Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters

EFFECTS OF SALINITY ON LETTUCE (LACTUCA SATIVA L.) QUALITY 8

Show all 8 →
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline mineral water did not change lettuce yield in lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Saline mineral watere0
Outcome
lettuce yielde0
Direction
did not affect changese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Saline mineral water did not affect changes of lettuce yield, nor content of phosphorus, potassium, sodium, vitamin C, P-carotene and chlorophyll, but it led to the decrease of nitrogen content (especially of nitrite form) and the increase of magnesium, sulphur and chlorine.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–674
t0

“LETTUCE (LACTUCA SATIVA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–50

Title

EFFECTS OF SALINITY ON LETTUCE (LACTUCA SATIVA L.) QUALITY

V Dragidevic; D Prodanovic; Slobodanka Sredojević Acta periodica technologica 2000

Other claims from this paper (11)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline mineral water did not change potassium in lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Saline mineral watere0
Outcome
potassiume0
Direction
did not affect changese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Saline mineral water did not affect changes of lettuce yield, nor content of phosphorus, potassium, sodium, vitamin C, P-carotene and chlorophyll, but it led to the decrease of nitrogen content (especially of nitrite form) and the increase of magnesium, sulphur and chlorine.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–674
t0

“LETTUCE (LACTUCA SATIVA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–50

Title

EFFECTS OF SALINITY ON LETTUCE (LACTUCA SATIVA L.) QUALITY

V Dragidevic; D Prodanovic; Slobodanka Sredojević Acta periodica technologica 2000

Other claims from this paper (11)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline mineral water did not change sodium in lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Saline mineral watere0
Outcome
sodiume0
Direction
did not affect changese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Saline mineral water did not affect changes of lettuce yield, nor content of phosphorus, potassium, sodium, vitamin C, P-carotene and chlorophyll, but it led to the decrease of nitrogen content (especially of nitrite form) and the increase of magnesium, sulphur and chlorine.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–674
t0

“LETTUCE (LACTUCA SATIVA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–50

Title

EFFECTS OF SALINITY ON LETTUCE (LACTUCA SATIVA L.) QUALITY

V Dragidevic; D Prodanovic; Slobodanka Sredojević Acta periodica technologica 2000

Other claims from this paper (11)

Nitrogen fertiliser effects on milk yield and composition, pasture intake, nitrogen and energy partitioning, and rumen fermentation parameters of dairy cows in early lactation 5

Show all 5 →
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher N fertiliser rates left foremilk urea levels unchanged.

Taxon
pasturese1
Treatment
higher rates of N fertilisere2
Interactor
cowsBos tauruse0herbivore
Outcome
foremilk urea levelse3
Direction
unchangede3
Comparator
LNe2

Verbatim

e0

“Twenty Jersey and 12 Friesian cows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–250
e1

“freshly cut pastures that had received either 100–150 kg N/ha (HN) or 25 kg N/ha (LN) as urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–370
e2

“The main effects of higher rates of N fertiliser (LN versus HN) were to decrease milk protein yield (0.58 versus 0.56 kg/cow per day; P < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–663
e3

“while foremilk urea levels were unchanged”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1311

Title

Nitrogen fertiliser effects on milk yield and composition, pasture intake, nitrogen and energy partitioning, and rumen fermentation parameters of dairy cows in early lactation

T. R. Mackle; C. R. Parr; A. M. Bryant New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 1996. doi:10.1080/00288233.1996.9513194

Other claims from this paper (11)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertiliser had only minor effects on the chemical and botanical composition of the pasture.

Taxon
pasturee2
Treatment
N fertilisere2
Outcome
chemical and botanical composition of pasturee2
Direction
minore2
Comparator
LNe1

Verbatim

e0

“freshly cut pastures that had received either 100–150 kg N/ha (HN) or 25 kg N/ha (LN) as urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–370
e1

“The main effects of higher rates of N fertiliser (LN versus HN) were to decrease milk protein yield (0.58 versus 0.56 kg/cow per day; P < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–663
e2

“Effects of N fertiliser on the chemical and botanical composition of pasture were minor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1489

Title

Nitrogen fertiliser effects on milk yield and composition, pasture intake, nitrogen and energy partitioning, and rumen fermentation parameters of dairy cows in early lactation

T. R. Mackle; C. R. Parr; A. M. Bryant New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 1996. doi:10.1080/00288233.1996.9513194

Other claims from this paper (11)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertiliser had no clear effect on rumen volatile fatty acid concentrations.

Taxon
pasturese1
Treatment
N fertilisere3
Interactor
cowsBos tauruse0herbivore
Outcome
rumen volatile fatty acid concentrationse3
Direction
no clear effectse3
Comparator
LNe2

Verbatim

e0

“Twenty Jersey and 12 Friesian cows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–250
e1

“freshly cut pastures that had received either 100–150 kg N/ha (HN) or 25 kg N/ha (LN) as urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–370
e2

“The main effects of higher rates of N fertiliser (LN versus HN) were to decrease milk protein yield (0.58 versus 0.56 kg/cow per day; P < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–663
e3

“There were no clear effects of N fertiliser on rumen volatile fatty acid concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1400

Title

Nitrogen fertiliser effects on milk yield and composition, pasture intake, nitrogen and energy partitioning, and rumen fermentation parameters of dairy cows in early lactation

T. R. Mackle; C. R. Parr; A. M. Bryant New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 1996. doi:10.1080/00288233.1996.9513194

Other claims from this paper (11)

Partial Defoliation Can Decrease Average Leaf Size but Has Little Effect on Orange Tree Growth, Fruit Yield and Juice Quality 5

Show all 5 →
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Up to 50% leaf removal did not change Hamlin yield, fruit number or fruit size.

Taxon
oranget0
Material
Hamline0
Treatment
removal of up to 50% of the leavese0
Outcome
fruit yield, fruit number, fruit sizee0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In `Hamlin', removal of up to 50% of the leaves in late November had no effect on fruit yield, fruit number, fruit size, soluble solids yield, juice °Brix, and °Brix to acid ratio of juice the following year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–483
t0

“Orange Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87

Title

Partial Defoliation Can Decrease Average Leaf Size but Has Little Effect on Orange Tree Growth, Fruit Yield and Juice Quality

Rongcai Yuan; Fernando Alferez; Igor Kostenyuk; et al. HortScience 2005. doi:10.21273/hortsci.40.7.2011

Other claims from this paper (7)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Up to 50% leaf removal did not change Hamlin soluble solids yield or juice measures.

Taxon
oranget0
Material
Hamline0
Treatment
removal of up to 50% of the leavese0
Outcome
soluble solids yield, juice °Brix, and °Brix to acid ratio of juicee0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In `Hamlin', removal of up to 50% of the leaves in late November had no effect on fruit yield, fruit number, fruit size, soluble solids yield, juice °Brix, and °Brix to acid ratio of juice the following year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–483
t0

“Orange Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87

Title

Partial Defoliation Can Decrease Average Leaf Size but Has Little Effect on Orange Tree Growth, Fruit Yield and Juice Quality

Rongcai Yuan; Fernando Alferez; Igor Kostenyuk; et al. HortScience 2005. doi:10.21273/hortsci.40.7.2011

Other claims from this paper (7)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removing 25% of canopy leaves had no measured effects.

Taxon
oranget0
Treatment
removing 25% of leavese0
Outcome
no measured effectse0
Direction
no measured effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“There were no measured effects of removing 25% of leaves from tree canopies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–864
t0

“Orange Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87

Title

Partial Defoliation Can Decrease Average Leaf Size but Has Little Effect on Orange Tree Growth, Fruit Yield and Juice Quality

Rongcai Yuan; Fernando Alferez; Igor Kostenyuk; et al. HortScience 2005. doi:10.21273/hortsci.40.7.2011

Other claims from this paper (7)

Effect of low concentrations of sulphur dioxide on yield of alfalfa and cruciferae 4

Show all 4 →
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur dioxide did not decrease alfalfa yield under any of the conditions studied.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
sulphur dioxide treatmente0
Outcome
yield of alfalfae0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Qualifier
under none of the conditions studiede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515

Title

Effect of low concentrations of sulphur dioxide on yield of alfalfa and cruciferae

C. Setterstrom; P. W. Zimmerman; William Crocker OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) 1938

Other claims from this paper (9)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under most conditions sulphur dioxide had no significant effect on alfalfa yield.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
sulphur dioxidee0
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
no significant effecte1
Qualifier
under most of the conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515
e1

“under most of the conditions it had no significant effect on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–583

Title

Effect of low concentrations of sulphur dioxide on yield of alfalfa and cruciferae

C. Setterstrom; P. W. Zimmerman; William Crocker OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) 1938

Other claims from this paper (9)
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant age and the amount of supplied nutrients had no effect on the alfalfa yield response to sulphur dioxide.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
amount of supplied nutrientse1
Outcome
yield response to the gas treatmente1
Direction
no effecte1
Qualifier
Age of plants and the amount of supplied nutrientse1

Verbatim

e0

“Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515
e1

“Age of plants and the amount of supplied nutrients had no effect on the yield response to the gas treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–905

Title

Effect of low concentrations of sulphur dioxide on yield of alfalfa and cruciferae

C. Setterstrom; P. W. Zimmerman; William Crocker OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) 1938

Other claims from this paper (9)

Assessment of the nitrogen requirements of planted maize (Zea mays L.) in the semi-arid areas of Zimbabwe 4

Show all 4 →
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)simulated

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated maize planting could extend to early December with no nitrogen without significant yield decrease.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
early Decembere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
without a significant decreasee0
Qualifier
no nitrogene0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“planting can be extended to early December, late December, early January and late January without a significant decrease in yield by adding no nitrogen, 15, 30 and 60 kg ha-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1080
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56

Title

Assessment of the nitrogen requirements of planted maize (Zea mays L.) in the semi-arid areas of Zimbabwe

Francis T Mugabe; Dominic J Banga UNISWA Journal of Agriculture 2004. doi:10.4314/uniswa.v10i1.4602

Other claims from this paper (6)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)simulated

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated maize planting could extend to late December with 15 kg ha-1 nitrogen without significant yield decrease.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
late Decembere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
without a significant decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“planting can be extended to early December, late December, early January and late January without a significant decrease in yield by adding no nitrogen, 15, 30 and 60 kg ha-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1080
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56

Title

Assessment of the nitrogen requirements of planted maize (Zea mays L.) in the semi-arid areas of Zimbabwe

Francis T Mugabe; Dominic J Banga UNISWA Journal of Agriculture 2004. doi:10.4314/uniswa.v10i1.4602

Other claims from this paper (6)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)simulated

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated maize planting could extend to late January with 60 kg ha-1 nitrogen without significant yield decrease.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
late Januarye0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
without a significant decreasee0
Qualifier
60 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“planting can be extended to early December, late December, early January and late January without a significant decrease in yield by adding no nitrogen, 15, 30 and 60 kg ha-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1080
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56

Title

Assessment of the nitrogen requirements of planted maize (Zea mays L.) in the semi-arid areas of Zimbabwe

Francis T Mugabe; Dominic J Banga UNISWA Journal of Agriculture 2004. doi:10.4314/uniswa.v10i1.4602

Other claims from this paper (6)

Impact of Brown Spot Caused by Septoria glycines on Soybean in Ohio 4

Show all 4 →
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flutriafol at R3 or R5 did not significantly decrease brown spot.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
R3 or R5e0
Treatment
flutriafole0
Interactor
Septoria glycinesSeptoria glycinest0pathogene0
Outcome
levels of brown spote0
Direction
did not significantly decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Triazoles, flutriafol and tebuconazole, applied at R3 or R5 did not significantly decrease levels of brown spot or impact yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1196
t0

“Septoria glycines on Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–59

Title

Impact of Brown Spot Caused by Septoria glycines on Soybean in Ohio

Christian D. Cruz; Dennis Mills; Pierce A. Paul; et al. Plant Disease 2010. doi:10.1094/pdis-94-7-0820

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tebuconazole at R3 or R5 did not significantly decrease brown spot.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
R3 or R5e0
Treatment
tebuconazolee0
Interactor
Septoria glycinesSeptoria glycinest0pathogene0
Outcome
levels of brown spote0
Direction
did not significantly decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Triazoles, flutriafol and tebuconazole, applied at R3 or R5 did not significantly decrease levels of brown spot or impact yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1196
t0

“Septoria glycines on Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–59

Title

Impact of Brown Spot Caused by Septoria glycines on Soybean in Ohio

Christian D. Cruz; Dennis Mills; Pierce A. Paul; et al. Plant Disease 2010. doi:10.1094/pdis-94-7-0820

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flutriafol did not significantly affect yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
flutriafole0
Interactor
Septoria glycinesSeptoria glycinest0pathogene0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Triazoles, flutriafol and tebuconazole, applied at R3 or R5 did not significantly decrease levels of brown spot or impact yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1196
t0

“Septoria glycines on Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–59

Title

Impact of Brown Spot Caused by Septoria glycines on Soybean in Ohio

Christian D. Cruz; Dennis Mills; Pierce A. Paul; et al. Plant Disease 2010. doi:10.1094/pdis-94-7-0820

Other claims from this paper (10)

Effect of remaining monopodial branches on the ~(14)C-assimilation,partitioning of ~(14)C assimilates and lint yield of the cotton plant 4

Show all 4 →
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Retained monopodial branches had no remarkable effect on lint yield.

Taxon
cotton plantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
remaining monopodial branchese1
Outcome
lint yielde0
Direction
no remarkable effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“there was no remarkable effect on the number of bolls per hectare,boll weight,lint percent and lint yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–948
e1

“the remaining monopodial branches could decrease the translocation of 14 C assimilates into main stem and fruiting branches at flowering and fruiting stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–702
t0

“cotton plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–136

Title

Effect of remaining monopodial branches on the ~(14)C-assimilation,partitioning of ~(14)C assimilates and lint yield of the cotton plant

Xue Sun Xibei zhiwu xuebao 2000

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Retained monopodial branches had no remarkable effect on boll weight.

Taxon
cotton plantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
remaining monopodial branchese1
Outcome
boll weighte0
Direction
no remarkable effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“there was no remarkable effect on the number of bolls per hectare,boll weight,lint percent and lint yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–948
e1

“the remaining monopodial branches could decrease the translocation of 14 C assimilates into main stem and fruiting branches at flowering and fruiting stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–702
t0

“cotton plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–136

Title

Effect of remaining monopodial branches on the ~(14)C-assimilation,partitioning of ~(14)C assimilates and lint yield of the cotton plant

Xue Sun Xibei zhiwu xuebao 2000

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Retained monopodial branches had no remarkable effect on lint percent.

Taxon
cotton plantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
remaining monopodial branchese1
Outcome
lint percente0
Direction
no remarkable effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“there was no remarkable effect on the number of bolls per hectare,boll weight,lint percent and lint yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–948
e1

“the remaining monopodial branches could decrease the translocation of 14 C assimilates into main stem and fruiting branches at flowering and fruiting stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–702
t0

“cotton plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–136

Title

Effect of remaining monopodial branches on the ~(14)C-assimilation,partitioning of ~(14)C assimilates and lint yield of the cotton plant

Xue Sun Xibei zhiwu xuebao 2000

Other claims from this paper (8)

Effects of reducing and postponing nitrogen application on soil N supply,plant N uptake and utilization of summer maize 4

Show all 4 →
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced and postponed N application did not decrease yield.

Taxon
summer maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
reducing and postponing N applicatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
not decreasede0
Comparator
farmers' practicee1

Verbatim

e0

“The results show that N accumulation rate is increased under the reducing and postponing N application(N 168 kg/ha,1/5 basal,3/5 topdressing at stalk enlongation stage and 1/5 topdressing at silking stage,respectively) compared with farmers' practice(N 240 kg/ha,1/3 basal and 2/3 topdressing at booting stage,respectively),while N use efficiency,dry biomass accumulation,yield and N accumulation amount are not decrease…” Show full quote

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–581
t0

“summer maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–119
e1

“compared with farmers' practice(N 240 kg/ha,1/3 basal and 2/3 topdressing at booting stage,respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–482

Title

Effects of reducing and postponing nitrogen application on soil N supply,plant N uptake and utilization of summer maize

Jiyun Jin Plant Nutrition and Fertilizing Science 2010

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced and postponed N application did not decrease N use efficiency.

Taxon
summer maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
reducing and postponing N applicatione0
Outcome
N use efficiencye0
Direction
not decreasede0
Comparator
farmers' practicee1

Verbatim

e0

“The results show that N accumulation rate is increased under the reducing and postponing N application(N 168 kg/ha,1/5 basal,3/5 topdressing at stalk enlongation stage and 1/5 topdressing at silking stage,respectively) compared with farmers' practice(N 240 kg/ha,1/3 basal and 2/3 topdressing at booting stage,respectively),while N use efficiency,dry biomass accumulation,yield and N accumulation amount are not decrease…” Show full quote

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–581
t0

“summer maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–119
e1

“compared with farmers' practice(N 240 kg/ha,1/3 basal and 2/3 topdressing at booting stage,respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–482

Title

Effects of reducing and postponing nitrogen application on soil N supply,plant N uptake and utilization of summer maize

Jiyun Jin Plant Nutrition and Fertilizing Science 2010

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced and postponed N application did not decrease dry biomass accumulation.

Taxon
summer maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
reducing and postponing N applicatione0
Outcome
dry biomass accumulatione0
Direction
not decreasede0
Comparator
farmers' practicee1

Verbatim

e0

“The results show that N accumulation rate is increased under the reducing and postponing N application(N 168 kg/ha,1/5 basal,3/5 topdressing at stalk enlongation stage and 1/5 topdressing at silking stage,respectively) compared with farmers' practice(N 240 kg/ha,1/3 basal and 2/3 topdressing at booting stage,respectively),while N use efficiency,dry biomass accumulation,yield and N accumulation amount are not decrease…” Show full quote

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–581
t0

“summer maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–119
e1

“compared with farmers' practice(N 240 kg/ha,1/3 basal and 2/3 topdressing at booting stage,respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–482

Title

Effects of reducing and postponing nitrogen application on soil N supply,plant N uptake and utilization of summer maize

Jiyun Jin Plant Nutrition and Fertilizing Science 2010

Other claims from this paper (8)

Maize-crotalaria intercropping systems 4

Show all 4 →
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

crotalaria was sown in the maize sowing furrow was associated with no reduction in corn grain yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
crotalaria was sown in the maize sowing furrowe0
Outcome
corn grain yielde0
Direction
did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“crotalaria was sown in the inter-row with a ridge planter at the time of maize planting and the system in which crotalaria was sown in the maize sowing furrow were feasible for straw production because they did not decrease corn grain yield and did not affect maize harvesting operations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1221

Title

Maize-crotalaria intercropping systems

Rafael Torres de Souza; Franciele Caroline de Assis Valadão; Daniel Dias Valadão Júnior; et al. Semina Ciências Agrárias 2019. doi:10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n4p1455

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

crotalaria was sown in the inter-row with a ridge planter at the time of maize planting was associated with no reduction in corn grain yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
crotalaria was sown in the inter-row with a ridge planter at the time of maize plantinge0
Outcome
corn grain yielde0
Direction
did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“crotalaria was sown in the inter-row with a ridge planter at the time of maize planting and the system in which crotalaria was sown in the maize sowing furrow were feasible for straw production because they did not decrease corn grain yield and did not affect maize harvesting operations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1221

Title

Maize-crotalaria intercropping systems

Rafael Torres de Souza; Franciele Caroline de Assis Valadão; Daniel Dias Valadão Júnior; et al. Semina Ciências Agrárias 2019. doi:10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n4p1455

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

crotalaria was sown in the maize sowing furrow was associated with no reduction in maize harvesting operations.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
crotalaria was sown in the maize sowing furrowe0
Outcome
maize harvesting operationse0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“crotalaria was sown in the inter-row with a ridge planter at the time of maize planting and the system in which crotalaria was sown in the maize sowing furrow were feasible for straw production because they did not decrease corn grain yield and did not affect maize harvesting operations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1221

Title

Maize-crotalaria intercropping systems

Rafael Torres de Souza; Franciele Caroline de Assis Valadão; Daniel Dias Valadão Júnior; et al. Semina Ciências Agrárias 2019. doi:10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n4p1455

Other claims from this paper (8)

Effect of Deficit Irrigation and Planting Method on Maize Plants under Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt 4

Show all 4 →
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 65% AVSMD did not significantly decrease kernels per row, 100-kernel weight or grain yield of maize.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Irrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD)e0
Outcome
kernels per row,100-kernel weight and grain yielde0
Direction
did not significantly decreasee0
Setting
Middle Delta Conditions of Egyptt0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Maize Plants under Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–103
e0

“Irrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD) did not significantly decrease chlorophyll content, dry matter (DM), leaf area index (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR), relative water content (RWC), osmotic potential (OP), ear length, ear diameter, rows per ear, kernels per row,100-kernel weight and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–573

Title

Effect of Deficit Irrigation and Planting Method on Maize Plants under Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt

O. S. Abu-Grab; Seham M. M. Ahmed; M. A. M. EL-Ghonemy Journal of Plant Production 2019. doi:10.21608/jpp.2019.62278

Other claims from this paper (12)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 65% AVSMD did not significantly decrease ear length, ear diameter or rows per ear of maize.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Irrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD)e0
Outcome
ear length, ear diameter, rows per eare0
Direction
did not significantly decreasee0
Setting
Middle Delta Conditions of Egyptt0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Maize Plants under Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–103
e0

“Irrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD) did not significantly decrease chlorophyll content, dry matter (DM), leaf area index (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR), relative water content (RWC), osmotic potential (OP), ear length, ear diameter, rows per ear, kernels per row,100-kernel weight and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–573

Title

Effect of Deficit Irrigation and Planting Method on Maize Plants under Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt

O. S. Abu-Grab; Seham M. M. Ahmed; M. A. M. EL-Ghonemy Journal of Plant Production 2019. doi:10.21608/jpp.2019.62278

Other claims from this paper (12)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 65% AVSMD did not significantly decrease chlorophyll content, dry matter or leaf area index of maize.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Irrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD)e0
Outcome
chlorophyll content, dry matter (DM), leaf area index (LAI)e0
Direction
did not significantly decreasee0
Setting
Middle Delta Conditions of Egyptt0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Maize Plants under Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–103
e0

“Irrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD) did not significantly decrease chlorophyll content, dry matter (DM), leaf area index (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR), relative water content (RWC), osmotic potential (OP), ear length, ear diameter, rows per ear, kernels per row,100-kernel weight and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–573

Title

Effect of Deficit Irrigation and Planting Method on Maize Plants under Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt

O. S. Abu-Grab; Seham M. M. Ahmed; M. A. M. EL-Ghonemy Journal of Plant Production 2019. doi:10.21608/jpp.2019.62278

Other claims from this paper (12)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.