weeds was observed”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1758

Title

ESTIMATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN

Svitlana Okrushko Agriculture and Forestry 2020. doi:10.37128/2707-5826-2020-2-9

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed numbers by 89,7% versus control after treatment.
Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed quantity by 94,7% at harvest.
Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed mass by 655 g/m2 at harvest.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 93,5% at the first survey.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,0% at the second survey.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,9% at the third survey.
Intervention effect Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides did not decrease weed number.
Intervention effect Maize height was 17,3% higher on herbicidal variant 2 than control.
Intervention effect Maize height was 19,8% higher on herbicidal variant 4 than control.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin further increased maize height by 2 cm.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm with Laudis.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 18,3 cm to 19,4 cm with Stellar.
Intervention effect Weed reduction and Zeastimulin increased maize cob diameter.
Intervention effect Laudis increased maize grain yield by 2,9 t/ha.
Intervention effect Stellar increased maize grain yield by 3,1 t/ha.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,5% with Laudis.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,2% with Stellar.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,0% at the second survey.

Taxon: CORNZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment: Stellar herbicidee3
Outcome: weed numberse0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 97,0%e0
Qualifier: seconde0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The decrease in weed numbers was 93,5% during the first survey, 97,0% during the second and 97,9% during the third.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1619

t0
“CORN”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–93

t1
“HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–93

e1
“the length of maize cobs increased from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm in the version of weed control by Laudis (0,5 kg/ha)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2146–2257

e2
“which gave a grain yield increase of 2,9 t/ha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2611–2656

e3
“Stellar herbicide (1,1 l/ha) - for 3,1 t/ha.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2662–2706

e4
“where herbicides were applied together with PGR Zeastimulin, no decrease in the number of weeds was observed”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1758

Title

ESTIMATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN

Svitlana Okrushko Agriculture and Forestry 2020. doi:10.37128/2707-5826-2020-2-9

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed numbers by 89,7% versus control after treatment.
Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed quantity by 94,7% at harvest.
Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed mass by 655 g/m2 at harvest.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 93,5% at the first survey.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,9% at the third survey.
Intervention effect Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides did not decrease weed number.
Intervention effect Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides slightly decreased dry weed biomass.
Intervention effect Maize height was 17,3% higher on herbicidal variant 2 than control.
Intervention effect Maize height was 19,8% higher on herbicidal variant 4 than control.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin further increased maize height by 2 cm.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm with Laudis.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 18,3 cm to 19,4 cm with Stellar.
Intervention effect Weed reduction and Zeastimulin increased maize cob diameter.
Intervention effect Laudis increased maize grain yield by 2,9 t/ha.
Intervention effect Stellar increased maize grain yield by 3,1 t/ha.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,5% with Laudis.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,2% with Stellar.

Neglecting acclimation of photosynthesis under drought can cause significant errors in predicting leaf photosynthesis in wheat 17

Show all 17 →

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The decrease in wheat photosynthesis under drought varied with growth temperature.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5
Treatment: T growthe0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5
Outcome: decrease in photosynthesise0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5
Direction: decreasee0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5

Verbatim

e0
“The decrease in photosynthesis under drought varied among T growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1392

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–126

e1
“well‐watered conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1298

e2
“T opt for V cmax was up to 40°C under well‐watered conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1298

e3
“The decrease in photosynthesis under drought varied among T growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1392

e4
“The temperature response of photosynthetic quantum yield under drought was partly attributed to photorespiration”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1540

e5
“both diffusional and biochemical parameters of photosynthesis and their thermal sensitivity acclimate little to T growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1851

Title

Neglecting acclimation of photosynthesis under drought can cause significant errors in predicting leaf photosynthesis in wheat

Liang Fang; Pierre Martre; Kaining Jin; et al. Global Change Biology 2022. doi:10.1111/gcb.16488

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observation Wheat photosynthesis acclimated more to drought than to growth temperature.
Intervention effect Drought lowered the optimum temperature of wheat photosynthesis.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat light‐saturated net photosynthesis at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat stomatal conductance at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat mesophyll conductance at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat maximum rate of electron transport ( J max ) at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat maximum rate of carboxylation by Rubisco ( V cmax ) at the photosynthetic optimum.
Observation Optimum temperature for wheat V cmax reached 40°C when well watered.
Observation Optimum temperature for wheat V cmax was 24–34°C under drought.
Observation The drought decrease in wheat photosynthesis was similar across genotypes.
Mechanism Photorespiration partly explained the temperature response of wheat photosynthetic quantum yield under drought.
Mechanism Alternative electron transport explained more of the wheat quantum yield response under drought.
Mechanism Changed wheat leaf nitrogen did not fully explain the biochemical parameter changes.
Observation Wheat diffusional and biochemical photosynthesis parameters acclimated little to growth temperature.
Observation Wheat photosynthetic parameters acclimated considerably to drought and combined drought and growth temperature.
Method / resource Common models strongly overestimated wheat leaf photosynthesis under variable temperature and drought.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The drought decrease in wheat photosynthesis was similar across genotypes.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5
Material: genotypese0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5
Outcome: decrease in photosynthesise0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5
Direction: similare0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5

Verbatim

e0
“was similar between genotypes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1426

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–126

e1
“well‐watered conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1298

e2
“T opt for V cmax was up to 40°C under well‐watered conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1298

e3
“The decrease in photosynthesis under drought varied among T growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1392

e4
“The temperature response of photosynthetic quantum yield under drought was partly attributed to photorespiration”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1540

e5
“both diffusional and biochemical parameters of photosynthesis and their thermal sensitivity acclimate little to T growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1851

Title

Neglecting acclimation of photosynthesis under drought can cause significant errors in predicting leaf photosynthesis in wheat

Liang Fang; Pierre Martre; Kaining Jin; et al. Global Change Biology 2022. doi:10.1111/gcb.16488

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observation Wheat photosynthesis acclimated more to drought than to growth temperature.
Intervention effect Drought lowered the optimum temperature of wheat photosynthesis.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat light‐saturated net photosynthesis at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat stomatal conductance at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat mesophyll conductance at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat maximum rate of electron transport ( J max ) at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat maximum rate of carboxylation by Rubisco ( V cmax ) at the photosynthetic optimum.
Observation Optimum temperature for wheat V cmax reached 40°C when well watered.
Observation Optimum temperature for wheat V cmax was 24–34°C under drought.
Association The decrease in wheat photosynthesis under drought varied with growth temperature.
Mechanism Photorespiration partly explained the temperature response of wheat photosynthetic quantum yield under drought.
Mechanism Alternative electron transport explained more of the wheat quantum yield response under drought.
Mechanism Changed wheat leaf nitrogen did not fully explain the biochemical parameter changes.
Observation Wheat diffusional and biochemical photosynthesis parameters acclimated little to growth temperature.
Observation Wheat photosynthetic parameters acclimated considerably to drought and combined drought and growth temperature.
Method / resource Common models strongly overestimated wheat leaf photosynthesis under variable temperature and drought.

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternative electron transport explained more of the wheat quantum yield response under drought.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5
Treatment: droughte0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5
Outcome: temperature response of photosynthetic quantum yielde0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5
Qualifier: alternative electron transporte0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5

Verbatim

e0
“but more to alternative electron transport”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1583

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–126

e1
“well‐watered conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1298

e2
“T opt for V cmax was up to 40°C under well‐watered conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1298

e3
“The decrease in photosynthesis under drought varied among T growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1392

e4
“The temperature response of photosynthetic quantum yield under drought was partly attributed to photorespiration”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1540

e5
“both diffusional and biochemical parameters of photosynthesis and their thermal sensitivity acclimate little to T growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1851

Title

Neglecting acclimation of photosynthesis under drought can cause significant errors in predicting leaf photosynthesis in wheat

Liang Fang; Pierre Martre; Kaining Jin; et al. Global Change Biology 2022. doi:10.1111/gcb.16488

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observation Wheat photosynthesis acclimated more to drought than to growth temperature.
Intervention effect Drought lowered the optimum temperature of wheat photosynthesis.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat light‐saturated net photosynthesis at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat stomatal conductance at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat mesophyll conductance at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat maximum rate of electron transport ( J max ) at the photosynthetic optimum.
Intervention effect Drought lowered wheat maximum rate of carboxylation by Rubisco ( V cmax ) at the photosynthetic optimum.
Observation Optimum temperature for wheat V cmax reached 40°C when well watered.
Observation Optimum temperature for wheat V cmax was 24–34°C under drought.
Association The decrease in wheat photosynthesis under drought varied with growth temperature.
Observation The drought decrease in wheat photosynthesis was similar across genotypes.
Mechanism Photorespiration partly explained the temperature response of wheat photosynthetic quantum yield under drought.
Mechanism Changed wheat leaf nitrogen did not fully explain the biochemical parameter changes.
Observation Wheat diffusional and biochemical photosynthesis parameters acclimated little to growth temperature.
Observation Wheat photosynthetic parameters acclimated considerably to drought and combined drought and growth temperature.
Method / resource Common models strongly overestimated wheat leaf photosynthesis under variable temperature and drought.

Root System, Phenology and Yield of Sunflower in Relation to Nitrogen and Phosphorus 16

Show all 16 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P decrease sunflower CDM/RDM relation.

Taxon: SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment: Pe0
Outcome: CDM/RDM relatione0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Sunflower”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–45

e0
“The time to phenological stages was similar between treatment. The N and in minor degree the P increased grain yield (GY) and oil yield (OY) by increases in the grains number (GN), capitulum area (CA), canopy dry matter (CDM) and radical area (RA). In contrast, the P increase RDM but decrease the CDM/RDM relation. The effect of the interaction N * P on GY, OY indicates it is necessary to seek the best combination of …” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–1215

Title

Root System, Phenology and Yield of Sunflower in Relation to Nitrogen and Phosphorus

José Alberto Salvador Escalante Estrada; María Teresa Rodríguez González; Yolanda Isabel Escalante Estrada Helia 2015. doi:10.1515/helia-2014-0025

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect N increased sunflower grain yield (GY).
Intervention effect N increased sunflower oil yield (OY).
Intervention effect P increased sunflower grain yield (GY).
Intervention effect P increased sunflower oil yield (OY).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower grains number (GN).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower capitulum area (CA).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower canopy dry matter (CDM).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower radical area (RA).
Intervention effect P increase sunflower RDM.
Intervention effect Phenological timing was similar across treatments.
Intervention effect Grain size did not change with N and P.
Intervention effect Grain oil content did not change with N and P.
Observation The sunflower growth cycle lasted 122 days.
Observation Seasonal sunflower ETc was 207 mm.
Observation Seasonal heat units were 1,369°C d.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N increased sunflower grain yield (GY).

Taxon: SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment: Ne0
Outcome: grain yield (GY)e0
Direction: increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Sunflower”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–45

e0
“The time to phenological stages was similar between treatment. The N and in minor degree the P increased grain yield (GY) and oil yield (OY) by increases in the grains number (GN), capitulum area (CA), canopy dry matter (CDM) and radical area (RA). In contrast, the P increase RDM but decrease the CDM/RDM relation. The effect of the interaction N * P on GY, OY indicates it is necessary to seek the best combination of …” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–1215

Title

Root System, Phenology and Yield of Sunflower in Relation to Nitrogen and Phosphorus

José Alberto Salvador Escalante Estrada; María Teresa Rodríguez González; Yolanda Isabel Escalante Estrada Helia 2015. doi:10.1515/helia-2014-0025

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect N increased sunflower oil yield (OY).
Intervention effect P increased sunflower grain yield (GY).
Intervention effect P increased sunflower oil yield (OY).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower grains number (GN).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower capitulum area (CA).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower canopy dry matter (CDM).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower radical area (RA).
Intervention effect P increase sunflower RDM.
Intervention effect P decrease sunflower CDM/RDM relation.
Intervention effect Phenological timing was similar across treatments.
Intervention effect Grain size did not change with N and P.
Intervention effect Grain oil content did not change with N and P.
Observation The sunflower growth cycle lasted 122 days.
Observation Seasonal sunflower ETc was 207 mm.
Observation Seasonal heat units were 1,369°C d.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N increased sunflower oil yield (OY).

Taxon: SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment: Ne0
Outcome: oil yield (OY)e0
Direction: increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Sunflower”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–45

e0
“The time to phenological stages was similar between treatment. The N and in minor degree the P increased grain yield (GY) and oil yield (OY) by increases in the grains number (GN), capitulum area (CA), canopy dry matter (CDM) and radical area (RA). In contrast, the P increase RDM but decrease the CDM/RDM relation. The effect of the interaction N * P on GY, OY indicates it is necessary to seek the best combination of …” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–1215

Title

Root System, Phenology and Yield of Sunflower in Relation to Nitrogen and Phosphorus

José Alberto Salvador Escalante Estrada; María Teresa Rodríguez González; Yolanda Isabel Escalante Estrada Helia 2015. doi:10.1515/helia-2014-0025

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect N increased sunflower grain yield (GY).
Intervention effect P increased sunflower grain yield (GY).
Intervention effect P increased sunflower oil yield (OY).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower grains number (GN).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower capitulum area (CA).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower canopy dry matter (CDM).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower radical area (RA).
Intervention effect P increase sunflower RDM.
Intervention effect P decrease sunflower CDM/RDM relation.
Intervention effect Phenological timing was similar across treatments.
Intervention effect Grain size did not change with N and P.
Intervention effect Grain oil content did not change with N and P.
Observation The sunflower growth cycle lasted 122 days.
Observation Seasonal sunflower ETc was 207 mm.
Observation Seasonal heat units were 1,369°C d.

EFFECTS OF INITIAL HARVEST DATE ON DRY MATTER YIELD, IN VITRO DRY MATTER DIGESTIBILITY AND PROTEIN IN TIMOTHY, TALL FESCUE, REED CANARYGRASS AND KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS 15

Show all 15 →

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Timothy IVDMD decreased on average by 0.74% per day during June.

Taxon: timothyPhleum pratensee0
Outcome: IVDMDe0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 0.74e0
Qualifier: % per daye0

Verbatim

e0
“In vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) values ranged from above 80% down to 45%, with an average rate of decrease during June of 0.74, 0.84, 0.85 and 0.45% per day in timothy, tall fescue, reed canarygrass and Kentucky bluegrass, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–600

Title

EFFECTS OF INITIAL HARVEST DATE ON DRY MATTER YIELD, IN VITRO DRY MATTER DIGESTIBILITY AND PROTEIN IN TIMOTHY, TALL FESCUE, REED CANARYGRASS AND KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS

W. MASON; L. LACHANCE Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1983. doi:10.4141/cjps83-085

Other claims from this paper (17)

Observation Tall fescue IVDMD decreased on average by 0.84% per day during June.
Observation Reed canarygrass IVDMD decreased on average by 0.85% per day during June.
Observation Kentucky bluegrass IVDMD decreased on average by 0.45% per day during June.
Observation Timothy crude protein in first-cut forage decreased by 0.47% per day.
Observation Tall fescue crude protein in first-cut forage decreased by 0.40% per day.
Observation Reed canarygrass crude protein in first-cut forage decreased by 0.39% per day.
Observation Kentucky bluegrass crude protein in first-cut forage decreased by 0.28% per day.
Observation Regrowth forage in midsummer and fall harvests averaged 63 to 59% IVDMD.
Observation Regrowth forage in midsummer and fall harvests averaged 16 to 20% CP.
Intervention effect Delaying the initial cut continued to increase total annual dry matter yield, except in reed canarygrass.
Intervention effect Delaying the initial cut significantly increased total IVDMD yield until flowering.
Intervention effect Delaying the initial cut decreased total CP yield from stem elongation onwards.
Observation Reed canarygrass reached its optimum CP yield at early heading.
Observation Reed canarygrass had significant increases in IVDMD yield until the flowering stage.
Intervention effect Harvesting all forages at the stem elongation stage substantially reduced yield of DM, IVDMD and CP.
Observation Most of the DM was obtained in the initial harvest.
Observation Almost half of the total CP was obtained in the final harvest.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tall fescue IVDMD decreased on average by 0.84% per day during June.

Taxon: tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Outcome: IVDMDe0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 0.84e0
Qualifier: % per daye0

Verbatim

e0
“In vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) values ranged from above 80% down to 45%, with an average rate of decrease during June of 0.74, 0.84, 0.85 and 0.45% per day in timothy, tall fescue, reed canarygrass and Kentucky bluegrass, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–600

Title

EFFECTS OF INITIAL HARVEST DATE ON DRY MATTER YIELD, IN VITRO DRY MATTER DIGESTIBILITY AND PROTEIN IN TIMOTHY, TALL FESCUE, REED CANARYGRASS AND KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS

W. MASON; L. LACHANCE Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1983. doi:10.4141/cjps83-085

Other claims from this paper (17)

Observation Timothy IVDMD decreased on average by 0.74% per day during June.
Observation Reed canarygrass IVDMD decreased on average by 0.85% per day during June.
Observation Kentucky bluegrass IVDMD decreased on average by 0.45% per day during June.
Observation Timothy crude protein in first-cut forage decreased by 0.47% per day.
Observation Tall fescue crude protein in first-cut forage decreased by 0.40% per day.
Observation Reed canarygrass crude protein in first-cut forage decreased by 0.39% per day.
Observation Kentucky bluegrass crude protein in first-cut forage decreased by 0.28% per day.
Observation Regrowth forage in midsummer and fall harvests averaged 63 to 59% IVDMD.
Observation Regrowth forage in midsummer and fall harvests averaged 16 to 20% CP.
Intervention effect Delaying the initial cut continued to increase total annual dry matter yield, except in reed canarygrass.
Intervention effect Delaying the initial cut significantly increased total IVDMD yield until flowering.
Intervention effect Delaying the initial cut decreased total CP yield from stem elongation onwards.
Observation Reed canarygrass reached its optimum CP yield at early heading.
Observation Reed canarygrass had significant increases in IVDMD yield until the flowering stage.
Intervention effect Harvesting all forages at the stem elongation stage substantially reduced yield of DM, IVDMD and CP.
Observation Most of the DM was obtained in the initial harvest.
Observation Almost half of the total CP was obtained in the final harvest.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reed canarygrass IVDMD decreased on average by 0.85% per day during June.

Taxon: reed canarygrasse0
Outcome: IVDMDe0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 0.85e0
Qualifier: % per daye0

Verbatim

e0
“In vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) values ranged from above 80% down to 45%, with an average rate of decrease during June of 0.74, 0.84, 0.85 and 0.45% per day in timothy, tall fescue, reed canarygrass and Kentucky bluegrass, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–600

Title

EFFECTS OF INITIAL HARVEST DATE ON DRY MATTER YIELD, IN VITRO DRY MATTER DIGESTIBILITY AND PROTEIN IN TIMOTHY, TALL FESCUE, REED CANARYGRASS AND KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS

W. MASON; L. LACHANCE Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1983. doi:10.4141/cjps83-085

Other claims from this paper (17)

Observation Timothy IVDMD decreased on average by 0.74% per day during June.
Observation Tall fescue IVDMD decreased on average by 0.84% per day during June.
Observation Kentucky bluegrass IVDMD decreased on average by 0.45% per day during June.
Observation Timothy crude protein in first-cut forage decreased by 0.47% per day.
Observation Tall fescue crude protein in first-cut forage decreased by 0.40% per day.
Observation Reed canarygrass crude protein in first-cut forage decreased by 0.39% per day.
Observation Kentucky bluegrass crude protein in first-cut forage decreased by 0.28% per day.
Observation Regrowth forage in midsummer and fall harvests averaged 63 to 59% IVDMD.
Observation Regrowth forage in midsummer and fall harvests averaged 16 to 20% CP.
Intervention effect Delaying the initial cut continued to increase total annual dry matter yield, except in reed canarygrass.
Intervention effect Delaying the initial cut significantly increased total IVDMD yield until flowering.
Intervention effect Delaying the initial cut decreased total CP yield from stem elongation onwards.
Observation Reed canarygrass reached its optimum CP yield at early heading.
Observation Reed canarygrass had significant increases in IVDMD yield until the flowering stage.
Intervention effect Harvesting all forages at the stem elongation stage substantially reduced yield of DM, IVDMD and CP.
Observation Most of the DM was obtained in the initial harvest.
Observation Almost half of the total CP was obtained in the final harvest.

Effects of Subsoiling at Jointing Stage on Dry Matter Production and Photosynthesis of Summer Maize 15

Show all 15 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained grain yield by 1 662.0 kg/ha.

Taxon: Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Material: Zhendan958e1
Treatment: subsoiling at jointing stagee0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: reducede0
Value: 1 662.0 kg/hae0
Comparator: non-subsoilinge0

Verbatim

t0
“Summer Maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–99

e0
“compared with non-subsoiling,subsoiling at jointing stage achieved the following characters: plant height and ear height decreased by 17.3 cm and 9.0 cm,stem diameter decreased by 2.7 mm,and one leaf less;the increase of LAI before silking was limited,while decrease of LAI after silking was slow;stomatal conductance,intercellular CO2 concentration,transpiration rate,net photosynthetic rate of ear leaves decreased 38%…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–1013

e1
“Zhendan958 was applied in the field experiment.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–47

Title

Effects of Subsoiling at Jointing Stage on Dry Matter Production and Photosynthesis of Summer Maize

Dongxing Zhang Yumi kexue 2013

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained plant height by 17.3 cm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained ear height by 9.0 cm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained stem diameter by 2.7 mm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained leaf by one leaf.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained LAI before silking.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained LAI after silking.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained stomatal conductance by 38%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained intercellular CO2 concentration by 25.3%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained transpiration rate by 42.5%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained net photosynthetic rate by 2.0%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained dry matter production by 1 519.5 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained dry matter production by 168.8 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained grain number by 100.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained economic index by 7 percentage.
Intervention effect The two nitrogen regimes did not differ significantly for the studied outcomes.
Association No subsoiling by nitrogen regime interaction was observed.
Recommendation The authors conclude that jointing-stage subsoiling is unsuitable.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained LAI before silking.

Taxon: Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Material: Zhendan958e1
Treatment: subsoiling at jointing stagee0
Outcome: LAI before silkinge0
Direction: limitede0
Comparator: non-subsoilinge0

Verbatim

t0
“Summer Maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–99

e0
“compared with non-subsoiling,subsoiling at jointing stage achieved the following characters: plant height and ear height decreased by 17.3 cm and 9.0 cm,stem diameter decreased by 2.7 mm,and one leaf less;the increase of LAI before silking was limited,while decrease of LAI after silking was slow;stomatal conductance,intercellular CO2 concentration,transpiration rate,net photosynthetic rate of ear leaves decreased 38%…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–1013

e1
“Zhendan958 was applied in the field experiment.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–47

Title

Effects of Subsoiling at Jointing Stage on Dry Matter Production and Photosynthesis of Summer Maize

Dongxing Zhang Yumi kexue 2013

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained plant height by 17.3 cm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained ear height by 9.0 cm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained stem diameter by 2.7 mm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained leaf by one leaf.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained LAI after silking.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained stomatal conductance by 38%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained intercellular CO2 concentration by 25.3%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained transpiration rate by 42.5%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained net photosynthetic rate by 2.0%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained dry matter production by 1 519.5 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained dry matter production by 168.8 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained grain number by 100.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained economic index by 7 percentage.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained grain yield by 1 662.0 kg/ha.
Intervention effect The two nitrogen regimes did not differ significantly for the studied outcomes.
Association No subsoiling by nitrogen regime interaction was observed.
Recommendation The authors conclude that jointing-stage subsoiling is unsuitable.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained LAI after silking.

Taxon: Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Material: Zhendan958e1
Treatment: subsoiling at jointing stagee0
Outcome: LAI after silkinge0
Direction: slowe0
Comparator: non-subsoilinge0

Verbatim

t0
“Summer Maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–99

e0
“compared with non-subsoiling,subsoiling at jointing stage achieved the following characters: plant height and ear height decreased by 17.3 cm and 9.0 cm,stem diameter decreased by 2.7 mm,and one leaf less;the increase of LAI before silking was limited,while decrease of LAI after silking was slow;stomatal conductance,intercellular CO2 concentration,transpiration rate,net photosynthetic rate of ear leaves decreased 38%…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–1013

e1
“Zhendan958 was applied in the field experiment.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–47

Title

Effects of Subsoiling at Jointing Stage on Dry Matter Production and Photosynthesis of Summer Maize

Dongxing Zhang Yumi kexue 2013

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained plant height by 17.3 cm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained ear height by 9.0 cm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained stem diameter by 2.7 mm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained leaf by one leaf.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained LAI before silking.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained stomatal conductance by 38%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained intercellular CO2 concentration by 25.3%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained transpiration rate by 42.5%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained net photosynthetic rate by 2.0%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained dry matter production by 1 519.5 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained dry matter production by 168.8 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained grain number by 100.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained economic index by 7 percentage.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained grain yield by 1 662.0 kg/ha.
Intervention effect The two nitrogen regimes did not differ significantly for the studied outcomes.
Association No subsoiling by nitrogen regime interaction was observed.
Recommendation The authors conclude that jointing-stage subsoiling is unsuitable.

Effects of integrated fertilization and tillage technologies on cassava yield and physical and chemical properties of soil 15

Show all 15 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integration method decreased soil bulk density by 5.63 % versus the control.

Taxon: cassavaManihot esculentat0
Treatment: integration methode0
Outcome: soil bulk densitye0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 5.63 %e0
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

t0
“cassava”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71

e0
“Compared with the control,integration method brought about the increase of 11.14%,15.06%,12.44%,21.43%,32.39%,23.04% and 7697.90 yuan/ha on cassava stem diameter,tuberous root diameter,tuberous root length,tuberous root number per plant,tuberous root weight per plant,fresh weight of tuberous root per hectare and benefit,increase of 8.84%,8.73%,5.22%,7.56%,3.08%,15.51% and 9.86% on available nitrogen,phosphorus,potass…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–1258

Title

Effects of integrated fertilization and tillage technologies on cassava yield and physical and chemical properties of soil

HE Yong-qu Nanfang nongye xuebao 2014

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect The integration method increased cassava stem diameter by 11.14% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root diameter by 15.06% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root length by 12.44% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root number per plant by 21.43% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root weight per plant by 32.39% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased fresh weight of tuberous root per hectare by 23.04% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased benefit by 7697.90 yuan/ha versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased available nitrogen by 8.84% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased phosphorus by 8.73% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased potassium by 5.22% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased organic matter by 7.56% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased pH by 3.08% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased moisture content by 15.51% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased total porosity by 9.86% versus the control.
Recommendation The authors recommend the integrated fertilization and tillage method for cassava production.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integration method increased phosphorus by 8.73% versus the control.

Taxon: cassavaManihot esculentat0
Treatment: integration methode0
Outcome: phosphoruse0
Direction: increasee0
Value: 8.73%e0
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

t0
“cassava”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71

e0
“Compared with the control,integration method brought about the increase of 11.14%,15.06%,12.44%,21.43%,32.39%,23.04% and 7697.90 yuan/ha on cassava stem diameter,tuberous root diameter,tuberous root length,tuberous root number per plant,tuberous root weight per plant,fresh weight of tuberous root per hectare and benefit,increase of 8.84%,8.73%,5.22%,7.56%,3.08%,15.51% and 9.86% on available nitrogen,phosphorus,potass…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–1258

Title

Effects of integrated fertilization and tillage technologies on cassava yield and physical and chemical properties of soil

HE Yong-qu Nanfang nongye xuebao 2014

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect The integration method increased cassava stem diameter by 11.14% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root diameter by 15.06% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root length by 12.44% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root number per plant by 21.43% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root weight per plant by 32.39% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased fresh weight of tuberous root per hectare by 23.04% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased benefit by 7697.90 yuan/ha versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased available nitrogen by 8.84% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased potassium by 5.22% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased organic matter by 7.56% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased pH by 3.08% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased moisture content by 15.51% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased total porosity by 9.86% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method decreased soil bulk density by 5.63 % versus the control.
Recommendation The authors recommend the integrated fertilization and tillage method for cassava production.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integration method increased potassium by 5.22% versus the control.

Taxon: cassavaManihot esculentat0
Treatment: integration methode0
Outcome: potassiume0
Direction: increasee0
Value: 5.22%e0
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

t0
“cassava”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71

e0
“Compared with the control,integration method brought about the increase of 11.14%,15.06%,12.44%,21.43%,32.39%,23.04% and 7697.90 yuan/ha on cassava stem diameter,tuberous root diameter,tuberous root length,tuberous root number per plant,tuberous root weight per plant,fresh weight of tuberous root per hectare and benefit,increase of 8.84%,8.73%,5.22%,7.56%,3.08%,15.51% and 9.86% on available nitrogen,phosphorus,potass…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–1258

Title

Effects of integrated fertilization and tillage technologies on cassava yield and physical and chemical properties of soil

HE Yong-qu Nanfang nongye xuebao 2014

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect The integration method increased cassava stem diameter by 11.14% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root diameter by 15.06% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root length by 12.44% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root number per plant by 21.43% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root weight per plant by 32.39% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased fresh weight of tuberous root per hectare by 23.04% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased benefit by 7697.90 yuan/ha versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased available nitrogen by 8.84% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased phosphorus by 8.73% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased organic matter by 7.56% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased pH by 3.08% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased moisture content by 15.51% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased total porosity by 9.86% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method decreased soil bulk density by 5.63 % versus the control.
Recommendation The authors recommend the integrated fertilization and tillage method for cassava production.

Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Membrane Lipid Peroxidation in the Flag Leaves of Different High Yield Rice Variety at Late Stage of Development Under Natural Condition 15

Show all 15 →

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quantum yield of PSII (Φ PSⅡ) decreased in rice varieties as chlorophyll content declined late in development.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae1
Compound: chlorophyll contente1
Outcome: Φ PSⅡe1
Direction: decreasede1

Verbatim

e1
“primary photochemical efficiency of PSⅡ (F v/F m), quantum yield of linear electron transport of PSⅡ (Φ PSⅡ), electron transfer rate (ETR) in these rice varieties decreased with their decrease of chlorophyll content during this period”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–710

Title

Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Membrane Lipid Peroxidation in the Flag Leaves of Different High Yield Rice Variety at Late Stage of Development Under Natural Condition

Xia Li; Jiao De Mao; Liu Liang; et al. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 2002

Other claims from this paper (16)

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shanyou 63 had reduced seed-setting rate and yield.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae1
Material: Shanyou 63e2
Outcome: seed-setting rate and yielde3
Direction: reducede3

Verbatim

e1
“primary photochemical efficiency of PSⅡ (F v/F m), quantum yield of linear electron transport of PSⅡ (Φ PSⅡ), electron transfer rate (ETR) in these rice varieties decreased with their decrease of chlorophyll content during this period”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–710

e2
“While F v/F m, Φ PSⅡ,ETR and photochemical qP in Shanyou 63 sensitive to photooxidation decreased more and therefore premature senescence was easy to happen”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1576

e3
“thus the seed-setting rate and yield were all reduced”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1578–1631

Title

Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Membrane Lipid Peroxidation in the Flag Leaves of Different High Yield Rice Variety at Late Stage of Development Under Natural Condition

Xia Li; Jiao De Mao; Liu Liang; et al. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 2002

Other claims from this paper (16)

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Shanyou 63, quantum yield of PSII (Φ PSⅡ) decreased more.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae1
Material: Shanyou 63e2
Outcome: Φ PSⅡe2
Direction: decreased moree2
Qualifier: sensitive to photooxidatione2

Verbatim

e1
“primary photochemical efficiency of PSⅡ (F v/F m), quantum yield of linear electron transport of PSⅡ (Φ PSⅡ), electron transfer rate (ETR) in these rice varieties decreased with their decrease of chlorophyll content during this period”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–710

e2
“While F v/F m, Φ PSⅡ,ETR and photochemical qP in Shanyou 63 sensitive to photooxidation decreased more and therefore premature senescence was easy to happen”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1576

Title

Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Membrane Lipid Peroxidation in the Flag Leaves of Different High Yield Rice Variety at Late Stage of Development Under Natural Condition

Xia Li; Jiao De Mao; Liu Liang; et al. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 2002

Other claims from this paper (16)

Influence of bio-humus on soil fertility, productivity and environmental safety of spring wheat grain 15

Show all 15 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-humus increased wheat yield by 10.2 hwt ha-1.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: bio humuse0
Outcome: wheat yielde0
Direction: increasee0
Value: 10.2 hwt ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The introduction of bio humus in the tilth top soil before sowing and during tillering of spring wheat contributed to the increase in humus composition by 1.88 times, the change in acidity to pH = 6.9–7.0, reduction of lead and cadmium concentrations in 1.63 and 1.20 times against the background of increased zinc and cobalt levels by 15.62% and 7.98%; increase of field germination of spring wheat from 75.0 ± 0.4 to 8…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1932

Title

Influence of bio-humus on soil fertility, productivity and environmental safety of spring wheat grain

Muhamedyarova, L.G.; Derkho, M.A.; Meshcheriakova, G.V.; et al. Eesti Maaülikool. EMU Dspace 2020. doi:10.15159/ar.20.152

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observation The study soil had low humus content of 4.58–4.60%.
Observation The study soil had a weak acid reaction at pH 6.1–6.5.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil humus composition 1.88-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus changed soil acidity to pH 6.9–7.0.
Intervention effect Bio-humus reduced soil lead concentration 1.63-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus reduced soil cadmium concentration 1.20-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil zinc level by 15.62%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil cobalt level by 7.98%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased spring wheat field germination from 75.0 ± 0.4 to 82.0 ± 0.9%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased developed harvestable stems per square metre by 10.15%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased productive tilling capacity by 8.33%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased spikes per ear by 20%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased grain per ear by 7.69%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased thousand-grain mass by 16.12%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus decreased spring wheat grain lead concentration by 14%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus decreased spring wheat grain cadmium concentration by 16%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-humus decreased spring wheat grain lead concentration by 14%.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: bio humuse0
Outcome: spring wheat grain concentration of leade0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 14.00e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The introduction of bio humus in the tilth top soil before sowing and during tillering of spring wheat contributed to the increase in humus composition by 1.88 times, the change in acidity to pH = 6.9–7.0, reduction of lead and cadmium concentrations in 1.63 and 1.20 times against the background of increased zinc and cobalt levels by 15.62% and 7.98%; increase of field germination of spring wheat from 75.0 ± 0.4 to 8…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1932

Title

Influence of bio-humus on soil fertility, productivity and environmental safety of spring wheat grain

Muhamedyarova, L.G.; Derkho, M.A.; Meshcheriakova, G.V.; et al. Eesti Maaülikool. EMU Dspace 2020. doi:10.15159/ar.20.152

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observation The study soil had low humus content of 4.58–4.60%.
Observation The study soil had a weak acid reaction at pH 6.1–6.5.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil humus composition 1.88-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus changed soil acidity to pH 6.9–7.0.
Intervention effect Bio-humus reduced soil lead concentration 1.63-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus reduced soil cadmium concentration 1.20-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil zinc level by 15.62%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil cobalt level by 7.98%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased spring wheat field germination from 75.0 ± 0.4 to 82.0 ± 0.9%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased developed harvestable stems per square metre by 10.15%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased productive tilling capacity by 8.33%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased spikes per ear by 20%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased grain per ear by 7.69%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased thousand-grain mass by 16.12%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased wheat yield by 10.2 hwt ha-1.
Intervention effect Bio-humus decreased spring wheat grain cadmium concentration by 16%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-humus decreased spring wheat grain cadmium concentration by 16%.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: bio humuse0
Outcome: spring wheat grain concentration of lead and cadmiume0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 16.00%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The introduction of bio humus in the tilth top soil before sowing and during tillering of spring wheat contributed to the increase in humus composition by 1.88 times, the change in acidity to pH = 6.9–7.0, reduction of lead and cadmium concentrations in 1.63 and 1.20 times against the background of increased zinc and cobalt levels by 15.62% and 7.98%; increase of field germination of spring wheat from 75.0 ± 0.4 to 8…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1932

Title

Influence of bio-humus on soil fertility, productivity and environmental safety of spring wheat grain

Muhamedyarova, L.G.; Derkho, M.A.; Meshcheriakova, G.V.; et al. Eesti Maaülikool. EMU Dspace 2020. doi:10.15159/ar.20.152

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observation The study soil had low humus content of 4.58–4.60%.
Observation The study soil had a weak acid reaction at pH 6.1–6.5.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil humus composition 1.88-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus changed soil acidity to pH 6.9–7.0.
Intervention effect Bio-humus reduced soil lead concentration 1.63-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus reduced soil cadmium concentration 1.20-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil zinc level by 15.62%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil cobalt level by 7.98%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased spring wheat field germination from 75.0 ± 0.4 to 82.0 ± 0.9%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased developed harvestable stems per square metre by 10.15%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased productive tilling capacity by 8.33%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased spikes per ear by 20%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased grain per ear by 7.69%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased thousand-grain mass by 16.12%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased wheat yield by 10.2 hwt ha-1.
Intervention effect Bio-humus decreased spring wheat grain lead concentration by 14%.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

Salt Tolerance of Different Cultivars of Chickpea as Influenced by Zinc Fertilization 20

ACC-Deaminase, Phosphate-Solubilizing Pseudomonas fluorescens Increase Phosphorus and Decrease Cadmium Concentration to Enhance Wheat Yield 20

ESTIMATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN 18

Neglecting acclimation of photosynthesis under drought can cause significant errors in predicting leaf photosynthesis in wheat 17

Root System, Phenology and Yield of Sunflower in Relation to Nitrogen and Phosphorus 16

EFFECTS OF INITIAL HARVEST DATE ON DRY MATTER YIELD, IN VITRO DRY MATTER DIGESTIBILITY AND PROTEIN IN TIMOTHY, TALL FESCUE, REED CANARYGRASS AND KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS 15

Effects of Subsoiling at Jointing Stage on Dry Matter Production and Photosynthesis of Summer Maize 15

Effects of integrated fertilization and tillage technologies on cassava yield and physical and chemical properties of soil 15

Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Membrane Lipid Peroxidation in the Flag Leaves of Different High Yield Rice Variety at Late Stage of Development Under Natural Condition 15

Influence of bio-humus on soil fertility, productivity and environmental safety of spring wheat grain 15