View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Salt Tolerance of Different Cultivars of Chickpea as Influenced by Zinc Fertilization 20 Show all 20 → Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At ESP 20.8, L550 grain yield decrease d 47.45 per cent.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “47.45 per cent in L550 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–480 t0 “Chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–49 e1 “decrease in grain yield at ESP 20.8 was 82.76 per cent in Phule G5 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–456 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, Phule G5 grain yield decreased 82.76 per cent from normal conditions. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, GNG 146 grain yield decreased 60.38 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, ICCC 32 grain yield decreased 49.87 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, BG261 grain yield decreased 52.90 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, JG 315 grain yield decreased 52.72 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, BGM 413 grain yield decreased 80.95 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, Radhey grain yield decreased 80.31 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 24 grain yield decreased 64.46 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 70 grain yield decreased 58.73 per cent. Intervention effect Zinc application reduced the corresponding grain yield loss for Phule G5 to 64.48 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding L550 grain yield loss was 34.28 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding GNG 146 grain yield loss was 43.13 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding ICCC 32 grain yield loss was 34.94 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BG261 grain yield loss was 36.76 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding JG 315 grain yield loss was 36.18 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BGM 413 grain yield loss was 61.85 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding Radhey grain yield loss was 61.34 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 24 grain yield loss was 44.15 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 70 grain yield loss was 41.45 per cent. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At ESP 20.8, BG261 grain yield decrease d 52.90 per cent.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “52.90 per cent in BG261 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–558 t0 “Chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–49 e1 “decrease in grain yield at ESP 20.8 was 82.76 per cent in Phule G5 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–456 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, Phule G5 grain yield decreased 82.76 per cent from normal conditions. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, L550 grain yield decreased 47.45 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, GNG 146 grain yield decreased 60.38 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, ICCC 32 grain yield decreased 49.87 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, JG 315 grain yield decreased 52.72 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, BGM 413 grain yield decreased 80.95 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, Radhey grain yield decreased 80.31 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 24 grain yield decreased 64.46 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 70 grain yield decreased 58.73 per cent. Intervention effect Zinc application reduced the corresponding grain yield loss for Phule G5 to 64.48 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding L550 grain yield loss was 34.28 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding GNG 146 grain yield loss was 43.13 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding ICCC 32 grain yield loss was 34.94 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BG261 grain yield loss was 36.76 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding JG 315 grain yield loss was 36.18 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BGM 413 grain yield loss was 61.85 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding Radhey grain yield loss was 61.34 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 24 grain yield loss was 44.15 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 70 grain yield loss was 41.45 per cent. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At ESP 20.8, Radhey grain yield decrease d 80.31 per cent.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “80.31 per cent in Radhey ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–637 t0 “Chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–49 e1 “decrease in grain yield at ESP 20.8 was 82.76 per cent in Phule G5 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–456 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, Phule G5 grain yield decreased 82.76 per cent from normal conditions. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, L550 grain yield decreased 47.45 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, GNG 146 grain yield decreased 60.38 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, ICCC 32 grain yield decreased 49.87 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, BG261 grain yield decreased 52.90 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, JG 315 grain yield decreased 52.72 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, BGM 413 grain yield decreased 80.95 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 24 grain yield decreased 64.46 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 70 grain yield decreased 58.73 per cent. Intervention effect Zinc application reduced the corresponding grain yield loss for Phule G5 to 64.48 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding L550 grain yield loss was 34.28 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding GNG 146 grain yield loss was 43.13 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding ICCC 32 grain yield loss was 34.94 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BG261 grain yield loss was 36.76 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding JG 315 grain yield loss was 36.18 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BGM 413 grain yield loss was 61.85 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding Radhey grain yield loss was 61.34 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 24 grain yield loss was 44.15 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 70 grain yield loss was 41.45 per cent. ACC-Deaminase, Phosphate-Solubilizing Pseudomonas fluorescens Increase Phosphorus and Decrease Cadmium Concentration to Enhance Wheat Yield 20 Show all 20 → Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P0, with a reported range of 24-132%.
1000-grain weight (TGW), yield and P concentration e0 Verbatim
t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133 e0 “Increased 1000-grain weight (TGW), yield and P concentration of wheat was noted at P90 over P0 (24-132%) and P45 (3.7-37%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–774 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P45, with a reported range of 3.7-37%.
1000-grain weight (TGW), yield and P concentration e0 Verbatim
t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133 e0 “Increased 1000-grain weight (TGW), yield and P concentration of wheat was noted at P90 over P0 (24-132%) and P45 (3.7-37%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–774 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
P90 decrease d wheat grain Cd over P0 by 34%.
Grain-Cd concentration e0 Verbatim
t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133 e0 “Grain-Cd concentration decrease d at P90 over P0 (34%) and P45 (17%), and at P45 over P0 (21%). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–966 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P0, with a reported range of 24-132%. Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P45, with a reported range of 3.7-37%. Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 13-57%. Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 5.4-34%. Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM1, with a reported range of 1.4 to 2.4-fold. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P45 by 17%. Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 21%. Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 22%. Intervention effect SM1 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 8%. Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM1 by 2.7-fold. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 25%. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P45 by 18%. Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 8%. Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 18%. Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 9%. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat TGW over SM0 by 8.6. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat straw-P over SM0 by 29%. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat Grain-Cd over SM0 by 30. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat straw-Cd over SM0 by 23%. Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system 20 Show all 20 → Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
NS22 inferior-grain weight decrease d 23.19% under TR6.
Verbatim
e0 “greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 e1 “after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039 e2 “grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615 e3 “greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390 e4 “for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
NS44 inferior-grain weight decrease d 7.78% under TR6.
Verbatim
e0 “greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 e1 “after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039 e2 “grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615 e3 “greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390 e4 “for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decrease d 13.97% under TR6.
average grain-filling rate (AGFR) e0 e1 e2 e3 e4 Verbatim
e0 “greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 e1 “after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039 e2 “grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615 e3 “greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390 e4 “for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179 Other claims from this paper (19) ESTIMATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN 18 Show all 18 → Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides did not decrease weed number.
herbicides were applied together with PGR Zeastimulin e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “where herbicides were applied together with PGR Zeastimulin, no decrease in the number of weeds was observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1758 t0 “CORN ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–93 t1 “HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–93 e1 “the length of maize cobs increased from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm in the version of weed control by Laudis (0,5 kg/ha) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2146–2257 e2 “which gave a grain yield increase of 2,9 t/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2611–2656 e3 “Stellar herbicide (1,1 l/ha) - for 3,1 t/ha. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2662–2706 e4 “where herbicides were applied together with PGR Zeastimulin, no decrease in the number of weeds was observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1758 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed numbers by 89,7% versus control after treatment. Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed quantity by 94,7% at harvest. Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed mass by 655 g/m2 at harvest. Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 93,5% at the first survey. Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,0% at the second survey. Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,9% at the third survey. Intervention effect Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides slightly decreased dry weed biomass. Intervention effect Maize height was 17,3% higher on herbicidal variant 2 than control. Intervention effect Maize height was 19,8% higher on herbicidal variant 4 than control. Intervention effect Zeastimulin further increased maize height by 2 cm. Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm with Laudis. Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 18,3 cm to 19,4 cm with Stellar. Intervention effect Weed reduction and Zeastimulin increased maize cob diameter. Intervention effect Laudis increased maize grain yield by 2,9 t/ha. Intervention effect Stellar increased maize grain yield by 3,1 t/ha. Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,5% with Laudis. Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,2% with Stellar. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides slightly decrease d dry weed biomass.
PGR Zeastimulin e4 above-ground air-dry mass of weed plants e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “only a slight decrease in the above-ground air-dry mass of weed plants was observed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1764–1848 t0 “CORN ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–93 t1 “HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–93 e1 “the length of maize cobs increased from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm in the version of weed control by Laudis (0,5 kg/ha) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2146–2257 e2 “which gave a grain yield increase of 2,9 t/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2611–2656 e3 “Stellar herbicide (1,1 l/ha) - for 3,1 t/ha. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2662–2706 e4 “where herbicides were applied together with PGR Zeastimulin, no decrease in the number of weeds was observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1758 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed numbers by 89,7% versus control after treatment. Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed quantity by 94,7% at harvest. Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed mass by 655 g/m2 at harvest. Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 93,5% at the first survey. Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,0% at the second survey. Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,9% at the third survey. Intervention effect Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides did not decrease weed number. Intervention effect Maize height was 17,3% higher on herbicidal variant 2 than control. Intervention effect Maize height was 19,8% higher on herbicidal variant 4 than control. Intervention effect Zeastimulin further increased maize height by 2 cm. Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm with Laudis. Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 18,3 cm to 19,4 cm with Stellar. Intervention effect Weed reduction and Zeastimulin increased maize cob diameter. Intervention effect Laudis increased maize grain yield by 2,9 t/ha. Intervention effect Stellar increased maize grain yield by 3,1 t/ha. Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,5% with Laudis. Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,2% with Stellar. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,0% at the second survey.
Stellar herbicide e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in weed numbers was 93,5% during the first survey, 97,0% during the second and 97,9% during the third. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1619 t0 “CORN ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–93 t1 “HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–93 e1 “the length of maize cobs increased from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm in the version of weed control by Laudis (0,5 kg/ha) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2146–2257 e2 “which gave a grain yield increase of 2,9 t/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2611–2656 e3 “Stellar herbicide (1,1 l/ha) - for 3,1 t/ha. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2662–2706 e4 “where herbicides were applied together with PGR Zeastimulin, no decrease in the number of weeds was observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1758 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed numbers by 89,7% versus control after treatment. Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed quantity by 94,7% at harvest. Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed mass by 655 g/m2 at harvest. Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 93,5% at the first survey. Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,9% at the third survey. Intervention effect Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides did not decrease weed number. Intervention effect Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides slightly decreased dry weed biomass. Intervention effect Maize height was 17,3% higher on herbicidal variant 2 than control. Intervention effect Maize height was 19,8% higher on herbicidal variant 4 than control. Intervention effect Zeastimulin further increased maize height by 2 cm. Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm with Laudis. Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 18,3 cm to 19,4 cm with Stellar. Intervention effect Weed reduction and Zeastimulin increased maize cob diameter. Intervention effect Laudis increased maize grain yield by 2,9 t/ha. Intervention effect Stellar increased maize grain yield by 3,1 t/ha. Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,5% with Laudis. Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,2% with Stellar. Optimized Ridge–Furrow Ratio to Decrease Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Increase Winter Wheat Yield in Dry Semi-Humid Areas 18 Show all 18 → Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
RF40 significantly increased yield by 13.9% compared with RF60.
Verbatim
e4 “Among the three RF treatments, RF40 and RF80 significantly increased the yield by 13.9% and 17.2%, respectively, compared with RF60 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1315 t0 “Increase Winter Wheat Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–97 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
RF80 significantly increased yield by 17.2% compared with RF60.
Verbatim
e4 “Among the three RF treatments, RF40 and RF80 significantly increased the yield by 13.9% and 17.2%, respectively, compared with RF60 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1315 t0 “Increase Winter Wheat Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–97 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In a wet year, FP significantly increased winter wheat yield by 43.6% compared with RF.
winter wheat yield e3 wet year (2017–2018) e3 Verbatim
e3 “In a wet year (2017–2018), FP significantly increased the winter wheat yield (43.6%) compared with RF, while the opposite was the case in a normal year (2018–2019) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1182 t0 “Increase Winter Wheat Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–97 Other claims from this paper (17) Neglecting acclimation of photosynthesis under drought can cause significant errors in predicting leaf photosynthesis in wheat 17 Show all 17 → Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in wheat photosynthesis under drought varied with growth temperature.
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in photosynthesis under drought varied among T growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1392 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–126 e1 “well‐watered conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1298 e2 “T opt for V cmax was up to 40°C under well‐watered conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1298 e3 “The decrease in photosynthesis under drought varied among T growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1392 e4 “The temperature response of photosynthetic quantum yield under drought was partly attributed to photorespiration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1540 e5 “both diffusional and biochemical parameters of photosynthesis and their thermal sensitivity acclimate little to T growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1851 Other claims from this paper (16) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The drought decrease in wheat photosynthesis was similar across genotypes.
Verbatim
e0 “was similar between genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1426 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–126 e1 “well‐watered conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1298 e2 “T opt for V cmax was up to 40°C under well‐watered conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1298 e3 “The decrease in photosynthesis under drought varied among T growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1392 e4 “The temperature response of photosynthetic quantum yield under drought was partly attributed to photorespiration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1540 e5 “both diffusional and biochemical parameters of photosynthesis and their thermal sensitivity acclimate little to T growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1851 Other claims from this paper (16) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Alternative electron transport explained more of the wheat quantum yield response under drought.
temperature response of photosynthetic quantum yield e0 t0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5 Verbatim
e0 “but more to alternative electron transport ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1583 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–126 e1 “well‐watered conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1298 e2 “T opt for V cmax was up to 40°C under well‐watered conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1298 e3 “The decrease in photosynthesis under drought varied among T growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1392 e4 “The temperature response of photosynthetic quantum yield under drought was partly attributed to photorespiration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1540 e5 “both diffusional and biochemical parameters of photosynthesis and their thermal sensitivity acclimate little to T growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1851 Other claims from this paper (16) EFFECTS OF INITIAL HARVEST DATE ON DRY MATTER YIELD, IN VITRO DRY MATTER DIGESTIBILITY AND PROTEIN IN TIMOTHY, TALL FESCUE, REED CANARYGRASS AND KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS 16 Show all 16 → Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Timothy IVDMD decrease d on average by 0.74% per day during June.
Verbatim
e0 “In vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) values ranged from above 80% down to 45%, with an average rate of decrease during June of 0.74, 0.84, 0.85 and 0.45% per day in timothy, tall fescue, reed canarygrass and Kentucky bluegrass, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–600 Other claims from this paper (17) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Tall fescue IVDMD decrease d on average by 0.84% per day during June.
Verbatim
e0 “In vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) values ranged from above 80% down to 45%, with an average rate of decrease during June of 0.74, 0.84, 0.85 and 0.45% per day in timothy, tall fescue, reed canarygrass and Kentucky bluegrass, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–600 Other claims from this paper (17) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Reed canarygrass IVDMD decrease d on average by 0.85% per day during June.
Verbatim
e0 “In vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) values ranged from above 80% down to 45%, with an average rate of decrease during June of 0.74, 0.84, 0.85 and 0.45% per day in timothy, tall fescue, reed canarygrass and Kentucky bluegrass, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–600 Other claims from this paper (17) Root System, Phenology and Yield of Sunflower in Relation to Nitrogen and Phosphorus 16 Show all 16 → Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
P decrease sunflower CDM/RDM relation.
CDM/RDM relation e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–45 e0 “The time to phenological stages was similar between treatment. The N and in minor degree the P increased grain yield (GY) and oil yield (OY) by increases in the grains number (GN), capitulum area (CA), canopy dry matter (CDM) and radical area (RA). In contrast, the P increase RDM but decrease the CDM/RDM relation. The effect of the interaction N * P on GY, OY indicates it is necessary to seek the best combination of … ” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–1215 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
N increased sunflower grain yield (GY).
grain yield (GY) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–45 e0 “The time to phenological stages was similar between treatment. The N and in minor degree the P increased grain yield (GY) and oil yield (OY) by increases in the grains number (GN), capitulum area (CA), canopy dry matter (CDM) and radical area (RA). In contrast, the P increase RDM but decrease the CDM/RDM relation. The effect of the interaction N * P on GY, OY indicates it is necessary to seek the best combination of … ” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–1215 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
N increased sunflower oil yield (OY).
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–45 e0 “The time to phenological stages was similar between treatment. The N and in minor degree the P increased grain yield (GY) and oil yield (OY) by increases in the grains number (GN), capitulum area (CA), canopy dry matter (CDM) and radical area (RA). In contrast, the P increase RDM but decrease the CDM/RDM relation. The effect of the interaction N * P on GY, OY indicates it is necessary to seek the best combination of … ” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–1215 Other claims from this paper (15) Introducing innovative precision farming techniques in agriculture to decrease carbon emissions. 16 Show all 16 → Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Strip tillage reduced crop yield by 20% versus conventional tillage.
strip-tillage (ST) e0 conventional tillage (CT) e0 Verbatim
e0 “Regarding crop yield , strip-tillage (ST) and no-tillage (NT) got a decrease of 20% and 15% compared to conventional tillage (CT). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2312–2441 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
No tillage reduced crop yield by 15% versus conventional tillage.
no-tillage (NT) e0 conventional tillage (CT) e0 Verbatim
e0 “Regarding crop yield , strip-tillage (ST) and no-tillage (NT) got a decrease of 20% and 15% compared to conventional tillage (CT). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2312–2441 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
SALUS projected soil organic carbon stock loss across treatments.
soil organic carbon (SOC) stock e0 Verbatim
e0 “SALUS simulation shown a general trend among the treatments characterized by a decrease in soil organic carbon (SOC) stock. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3513–3636 e1 “historical crop- yield data ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1655 Other claims from this paper (15) Effects of Subsoiling at Jointing Stage on Dry Matter Production and Photosynthesis of Summer Maize 15 Show all 15 → Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained grain yield by 1 662.0 kg/ha.
subsoiling at jointing stage e0 non-subsoiling e0 Verbatim
t0 “Summer Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–99 e0 “compared with non-subsoiling,subsoiling at jointing stage achieved the following characters: plant height and ear height decrease d by 17.3 cm and 9.0 cm,stem diameter decrease d by 2.7 mm,and one leaf less;the increase of LAI before silking was limited,while decrease of LAI after silking was slow;stomatal conductance,intercellular CO2 concentration,transpiration rate,net photosynthetic rate of ear leaves decrease d 38%… ” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–1013 e1 “Zhendan958 was applied in the field experiment. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–47 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained LAI before silking.
subsoiling at jointing stage e0 LAI before silking e0 non-subsoiling e0 Verbatim
t0 “Summer Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–99 e0 “compared with non-subsoiling,subsoiling at jointing stage achieved the following characters: plant height and ear height decrease d by 17.3 cm and 9.0 cm,stem diameter decrease d by 2.7 mm,and one leaf less;the increase of LAI before silking was limited,while decrease of LAI after silking was slow;stomatal conductance,intercellular CO2 concentration,transpiration rate,net photosynthetic rate of ear leaves decrease d 38%… ” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–1013 e1 “Zhendan958 was applied in the field experiment. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–47 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained LAI after silking.
subsoiling at jointing stage e0 LAI after silking e0 non-subsoiling e0 Verbatim
t0 “Summer Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–99 e0 “compared with non-subsoiling,subsoiling at jointing stage achieved the following characters: plant height and ear height decrease d by 17.3 cm and 9.0 cm,stem diameter decrease d by 2.7 mm,and one leaf less;the increase of LAI before silking was limited,while decrease of LAI after silking was slow;stomatal conductance,intercellular CO2 concentration,transpiration rate,net photosynthetic rate of ear leaves decrease d 38%… ” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–1013 e1 “Zhendan958 was applied in the field experiment. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–47 Other claims from this paper (17) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Cicer arietinumt0
Triticum aestivum
Zea mays subsp. mays
Phleum pratense
Lolium arundinaceum
Helianthus annuus
Zea mays