Search claims · PlantClaims

Effects of Subsoiling at Jointing Stage on Dry Matter Production and Photosynthesis of Summer Maize 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained grain yield by 1 662.0 kg/ha.

Taxon: Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Material: Zhendan958e1
Treatment: subsoiling at jointing stagee0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: reducede0
Value: 1 662.0 kg/hae0
Comparator: non-subsoilinge0

Verbatim

t0
“Summer Maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–99

e0
“compared with non-subsoiling,subsoiling at jointing stage achieved the following characters: plant height and ear height decreased by 17.3 cm and 9.0 cm,stem diameter decreased by 2.7 mm,and one leaf less;the increase of LAI before silking was limited,while decrease of LAI after silking was slow;stomatal conductance,intercellular CO2 concentration,transpiration rate,net photosynthetic rate of ear leaves decreased 38%…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–1013

e1
“Zhendan958 was applied in the field experiment.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–47

Title

Effects of Subsoiling at Jointing Stage on Dry Matter Production and Photosynthesis of Summer Maize

Dongxing Zhang Yumi kexue 2013

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained plant height by 17.3 cm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained ear height by 9.0 cm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained stem diameter by 2.7 mm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained leaf by one leaf.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained LAI before silking.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained LAI after silking.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained stomatal conductance by 38%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained intercellular CO2 concentration by 25.3%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained transpiration rate by 42.5%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained net photosynthetic rate by 2.0%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained dry matter production by 1 519.5 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained dry matter production by 168.8 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained grain number by 100.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained economic index by 7 percentage.
Intervention effect The two nitrogen regimes did not differ significantly for the studied outcomes.
Association No subsoiling by nitrogen regime interaction was observed.
Recommendation The authors conclude that jointing-stage subsoiling is unsuitable.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained LAI before silking.

Taxon: Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Material: Zhendan958e1
Treatment: subsoiling at jointing stagee0
Outcome: LAI before silkinge0
Direction: limitede0
Comparator: non-subsoilinge0

Verbatim

t0
“Summer Maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–99

e0
“compared with non-subsoiling,subsoiling at jointing stage achieved the following characters: plant height and ear height decreased by 17.3 cm and 9.0 cm,stem diameter decreased by 2.7 mm,and one leaf less;the increase of LAI before silking was limited,while decrease of LAI after silking was slow;stomatal conductance,intercellular CO2 concentration,transpiration rate,net photosynthetic rate of ear leaves decreased 38%…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–1013

e1
“Zhendan958 was applied in the field experiment.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–47

Title

Effects of Subsoiling at Jointing Stage on Dry Matter Production and Photosynthesis of Summer Maize

Dongxing Zhang Yumi kexue 2013

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained plant height by 17.3 cm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained ear height by 9.0 cm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained stem diameter by 2.7 mm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained leaf by one leaf.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained LAI after silking.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained stomatal conductance by 38%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained intercellular CO2 concentration by 25.3%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained transpiration rate by 42.5%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained net photosynthetic rate by 2.0%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained dry matter production by 1 519.5 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained dry matter production by 168.8 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained grain number by 100.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained economic index by 7 percentage.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained grain yield by 1 662.0 kg/ha.
Intervention effect The two nitrogen regimes did not differ significantly for the studied outcomes.
Association No subsoiling by nitrogen regime interaction was observed.
Recommendation The authors conclude that jointing-stage subsoiling is unsuitable.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained LAI after silking.

Taxon: Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Material: Zhendan958e1
Treatment: subsoiling at jointing stagee0
Outcome: LAI after silkinge0
Direction: slowe0
Comparator: non-subsoilinge0

Verbatim

t0
“Summer Maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–99

e0
“compared with non-subsoiling,subsoiling at jointing stage achieved the following characters: plant height and ear height decreased by 17.3 cm and 9.0 cm,stem diameter decreased by 2.7 mm,and one leaf less;the increase of LAI before silking was limited,while decrease of LAI after silking was slow;stomatal conductance,intercellular CO2 concentration,transpiration rate,net photosynthetic rate of ear leaves decreased 38%…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–1013

e1
“Zhendan958 was applied in the field experiment.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–47

Title

Effects of Subsoiling at Jointing Stage on Dry Matter Production and Photosynthesis of Summer Maize

Dongxing Zhang Yumi kexue 2013

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained plant height by 17.3 cm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained ear height by 9.0 cm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained stem diameter by 2.7 mm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained leaf by one leaf.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained LAI before silking.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained stomatal conductance by 38%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained intercellular CO2 concentration by 25.3%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained transpiration rate by 42.5%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained net photosynthetic rate by 2.0%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained dry matter production by 1 519.5 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained dry matter production by 168.8 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained grain number by 100.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained economic index by 7 percentage.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained grain yield by 1 662.0 kg/ha.
Intervention effect The two nitrogen regimes did not differ significantly for the studied outcomes.
Association No subsoiling by nitrogen regime interaction was observed.
Recommendation The authors conclude that jointing-stage subsoiling is unsuitable.

Mitigation of salinity induced effects using brassinolide in clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.) 15

Show all 15 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly decreased grain yield in clusterbean.

Taxon: clusterbeanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment: Salinitye0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Salinity was found to decrease significantly the photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate (at flowering stage), stomatal conductance, relative water content, chlorophyll stability index, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, plant height, pod length, leaf area index, test weight, grain yield, biological yield, harvest index and K+ and Na+ content in grain”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–876

t0
“clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–101

Title

Mitigation of salinity induced effects using brassinolide in clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.)

Gograj Jat; DL Bagdi; BL Kakralya; et al. Crop Research 2012

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased photosynthesis rate in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased transpiration rate in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased stomatal conductance in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased relative water content in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased chlorophyll stability index in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased number of pods per plant in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased number of seeds per pod in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased plant height in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased pod length in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased leaf area index in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased test weight in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased biological yield in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased harvest index in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased K+ and Na+ content in grain in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Brassinolide up to 1.0 ppm significantly increased the listed physiological and yield variables in clusterbean.
Observation RGC-1018 had higher measured parameters than RGC-936.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly decreased biological yield in clusterbean.

Taxon: clusterbeanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment: Salinitye0
Outcome: biological yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Salinity was found to decrease significantly the photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate (at flowering stage), stomatal conductance, relative water content, chlorophyll stability index, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, plant height, pod length, leaf area index, test weight, grain yield, biological yield, harvest index and K+ and Na+ content in grain”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–876

t0
“clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–101

Title

Mitigation of salinity induced effects using brassinolide in clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.)

Gograj Jat; DL Bagdi; BL Kakralya; et al. Crop Research 2012

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased photosynthesis rate in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased transpiration rate in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased stomatal conductance in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased relative water content in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased chlorophyll stability index in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased number of pods per plant in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased number of seeds per pod in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased plant height in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased pod length in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased leaf area index in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased test weight in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased grain yield in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased harvest index in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased K+ and Na+ content in grain in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Brassinolide up to 1.0 ppm significantly increased the listed physiological and yield variables in clusterbean.
Observation RGC-1018 had higher measured parameters than RGC-936.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly decreased photosynthesis rate in clusterbean.

Taxon: clusterbeanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment: Salinitye0
Outcome: photosynthesis ratee0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Salinity was found to decrease significantly the photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate (at flowering stage), stomatal conductance, relative water content, chlorophyll stability index, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, plant height, pod length, leaf area index, test weight, grain yield, biological yield, harvest index and K+ and Na+ content in grain”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–876

t0
“clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–101

Title

Mitigation of salinity induced effects using brassinolide in clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.)

Gograj Jat; DL Bagdi; BL Kakralya; et al. Crop Research 2012

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased transpiration rate in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased stomatal conductance in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased relative water content in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased chlorophyll stability index in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased number of pods per plant in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased number of seeds per pod in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased plant height in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased pod length in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased leaf area index in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased test weight in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased grain yield in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased biological yield in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased harvest index in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased K+ and Na+ content in grain in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Brassinolide up to 1.0 ppm significantly increased the listed physiological and yield variables in clusterbean.
Observation RGC-1018 had higher measured parameters than RGC-936.

WEED-CROP COMPETITION EFFECTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGARCANE PLANTED USING TWO METHODS 14

Show all 14 →

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area index, crop growth rate and yield components decreased as the weed-crop competition period lengthened.

Taxon: sugarcanee0
Treatment: weed-crop competition periode5
Outcome: leaf area index, crop growth rate and yield componentse5
Direction: decreasee5

Verbatim

e0
“Effect of planting techniques and weed-crop competition periods on yield potential of spring planted sugarcane variety HSF-240 was studied at the Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad, Pakistan”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–204

e5
“decrease in leaf area index, crop growth rate and yield components with an increase in weed-crop competition period”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1251

Title

WEED-CROP COMPETITION EFFECTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGARCANE PLANTED USING TWO METHODS

Muhammad Zafar; Asif Tanveer; Zahid Ata Cheema; et al. Pakistan Journal of Botany 2010

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Trench sowing increased leaf area index, average crop growth rate and yield-contributing attributes compared with flat sowing.
Association Weed population and biomass increased as the weed-crop competition period lengthened.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 45 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 10.06% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 60 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 17.90% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 75 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 22.42% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 90 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 28.65% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 105 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 37.64% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect The full-season weedy check reduced stripped cane yield by 56.89% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 45 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 9.84% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 60 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 18.76% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 75 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 22.92% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 90 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 27.98% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 105 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 38.75% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect The full-season weedy check reduced stripped cane yield by 54.98% in 2006-07.
Observation The critical period of weed-crop competition in sugarcane was 45 days after sowing.
Recommendation The authors recommend trench sowing at 1.2 m row spacing as the better sowing technique.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The full-season weedy check reduced stripped cane yield by 54.98% in 2006-07.

Taxon: sugarcanee0
Treatment: weedy checke1
Interactor: weede1weed
Outcome: stripped cane yielde7
Direction: decreasee7
Value: 54.98e7
Qualifier: 2006-07e7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Effect of planting techniques and weed-crop competition periods on yield potential of spring planted sugarcane variety HSF-240 was studied at the Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad, Pakistan”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–204

e7
“In 2006-07, the respective decrease in stripped cane yield was 9.84, 18.76, 22.92, 27.98, 38.75, and 54.98%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1592

e1
“weed-crop competition periods of 45, 60, 75, 90, 105 DAS and weedy check”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1424

Title

WEED-CROP COMPETITION EFFECTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGARCANE PLANTED USING TWO METHODS

Muhammad Zafar; Asif Tanveer; Zahid Ata Cheema; et al. Pakistan Journal of Botany 2010

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Trench sowing increased leaf area index, average crop growth rate and yield-contributing attributes compared with flat sowing.
Association Weed population and biomass increased as the weed-crop competition period lengthened.
Association Leaf area index, crop growth rate and yield components decreased as the weed-crop competition period lengthened.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 45 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 10.06% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 60 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 17.90% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 75 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 22.42% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 90 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 28.65% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 105 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 37.64% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect The full-season weedy check reduced stripped cane yield by 56.89% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 45 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 9.84% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 60 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 18.76% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 75 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 22.92% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 90 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 27.98% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 105 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 38.75% in 2006-07.
Observation The critical period of weed-crop competition in sugarcane was 45 days after sowing.
Recommendation The authors recommend trench sowing at 1.2 m row spacing as the better sowing technique.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-crop competition for 45 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 9.84% in 2006-07.

Taxon: sugarcanee0
Treatment: weed-crop competition periodse1
Interactor: weede1weed
Outcome: stripped cane yielde7
Direction: decreasee7
Value: 9.84e7
Qualifier: 2006-07e7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Effect of planting techniques and weed-crop competition periods on yield potential of spring planted sugarcane variety HSF-240 was studied at the Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad, Pakistan”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–204

e7
“In 2006-07, the respective decrease in stripped cane yield was 9.84, 18.76, 22.92, 27.98, 38.75, and 54.98%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1592

e1
“weed-crop competition periods of 45, 60, 75, 90, 105 DAS and weedy check”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1424

Title

WEED-CROP COMPETITION EFFECTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGARCANE PLANTED USING TWO METHODS

Muhammad Zafar; Asif Tanveer; Zahid Ata Cheema; et al. Pakistan Journal of Botany 2010

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Trench sowing increased leaf area index, average crop growth rate and yield-contributing attributes compared with flat sowing.
Association Weed population and biomass increased as the weed-crop competition period lengthened.
Association Leaf area index, crop growth rate and yield components decreased as the weed-crop competition period lengthened.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 45 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 10.06% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 60 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 17.90% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 75 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 22.42% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 90 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 28.65% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 105 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 37.64% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect The full-season weedy check reduced stripped cane yield by 56.89% relative to zero competition in 2005-06.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 60 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 18.76% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 75 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 22.92% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 90 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 27.98% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect Weed-crop competition for 105 DAS reduced stripped cane yield by 38.75% in 2006-07.
Intervention effect The full-season weedy check reduced stripped cane yield by 54.98% in 2006-07.
Observation The critical period of weed-crop competition in sugarcane was 45 days after sowing.
Recommendation The authors recommend trench sowing at 1.2 m row spacing as the better sowing technique.

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PRODUCTION FACTORS ON PRODUCTIVITY, NPK UPTAKE AND QUALITY OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.) 14

Show all 14 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control grain yield was 48.0% below the full package.

Taxon: pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment: controle0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 48.0e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0
“caused a decrease in grain yield by 32.8, 12.2, 7.7, 16.7, 30.1, 20.2 and 48.0 (control), per cent”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1030

t0
“pearl millet”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–94

Title

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PRODUCTION FACTORS ON PRODUCTIVITY, NPK UPTAKE AND QUALITY OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.)

Arun Kumar; Anil Kumar; L. K. Midha; et al. 2015

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Omitting recommended fertilizer reduced grain yield 32.8% versus the full package.
Intervention effect Omitting ZnSO4 reduced grain yield 12.2%.
Intervention effect Omitting biomix reduced grain yield 7.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting thinning and gap filling reduced grain yield 16.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting weeding and hoeing reduced grain yield 30.1%.
Intervention effect Omitting irrigation reduced grain yield 20.2%.
Intervention effect Omitting fertilizer reduced stover yield 22.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting ZnSO4 reduced stover yield 7.9%.
Intervention effect Omitting biomix reduced stover yield 4.0%.
Intervention effect Omitting thinning reduced stover yield 10.0%.
Intervention effect Omitting weeding reduced stover yield 18.9%.
Intervention effect Omitting irrigation reduced stover yield 16.0%.
Intervention effect Control stover yield was 32.2% below the full package.
Intervention effect Full package significantly increased N, P, K and protein contents and uptake in grain and stover.
Intervention effect Grain nitrogen content rose from 1.66% under control to 1.84% under T1.
Intervention effect Grain phosphorus content rose from 0.24% under control to 0.31% under T1.
Intervention effect Grain potassium content was highest under T1 at 0.60% versus 0.53% under T8.
Observation Full package yielded highest total N, P and K uptake at 129.78, 26.47 and 308.77 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Grain protein content increased from 10.4% under control to 11.5% under T1.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting ZnSO4 reduced stover yield 7.9%.

Taxon: pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Outcome: stover yielde0
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 7.9e0
Comparator: T 1 (FPP)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleTreatmentSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0
“stover yield by 22.7, 7.9, 4.0, 10.0, 18.9, 16.0 and 32.2 per cent (control) than T 1 (FPP)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1126

t0
“pearl millet”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–94

e1
“caused a decrease in grain yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–964

Title

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PRODUCTION FACTORS ON PRODUCTIVITY, NPK UPTAKE AND QUALITY OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.)

Arun Kumar; Anil Kumar; L. K. Midha; et al. 2015

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Omitting recommended fertilizer reduced grain yield 32.8% versus the full package.
Intervention effect Omitting ZnSO4 reduced grain yield 12.2%.
Intervention effect Omitting biomix reduced grain yield 7.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting thinning and gap filling reduced grain yield 16.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting weeding and hoeing reduced grain yield 30.1%.
Intervention effect Omitting irrigation reduced grain yield 20.2%.
Intervention effect Control grain yield was 48.0% below the full package.
Intervention effect Omitting fertilizer reduced stover yield 22.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting biomix reduced stover yield 4.0%.
Intervention effect Omitting thinning reduced stover yield 10.0%.
Intervention effect Omitting weeding reduced stover yield 18.9%.
Intervention effect Omitting irrigation reduced stover yield 16.0%.
Intervention effect Control stover yield was 32.2% below the full package.
Intervention effect Full package significantly increased N, P, K and protein contents and uptake in grain and stover.
Intervention effect Grain nitrogen content rose from 1.66% under control to 1.84% under T1.
Intervention effect Grain phosphorus content rose from 0.24% under control to 0.31% under T1.
Intervention effect Grain potassium content was highest under T1 at 0.60% versus 0.53% under T8.
Observation Full package yielded highest total N, P and K uptake at 129.78, 26.47 and 308.77 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Grain protein content increased from 10.4% under control to 11.5% under T1.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting biomix reduced stover yield 4.0%.

Taxon: pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Outcome: stover yielde0
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 4.0e0
Comparator: T 1 (FPP)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleTreatmentSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0
“stover yield by 22.7, 7.9, 4.0, 10.0, 18.9, 16.0 and 32.2 per cent (control) than T 1 (FPP)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1126

t0
“pearl millet”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–94

e1
“caused a decrease in grain yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–964

Title

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PRODUCTION FACTORS ON PRODUCTIVITY, NPK UPTAKE AND QUALITY OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.)

Arun Kumar; Anil Kumar; L. K. Midha; et al. 2015

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Omitting recommended fertilizer reduced grain yield 32.8% versus the full package.
Intervention effect Omitting ZnSO4 reduced grain yield 12.2%.
Intervention effect Omitting biomix reduced grain yield 7.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting thinning and gap filling reduced grain yield 16.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting weeding and hoeing reduced grain yield 30.1%.
Intervention effect Omitting irrigation reduced grain yield 20.2%.
Intervention effect Control grain yield was 48.0% below the full package.
Intervention effect Omitting fertilizer reduced stover yield 22.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting ZnSO4 reduced stover yield 7.9%.
Intervention effect Omitting thinning reduced stover yield 10.0%.
Intervention effect Omitting weeding reduced stover yield 18.9%.
Intervention effect Omitting irrigation reduced stover yield 16.0%.
Intervention effect Control stover yield was 32.2% below the full package.
Intervention effect Full package significantly increased N, P, K and protein contents and uptake in grain and stover.
Intervention effect Grain nitrogen content rose from 1.66% under control to 1.84% under T1.
Intervention effect Grain phosphorus content rose from 0.24% under control to 0.31% under T1.
Intervention effect Grain potassium content was highest under T1 at 0.60% versus 0.53% under T8.
Observation Full package yielded highest total N, P and K uptake at 129.78, 26.47 and 308.77 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Grain protein content increased from 10.4% under control to 11.5% under T1.

CONTRIBUTION OF PRODUCTION FACTORS TO THE YIELD AND ECONOMICS OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.) 14

Show all 14 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control without any of the production factors decreased grain yield by 48.0% relative to the full package T1.

Taxon: pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment: controle1
Outcome: grain yielde1
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 48.0e1
Comparator: T1 (FPP)e1

Verbatim

e0
“on the grain productivity of pearl millet”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–278

e1
“Non-adoption of individual factors RDF (T2), ZnSO4 (T3), biomix (T4), thinning and gap filling (T5), weeding and hoeing (T6) and irrigation (T7) caused a decrease in grain yield by 32.8, 12.2, 7.7, 16.7, 30.1, 20.2, 48.0 (control) per cent and stover yield by 22.7, 7.9, 4.0, 10.0, 18.9, 16.0 and 32.2 per cent (control) than T1 (FPP), respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–1057

Title

CONTRIBUTION OF PRODUCTION FACTORS TO THE YIELD AND ECONOMICS OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.)

Arun Kumar; Anil Kumar; L. K. Midha; et al. 2014

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Non-adoption of RDF (T2) decreased grain yield by 32.8% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of ZnSO4 (T3) decreased grain yield by 12.2% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of biomix (T4) decreased grain yield by 7.7% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of thinning and gap filling (T5) decreased grain yield by 16.7% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of weeding and hoeing (T6) decreased grain yield by 30.1% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of irrigation (T7) decreased grain yield by 20.2% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of RDF (T2) decreased stover yield by 22.7% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of ZnSO4 (T3) decreased stover yield by 7.9% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of biomix (T4) decreased stover yield by 4.0% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of thinning and gap filling (T5) decreased stover yield by 10.0% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of weeding and hoeing (T6) decreased stover yield by 18.9% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of irrigation (T7) decreased stover yield by 16.0% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect The control without any of the production factors decreased stover yield by 32.2% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Treatment T1 gave the maximum gross returns (Rs. 48727/ha), with T4 ranked next.
Intervention effect Treatment T1 gave the maximum net returns (Rs. 16926/ha), with T4 ranked next.
Intervention effect Treatment T1 gave the maximum benefit-cost ratio (1.53), with T4 ranked next.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control without any of the production factors decreased stover yield by 32.2% relative to the full package T1.

Taxon: pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment: controle1
Outcome: stover yielde1
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 32.2e1
Comparator: T1 (FPP)e1

Verbatim

e0
“on the grain productivity of pearl millet”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–278

e1
“Non-adoption of individual factors RDF (T2), ZnSO4 (T3), biomix (T4), thinning and gap filling (T5), weeding and hoeing (T6) and irrigation (T7) caused a decrease in grain yield by 32.8, 12.2, 7.7, 16.7, 30.1, 20.2, 48.0 (control) per cent and stover yield by 22.7, 7.9, 4.0, 10.0, 18.9, 16.0 and 32.2 per cent (control) than T1 (FPP), respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–1057

Title

CONTRIBUTION OF PRODUCTION FACTORS TO THE YIELD AND ECONOMICS OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.)

Arun Kumar; Anil Kumar; L. K. Midha; et al. 2014

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Non-adoption of RDF (T2) decreased grain yield by 32.8% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of ZnSO4 (T3) decreased grain yield by 12.2% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of biomix (T4) decreased grain yield by 7.7% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of thinning and gap filling (T5) decreased grain yield by 16.7% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of weeding and hoeing (T6) decreased grain yield by 30.1% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of irrigation (T7) decreased grain yield by 20.2% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect The control without any of the production factors decreased grain yield by 48.0% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of RDF (T2) decreased stover yield by 22.7% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of ZnSO4 (T3) decreased stover yield by 7.9% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of biomix (T4) decreased stover yield by 4.0% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of thinning and gap filling (T5) decreased stover yield by 10.0% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of weeding and hoeing (T6) decreased stover yield by 18.9% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of irrigation (T7) decreased stover yield by 16.0% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Treatment T1 gave the maximum gross returns (Rs. 48727/ha), with T4 ranked next.
Intervention effect Treatment T1 gave the maximum net returns (Rs. 16926/ha), with T4 ranked next.
Intervention effect Treatment T1 gave the maximum benefit-cost ratio (1.53), with T4 ranked next.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-adoption of RDF (T2) decreased grain yield by 32.8% relative to the full package T1.

Taxon: pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment: RDF (T2)e1
Outcome: grain yielde1
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 32.8e1
Qualifier: Non-adoption of individual factorse1
Comparator: T1 (FPP)e1

Verbatim

e0
“on the grain productivity of pearl millet”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–278

e1
“Non-adoption of individual factors RDF (T2), ZnSO4 (T3), biomix (T4), thinning and gap filling (T5), weeding and hoeing (T6) and irrigation (T7) caused a decrease in grain yield by 32.8, 12.2, 7.7, 16.7, 30.1, 20.2, 48.0 (control) per cent and stover yield by 22.7, 7.9, 4.0, 10.0, 18.9, 16.0 and 32.2 per cent (control) than T1 (FPP), respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–1057

Title

CONTRIBUTION OF PRODUCTION FACTORS TO THE YIELD AND ECONOMICS OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.)

Arun Kumar; Anil Kumar; L. K. Midha; et al. 2014

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Non-adoption of ZnSO4 (T3) decreased grain yield by 12.2% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of biomix (T4) decreased grain yield by 7.7% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of thinning and gap filling (T5) decreased grain yield by 16.7% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of weeding and hoeing (T6) decreased grain yield by 30.1% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of irrigation (T7) decreased grain yield by 20.2% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect The control without any of the production factors decreased grain yield by 48.0% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of RDF (T2) decreased stover yield by 22.7% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of ZnSO4 (T3) decreased stover yield by 7.9% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of biomix (T4) decreased stover yield by 4.0% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of thinning and gap filling (T5) decreased stover yield by 10.0% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of weeding and hoeing (T6) decreased stover yield by 18.9% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Non-adoption of irrigation (T7) decreased stover yield by 16.0% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect The control without any of the production factors decreased stover yield by 32.2% relative to the full package T1.
Intervention effect Treatment T1 gave the maximum gross returns (Rs. 48727/ha), with T4 ranked next.
Intervention effect Treatment T1 gave the maximum net returns (Rs. 16926/ha), with T4 ranked next.
Intervention effect Treatment T1 gave the maximum benefit-cost ratio (1.53), with T4 ranked next.

Effects of Waterlogging, Drought and Their Combination on Yield and Water-Use Efficiency of Five Hungarian Winter Wheat Varieties 13

Show all 13 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging significantly lowered grain yield in BKT and TOB.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: BKT, TOBe0
Treatment: waterlogging treatmente0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: controlse0

Verbatim

e0
“The waterlogging treatment resulted in a significant decrease in plant biomass (BKT, TOB), number of spikes (TOB), grain yield (BKT, TOB), water use (BTK) and water-use efficiency (TOB, MAM, PAL) compared to the controls.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–910

t0
“Winter Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–119

Title

Effects of Waterlogging, Drought and Their Combination on Yield and Water-Use Efficiency of Five Hungarian Winter Wheat Varieties

Zsuzsanna Farkas; Emese Varga-László; Angéla Anda; et al. Water 2020. doi:10.3390/w12051318

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered biomass in BKT and TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered spike number in TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered water use in BTK.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered water-use efficiency in TOB, MAM and PAL.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered plant height in BTK, MAM and KAR.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered spike number in BTK, TOB, MAM and KAR.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered thousand kernel weight in TOB.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered harvest index in BTK.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered biomass in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered grain yield in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered water-use efficiency in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered water use in BKT, TOB, MAM and KAR.
Observation MAM had the best water-use efficiency.
Recommendation Authors recommend MAM for stress-prone cultivation areas.
Observation MAM showed good adaptability.
Observation KAR showed good adaptability.
Observation PAL showed good adaptability.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined stress significantly lowered grain yield in all varieties.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: WL + De0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Qualifier: in all varietiese0
Comparator: control treatment (C)t1

Verbatim

e0
“The combined treatment (WL + D) led to a significant decrease in plant height (BTK, MAM, KAR), number of spikes (BTK, TOB, MAM, KAR), thousand kernel weight (TOB), harvest index (BTK), biomass, grain yield, water-use efficiency (in all varieties) and water use (BKT, TOB, MAM, KAR) of the plants.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1207

t0
“Winter Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–119

t1
“control treatment (C)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–374

Title

Effects of Waterlogging, Drought and Their Combination on Yield and Water-Use Efficiency of Five Hungarian Winter Wheat Varieties

Zsuzsanna Farkas; Emese Varga-László; Angéla Anda; et al. Water 2020. doi:10.3390/w12051318

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered biomass in BKT and TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered spike number in TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered grain yield in BKT and TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered water use in BTK.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered water-use efficiency in TOB, MAM and PAL.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered plant height in BTK, MAM and KAR.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered spike number in BTK, TOB, MAM and KAR.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered thousand kernel weight in TOB.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered harvest index in BTK.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered biomass in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered water-use efficiency in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered water use in BKT, TOB, MAM and KAR.
Observation MAM had the best water-use efficiency.
Recommendation Authors recommend MAM for stress-prone cultivation areas.
Observation MAM showed good adaptability.
Observation KAR showed good adaptability.
Observation PAL showed good adaptability.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging significantly lowered water use in BTK.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: BTKe0
Treatment: waterlogging treatmente0
Outcome: water usee0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: controlse0

Verbatim

e0
“The waterlogging treatment resulted in a significant decrease in plant biomass (BKT, TOB), number of spikes (TOB), grain yield (BKT, TOB), water use (BTK) and water-use efficiency (TOB, MAM, PAL) compared to the controls.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–910

t0
“Winter Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–119

Title

Effects of Waterlogging, Drought and Their Combination on Yield and Water-Use Efficiency of Five Hungarian Winter Wheat Varieties

Zsuzsanna Farkas; Emese Varga-László; Angéla Anda; et al. Water 2020. doi:10.3390/w12051318

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered biomass in BKT and TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered spike number in TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered grain yield in BKT and TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered water-use efficiency in TOB, MAM and PAL.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered plant height in BTK, MAM and KAR.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered spike number in BTK, TOB, MAM and KAR.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered thousand kernel weight in TOB.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered harvest index in BTK.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered biomass in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered grain yield in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered water-use efficiency in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered water use in BKT, TOB, MAM and KAR.
Observation MAM had the best water-use efficiency.
Recommendation Authors recommend MAM for stress-prone cultivation areas.
Observation MAM showed good adaptability.
Observation KAR showed good adaptability.
Observation PAL showed good adaptability.

Empirical estimation of weather-driven yield shocks using biophysical characteristics for U.S. rainfed and irrigated maize, soybeans, and winter wheat 12

Show all 12 →

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Under a bias-corrected GFDL RCP8.5 scenario, rainfed maize yield shocks across U.S. counties are predicted to decrease by 17% in 2040–2060 relative to the 2006–2020 average.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse1
Treatment: bias-corrected GFDL RCP8.5 scenarioe1
Outcome: annual weather-induced yield shockse1
Direction: decreaseinferrede1
Value: −17%e1
Qualifier: rainfede1
Comparator: average of 2006–2020 annual yield shockse1
Setting: U.S. countiese1

Verbatim

e1
“Under a bias-corrected GFDL RCP8.5 scenario, this approach predicts the average of annual weather-induced yield shocks, relative to the average of 2006–2020 annual yield shocks, across U.S. counties in the 2040–2060 period of −17% and −13% for rainfed and irrigated maize, −19% and −18% for rainfed and irrigated soybean, and −4% and −2% for rainfed and irrigated winter wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1653

Title

Empirical estimation of weather-driven yield shocks using biophysical characteristics for U.S. rainfed and irrigated maize, soybeans, and winter wheat

Abigail Snyder; Stephanie Waldhoff; Mary Ollenberger; et al. Environmental Research Letters 2021. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac15ce

Other claims from this paper (11)

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Under a bias-corrected GFDL RCP8.5 scenario, irrigated maize yield shocks across U.S. counties are predicted to decrease by 13% in 2040–2060 relative to the 2006–2020 average.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse1
Treatment: bias-corrected GFDL RCP8.5 scenarioe1
Outcome: annual weather-induced yield shockse1
Direction: decreaseinferrede1
Value: −13%e1
Qualifier: irrigatede1
Comparator: average of 2006–2020 annual yield shockse1
Setting: U.S. countiese1

Verbatim

e1
“Under a bias-corrected GFDL RCP8.5 scenario, this approach predicts the average of annual weather-induced yield shocks, relative to the average of 2006–2020 annual yield shocks, across U.S. counties in the 2040–2060 period of −17% and −13% for rainfed and irrigated maize, −19% and −18% for rainfed and irrigated soybean, and −4% and −2% for rainfed and irrigated winter wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1653

Title

Empirical estimation of weather-driven yield shocks using biophysical characteristics for U.S. rainfed and irrigated maize, soybeans, and winter wheat

Abigail Snyder; Stephanie Waldhoff; Mary Ollenberger; et al. Environmental Research Letters 2021. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac15ce

Other claims from this paper (11)

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Under a bias-corrected GFDL RCP8.5 scenario, rainfed soybean yield shocks across U.S. counties are predicted to decrease by 19% in 2040–2060 relative to the 2006–2020 average.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment: bias-corrected GFDL RCP8.5 scenarioe1
Outcome: annual weather-induced yield shockse1
Direction: decreaseinferrede1
Value: −19%e1
Qualifier: rainfede1
Comparator: average of 2006–2020 annual yield shockse1
Setting: U.S. countiese1

Verbatim

e1
“Under a bias-corrected GFDL RCP8.5 scenario, this approach predicts the average of annual weather-induced yield shocks, relative to the average of 2006–2020 annual yield shocks, across U.S. counties in the 2040–2060 period of −17% and −13% for rainfed and irrigated maize, −19% and −18% for rainfed and irrigated soybean, and −4% and −2% for rainfed and irrigated winter wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1653

Title

Empirical estimation of weather-driven yield shocks using biophysical characteristics for U.S. rainfed and irrigated maize, soybeans, and winter wheat

Abigail Snyder; Stephanie Waldhoff; Mary Ollenberger; et al. Environmental Research Letters 2021. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac15ce

Other claims from this paper (11)

Nitrogen deficiency induced a decrease in grain yield related to photosynthetic characteristics, carbon–nitrogen balance and nitrogen use efficiency in proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) 11

Show all 11 →

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proso millet grain yield correlated negatively with the C/N ratio.

Taxon: proso milletPanicum miliaceumt0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: negativee0
Comparator: C/N ratioe0

Verbatim

e0
“a negative correlation was found between the grain yield and the C/N ratio.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1043

t0
“proso millet”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–164

Title

Nitrogen deficiency induced a decrease in grain yield related to photosynthetic characteristics, carbon–nitrogen balance and nitrogen use efficiency in proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.)

Xiangwei Gong; Jing Li; Hongchi Ma; et al. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 2019. doi:10.1080/03650340.2019.1619077

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency decreased net photosynthesis rate, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate in proso millet flag leaves.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency decreased chlorophyll content in proso millet flag leaves.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency increased intercellular CO2 concentration in proso millet flag leaves.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency negatively regulated proso millet carbon–nitrogen balance.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency increased the C/N ratio in proso millet.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency reduced total N, soluble protein and soluble sugar contents in proso millet.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency resulted in high starch content in proso millet.
Intervention effect Lower available N significantly reduced proso millet N uptake and utilisation.
Association Proso millet grain yield correlated positively with photosynthetic characteristics.
Association Proso millet grain yield correlated positively with N use efficiency.
Intervention effect N0 yielded less than N150 in both years.
Intervention effect N60 yielded less than N150 in both years.
Intervention effect N105 yielded less than N150 in both years.
Method / resource The developed N fertiliser regression formulae were presented as useful for choosing proso millet N rates.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower available N significantly reduced proso millet N uptake and utilisation.

Taxon: proso milletPanicum miliaceumt0
Treatment: less available Ne0
Outcome: N uptake and utilisatione0
Direction: reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“N uptake and utilisation were significantly reduced because of less available N.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–829

t0
“proso millet”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–164

Title

Nitrogen deficiency induced a decrease in grain yield related to photosynthetic characteristics, carbon–nitrogen balance and nitrogen use efficiency in proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.)

Xiangwei Gong; Jing Li; Hongchi Ma; et al. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 2019. doi:10.1080/03650340.2019.1619077

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency decreased net photosynthesis rate, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate in proso millet flag leaves.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency decreased chlorophyll content in proso millet flag leaves.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency increased intercellular CO2 concentration in proso millet flag leaves.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency negatively regulated proso millet carbon–nitrogen balance.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency increased the C/N ratio in proso millet.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency reduced total N, soluble protein and soluble sugar contents in proso millet.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency resulted in high starch content in proso millet.
Association Proso millet grain yield correlated positively with photosynthetic characteristics.
Association Proso millet grain yield correlated positively with N use efficiency.
Association Proso millet grain yield correlated negatively with the C/N ratio.
Intervention effect N0 yielded less than N150 in both years.
Intervention effect N60 yielded less than N150 in both years.
Intervention effect N105 yielded less than N150 in both years.
Method / resource The developed N fertiliser regression formulae were presented as useful for choosing proso millet N rates.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N0 yielded less than N150 in both years.

Taxon: proso milletPanicum miliaceumt0
Treatment: N0e0
Outcome: yieldse0
Direction: lowere0
Qualifier: both yearse0
Comparator: N150e0

Verbatim

e0
“The yields generated by N0, N60 and N105 were lower than that of N150 in both years.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1128

t0
“proso millet”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–164

Title

Nitrogen deficiency induced a decrease in grain yield related to photosynthetic characteristics, carbon–nitrogen balance and nitrogen use efficiency in proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.)

Xiangwei Gong; Jing Li; Hongchi Ma; et al. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 2019. doi:10.1080/03650340.2019.1619077

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency decreased net photosynthesis rate, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate in proso millet flag leaves.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency decreased chlorophyll content in proso millet flag leaves.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency increased intercellular CO2 concentration in proso millet flag leaves.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency negatively regulated proso millet carbon–nitrogen balance.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency increased the C/N ratio in proso millet.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency reduced total N, soluble protein and soluble sugar contents in proso millet.
Intervention effect Nitrogen deficiency resulted in high starch content in proso millet.
Intervention effect Lower available N significantly reduced proso millet N uptake and utilisation.
Association Proso millet grain yield correlated positively with photosynthetic characteristics.
Association Proso millet grain yield correlated positively with N use efficiency.
Association Proso millet grain yield correlated negatively with the C/N ratio.
Intervention effect N60 yielded less than N150 in both years.
Intervention effect N105 yielded less than N150 in both years.
Method / resource The developed N fertiliser regression formulae were presented as useful for choosing proso millet N rates.

Charcoal rot severity and yield components of common bean cultivars inoculated with Macrophomina phaseolina 11

Show all 11 →

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IPR Tangará, ANFC-9 Agro Norte, BRS Esteio, BRS Pérola and FTS Soberano each had a decrease in at least one yield component.

Taxon: common bean cultivarsPhaseolus vulgarist0
Outcome: at least one yield componente0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

t0
“common bean cultivars inoculated with Macrophomina phaseolina”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–107

e0
“The cultivars ‘IPR Tangará’, ‘ANFC-9 Agro Norte’, ‘BRS Esteio’, ‘BRS Pérola’ and ‘FTS Soberano’ had a decrease in at least one yield component”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1346

Title

Charcoal rot severity and yield components of common bean cultivars inoculated with Macrophomina phaseolina

Eduardo José Zanella; Juliano Berghetti; Bruno Tabarelli Scheidt; et al. Summa Phytopathologica 2020. doi:10.1590/0100-5405/240745

Other claims from this paper (14)

Observation All common bean cultivars were susceptible to M. phaseolina.
Intervention effect Inoculated common bean cultivars showed reductions in pod number, grain number, and grain mass.
Observation Root rot severity was greater than 75% regardless of isolate origin.
Intervention effect Mean root dry mass fell significantly by 54.3% relative to control treatments.
Observation IPR Tangará had reductions in every measured yield component.
Intervention effect NPP decreased by 7.9% with isolates from beans.
Intervention effect NGP decreased by 7.6% with isolates from beans.
Intervention effect GMP decreased by 7.2% with isolates from beans.
Intervention effect NPP decreased by 13.4% with isolates from soybeans.
Intervention effect NGP decreased by 12.8% with isolates from soybeans.
Intervention effect GMP decreased by 6.7% with isolates from soybeans.
Intervention effect NPP decreased by 14.2% with isolates from maize.
Intervention effect NGP decreased by 12.9% with isolates from maize.
Intervention effect GMP decreased by 10.1% with isolates from maize.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean root dry mass fell significantly by 54.3% relative to control treatments.

Taxon: common bean cultivarsPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment: inoculatedt0
Outcome: RDMe0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 54.3%e0
Comparator: control treatmentse0

Verbatim

t0
“common bean cultivars inoculated with Macrophomina phaseolina”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–107

e0
“Considering the average of cultivars, there was a significant decrease of 54.3% in RDM, compared to control treatments”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1202

Title

Charcoal rot severity and yield components of common bean cultivars inoculated with Macrophomina phaseolina

Eduardo José Zanella; Juliano Berghetti; Bruno Tabarelli Scheidt; et al. Summa Phytopathologica 2020. doi:10.1590/0100-5405/240745

Other claims from this paper (14)

Observation All common bean cultivars were susceptible to M. phaseolina.
Intervention effect Inoculated common bean cultivars showed reductions in pod number, grain number, and grain mass.
Observation Root rot severity was greater than 75% regardless of isolate origin.
Observation IPR Tangará, ANFC-9 Agro Norte, BRS Esteio, BRS Pérola and FTS Soberano each had a decrease in at least one yield component.
Observation IPR Tangará had reductions in every measured yield component.
Intervention effect NPP decreased by 7.9% with isolates from beans.
Intervention effect NGP decreased by 7.6% with isolates from beans.
Intervention effect GMP decreased by 7.2% with isolates from beans.
Intervention effect NPP decreased by 13.4% with isolates from soybeans.
Intervention effect NGP decreased by 12.8% with isolates from soybeans.
Intervention effect GMP decreased by 6.7% with isolates from soybeans.
Intervention effect NPP decreased by 14.2% with isolates from maize.
Intervention effect NGP decreased by 12.9% with isolates from maize.
Intervention effect GMP decreased by 10.1% with isolates from maize.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPP decreased by 7.9% with isolates from beans.

Taxon: common bean cultivarsPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment: isolates obtained from beans, soybeans and maizee0
Outcome: NPPe0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 7.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“common bean cultivars inoculated with Macrophomina phaseolina”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–107

e0
“There was an average decrease in NPP, NGP and GMP of 7.9%, 7.6% and 7.2%; 13.4%, 12.8% and 6.7%; and 14.2%, 12.9% and 10.1%, considering the isolates obtained from beans, soybeans and maize, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1624

Title

Charcoal rot severity and yield components of common bean cultivars inoculated with Macrophomina phaseolina

Eduardo José Zanella; Juliano Berghetti; Bruno Tabarelli Scheidt; et al. Summa Phytopathologica 2020. doi:10.1590/0100-5405/240745

Other claims from this paper (14)

Observation All common bean cultivars were susceptible to M. phaseolina.
Intervention effect Inoculated common bean cultivars showed reductions in pod number, grain number, and grain mass.
Observation Root rot severity was greater than 75% regardless of isolate origin.
Intervention effect Mean root dry mass fell significantly by 54.3% relative to control treatments.
Observation IPR Tangará, ANFC-9 Agro Norte, BRS Esteio, BRS Pérola and FTS Soberano each had a decrease in at least one yield component.
Observation IPR Tangará had reductions in every measured yield component.
Intervention effect NGP decreased by 7.6% with isolates from beans.
Intervention effect GMP decreased by 7.2% with isolates from beans.
Intervention effect NPP decreased by 13.4% with isolates from soybeans.
Intervention effect NGP decreased by 12.8% with isolates from soybeans.
Intervention effect GMP decreased by 6.7% with isolates from soybeans.
Intervention effect NPP decreased by 14.2% with isolates from maize.
Intervention effect NGP decreased by 12.9% with isolates from maize.
Intervention effect GMP decreased by 10.1% with isolates from maize.

Screening of mustard (Brassica juncea) varieties under different quality of saline water irrigation in semi-arid conditions of Haryana 11

Show all 11 →

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

seed yield declined as irrigation water salinity rose.

Taxon: mustarde1
Treatment: increasing salinity of irrigation watere0
Outcome: seed yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“The data on seed yield, straw yield and other physiological parameters indicated decrease with increasing salinity of irrigation water.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–628

e1
“mustard (Brassica juncea) varieties”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–48

Title

Screening of mustard (Brassica juncea) varieties under different quality of saline water irrigation in semi-arid conditions of Haryana

R. Prakash; S. Devi; N. Kumar; et al. Journal of Environmental Biology 2023. doi:10.22438/jeb/44/3/si-151

Other claims from this paper (15)

Association straw yield declined as irrigation water salinity rose.
Association other physiological parameters declined as irrigation water salinity rose.
Observation Variety by saline water interaction was reported as insignificant.
Observation CS 2005-143 had significantly higher seed yield than other varieties.
Observation CS 2005-143 had significantly higher straw yield than other varieties.
Observation Kranti (NC) had the lowest seed yield.
Observation Kranti (NC) had the lowest straw yield.
Intervention effect seed yield fell by 3.69 at irrigation salinity 2.5 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect seed yield fell by 12.42 at irrigation salinity 5.0 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect seed yield fell by 24.89 at irrigation salinity 7.5 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect straw yield fell by 4.16 at irrigation salinity 2.5 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect straw yield fell by 14.85 at irrigation salinity 5.0 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect straw yield fell by 27.54% at irrigation salinity 7.5 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect Chlorophyll content, stability, relative water content and assimilation rate declined under salinity.
Observation Reductions were greatest at 7.5 dS m-1 salinity.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

straw yield declined as irrigation water salinity rose.

Taxon: mustarde1
Treatment: increasing salinity of irrigation watere0
Outcome: straw yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“The data on seed yield, straw yield and other physiological parameters indicated decrease with increasing salinity of irrigation water.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–628

e1
“mustard (Brassica juncea) varieties”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–48

Title

Screening of mustard (Brassica juncea) varieties under different quality of saline water irrigation in semi-arid conditions of Haryana

R. Prakash; S. Devi; N. Kumar; et al. Journal of Environmental Biology 2023. doi:10.22438/jeb/44/3/si-151

Other claims from this paper (15)

Association seed yield declined as irrigation water salinity rose.
Association other physiological parameters declined as irrigation water salinity rose.
Observation Variety by saline water interaction was reported as insignificant.
Observation CS 2005-143 had significantly higher seed yield than other varieties.
Observation CS 2005-143 had significantly higher straw yield than other varieties.
Observation Kranti (NC) had the lowest seed yield.
Observation Kranti (NC) had the lowest straw yield.
Intervention effect seed yield fell by 3.69 at irrigation salinity 2.5 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect seed yield fell by 12.42 at irrigation salinity 5.0 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect seed yield fell by 24.89 at irrigation salinity 7.5 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect straw yield fell by 4.16 at irrigation salinity 2.5 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect straw yield fell by 14.85 at irrigation salinity 5.0 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect straw yield fell by 27.54% at irrigation salinity 7.5 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect Chlorophyll content, stability, relative water content and assimilation rate declined under salinity.
Observation Reductions were greatest at 7.5 dS m-1 salinity.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

other physiological parameters declined as irrigation water salinity rose.

Taxon: mustarde1
Treatment: increasing salinity of irrigation watere0
Outcome: other physiological parameterse0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“The data on seed yield, straw yield and other physiological parameters indicated decrease with increasing salinity of irrigation water.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–628

e1
“mustard (Brassica juncea) varieties”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–48

Title

Screening of mustard (Brassica juncea) varieties under different quality of saline water irrigation in semi-arid conditions of Haryana

R. Prakash; S. Devi; N. Kumar; et al. Journal of Environmental Biology 2023. doi:10.22438/jeb/44/3/si-151

Other claims from this paper (15)

Association seed yield declined as irrigation water salinity rose.
Association straw yield declined as irrigation water salinity rose.
Observation Variety by saline water interaction was reported as insignificant.
Observation CS 2005-143 had significantly higher seed yield than other varieties.
Observation CS 2005-143 had significantly higher straw yield than other varieties.
Observation Kranti (NC) had the lowest seed yield.
Observation Kranti (NC) had the lowest straw yield.
Intervention effect seed yield fell by 3.69 at irrigation salinity 2.5 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect seed yield fell by 12.42 at irrigation salinity 5.0 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect seed yield fell by 24.89 at irrigation salinity 7.5 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect straw yield fell by 4.16 at irrigation salinity 2.5 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect straw yield fell by 14.85 at irrigation salinity 5.0 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect straw yield fell by 27.54% at irrigation salinity 7.5 dS m-1 versus canal water.
Intervention effect Chlorophyll content, stability, relative water content and assimilation rate declined under salinity.
Observation Reductions were greatest at 7.5 dS m-1 salinity.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

Effects of Subsoiling at Jointing Stage on Dry Matter Production and Photosynthesis of Summer Maize 15

Mitigation of salinity induced effects using brassinolide in clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.) 15

WEED-CROP COMPETITION EFFECTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGARCANE PLANTED USING TWO METHODS 14

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PRODUCTION FACTORS ON PRODUCTIVITY, NPK UPTAKE AND QUALITY OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.) 14

CONTRIBUTION OF PRODUCTION FACTORS TO THE YIELD AND ECONOMICS OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.) 14

Effects of Waterlogging, Drought and Their Combination on Yield and Water-Use Efficiency of Five Hungarian Winter Wheat Varieties 13

Empirical estimation of weather-driven yield shocks using biophysical characteristics for U.S. rainfed and irrigated maize, soybeans, and winter wheat 12

Nitrogen deficiency induced a decrease in grain yield related to photosynthetic characteristics, carbon–nitrogen balance and nitrogen use efficiency in proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) 11

Charcoal rot severity and yield components of common bean cultivars inoculated with Macrophomina phaseolina 11

Screening of mustard (Brassica juncea) varieties under different quality of saline water irrigation in semi-arid conditions of Haryana 11