Search claims · PlantClaims

IMPACT OF SALINITY LEVELS AND EFFECTIVE SOIL DEPTH ON SORGHUM PLANTS GROWN IN SOME NILE ALLUVIAL AND CALCAREOUS SOILS UNDER EL FAYOUM CONDITIONS 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum yield by 86.55% in Nile alluvial soil.

Taxon: SORGHUMSorghumt0
Treatment: reducing effective soil depths from deep to shallow water tablee0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 86.55%e0
Comparator: deepe0
Setting: Nilealluvial soile0

Verbatim

e0
“reducing effective soil depths from deep to shallow water table led todecrease plant height, panicle length, weight of 1000 grain, grain proteincontent and yield by 32.48, 24.13, 11.64, 11.78, and 86.55% in the Nilealluvial soil”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1520

t0
“SORGHUM”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–61

Title

IMPACT OF SALINITY LEVELS AND EFFECTIVE SOIL DEPTH ON SORGHUM PLANTS GROWN IN SOME NILE ALLUVIAL AND CALCAREOUS SOILS UNDER EL FAYOUM CONDITIONS

Abdel Aty M. Ibrahim; Ibrahim M. El-Samnoudi; Taia A. Abdel Mageed Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development /Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development 2006. doi:10.21608/fjard.2006.197570

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Increasing salinity from normal to saline soil reduced sorghum plant height by 36.98% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum panicle length by 32.27% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum 1000-grain weight by 20.45% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum grain protein content by 29.95% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum grain yield by 57.46% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum plant height by 36.76% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum panicle length by 33.31% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum 1000-grain weight by 24.05% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum grain protein content by 33.75% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum grain yield by 59.14% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum plant height by 32.48% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum panicle length by 24.13% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum 1000-grain weight by 11.64% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum grain protein content by 11.78% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum plant height by 34.2% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum panicle length by 18.19% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum 1000-grain weight by 11.97% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum grain protein content by 16.51% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum yield by 86.18% in calcareous soil.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum yield by 86.18% in calcareous soil.

Taxon: SORGHUMSorghumt0
Treatment: reducing effective soil depths from deep to shallow water tablee0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 86.18%e0
Comparator: deepe0
Setting: calcareous soile0

Verbatim

e0
“reducing effective soil depths from deep to shallow water table led todecrease plant height, panicle length, weight of 1000 grain, grain proteincontent and yield by 32.48, 24.13, 11.64, 11.78, and 86.55% in the Nilealluvial soil vs 34.2, 18.19, 11.97, 16.51 and 86.18% in the calcareous soil,respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1596

t0
“SORGHUM”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–61

Title

IMPACT OF SALINITY LEVELS AND EFFECTIVE SOIL DEPTH ON SORGHUM PLANTS GROWN IN SOME NILE ALLUVIAL AND CALCAREOUS SOILS UNDER EL FAYOUM CONDITIONS

Abdel Aty M. Ibrahim; Ibrahim M. El-Samnoudi; Taia A. Abdel Mageed Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development /Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development 2006. doi:10.21608/fjard.2006.197570

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Increasing salinity from normal to saline soil reduced sorghum plant height by 36.98% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum panicle length by 32.27% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum 1000-grain weight by 20.45% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum grain protein content by 29.95% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum grain yield by 57.46% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum plant height by 36.76% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum panicle length by 33.31% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum 1000-grain weight by 24.05% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum grain protein content by 33.75% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum grain yield by 59.14% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum plant height by 32.48% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum panicle length by 24.13% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum 1000-grain weight by 11.64% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum grain protein content by 11.78% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum yield by 86.55% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum plant height by 34.2% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum panicle length by 18.19% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum 1000-grain weight by 11.97% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum grain protein content by 16.51% in calcareous soil.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum plant height by 32.48% in Nile alluvial soil.

Taxon: SORGHUMSorghumt0
Treatment: reducing effective soil depths from deep to shallow water tablee0
Outcome: plant heighte0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 32.48e0
Comparator: deepe0
Setting: Nilealluvial soile0

Verbatim

e0
“reducing effective soil depths from deep to shallow water table led todecrease plant height, panicle length, weight of 1000 grain, grain proteincontent and yield by 32.48, 24.13, 11.64, 11.78, and 86.55% in the Nilealluvial soil”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1520

t0
“SORGHUM”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–61

Title

IMPACT OF SALINITY LEVELS AND EFFECTIVE SOIL DEPTH ON SORGHUM PLANTS GROWN IN SOME NILE ALLUVIAL AND CALCAREOUS SOILS UNDER EL FAYOUM CONDITIONS

Abdel Aty M. Ibrahim; Ibrahim M. El-Samnoudi; Taia A. Abdel Mageed Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development /Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development 2006. doi:10.21608/fjard.2006.197570

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Increasing salinity from normal to saline soil reduced sorghum plant height by 36.98% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum panicle length by 32.27% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum 1000-grain weight by 20.45% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum grain protein content by 29.95% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum grain yield by 57.46% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum plant height by 36.76% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum panicle length by 33.31% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum 1000-grain weight by 24.05% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum grain protein content by 33.75% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum grain yield by 59.14% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum panicle length by 24.13% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum 1000-grain weight by 11.64% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum grain protein content by 11.78% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum yield by 86.55% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum plant height by 34.2% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum panicle length by 18.19% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum 1000-grain weight by 11.97% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum grain protein content by 16.51% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum yield by 86.18% in calcareous soil.

Comparison of Early and Conventional Soybean Production Systems for Yield and other Agronomic Traits 10

Show all 10 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CSPS decreased plant height by 41.96% relative to ESPS.

Taxon: SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: CSPSe0
Outcome: plant heighte0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 41.96%e0
Comparator: ESPSe0

Verbatim

e0
“several traits showed a significant mean decrease in CSPS compared to ESPS as plant height by 41.96%, seed weight by 74.7%, harvest index by 73.3%, pod number by 65.2%, and seed number by 64.9%.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1313

t0
“Soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–44

Title

Comparison of Early and Conventional Soybean Production Systems for Yield and other Agronomic Traits

Khaled Ouertani; Evandrew Washington; Patricia Lage; et al. Atlas Journal of Plant Biology 2011. doi:10.5147/ajpb.2011.0008

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Survival was 83.7 to 90.22% under ESPS versus 21.74% under CSPS.
Intervention effect Almost all measured traits differed significantly between planting systems.
Intervention effect CSPS increased flowering time by 9 days compared with ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased seed weight by 74.7% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased harvest index by 73.3% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased pod number by 65.2% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased seed number by 64.9% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased root fresh weight by 40.4% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased root dry weight by 70.2% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased shoot fresh weight by 68.1% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased shoot dry weight by 80.1% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased maximum root length by 83.3% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS increased lateral root numbers by 12.7% relative to ESPS.
Recommendation Authors advise that CSPS may be inappropriate for soybean in NC Sandhills.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CSPS decreased seed weight by 74.7% relative to ESPS.

Taxon: SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: CSPSe0
Outcome: seed weighte0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 74.7%e0
Comparator: ESPSe0

Verbatim

e0
“several traits showed a significant mean decrease in CSPS compared to ESPS as plant height by 41.96%, seed weight by 74.7%, harvest index by 73.3%, pod number by 65.2%, and seed number by 64.9%.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1313

t0
“Soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–44

Title

Comparison of Early and Conventional Soybean Production Systems for Yield and other Agronomic Traits

Khaled Ouertani; Evandrew Washington; Patricia Lage; et al. Atlas Journal of Plant Biology 2011. doi:10.5147/ajpb.2011.0008

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Survival was 83.7 to 90.22% under ESPS versus 21.74% under CSPS.
Intervention effect Almost all measured traits differed significantly between planting systems.
Intervention effect CSPS increased flowering time by 9 days compared with ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased plant height by 41.96% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased harvest index by 73.3% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased pod number by 65.2% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased seed number by 64.9% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased root fresh weight by 40.4% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased root dry weight by 70.2% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased shoot fresh weight by 68.1% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased shoot dry weight by 80.1% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased maximum root length by 83.3% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS increased lateral root numbers by 12.7% relative to ESPS.
Recommendation Authors advise that CSPS may be inappropriate for soybean in NC Sandhills.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CSPS decreased harvest index by 73.3% relative to ESPS.

Taxon: SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: CSPSe0
Outcome: harvest indexe0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 73.3%e0
Comparator: ESPSe0

Verbatim

e0
“several traits showed a significant mean decrease in CSPS compared to ESPS as plant height by 41.96%, seed weight by 74.7%, harvest index by 73.3%, pod number by 65.2%, and seed number by 64.9%.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1313

t0
“Soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–44

Title

Comparison of Early and Conventional Soybean Production Systems for Yield and other Agronomic Traits

Khaled Ouertani; Evandrew Washington; Patricia Lage; et al. Atlas Journal of Plant Biology 2011. doi:10.5147/ajpb.2011.0008

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Survival was 83.7 to 90.22% under ESPS versus 21.74% under CSPS.
Intervention effect Almost all measured traits differed significantly between planting systems.
Intervention effect CSPS increased flowering time by 9 days compared with ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased plant height by 41.96% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased seed weight by 74.7% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased pod number by 65.2% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased seed number by 64.9% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased root fresh weight by 40.4% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased root dry weight by 70.2% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased shoot fresh weight by 68.1% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased shoot dry weight by 80.1% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased maximum root length by 83.3% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS increased lateral root numbers by 12.7% relative to ESPS.
Recommendation Authors advise that CSPS may be inappropriate for soybean in NC Sandhills.

INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF GENOTYPE AND WATER DEFICIT ON YIELD AND QUALITY TRAITS OF MAIZE INBRED LINES AND F1 DIALLEL CROSSES 10

Show all 10 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit significantly decreased grain yield per plant by 32.3%.

Taxon: MaizeZea mayse1
Treatment: Water deficit stresse0
Outcome: grain yield/plante0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 32.3%e0
Comparator: Well Watering (WW)e2

Verbatim

e0
“Water deficit stress caused a significant decrease in grain yield/plant (32.3%), grain yield/ha (26.7%), ears/plant (30.6%), rows/ear (10.2%), kernels/row (9.3%), kernels/plant (43.8%), 100-kernel weight (19.9%), plant height (8.5%), ear height (11.9%), and chlorophyll concentration index (17.3%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–1132

e1
“Maize (Zea mays L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19

e2
“Well Watering (WW) by giving all recommended irrigations and WDS by withholding the 4th and 5th irrigations”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–789

Title

INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF GENOTYPE AND WATER DEFICIT ON YIELD AND QUALITY TRAITS OF MAIZE INBRED LINES AND F1 DIALLEL CROSSES

AHMED MEDHAT MOHAMED AL-NAGGAR; AHMED MONGED SOLIMAN; ELHAM MOHAMED HASSAN MOHAMED PLANT CELL BIOTECHNOLOGY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 2022. doi:10.56557/pcbmb/2022/v23i37-387899

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Water deficit significantly decreased grain yield per hectare by 26.7%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly decreased ears per plant by 30.6%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly decreased rows per ear by 10.2%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly decreased kernels per row by 9.3%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly decreased kernels per plant by 43.8%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly decreased 100-kernel weight by 19.9%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly decreased plant height by 8.5%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly decreased ear height by 11.9%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly decreased chlorophyll concentration index by 17.3%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly increased anthesis-silking interval by 58.82 %.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly increased days to anthesis by 4.29%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly increased days to silking by 6.40%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly increased barren stalks by 20.0%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly increased grain protein content by 16.0%.
Observation F1 crosses averaged higher than inbreds for most studied traits in both water regimes.
Observation Inbreds averaged higher grain protein content and days to 50% silking than F1 crosses.
Observation Genotype rankings changed between WDS and WW conditions.
Intervention effect Drought reduced yield per hectare by 37.36% in inbreds, more than the 25.67% reduction in F1 hybrids.
Recommendation The authors recommended high yield, water deficit tolerant inbreds and hybrids for maize breeding.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit significantly decreased grain yield per hectare by 26.7%.

Taxon: MaizeZea mayse1
Treatment: Water deficit stresse0
Outcome: grain yield/hae0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 26.7%e0
Comparator: Well Watering (WW)e2

Verbatim

e0
“Water deficit stress caused a significant decrease in grain yield/plant (32.3%), grain yield/ha (26.7%), ears/plant (30.6%), rows/ear (10.2%), kernels/row (9.3%), kernels/plant (43.8%), 100-kernel weight (19.9%), plant height (8.5%), ear height (11.9%), and chlorophyll concentration index (17.3%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–1132

e1
“Maize (Zea mays L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19

e2
“Well Watering (WW) by giving all recommended irrigations and WDS by withholding the 4th and 5th irrigations”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–789

Title

INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF GENOTYPE AND WATER DEFICIT ON YIELD AND QUALITY TRAITS OF MAIZE INBRED LINES AND F1 DIALLEL CROSSES

AHMED MEDHAT MOHAMED AL-NAGGAR; AHMED MONGED SOLIMAN; ELHAM MOHAMED HASSAN MOHAMED PLANT CELL BIOTECHNOLOGY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 2022. doi:10.56557/pcbmb/2022/v23i37-387899

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Water deficit significantly decreased grain yield per plant by 32.3%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly decreased ears per plant by 30.6%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly decreased rows per ear by 10.2%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly decreased kernels per row by 9.3%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly decreased kernels per plant by 43.8%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly decreased 100-kernel weight by 19.9%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly decreased plant height by 8.5%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly decreased ear height by 11.9%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly decreased chlorophyll concentration index by 17.3%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly increased anthesis-silking interval by 58.82 %.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly increased days to anthesis by 4.29%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly increased days to silking by 6.40%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly increased barren stalks by 20.0%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly increased grain protein content by 16.0%.
Observation F1 crosses averaged higher than inbreds for most studied traits in both water regimes.
Observation Inbreds averaged higher grain protein content and days to 50% silking than F1 crosses.
Observation Genotype rankings changed between WDS and WW conditions.
Intervention effect Drought reduced yield per hectare by 37.36% in inbreds, more than the 25.67% reduction in F1 hybrids.
Recommendation The authors recommended high yield, water deficit tolerant inbreds and hybrids for maize breeding.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit significantly decreased plant height by 8.5%.

Taxon: MaizeZea mayse1
Treatment: Water deficit stresse0
Outcome: plant heighte0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 8.5%e0
Comparator: Well Watering (WW)e2

Verbatim

e0
“Water deficit stress caused a significant decrease in grain yield/plant (32.3%), grain yield/ha (26.7%), ears/plant (30.6%), rows/ear (10.2%), kernels/row (9.3%), kernels/plant (43.8%), 100-kernel weight (19.9%), plant height (8.5%), ear height (11.9%), and chlorophyll concentration index (17.3%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–1132

e1
“Maize (Zea mays L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19

e2
“Well Watering (WW) by giving all recommended irrigations and WDS by withholding the 4th and 5th irrigations”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–789

Title

INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF GENOTYPE AND WATER DEFICIT ON YIELD AND QUALITY TRAITS OF MAIZE INBRED LINES AND F1 DIALLEL CROSSES

AHMED MEDHAT MOHAMED AL-NAGGAR; AHMED MONGED SOLIMAN; ELHAM MOHAMED HASSAN MOHAMED PLANT CELL BIOTECHNOLOGY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 2022. doi:10.56557/pcbmb/2022/v23i37-387899

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Water deficit significantly decreased grain yield per plant by 32.3%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly decreased grain yield per hectare by 26.7%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly decreased ears per plant by 30.6%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly decreased rows per ear by 10.2%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly decreased kernels per row by 9.3%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly decreased kernels per plant by 43.8%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly decreased 100-kernel weight by 19.9%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly decreased ear height by 11.9%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly decreased chlorophyll concentration index by 17.3%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly increased anthesis-silking interval by 58.82 %.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly increased days to anthesis by 4.29%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly increased days to silking by 6.40%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly increased barren stalks by 20.0%.
Intervention effect Water deficit significantly increased grain protein content by 16.0%.
Observation F1 crosses averaged higher than inbreds for most studied traits in both water regimes.
Observation Inbreds averaged higher grain protein content and days to 50% silking than F1 crosses.
Observation Genotype rankings changed between WDS and WW conditions.
Intervention effect Drought reduced yield per hectare by 37.36% in inbreds, more than the 25.67% reduction in F1 hybrids.
Recommendation The authors recommended high yield, water deficit tolerant inbreds and hybrids for maize breeding.

A systemic approach to grapevine decline diagnosed using three key indicators: plant mortality, yield loss and vigour decrease 10

Show all 10 →

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield fluctuated annually without systematically declining.

Taxon: grapevineVitist0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: did not systematically decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“large yearly fluctuations in yield, which did not systematically decrease over time”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1391

t0
“grapevine”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32

Title

A systemic approach to grapevine decline diagnosed using three key indicators: plant mortality, yield loss and vigour decrease

Anne MEROT; Guillaume Coulouma; Nathalie Smits; et al. OENO One 2023. doi:10.20870/oeno-one.2023.57.1.5575

Other claims from this paper (9)

Association Farmers’ perceptions agreed with field measures of decline.
Observation Vine mortality spread progressively over years.
Association The survey and historical analysis found no direct link between decline and yield loss.
Method / resource Mortality rate was an earlier indicator of decline than yield loss.
Method / resource NDVI was an earlier indicator of decline than yield loss.
Method / resource Ground based NDVI indicators were proposed for accessible decline diagnosis.
Method / resource An aerial photograph image analysis method was proposed for accessible decline diagnosis.
Association NDVI indicators correlated linearly with yield achievement ratio.
Association NDVI indicators correlated linearly with mortality rate.

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NDVI indicators correlated linearly with yield achievement ratio.

Taxon: grapevineVitist0
Outcome: YARe0
Comparator: NDVI indicatorse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“NDVI indicators were linearly correlated to both YAR and mortality rate”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2021–2092

t0
“grapevine”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32

Title

A systemic approach to grapevine decline diagnosed using three key indicators: plant mortality, yield loss and vigour decrease

Anne MEROT; Guillaume Coulouma; Nathalie Smits; et al. OENO One 2023. doi:10.20870/oeno-one.2023.57.1.5575

Other claims from this paper (9)

Association Farmers’ perceptions agreed with field measures of decline.
Observation Vine mortality spread progressively over years.
Association The survey and historical analysis found no direct link between decline and yield loss.
Observation Yield fluctuated annually without systematically declining.
Method / resource Mortality rate was an earlier indicator of decline than yield loss.
Method / resource NDVI was an earlier indicator of decline than yield loss.
Method / resource Ground based NDVI indicators were proposed for accessible decline diagnosis.
Method / resource An aerial photograph image analysis method was proposed for accessible decline diagnosis.
Association NDVI indicators correlated linearly with mortality rate.

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The survey and historical analysis found no direct link between decline and yield loss.

Taxon: grapevineVitist0
Outcome: yield losse0
Comparator: declinee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“neither the survey nor the historical analysis showed a direct link between decline and yield loss”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1298

t0
“grapevine”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32

Title

A systemic approach to grapevine decline diagnosed using three key indicators: plant mortality, yield loss and vigour decrease

Anne MEROT; Guillaume Coulouma; Nathalie Smits; et al. OENO One 2023. doi:10.20870/oeno-one.2023.57.1.5575

Other claims from this paper (9)

Association Farmers’ perceptions agreed with field measures of decline.
Observation Vine mortality spread progressively over years.
Observation Yield fluctuated annually without systematically declining.
Method / resource Mortality rate was an earlier indicator of decline than yield loss.
Method / resource NDVI was an earlier indicator of decline than yield loss.
Method / resource Ground based NDVI indicators were proposed for accessible decline diagnosis.
Method / resource An aerial photograph image analysis method was proposed for accessible decline diagnosis.
Association NDVI indicators correlated linearly with yield achievement ratio.
Association NDVI indicators correlated linearly with mortality rate.

Effect of Girdling and Cincturing on Setting and Yield in Balady Mandarin Trees 10

Show all 10 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

girdling decreased leaf nitrogen content in Balady mandarin trees.

Taxon: Balady mandarin treese0
Treatment: girdlinge0
Outcome: leaves content of nitrogene0
Direction: decreasee0
Setting: Sohag Governoratee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“all girdling and cincturing treatments (girdling or cincturing the trunk or branches) had a positive effect on flowering, fruiting, leaves content of carbohydrates, yield, and some fruit quality properties (TSS and TSS/acid ratio), while they led to a decrease in the leaves content of nitrogen in Balady mandarin trees under the climatic conditions of Sohag Governorate.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–1125

t0
“Balady Mandarin Trees”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–79

Title

Effect of Girdling and Cincturing on Setting and Yield in Balady Mandarin Trees

sabah M. Badawy; Azza S. Mohamed Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences/Assuit Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2023. doi:10.21608/ajas.2023.201670.1244

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect girdling positively affected flowering, fruiting in Balady mandarin trees.
Intervention effect girdling positively affected leaves content of carbohydrates in Balady mandarin trees.
Intervention effect girdling positively affected yield in Balady mandarin trees.
Intervention effect girdling positively affected TSS and TSS/acid ratio in Balady mandarin trees.
Intervention effect cincturing positively affected flowering, fruiting in Balady mandarin trees.
Intervention effect cincturing positively affected leaves content of carbohydrates in Balady mandarin trees.
Intervention effect cincturing positively affected yield in Balady mandarin trees.
Intervention effect cincturing positively affected TSS and TSS/acid ratio in Balady mandarin trees.
Intervention effect cincturing decreased leaf nitrogen content in Balady mandarin trees.
Recommendation The authors recommend girdling branches and trunk to improve Balady mandarin yield and fruit quality under Sohag conditions.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

cincturing decreased leaf nitrogen content in Balady mandarin trees.

Taxon: Balady mandarin treese0
Treatment: cincturinge0
Outcome: leaves content of nitrogene0
Direction: decreasee0
Setting: Sohag Governoratee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“all girdling and cincturing treatments (girdling or cincturing the trunk or branches) had a positive effect on flowering, fruiting, leaves content of carbohydrates, yield, and some fruit quality properties (TSS and TSS/acid ratio), while they led to a decrease in the leaves content of nitrogen in Balady mandarin trees under the climatic conditions of Sohag Governorate.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–1125

t0
“Balady Mandarin Trees”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–79

Title

Effect of Girdling and Cincturing on Setting and Yield in Balady Mandarin Trees

sabah M. Badawy; Azza S. Mohamed Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences/Assuit Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2023. doi:10.21608/ajas.2023.201670.1244

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect girdling positively affected flowering, fruiting in Balady mandarin trees.
Intervention effect girdling positively affected leaves content of carbohydrates in Balady mandarin trees.
Intervention effect girdling positively affected yield in Balady mandarin trees.
Intervention effect girdling positively affected TSS and TSS/acid ratio in Balady mandarin trees.
Intervention effect girdling decreased leaf nitrogen content in Balady mandarin trees.
Intervention effect cincturing positively affected flowering, fruiting in Balady mandarin trees.
Intervention effect cincturing positively affected leaves content of carbohydrates in Balady mandarin trees.
Intervention effect cincturing positively affected yield in Balady mandarin trees.
Intervention effect cincturing positively affected TSS and TSS/acid ratio in Balady mandarin trees.
Recommendation The authors recommend girdling branches and trunk to improve Balady mandarin yield and fruit quality under Sohag conditions.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

girdling positively affected yield in Balady mandarin trees.

Taxon: Balady mandarin treese0
Treatment: girdlinge0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: positive effecte0
Setting: Sohag Governoratee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“all girdling and cincturing treatments (girdling or cincturing the trunk or branches) had a positive effect on flowering, fruiting, leaves content of carbohydrates, yield, and some fruit quality properties (TSS and TSS/acid ratio), while they led to a decrease in the leaves content of nitrogen in Balady mandarin trees under the climatic conditions of Sohag Governorate.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–1125

t0
“Balady Mandarin Trees”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–79

Title

Effect of Girdling and Cincturing on Setting and Yield in Balady Mandarin Trees

sabah M. Badawy; Azza S. Mohamed Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences/Assuit Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2023. doi:10.21608/ajas.2023.201670.1244

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect girdling positively affected flowering, fruiting in Balady mandarin trees.
Intervention effect girdling positively affected leaves content of carbohydrates in Balady mandarin trees.
Intervention effect girdling positively affected TSS and TSS/acid ratio in Balady mandarin trees.
Intervention effect girdling decreased leaf nitrogen content in Balady mandarin trees.
Intervention effect cincturing positively affected flowering, fruiting in Balady mandarin trees.
Intervention effect cincturing positively affected leaves content of carbohydrates in Balady mandarin trees.
Intervention effect cincturing positively affected yield in Balady mandarin trees.
Intervention effect cincturing positively affected TSS and TSS/acid ratio in Balady mandarin trees.
Intervention effect cincturing decreased leaf nitrogen content in Balady mandarin trees.
Recommendation The authors recommend girdling branches and trunk to improve Balady mandarin yield and fruit quality under Sohag conditions.

Content Patterns of Maize Endogenous Hormones and Grain Yield Influenced by Field Phosphorus Application 10

Show all 10 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P6 produced the highest leaf ABA decrease, 28.05%.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage: leavese0
Treatment: P6 treatmente0
Outcome: ABAe0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 28.05%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“in the P6 treatment in maize leaves were 57.5%, 62.50%, and 48.57%, respectively, and the highest decrease in ABA was 28.05%.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1351

Title

Content Patterns of Maize Endogenous Hormones and Grain Yield Influenced by Field Phosphorus Application

Yingxin Zhang; Wenliang Wei; Wenlong Gao; et al. Agronomy 2023. doi:10.3390/agronomy13071911

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Phosphorus fertilization increased IAA content by 51.57% compared with P1.
Intervention effect Phosphorus fertilization decreased root ABA content by 18.92% on average versus P1.
Intervention effect Phosphorus fertilization decreased root GA3 content by 19.13% on average versus P1.
Intervention effect P6 produced the highest root IAA increase, 99.02%.
Intervention effect P6 produced the highest root ABA decrease, 32.30%.
Intervention effect P6 produced the highest root GA3 decrease, 26.85%.
Intervention effect Phosphorus treatment increased leaf IAA content by 41.34%.
Intervention effect Phosphorus treatment increased leaf SA content by 27.58%.
Intervention effect Phosphorus treatment increased leaf GA3 content by 37.36%.
Intervention effect Phosphorus treatment decreased leaf ABA content by 19.18%.
Intervention effect P6 produced the highest leaf IAA increase, 57.5%.
Intervention effect P6 produced the highest leaf GA3 increase, 62.50%.
Intervention effect P6 produced the highest leaf SA increase, 48.57%.
Observation Endogenous hormone contents in maize roots and leaves differed across growth stages.
Intervention effect Maize phenotypes increased with phosphorus application.
Intervention effect Soil available P content increased with phosphorus application.
Association Endogenous hormones were significantly correlated with maize phenotypes and yield.
Observation P3 was the best treatment for maize grain yield.
Recommendation The authors recommend 40 kg ha−1 phosphorus under the experimental conditions considering costs and environmental effects.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P6 produced the highest root ABA decrease, 32.30%.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage: rootse0
Treatment: P6 treatmente0
Outcome: ABAe0
Direction: decreasese0
Value: 32.30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The highest increase in IAA was 99.02%, and the highest decreases in ABA and GA3 were 32.30% and 26.85%, respectively, in the P6 treatment in maize roots.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1026

Title

Content Patterns of Maize Endogenous Hormones and Grain Yield Influenced by Field Phosphorus Application

Yingxin Zhang; Wenliang Wei; Wenlong Gao; et al. Agronomy 2023. doi:10.3390/agronomy13071911

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Phosphorus fertilization increased IAA content by 51.57% compared with P1.
Intervention effect Phosphorus fertilization decreased root ABA content by 18.92% on average versus P1.
Intervention effect Phosphorus fertilization decreased root GA3 content by 19.13% on average versus P1.
Intervention effect P6 produced the highest root IAA increase, 99.02%.
Intervention effect P6 produced the highest root GA3 decrease, 26.85%.
Intervention effect Phosphorus treatment increased leaf IAA content by 41.34%.
Intervention effect Phosphorus treatment increased leaf SA content by 27.58%.
Intervention effect Phosphorus treatment increased leaf GA3 content by 37.36%.
Intervention effect Phosphorus treatment decreased leaf ABA content by 19.18%.
Intervention effect P6 produced the highest leaf IAA increase, 57.5%.
Intervention effect P6 produced the highest leaf GA3 increase, 62.50%.
Intervention effect P6 produced the highest leaf SA increase, 48.57%.
Intervention effect P6 produced the highest leaf ABA decrease, 28.05%.
Observation Endogenous hormone contents in maize roots and leaves differed across growth stages.
Intervention effect Maize phenotypes increased with phosphorus application.
Intervention effect Soil available P content increased with phosphorus application.
Association Endogenous hormones were significantly correlated with maize phenotypes and yield.
Observation P3 was the best treatment for maize grain yield.
Recommendation The authors recommend 40 kg ha−1 phosphorus under the experimental conditions considering costs and environmental effects.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P6 produced the highest root GA3 decrease, 26.85%.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage: rootse0
Treatment: P6 treatmente0
Outcome: GA3e0
Direction: decreasese0
Value: 26.85%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The highest increase in IAA was 99.02%, and the highest decreases in ABA and GA3 were 32.30% and 26.85%, respectively, in the P6 treatment in maize roots.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1026

Title

Content Patterns of Maize Endogenous Hormones and Grain Yield Influenced by Field Phosphorus Application

Yingxin Zhang; Wenliang Wei; Wenlong Gao; et al. Agronomy 2023. doi:10.3390/agronomy13071911

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Phosphorus fertilization increased IAA content by 51.57% compared with P1.
Intervention effect Phosphorus fertilization decreased root ABA content by 18.92% on average versus P1.
Intervention effect Phosphorus fertilization decreased root GA3 content by 19.13% on average versus P1.
Intervention effect P6 produced the highest root IAA increase, 99.02%.
Intervention effect P6 produced the highest root ABA decrease, 32.30%.
Intervention effect Phosphorus treatment increased leaf IAA content by 41.34%.
Intervention effect Phosphorus treatment increased leaf SA content by 27.58%.
Intervention effect Phosphorus treatment increased leaf GA3 content by 37.36%.
Intervention effect Phosphorus treatment decreased leaf ABA content by 19.18%.
Intervention effect P6 produced the highest leaf IAA increase, 57.5%.
Intervention effect P6 produced the highest leaf GA3 increase, 62.50%.
Intervention effect P6 produced the highest leaf SA increase, 48.57%.
Intervention effect P6 produced the highest leaf ABA decrease, 28.05%.
Observation Endogenous hormone contents in maize roots and leaves differed across growth stages.
Intervention effect Maize phenotypes increased with phosphorus application.
Intervention effect Soil available P content increased with phosphorus application.
Association Endogenous hormones were significantly correlated with maize phenotypes and yield.
Observation P3 was the best treatment for maize grain yield.
Recommendation The authors recommend 40 kg ha−1 phosphorus under the experimental conditions considering costs and environmental effects.

Agrophysiological responses of bread wheat to raised-bed planting and irrigation level 10

Show all 10 →

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised bed system moderated, to some extent, the decrease in yield of bread wheat caused by drought stress.

Taxon: bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: raised bed systeme5
Outcome: decrease in yield due to drought stresse5
Direction: moderatede5
Qualifier: to some extente5

Verbatim

t0
“bread wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–42

e5
“The decrease in yield due to drought stress was moderated to some extent in the raised bed system”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1082

Title

Agrophysiological responses of bread wheat to raised-bed planting and irrigation level

Farahnaz Momtazi; Hamidreza Miri; Barmak Jafari Haghighi; et al. Water Science & Technology Water Supply 2024. doi:10.2166/ws.2024.228

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Raised bed planting increased grain yield of bread wheat by 24% compared with flat cultivation.
Intervention effect Raised bed planting increased biological yield of bread wheat by about 17%.
Intervention effect Raised bed planting increased the number of ears of bread wheat by 7%.
Intervention effect Raised bed planting increased the number of seeds per ear of bread wheat by 21%.
Intervention effect Drought stress decreased grain yield of bread wheat by 46.4% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought stress decreased the number of ears of bread wheat by 20.5% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought stress decreased seed number of bread wheat by 30.3% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought stress decreased biological yield of bread wheat by 45.9% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought stress decreased chlorophyll a of bread wheat by 31.8% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought stress decreased chlorophyll b of bread wheat by 28.1% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought stress decreased relative water content of bread wheat by 5.3% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought stress increased proline content of bread wheat by 24.3% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought stress increased ion leakage of bread wheat by 147.3% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Raised bed planting increased water use efficiency of bread wheat.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation increased water use efficiency of bread wheat.
Recommendation Cultivation on raised beds is suggested as a suitable planting pattern to improve yield and WUE in wheat under water shortage.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress decreased grain yield of bread wheat by 46.4% compared with the control.

Taxon: bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: Drought stresse3
Outcome: grain yielde3
Direction: decreasee3
Value: 46.4%e3
Comparator: controle2
Setting: Arsanjan, Irane0

Verbatim

t0
“bread wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–42

e0
“two field experiments were carried out in 2021/22 and 2022/23 in Arsanjan, Iran”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–179

e2
“the sub plots were irrigation levels at 100% (control), 80% (medium stress), and 60% (severe stress) of crop evapotranspiration”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–409

e3
“Drought stress caused a significant decrease in grain yield (46.4%), number of ears (20.5%), seed number (30.3%), biological yield (45.9%), chlorophyll a (31.8%), chlorophyll b (28.1%) and relative water content (5.3%) and increased, proline content (24.3%) and ion leakage (147.3%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–890

Title

Agrophysiological responses of bread wheat to raised-bed planting and irrigation level

Farahnaz Momtazi; Hamidreza Miri; Barmak Jafari Haghighi; et al. Water Science & Technology Water Supply 2024. doi:10.2166/ws.2024.228

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Raised bed planting increased grain yield of bread wheat by 24% compared with flat cultivation.
Intervention effect Raised bed planting increased biological yield of bread wheat by about 17%.
Intervention effect Raised bed planting increased the number of ears of bread wheat by 7%.
Intervention effect Raised bed planting increased the number of seeds per ear of bread wheat by 21%.
Intervention effect Drought stress decreased the number of ears of bread wheat by 20.5% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought stress decreased seed number of bread wheat by 30.3% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought stress decreased biological yield of bread wheat by 45.9% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought stress decreased chlorophyll a of bread wheat by 31.8% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought stress decreased chlorophyll b of bread wheat by 28.1% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought stress decreased relative water content of bread wheat by 5.3% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought stress increased proline content of bread wheat by 24.3% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought stress increased ion leakage of bread wheat by 147.3% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Raised bed planting increased water use efficiency of bread wheat.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation increased water use efficiency of bread wheat.
Association Raised bed system moderated, to some extent, the decrease in yield of bread wheat caused by drought stress.
Recommendation Cultivation on raised beds is suggested as a suitable planting pattern to improve yield and WUE in wheat under water shortage.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress decreased biological yield of bread wheat by 45.9% compared with the control.

Taxon: bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: Drought stresse3
Outcome: biological yielde3
Direction: decreasee3
Value: 45.9%e3
Comparator: controle2
Setting: Arsanjan, Irane0

Verbatim

t0
“bread wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–42

e0
“two field experiments were carried out in 2021/22 and 2022/23 in Arsanjan, Iran”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–179

e2
“the sub plots were irrigation levels at 100% (control), 80% (medium stress), and 60% (severe stress) of crop evapotranspiration”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–409

e3
“Drought stress caused a significant decrease in grain yield (46.4%), number of ears (20.5%), seed number (30.3%), biological yield (45.9%), chlorophyll a (31.8%), chlorophyll b (28.1%) and relative water content (5.3%) and increased, proline content (24.3%) and ion leakage (147.3%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–890

Title

Agrophysiological responses of bread wheat to raised-bed planting and irrigation level

Farahnaz Momtazi; Hamidreza Miri; Barmak Jafari Haghighi; et al. Water Science & Technology Water Supply 2024. doi:10.2166/ws.2024.228

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Raised bed planting increased grain yield of bread wheat by 24% compared with flat cultivation.
Intervention effect Raised bed planting increased biological yield of bread wheat by about 17%.
Intervention effect Raised bed planting increased the number of ears of bread wheat by 7%.
Intervention effect Raised bed planting increased the number of seeds per ear of bread wheat by 21%.
Intervention effect Drought stress decreased grain yield of bread wheat by 46.4% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought stress decreased the number of ears of bread wheat by 20.5% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought stress decreased seed number of bread wheat by 30.3% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought stress decreased chlorophyll a of bread wheat by 31.8% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought stress decreased chlorophyll b of bread wheat by 28.1% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought stress decreased relative water content of bread wheat by 5.3% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought stress increased proline content of bread wheat by 24.3% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought stress increased ion leakage of bread wheat by 147.3% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Raised bed planting increased water use efficiency of bread wheat.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation increased water use efficiency of bread wheat.
Association Raised bed system moderated, to some extent, the decrease in yield of bread wheat caused by drought stress.
Recommendation Cultivation on raised beds is suggested as a suitable planting pattern to improve yield and WUE in wheat under water shortage.

Accumulated Photosynthetically Active Radiation and Its Heterogeneity Collectively Decrease Soybean Yield in Apple-Based Intercropping Systems 10

Show all 10 →

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading intensity and under-canopy light heterogeneity jointly constrained intercropped soybean yield.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe7
Treatment: shading intensity and under-canopy light heterogeneitye7
Outcome: soybean yielde7
Direction: decreaseinferrede7

Verbatim

e7
“The shading intensity and under-canopy light heterogeneity jointly constrained the intercropped soybean yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1311

Title

Accumulated Photosynthetically Active Radiation and Its Heterogeneity Collectively Decrease Soybean Yield in Apple-Based Intercropping Systems

Ruidong Peng; Huasen Xu; Huaxing Bi; et al. Agronomy 2025. doi:10.3390/agronomy15030581

Other claims from this paper (9)

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced APAR had a negative effect on soybean yield and its components, especially in Y4.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe6
Treatment: reduction in APARe6
Outcome: yield and its componentse6
Direction: negativee6
Setting: Y4e6

Verbatim

e6
“The reduction in APAR showed a negative effect on yield and its components of soybean, especially in Y4”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1200

Title

Accumulated Photosynthetically Active Radiation and Its Heterogeneity Collectively Decrease Soybean Yield in Apple-Based Intercropping Systems

Ruidong Peng; Huasen Xu; Huaxing Bi; et al. Agronomy 2025. doi:10.3390/agronomy15030581

Other claims from this paper (9)

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The constraint of light on soybean yield was gradually strengthened with increasing tree age.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe7
Treatment: tree agee7
Outcome: soybean yielde7
Direction: increaseinferrede7

Verbatim

e7
“The shading intensity and under-canopy light heterogeneity jointly constrained the intercropped soybean yield; this effect was gradually strengthened with increasing tree age”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1376

Title

Accumulated Photosynthetically Active Radiation and Its Heterogeneity Collectively Decrease Soybean Yield in Apple-Based Intercropping Systems

Ruidong Peng; Huasen Xu; Huaxing Bi; et al. Agronomy 2025. doi:10.3390/agronomy15030581

Other claims from this paper (9)

Effect of low concentrations of sulphur dioxide on yield of alfalfa and cruciferae 9

Show all 9 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur dioxide did not decrease alfalfa yield under any of the conditions studied.

Taxon: alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment: sulphur dioxide treatmente0
Outcome: yield of alfalfae0
Direction: no_changeinferrede0
Qualifier: under none of the conditions studiede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515

Title

Effect of low concentrations of sulphur dioxide on yield of alfalfa and cruciferae

C. Setterstrom; P. W. Zimmerman; William Crocker OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) 1938

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under some conditions sulphur dioxide significantly increased alfalfa yield.

Taxon: alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment: sulphur dioxidee0
Outcome: yielde1
Direction: increasese1
Qualifier: under some of the conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515

e1
“under some of the conditions it brought about significant yield increases”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–662

Title

Effect of low concentrations of sulphur dioxide on yield of alfalfa and cruciferae

C. Setterstrom; P. W. Zimmerman; William Crocker OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) 1938

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under most conditions sulphur dioxide had no significant effect on alfalfa yield.

Taxon: alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment: sulphur dioxidee0
Outcome: yielde1
Direction: no significant effecte1
Qualifier: under most of the conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515

e1
“under most of the conditions it had no significant effect on yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–583

Title

Effect of low concentrations of sulphur dioxide on yield of alfalfa and cruciferae

C. Setterstrom; P. W. Zimmerman; William Crocker OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) 1938

Other claims from this paper (9)

Rhizobacteria that produce auxins and contain 1‐amino‐cyclopropane‐1‐carboxylic acid deaminase decrease amino acid concentrations in the rhizosphere and improve growth and yield of well‐watered and water‐limited potato (Solanum tuberosum) 9

Show all 9 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobacterial inoculation increased potato tuber yield by up to 40% in pots.

Taxon: potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment: Rhizobacterial inoculatione0
Outcome: tuber yielde0
Direction: increasede0
Value: up to 40%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Rhizobacterial inoculation increased root biomass (by up to 50%) and tuber yield (by up to 40%) in pot trials”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1322

t0
“potato (Solanum tuberosum)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 212–238

Title

Rhizobacteria that produce auxins and contain 1‐amino‐cyclopropane‐1‐carboxylic acid deaminase decrease amino acid concentrations in the rhizosphere and improve growth and yield of well‐watered and water‐limited potato (Solanum tuberosum)

A.A. Belimov; I.C. Dodd; V.I. Safronova; et al. Annals of Applied Biology 2015. doi:10.1111/aab.12203

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect ACC-deaminase rhizobacteria lowered potato rhizosphere ACC concentration.
Intervention effect The rhizobacteria lowered several proteinogenic amino acids in the potato rhizosphere.
Association Amino acid concentration effects were not always correlated with bacterial metabolism of those compounds in vitro.
Observation All tested rhizobacteria showed similar potato root colonisation after sand-culture inoculation.
Intervention effect Rhizobacterial inoculation increased potato root biomass by up to 50% in pots.
Intervention effect Rhizobacterial inoculation increased potato tuber yield by up to 27% in field experiments.
Intervention effect Inoculated and control potato plants had similar leaf water relations.
Intervention effect Rhizobacteria generally increased potato tuber number more than individual tuber weight.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobacterial inoculation increased potato tuber yield by up to 27% in field experiments.

Taxon: potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
Outcome: tuber yielde0
Value: up to 27%e0
Qualifier: water‐limited conditionse0
Setting: field experimentse0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0
“tuber yield (by up to 27%) in field experiments, especially when plants were grown under water‐limited conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1441

t0
“potato (Solanum tuberosum)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 212–238

Title

Rhizobacteria that produce auxins and contain 1‐amino‐cyclopropane‐1‐carboxylic acid deaminase decrease amino acid concentrations in the rhizosphere and improve growth and yield of well‐watered and water‐limited potato (Solanum tuberosum)

A.A. Belimov; I.C. Dodd; V.I. Safronova; et al. Annals of Applied Biology 2015. doi:10.1111/aab.12203

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect ACC-deaminase rhizobacteria lowered potato rhizosphere ACC concentration.
Intervention effect The rhizobacteria lowered several proteinogenic amino acids in the potato rhizosphere.
Association Amino acid concentration effects were not always correlated with bacterial metabolism of those compounds in vitro.
Observation All tested rhizobacteria showed similar potato root colonisation after sand-culture inoculation.
Intervention effect Rhizobacterial inoculation increased potato root biomass by up to 50% in pots.
Intervention effect Rhizobacterial inoculation increased potato tuber yield by up to 40% in pots.
Intervention effect Inoculated and control potato plants had similar leaf water relations.
Intervention effect Rhizobacteria generally increased potato tuber number more than individual tuber weight.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobacterial inoculation increased potato root biomass by up to 50% in pots.

Taxon: potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment: Rhizobacterial inoculatione0
Outcome: root biomasse0
Direction: increasede0
Value: up to 50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Rhizobacterial inoculation increased root biomass (by up to 50%) and tuber yield (by up to 40%) in pot trials”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1322

t0
“potato (Solanum tuberosum)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 212–238

Title

Rhizobacteria that produce auxins and contain 1‐amino‐cyclopropane‐1‐carboxylic acid deaminase decrease amino acid concentrations in the rhizosphere and improve growth and yield of well‐watered and water‐limited potato (Solanum tuberosum)

A.A. Belimov; I.C. Dodd; V.I. Safronova; et al. Annals of Applied Biology 2015. doi:10.1111/aab.12203

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect ACC-deaminase rhizobacteria lowered potato rhizosphere ACC concentration.
Intervention effect The rhizobacteria lowered several proteinogenic amino acids in the potato rhizosphere.
Association Amino acid concentration effects were not always correlated with bacterial metabolism of those compounds in vitro.
Observation All tested rhizobacteria showed similar potato root colonisation after sand-culture inoculation.
Intervention effect Rhizobacterial inoculation increased potato tuber yield by up to 40% in pots.
Intervention effect Rhizobacterial inoculation increased potato tuber yield by up to 27% in field experiments.
Intervention effect Inoculated and control potato plants had similar leaf water relations.
Intervention effect Rhizobacteria generally increased potato tuber number more than individual tuber weight.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

IMPACT OF SALINITY LEVELS AND EFFECTIVE SOIL DEPTH ON SORGHUM PLANTS GROWN IN SOME NILE ALLUVIAL AND CALCAREOUS SOILS UNDER EL FAYOUM CONDITIONS 10

Comparison of Early and Conventional Soybean Production Systems for Yield and other Agronomic Traits 10

INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF GENOTYPE AND WATER DEFICIT ON YIELD AND QUALITY TRAITS OF MAIZE INBRED LINES AND F1 DIALLEL CROSSES 10

A systemic approach to grapevine decline diagnosed using three key indicators: plant mortality, yield loss and vigour decrease 10

Effect of Girdling and Cincturing on Setting and Yield in Balady Mandarin Trees 10

Content Patterns of Maize Endogenous Hormones and Grain Yield Influenced by Field Phosphorus Application 10

Agrophysiological responses of bread wheat to raised-bed planting and irrigation level 10

Accumulated Photosynthetically Active Radiation and Its Heterogeneity Collectively Decrease Soybean Yield in Apple-Based Intercropping Systems 10

Effect of low concentrations of sulphur dioxide on yield of alfalfa and cruciferae 9

Rhizobacteria that produce auxins and contain 1‐amino‐cyclopropane‐1‐carboxylic acid deaminase decrease amino acid concentrations in the rhizosphere and improve growth and yield of well‐watered and water‐limited potato (Solanum tuberosum) 9