Search claims · PlantClaims

Evaluation of dry matter production and yield in early-sown wheat using near-isogenic lines for the vernalization locus Vrn-D1 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield of Asa was higher with early sowing than with standard sowing.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivume1
Material: Asa (Vrn-D1b)e4
Treatment: early sowinge4
Outcome: grain yielde4
Direction: highere4
Comparator: standard sowinge4

Verbatim

e1
“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain yield is predicted to decrease in the future because of an increase in air temperature globally”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–130

e4
“The grain yield of Asa (Vrn-D1b) with early sowing was higher than with standard sowing”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1169

Title

Evaluation of dry matter production and yield in early-sown wheat using near-isogenic lines for the vernalization locus Vrn-D1

Hiroko Sawada; Hiromi Matsuyama; Hitoshi Matsunaka; et al. Plant Production Science 2019. doi:10.1080/1343943x.2018.1563495

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield of Asakazekomugi was lower in the early-sown crop than in the crop sown at the standard date.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivume1
Material: Asakazekomugie5
Treatment: early-sown crope5
Outcome: grain yielde5
Direction: lowere5
Comparator: the crop sown at the standard datee5

Verbatim

e1
“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain yield is predicted to decrease in the future because of an increase in air temperature globally”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–130

e5
“In contrast, the grain yield of ‘Asakazekomugi’ was lower in the early-sown crop than in the crop sown at the standard date”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1294

Title

Evaluation of dry matter production and yield in early-sown wheat using near-isogenic lines for the vernalization locus Vrn-D1

Hiroko Sawada; Hiromi Matsuyama; Hitoshi Matsunaka; et al. Plant Production Science 2019. doi:10.1080/1343943x.2018.1563495

Other claims from this paper (5)

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Higher grain yield of Asa under early sowing may be due to its maintenance of high dry matter production after the jointing stage.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivume1
Material: Asa (Vrn-D1b)e7
Outcome: grain yielde7
Qualifier: maintaining high dry matter production after the jointing stagee7

Verbatim

e1
“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain yield is predicted to decrease in the future because of an increase in air temperature globally”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–130

e7
“the higher grain yield of Asa (Vrn-D1b) than that of ‘Asakazekomugi’ under early-sown conditions could be due to Asa (Vrn-D1b) maintaining high dry matter production after the jointing stage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1515

Title

Evaluation of dry matter production and yield in early-sown wheat using near-isogenic lines for the vernalization locus Vrn-D1

Hiroko Sawada; Hiromi Matsuyama; Hitoshi Matsunaka; et al. Plant Production Science 2019. doi:10.1080/1343943x.2018.1563495

Other claims from this paper (5)

Customization of DNDC Model: Simulation of Yield and Nitrogen Balance in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) in Relation to Climate Change, Soil and Management Interventions 6

Show all 6 →

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Future simulated rice grain yield decreased.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Outcome: rice grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Qualifier: future time slicese0

Verbatim

e0
“Simulated rice grain yield, N uptake, volatilization, agronomic and recovery efficiency would decrease in future time slices but leaching would increase”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–933

Title

Customization of DNDC Model: Simulation of Yield and Nitrogen Balance in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) in Relation to Climate Change, Soil and Management Interventions

Gurpreet Singh; B.B. Vashisht; Sandeep Sharma Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 2018. doi:10.5958/0974-0228.2018.00034.8

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Simulated rice grain yield increased at higher N levels.
Intervention effect Simulated rice N uptake increased at higher N levels.
Intervention effect Simulated rice-system volatilization increased at higher N levels.
Intervention effect Simulated rice-system leaching increased at higher N levels.
Intervention effect Agronomic efficiency decreased at higher N levels.
Intervention effect Recovery efficiency decreased at higher N levels.
Observation Future simulated rice N uptake decreased.
Observation Future simulated volatilization decreased.
Observation Future simulated agronomic efficiency decreased.
Observation Future simulated recovery efficiency decreased.
Observation Future simulated leaching increased.
Association Projected yield reduction was greater later in mid-century, lower at higher N levels and in fine-textured soils.
Observation Projected yield reduction at Patiala in 2040–2050 was 54.7%.
Observation Projected yield reduction at Ludhiana in 2040–2050 was 50.7%.
Observation Projected yield reduction at Amritsar in 2040–2050 was 43.5%.
Observation At higher N treatments, the future yield-reduction ranking was Ludhiana above Patiala above Amritsar.
Observation The future leaching-increase ranking was Patiala above Amritsar above Ludhiana.
Observation The future volatilization ranking was Ludhiana above Patiala above Amritsar.
Recommendation The authors suggested higher N levels to offset future yield losses, while warning that they increase N leaching and volatilization.

Observationobservedoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Future simulated volatilization decreased.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Outcome: volatilizatione0
Direction: decreasee0
Qualifier: future time slicese0

Verbatim

e0
“Simulated rice grain yield, N uptake, volatilization, agronomic and recovery efficiency would decrease in future time slices but leaching would increase”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–933

Title

Customization of DNDC Model: Simulation of Yield and Nitrogen Balance in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) in Relation to Climate Change, Soil and Management Interventions

Gurpreet Singh; B.B. Vashisht; Sandeep Sharma Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 2018. doi:10.5958/0974-0228.2018.00034.8

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Simulated rice grain yield increased at higher N levels.
Intervention effect Simulated rice N uptake increased at higher N levels.
Intervention effect Simulated rice-system volatilization increased at higher N levels.
Intervention effect Simulated rice-system leaching increased at higher N levels.
Intervention effect Agronomic efficiency decreased at higher N levels.
Intervention effect Recovery efficiency decreased at higher N levels.
Observation Future simulated rice grain yield decreased.
Observation Future simulated rice N uptake decreased.
Observation Future simulated agronomic efficiency decreased.
Observation Future simulated recovery efficiency decreased.
Observation Future simulated leaching increased.
Association Projected yield reduction was greater later in mid-century, lower at higher N levels and in fine-textured soils.
Observation Projected yield reduction at Patiala in 2040–2050 was 54.7%.
Observation Projected yield reduction at Ludhiana in 2040–2050 was 50.7%.
Observation Projected yield reduction at Amritsar in 2040–2050 was 43.5%.
Observation At higher N treatments, the future yield-reduction ranking was Ludhiana above Patiala above Amritsar.
Observation The future leaching-increase ranking was Patiala above Amritsar above Ludhiana.
Observation The future volatilization ranking was Ludhiana above Patiala above Amritsar.
Recommendation The authors suggested higher N levels to offset future yield losses, while warning that they increase N leaching and volatilization.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Future simulated agronomic efficiency decreased.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Outcome: agronomice0
Direction: decreasee0
Qualifier: future time slicese0

Verbatim

e0
“Simulated rice grain yield, N uptake, volatilization, agronomic and recovery efficiency would decrease in future time slices but leaching would increase”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–933

Title

Customization of DNDC Model: Simulation of Yield and Nitrogen Balance in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) in Relation to Climate Change, Soil and Management Interventions

Gurpreet Singh; B.B. Vashisht; Sandeep Sharma Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 2018. doi:10.5958/0974-0228.2018.00034.8

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Simulated rice grain yield increased at higher N levels.
Intervention effect Simulated rice N uptake increased at higher N levels.
Intervention effect Simulated rice-system volatilization increased at higher N levels.
Intervention effect Simulated rice-system leaching increased at higher N levels.
Intervention effect Agronomic efficiency decreased at higher N levels.
Intervention effect Recovery efficiency decreased at higher N levels.
Observation Future simulated rice grain yield decreased.
Observation Future simulated rice N uptake decreased.
Observation Future simulated volatilization decreased.
Observation Future simulated recovery efficiency decreased.
Observation Future simulated leaching increased.
Association Projected yield reduction was greater later in mid-century, lower at higher N levels and in fine-textured soils.
Observation Projected yield reduction at Patiala in 2040–2050 was 54.7%.
Observation Projected yield reduction at Ludhiana in 2040–2050 was 50.7%.
Observation Projected yield reduction at Amritsar in 2040–2050 was 43.5%.
Observation At higher N treatments, the future yield-reduction ranking was Ludhiana above Patiala above Amritsar.
Observation The future leaching-increase ranking was Patiala above Amritsar above Ludhiana.
Observation The future volatilization ranking was Ludhiana above Patiala above Amritsar.
Recommendation The authors suggested higher N levels to offset future yield losses, while warning that they increase N leaching and volatilization.

Maize-crotalaria intercropping systems 6

Show all 6 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

crotalaria was sown in the maize sowing furrow was associated with no reduction in corn grain yield.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Treatment: crotalaria was sown in the maize sowing furrowe0
Outcome: corn grain yielde0
Direction: did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“crotalaria was sown in the inter-row with a ridge planter at the time of maize planting and the system in which crotalaria was sown in the maize sowing furrow were feasible for straw production because they did not decrease corn grain yield and did not affect maize harvesting operations.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1221

Title

Maize-crotalaria intercropping systems

Rafael Torres de Souza; Franciele Caroline de Assis Valadão; Daniel Dias Valadão Júnior; et al. Semina Ciências Agrárias 2019. doi:10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n4p1455

Other claims from this paper (8)

Association C. spectabilis was more sensitive to water variation than C. ochroleuca.
Intervention effect Sowing crotalaria before maize with incorporated maize seeds increased phytomass.
Intervention effect Sowing crotalaria before maize with incorporated maize seeds decreased corn grain yield.
Intervention effect crotalaria was sown in the inter-row with a ridge planter at the time of maize planting was feasible for straw production.
Intervention effect crotalaria was sown in the inter-row with a ridge planter at the time of maize planting was associated with no reduction in corn grain yield.
Intervention effect crotalaria was sown in the inter-row with a ridge planter at the time of maize planting was associated with no reduction in maize harvesting operations.
Intervention effect crotalaria was sown in the maize sowing furrow was feasible for straw production.
Intervention effect crotalaria was sown in the maize sowing furrow was associated with no reduction in maize harvesting operations.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

crotalaria was sown in the inter-row with a ridge planter at the time of maize planting was associated with no reduction in corn grain yield.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Treatment: crotalaria was sown in the inter-row with a ridge planter at the time of maize plantinge0
Outcome: corn grain yielde0
Direction: did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“crotalaria was sown in the inter-row with a ridge planter at the time of maize planting and the system in which crotalaria was sown in the maize sowing furrow were feasible for straw production because they did not decrease corn grain yield and did not affect maize harvesting operations.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1221

Title

Maize-crotalaria intercropping systems

Rafael Torres de Souza; Franciele Caroline de Assis Valadão; Daniel Dias Valadão Júnior; et al. Semina Ciências Agrárias 2019. doi:10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n4p1455

Other claims from this paper (8)

Association C. spectabilis was more sensitive to water variation than C. ochroleuca.
Intervention effect Sowing crotalaria before maize with incorporated maize seeds increased phytomass.
Intervention effect Sowing crotalaria before maize with incorporated maize seeds decreased corn grain yield.
Intervention effect crotalaria was sown in the inter-row with a ridge planter at the time of maize planting was feasible for straw production.
Intervention effect crotalaria was sown in the inter-row with a ridge planter at the time of maize planting was associated with no reduction in maize harvesting operations.
Intervention effect crotalaria was sown in the maize sowing furrow was feasible for straw production.
Intervention effect crotalaria was sown in the maize sowing furrow was associated with no reduction in corn grain yield.
Intervention effect crotalaria was sown in the maize sowing furrow was associated with no reduction in maize harvesting operations.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

crotalaria was sown in the maize sowing furrow was feasible for straw production.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Treatment: crotalaria was sown in the maize sowing furrowe0
Outcome: straw productione0
Direction: feasiblee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“crotalaria was sown in the inter-row with a ridge planter at the time of maize planting and the system in which crotalaria was sown in the maize sowing furrow were feasible for straw production because they did not decrease corn grain yield and did not affect maize harvesting operations.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1221

Title

Maize-crotalaria intercropping systems

Rafael Torres de Souza; Franciele Caroline de Assis Valadão; Daniel Dias Valadão Júnior; et al. Semina Ciências Agrárias 2019. doi:10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n4p1455

Other claims from this paper (8)

Association C. spectabilis was more sensitive to water variation than C. ochroleuca.
Intervention effect Sowing crotalaria before maize with incorporated maize seeds increased phytomass.
Intervention effect Sowing crotalaria before maize with incorporated maize seeds decreased corn grain yield.
Intervention effect crotalaria was sown in the inter-row with a ridge planter at the time of maize planting was feasible for straw production.
Intervention effect crotalaria was sown in the inter-row with a ridge planter at the time of maize planting was associated with no reduction in corn grain yield.
Intervention effect crotalaria was sown in the inter-row with a ridge planter at the time of maize planting was associated with no reduction in maize harvesting operations.
Intervention effect crotalaria was sown in the maize sowing furrow was associated with no reduction in corn grain yield.
Intervention effect crotalaria was sown in the maize sowing furrow was associated with no reduction in maize harvesting operations.

Investogations on the crop losses in maize caused by European corn borer ( Ostrinia nubilalis Hbn.). 6

Show all 6 →

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Per borer hole, Yerli lost 6.8% yield.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Material: Yerlie2
Treatment: delik basinae2
Interactor: Ostrinia nubilalis Hbn.Ostrinia nubilalist0pest
Outcome: urun kaybie2
Direction: decreaseinferrede2
Value: 6.8e2

Verbatim

t0
“crop losses in maize caused by European corn borer ( Ostrinia nubilalis Hbn.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–99

e2
“Buna gore Karadeniz Yildizi, Yerli ve TTM-813 cesidinde sirasiyla delik basina %8.0, 6.8 ve 7.1 urun kaybi oldugu belirlenmistir”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1190

Title

Investogations on the crop losses in maize caused by European corn borer ( Ostrinia nubilalis Hbn.).

Murat KILIÇ; Nutullah Özdemir Bitki Koruma Bülteni 1997

Other claims from this paper (5)

Association At 80% infestation, Karadeniz Yildizi lost 21.9% yield to European corn borer.
Association At 80% infestation, Yerli lost 31.3% yield to European corn borer.
Association At 80% infestation, TTM-813 lost 29.7% yield to European corn borer.
Association Per borer hole, Karadeniz Yildizi lost 8.0% yield.
Association Per borer hole, TTM-813 lost 7.1% yield.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Per borer hole, Karadeniz Yildizi lost 8.0% yield.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Material: Karadeniz Yildizie2
Treatment: delik basinae2
Interactor: Ostrinia nubilalis Hbn.Ostrinia nubilalist0pest
Outcome: urun kaybie2
Direction: decreaseinferrede2
Value: %8.0e2

Verbatim

t0
“crop losses in maize caused by European corn borer ( Ostrinia nubilalis Hbn.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–99

e2
“Buna gore Karadeniz Yildizi, Yerli ve TTM-813 cesidinde sirasiyla delik basina %8.0, 6.8 ve 7.1 urun kaybi oldugu belirlenmistir”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1190

Title

Investogations on the crop losses in maize caused by European corn borer ( Ostrinia nubilalis Hbn.).

Murat KILIÇ; Nutullah Özdemir Bitki Koruma Bülteni 1997

Other claims from this paper (5)

Association At 80% infestation, Karadeniz Yildizi lost 21.9% yield to European corn borer.
Association At 80% infestation, Yerli lost 31.3% yield to European corn borer.
Association At 80% infestation, TTM-813 lost 29.7% yield to European corn borer.
Association Per borer hole, Yerli lost 6.8% yield.
Association Per borer hole, TTM-813 lost 7.1% yield.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Per borer hole, TTM-813 lost 7.1% yield.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Material: TTM-813e2
Treatment: delik basinae2
Interactor: Ostrinia nubilalis Hbn.Ostrinia nubilalist0pest
Outcome: urun kaybie2
Direction: decreaseinferrede2
Value: 7.1e2

Verbatim

t0
“crop losses in maize caused by European corn borer ( Ostrinia nubilalis Hbn.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–99

e2
“Buna gore Karadeniz Yildizi, Yerli ve TTM-813 cesidinde sirasiyla delik basina %8.0, 6.8 ve 7.1 urun kaybi oldugu belirlenmistir”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1190

Title

Investogations on the crop losses in maize caused by European corn borer ( Ostrinia nubilalis Hbn.).

Murat KILIÇ; Nutullah Özdemir Bitki Koruma Bülteni 1997

Other claims from this paper (5)

Association At 80% infestation, Karadeniz Yildizi lost 21.9% yield to European corn borer.
Association At 80% infestation, Yerli lost 31.3% yield to European corn borer.
Association At 80% infestation, TTM-813 lost 29.7% yield to European corn borer.
Association Per borer hole, Karadeniz Yildizi lost 8.0% yield.
Association Per borer hole, Yerli lost 6.8% yield.

Effect of climate change on field crop production and greenhouse gas emissions in California's Central Valley. 6

Show all 6 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Under A2, cotton yield was projected to decrease by 29% by 2097 relative to the 2009 baseline.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutume1
Treatment: A2e1
Outcome: yieldse1
Direction: decreasede1
Value: 29%e1
Qualifier: By 2097e1
Comparator: 2009 baselinee1
Setting: California's Central Valleyt0

Verbatim

e1
“By 2097, yields under A2 decreased in comparison to the 2009 baseline in the following order: cotton (29%) > sunflower (27%) > wheat (17%) > rice (12%) > tomato (9%) > maize (8%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–999

t0
“Effect of climate change on field crop production and greenhouse gas emissions in California's Central Valley”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–109

Title

Effect of climate change on field crop production and greenhouse gas emissions in California's Central Valley.

J. H. Lee; Johan Six; R. J. Gilkes; et al. 2010

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Under A2, sunflower yield was projected to decrease by 27% by 2097 relative to the 2009 baseline.
Intervention effect Under A2, wheat yield was projected to decrease by 17% by 2097 relative to the 2009 baseline.
Intervention effect Under A2, rice yield was projected to decrease by 12% by 2097 relative to the 2009 baseline.
Intervention effect Under A2, tomato yield was projected to decrease by 9% by 2097 relative to the 2009 baseline.
Intervention effect Under A2, maize yield was projected to decrease by 8% by 2097 relative to the 2009 baseline.
Intervention effect Under A2, alfalfa yield was 5% lower than under B1.
Intervention effect Under A2, cotton yield was 21% lower than under B1.
Association Under A2, soil carbon storage tended to decrease under climate change.
Association Differences in nitrous oxide flux between A2 and B1 were not clear.
Mechanism Soil carbon storage decreases under A2 are explained by lower soil C inputs and higher soil C decomposition.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Under A2, sunflower yield was projected to decrease by 27% by 2097 relative to the 2009 baseline.

Taxon: sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment: A2e1
Outcome: yieldse1
Direction: decreasede1
Value: 27%e1
Qualifier: By 2097e1
Comparator: 2009 baselinee1
Setting: California's Central Valleyt0

Verbatim

e1
“By 2097, yields under A2 decreased in comparison to the 2009 baseline in the following order: cotton (29%) > sunflower (27%) > wheat (17%) > rice (12%) > tomato (9%) > maize (8%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–999

t0
“Effect of climate change on field crop production and greenhouse gas emissions in California's Central Valley”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–109

Title

Effect of climate change on field crop production and greenhouse gas emissions in California's Central Valley.

J. H. Lee; Johan Six; R. J. Gilkes; et al. 2010

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Under A2, cotton yield was projected to decrease by 29% by 2097 relative to the 2009 baseline.
Intervention effect Under A2, wheat yield was projected to decrease by 17% by 2097 relative to the 2009 baseline.
Intervention effect Under A2, rice yield was projected to decrease by 12% by 2097 relative to the 2009 baseline.
Intervention effect Under A2, tomato yield was projected to decrease by 9% by 2097 relative to the 2009 baseline.
Intervention effect Under A2, maize yield was projected to decrease by 8% by 2097 relative to the 2009 baseline.
Intervention effect Under A2, alfalfa yield was 5% lower than under B1.
Intervention effect Under A2, cotton yield was 21% lower than under B1.
Association Under A2, soil carbon storage tended to decrease under climate change.
Association Differences in nitrous oxide flux between A2 and B1 were not clear.
Mechanism Soil carbon storage decreases under A2 are explained by lower soil C inputs and higher soil C decomposition.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Under A2, wheat yield was projected to decrease by 17% by 2097 relative to the 2009 baseline.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment: A2e1
Outcome: yieldse1
Direction: decreasede1
Value: 17%e1
Qualifier: By 2097e1
Comparator: 2009 baselinee1
Setting: California's Central Valleyt0

Verbatim

e1
“By 2097, yields under A2 decreased in comparison to the 2009 baseline in the following order: cotton (29%) > sunflower (27%) > wheat (17%) > rice (12%) > tomato (9%) > maize (8%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–999

t0
“Effect of climate change on field crop production and greenhouse gas emissions in California's Central Valley”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–109

Title

Effect of climate change on field crop production and greenhouse gas emissions in California's Central Valley.

J. H. Lee; Johan Six; R. J. Gilkes; et al. 2010

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Under A2, cotton yield was projected to decrease by 29% by 2097 relative to the 2009 baseline.
Intervention effect Under A2, sunflower yield was projected to decrease by 27% by 2097 relative to the 2009 baseline.
Intervention effect Under A2, rice yield was projected to decrease by 12% by 2097 relative to the 2009 baseline.
Intervention effect Under A2, tomato yield was projected to decrease by 9% by 2097 relative to the 2009 baseline.
Intervention effect Under A2, maize yield was projected to decrease by 8% by 2097 relative to the 2009 baseline.
Intervention effect Under A2, alfalfa yield was 5% lower than under B1.
Intervention effect Under A2, cotton yield was 21% lower than under B1.
Association Under A2, soil carbon storage tended to decrease under climate change.
Association Differences in nitrous oxide flux between A2 and B1 were not clear.
Mechanism Soil carbon storage decreases under A2 are explained by lower soil C inputs and higher soil C decomposition.

Interactive Impacts of Rice Water Weevil1 and Sheath Blight Pathogen on Rice Yield 6

Show all 6 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R. solani alone gave a percent yield loss of 23.9 in Cocodrie.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Material: Cococdriee1
Treatment: R. solani alonee1
Interactor: R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie1pathogen
Outcome: Percent yield lossese1
Direction: decreaseinferrede1
Value: 23.9e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“rice, Oryza sativa L.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–41

e1
“Percent yield losses in Cococdrie in response to exposure to L. oryzophilus and R. solani alone and in combination were 5.6, 23.9, and 20.0%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–882

Title

Interactive Impacts of Rice Water Weevil1 and Sheath Blight Pathogen on Rice Yield

Suhas S. Vyavhare; Michael O. Way; Rebecca A. Pearson; et al. Southwestern Entomologist 2019. doi:10.3958/059.044.0201

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect L. oryzophilus infestation had no influence on sheath blight severity in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect L. oryzophilus infestation had no influence on sheath blight severity in Jefferson.
Intervention effect Grain yield of Cocodrie was significantly less in response to L. oryzophilus infestation.
Intervention effect Grain yield of Jefferson was significantly less in response to L. oryzophilus infestation.
Intervention effect R. solani infection alone significantly reduced yield in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect Exposure to L. oryzophilus alone gave a percent yield loss of 5.6 in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect Combined exposure to L. oryzophilus and R. solani gave a percent yield loss of 20.0 in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect L. oryzophilus exposure alone gave a percent yield loss of 7.3 in Jefferson.
Intervention effect R. solani alone gave a percent yield loss of 10.6 in Jefferson.
Intervention effect Combined exposure to L. oryzophilus and R. solani gave a percent yield loss of 5.4 in Jefferson.
Intervention effect The combined impact of L. oryzophilus and R. solani on yield in Cocodrie did not differ significantly from R. solani alone.
Intervention effect The combined impact of R. solani and L. oryzophilus on yield in Jefferson did not vary significantly from either alone.
Intervention effect The combined impact of L. oryzophilus and R. solani on rice yield was less than additive.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R. solani alone gave a percent yield loss of 10.6 in Jefferson.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Material: Jeffersone1
Treatment: R. solani alonee1
Interactor: R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie1pathogen
Outcome: percent yield lossese1
Direction: decreaseinferrede1
Value: 10.6e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“rice, Oryza sativa L.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–41

e1
“Similarly, percent yield losses in Jefferson in response to exposure to L. oryzophilus and R. solani alone and in combination were 7.3, 10.6, and 5.4%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1048

Title

Interactive Impacts of Rice Water Weevil1 and Sheath Blight Pathogen on Rice Yield

Suhas S. Vyavhare; Michael O. Way; Rebecca A. Pearson; et al. Southwestern Entomologist 2019. doi:10.3958/059.044.0201

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect L. oryzophilus infestation had no influence on sheath blight severity in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect L. oryzophilus infestation had no influence on sheath blight severity in Jefferson.
Intervention effect Grain yield of Cocodrie was significantly less in response to L. oryzophilus infestation.
Intervention effect Grain yield of Jefferson was significantly less in response to L. oryzophilus infestation.
Intervention effect R. solani infection alone significantly reduced yield in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect Exposure to L. oryzophilus alone gave a percent yield loss of 5.6 in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect R. solani alone gave a percent yield loss of 23.9 in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect Combined exposure to L. oryzophilus and R. solani gave a percent yield loss of 20.0 in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect L. oryzophilus exposure alone gave a percent yield loss of 7.3 in Jefferson.
Intervention effect Combined exposure to L. oryzophilus and R. solani gave a percent yield loss of 5.4 in Jefferson.
Intervention effect The combined impact of L. oryzophilus and R. solani on yield in Cocodrie did not differ significantly from R. solani alone.
Intervention effect The combined impact of R. solani and L. oryzophilus on yield in Jefferson did not vary significantly from either alone.
Intervention effect The combined impact of L. oryzophilus and R. solani on rice yield was less than additive.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exposure to L. oryzophilus alone gave a percent yield loss of 5.6 in Cocodrie.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Material: Cococdriee1
Treatment: exposure to L. oryzophiluse1
Interactor: L. oryzophilusLissorhoptrus oryzophiluse1pest
Outcome: Percent yield lossese1
Direction: decreaseinferrede1
Value: 5.6e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“rice, Oryza sativa L.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–41

e1
“Percent yield losses in Cococdrie in response to exposure to L. oryzophilus and R. solani alone and in combination were 5.6, 23.9, and 20.0%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–882

Title

Interactive Impacts of Rice Water Weevil1 and Sheath Blight Pathogen on Rice Yield

Suhas S. Vyavhare; Michael O. Way; Rebecca A. Pearson; et al. Southwestern Entomologist 2019. doi:10.3958/059.044.0201

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect L. oryzophilus infestation had no influence on sheath blight severity in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect L. oryzophilus infestation had no influence on sheath blight severity in Jefferson.
Intervention effect Grain yield of Cocodrie was significantly less in response to L. oryzophilus infestation.
Intervention effect Grain yield of Jefferson was significantly less in response to L. oryzophilus infestation.
Intervention effect R. solani infection alone significantly reduced yield in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect R. solani alone gave a percent yield loss of 23.9 in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect Combined exposure to L. oryzophilus and R. solani gave a percent yield loss of 20.0 in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect L. oryzophilus exposure alone gave a percent yield loss of 7.3 in Jefferson.
Intervention effect R. solani alone gave a percent yield loss of 10.6 in Jefferson.
Intervention effect Combined exposure to L. oryzophilus and R. solani gave a percent yield loss of 5.4 in Jefferson.
Intervention effect The combined impact of L. oryzophilus and R. solani on yield in Cocodrie did not differ significantly from R. solani alone.
Intervention effect The combined impact of R. solani and L. oryzophilus on yield in Jefferson did not vary significantly from either alone.
Intervention effect The combined impact of L. oryzophilus and R. solani on rice yield was less than additive.

Ripening Indices, Olive Yield and Oil Quality in Response to Irrigation With Saline Reclaimed Water and Deficit Strategies 6

Show all 6 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regulated deficit irrigation did not decrease olive fruit yield.

Taxon: olive treesOlea europaeae0
Treatment: RDI strategye3
Outcome: fruit yielde3
Direction: did not decreasee3
Comparator: full irrigatione6

Verbatim

e3
“The RDI strategy did not decrease the fruit yield despite the fact that olive weight tended to decrease, and it increased the oil yield by ~14.5%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1078

e6
“full irrigation (FI, 100% of ETc)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–447

e0
“olive trees cv Arbosana”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–585

Title

Ripening Indices, Olive Yield and Oil Quality in Response to Irrigation With Saline Reclaimed Water and Deficit Strategies

Cristina Romero-Trigueros; Gaetano Alessandro Vivaldi; Emilio Nicolás Nicolás; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2019. doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01243

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Reclaimed water without water restriction increased olive fruit yield by 35% compared with control trees.
Intervention effect Reclaimed water without water restriction did not result in higher olive oil yield.
Intervention effect Regulated deficit irrigation tended to decrease olive weight.
Intervention effect Regulated deficit irrigation increased olive oil yield by about 14.5%.
Intervention effect Combined reclaimed water and deficit irrigation did not decrease olive fruit yield.
Intervention effect Combined reclaimed water and deficit irrigation significantly reduced olive oil yield by 25% in 2018.
Intervention effect Combined reclaimed water and deficit irrigation strongly reduced oil content per fruit dry weight by 40%.
Intervention effect Both RDI treatments lowered acidity levels in olive paste compared with full irrigation treatments.
Intervention effect Both RDI treatments reduced oil extractability and fatty yield.
Intervention effect Reclaimed water exposure decreased olive oil quality.
Intervention effect Reclaimed water exposure reduced oleic acid in olive oil.
Intervention effect Reclaimed water exposure increased the C18:2/C18:3 ratio in olive oil.
Intervention effect Reclaimed water exposure increased peroxides in olive oil.
Intervention effect Reclaimed water improved total polyphenols in olive.
Intervention effect Regulated deficit irrigation improved total polyphenols in olive.
Observation In all cases the olive oil parameters met the legislation.
Recommendation Reclaimed water and regulated deficit irrigation have potential to manage olive oil production.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regulated deficit irrigation tended to decrease olive weight.

Taxon: olive treesOlea europaeae0
Treatment: RDI strategye3
Outcome: olive weighte3
Direction: tended to decreasee3
Comparator: full irrigatione6

Verbatim

e3
“The RDI strategy did not decrease the fruit yield despite the fact that olive weight tended to decrease, and it increased the oil yield by ~14.5%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1078

e6
“full irrigation (FI, 100% of ETc)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–447

e0
“olive trees cv Arbosana”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–585

Title

Ripening Indices, Olive Yield and Oil Quality in Response to Irrigation With Saline Reclaimed Water and Deficit Strategies

Cristina Romero-Trigueros; Gaetano Alessandro Vivaldi; Emilio Nicolás Nicolás; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2019. doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01243

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Reclaimed water without water restriction increased olive fruit yield by 35% compared with control trees.
Intervention effect Reclaimed water without water restriction did not result in higher olive oil yield.
Intervention effect Regulated deficit irrigation did not decrease olive fruit yield.
Intervention effect Regulated deficit irrigation increased olive oil yield by about 14.5%.
Intervention effect Combined reclaimed water and deficit irrigation did not decrease olive fruit yield.
Intervention effect Combined reclaimed water and deficit irrigation significantly reduced olive oil yield by 25% in 2018.
Intervention effect Combined reclaimed water and deficit irrigation strongly reduced oil content per fruit dry weight by 40%.
Intervention effect Both RDI treatments lowered acidity levels in olive paste compared with full irrigation treatments.
Intervention effect Both RDI treatments reduced oil extractability and fatty yield.
Intervention effect Reclaimed water exposure decreased olive oil quality.
Intervention effect Reclaimed water exposure reduced oleic acid in olive oil.
Intervention effect Reclaimed water exposure increased the C18:2/C18:3 ratio in olive oil.
Intervention effect Reclaimed water exposure increased peroxides in olive oil.
Intervention effect Reclaimed water improved total polyphenols in olive.
Intervention effect Regulated deficit irrigation improved total polyphenols in olive.
Observation In all cases the olive oil parameters met the legislation.
Recommendation Reclaimed water and regulated deficit irrigation have potential to manage olive oil production.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined reclaimed water and deficit irrigation did not decrease olive fruit yield.

Taxon: olive treesOlea europaeae0
Treatment: combination of both stresses (RW and RDI)e4
Outcome: fruit yielde4
Direction: neither did decreasee4
Comparator: control treese1

Verbatim

e4
“The combination of both stresses (RW and RDI) neither did decrease the fruit yield; however, it significantly reduced oil yield (25% less in 2018)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1226

e1
“RW without water restrictions increased the fruit yield by 35% due to a slight increase in the fruit weight and, mainly, to a greater fruit set than the control trees”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–813

e0
“olive trees cv Arbosana”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–585

Title

Ripening Indices, Olive Yield and Oil Quality in Response to Irrigation With Saline Reclaimed Water and Deficit Strategies

Cristina Romero-Trigueros; Gaetano Alessandro Vivaldi; Emilio Nicolás Nicolás; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2019. doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01243

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Reclaimed water without water restriction increased olive fruit yield by 35% compared with control trees.
Intervention effect Reclaimed water without water restriction did not result in higher olive oil yield.
Intervention effect Regulated deficit irrigation did not decrease olive fruit yield.
Intervention effect Regulated deficit irrigation tended to decrease olive weight.
Intervention effect Regulated deficit irrigation increased olive oil yield by about 14.5%.
Intervention effect Combined reclaimed water and deficit irrigation significantly reduced olive oil yield by 25% in 2018.
Intervention effect Combined reclaimed water and deficit irrigation strongly reduced oil content per fruit dry weight by 40%.
Intervention effect Both RDI treatments lowered acidity levels in olive paste compared with full irrigation treatments.
Intervention effect Both RDI treatments reduced oil extractability and fatty yield.
Intervention effect Reclaimed water exposure decreased olive oil quality.
Intervention effect Reclaimed water exposure reduced oleic acid in olive oil.
Intervention effect Reclaimed water exposure increased the C18:2/C18:3 ratio in olive oil.
Intervention effect Reclaimed water exposure increased peroxides in olive oil.
Intervention effect Reclaimed water improved total polyphenols in olive.
Intervention effect Regulated deficit irrigation improved total polyphenols in olive.
Observation In all cases the olive oil parameters met the legislation.
Recommendation Reclaimed water and regulated deficit irrigation have potential to manage olive oil production.

[Effects of atmospheric CO2 concentration enhancement and nitrogen application rate on wheat grain yield and quality]. 6

Show all 6 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 significantly reduced grain protein, gliadin and gluteinin contents.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment: elevated CO2 concentratione0
Outcome: protein, gliadin, gluteinine0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Under elevated CO2 concentration, there was a significant decrease in the protein, gliadin, gluteinin, and glutein contents of the grain and the sedimentation value of the flour”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–568

e1
“wheat grain yield and quality”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–121

Title

[Effects of atmospheric CO2 concentration enhancement and nitrogen application rate on wheat grain yield and quality].

Hao Cui; Zu-liang Shi; Jian Cai; et al. PubMed 2011

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Elevated CO2 significantly increased grain yield, spike number and grains per spike.
Intervention effect Nitrogen application significantly increased grain yield, spike number and grains per spike.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 significantly increased biomass.
Intervention effect Nitrogen application significantly increased biomass.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 had no significant effect on harvest index.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 significantly reduced glutein content and flour sedimentation value.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 significantly increased grain starch and its components.
Intervention effect Nitrogen application increased protein, gliadin and gluteinin contents, opposite to CO2 effects.
Intervention effect Nitrogen application increased glutein content and sedimentation value.
Intervention effect Nitrogen application reduced starch and its components.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 significantly increased dough stability time, peak viscosity and final viscosity.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 significantly increased setback value.
Intervention effect High nitrogen significantly increased dough stability time, peak viscosity and final viscosity.
Intervention effect High nitrogen significantly increased setback value.
Intervention effect CO2 and nitrogen interaction significantly benefited grain yield and biomass.
Intervention effect CO2 and nitrogen interaction had less effect on grain quality.
Recommendation Higher nitrogen was recommended under future elevated CO2 to benefit yield and paste characteristics and mitigate quality decline.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 significantly reduced glutein content and flour sedimentation value.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment: elevated CO2 concentratione0
Outcome: glutein contents of the grain and the sedimentation value of the floure0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Under elevated CO2 concentration, there was a significant decrease in the protein, gliadin, gluteinin, and glutein contents of the grain and the sedimentation value of the flour”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–568

e1
“wheat grain yield and quality”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–121

Title

[Effects of atmospheric CO2 concentration enhancement and nitrogen application rate on wheat grain yield and quality].

Hao Cui; Zu-liang Shi; Jian Cai; et al. PubMed 2011

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Elevated CO2 significantly increased grain yield, spike number and grains per spike.
Intervention effect Nitrogen application significantly increased grain yield, spike number and grains per spike.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 significantly increased biomass.
Intervention effect Nitrogen application significantly increased biomass.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 had no significant effect on harvest index.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 significantly reduced grain protein, gliadin and gluteinin contents.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 significantly increased grain starch and its components.
Intervention effect Nitrogen application increased protein, gliadin and gluteinin contents, opposite to CO2 effects.
Intervention effect Nitrogen application increased glutein content and sedimentation value.
Intervention effect Nitrogen application reduced starch and its components.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 significantly increased dough stability time, peak viscosity and final viscosity.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 significantly increased setback value.
Intervention effect High nitrogen significantly increased dough stability time, peak viscosity and final viscosity.
Intervention effect High nitrogen significantly increased setback value.
Intervention effect CO2 and nitrogen interaction significantly benefited grain yield and biomass.
Intervention effect CO2 and nitrogen interaction had less effect on grain quality.
Recommendation Higher nitrogen was recommended under future elevated CO2 to benefit yield and paste characteristics and mitigate quality decline.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application reduced starch and its components.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment: N applicatione0
Outcome: starch and its components contents of the graine0
Direction: decreaseinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Under elevated CO2 concentration, there was a significant decrease in the protein, gliadin, gluteinin, and glutein contents of the grain and the sedimentation value of the flour, and a significant increase in the starch and its components contents of the grain; under N application, an inverse was observed.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–698

e1
“wheat grain yield and quality”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–121

Title

[Effects of atmospheric CO2 concentration enhancement and nitrogen application rate on wheat grain yield and quality].

Hao Cui; Zu-liang Shi; Jian Cai; et al. PubMed 2011

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Elevated CO2 significantly increased grain yield, spike number and grains per spike.
Intervention effect Nitrogen application significantly increased grain yield, spike number and grains per spike.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 significantly increased biomass.
Intervention effect Nitrogen application significantly increased biomass.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 had no significant effect on harvest index.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 significantly reduced grain protein, gliadin and gluteinin contents.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 significantly reduced glutein content and flour sedimentation value.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 significantly increased grain starch and its components.
Intervention effect Nitrogen application increased protein, gliadin and gluteinin contents, opposite to CO2 effects.
Intervention effect Nitrogen application increased glutein content and sedimentation value.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 significantly increased dough stability time, peak viscosity and final viscosity.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 significantly increased setback value.
Intervention effect High nitrogen significantly increased dough stability time, peak viscosity and final viscosity.
Intervention effect High nitrogen significantly increased setback value.
Intervention effect CO2 and nitrogen interaction significantly benefited grain yield and biomass.
Intervention effect CO2 and nitrogen interaction had less effect on grain quality.
Recommendation Higher nitrogen was recommended under future elevated CO2 to benefit yield and paste characteristics and mitigate quality decline.

Effects of different irrigation regimes and two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on some physiological characteristics and yield of potato under field conditions 6

Show all 6 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Second-year ψw decreased 7.46 at S1.

Taxon: potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment: S1e1
Outcome: ψwe0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 7.46e0
Qualifier: second year of experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The corresponding trend for the second year of experiment was 20.11, 25.21 and 26.06% increase for LPC, 7.46, 12.69 and 18.66 decrease for ψw, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1145

t0
“potato”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–134

e1
“Leaf proline content (LPC) increased by 38.87, 51.93 and 41.54% and leaf water potential (ψw) decreased by 20.95, 31.43 and 59.05% at S1, S2 and S3 compared with S0 in the first year of experiment, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–988

Title

Effects of different irrigation regimes and two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on some physiological characteristics and yield of potato under field conditions

Saman Khosravifar; Farhad Farahvash; Nasser Aliasgharzad; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2020. doi:10.1080/01904167.2020.1758133

Other claims from this paper (18)

Intervention effect First-year leaf proline increased 38.87% at S1 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf proline increased 51.93% at S2 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf proline increased 41.54% at S3 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf water potential decreased 20.95% at S1 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf water potential decreased 31.43% at S2 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf water potential decreased 59.05% at S3 versus S0.
Intervention effect Second-year LPC increased 20.11% at S1.
Intervention effect Second-year LPC increased 25.21% at S2.
Intervention effect Second-year LPC increased 26.06% at S3.
Intervention effect Second-year ψw decreased 12.69 at S2.
Intervention effect Second-year ψw decreased 18.66 at S3.
Intervention effect Mean two-year tuber yield loss was 20.78% at S1 versus S0.
Intervention effect Mean two-year tuber yield loss was 36.46% at S2 versus S0.
Intervention effect Mean two-year tuber yield loss was 50.36% at S3 versus S0.
Intervention effect C. etunicatum treated plants had minimum LPC of 4.16 μmol g−1 FW.
Intervention effect R. intraradices inoculation increased tuber yield 36.00% in 2013.
Intervention effect R. intraradices inoculation increased tuber yield 32.48% in 2014.
Intervention effect R. intraradices inoculated plants had maximum root colonization of 54.20%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Second-year ψw decreased 12.69 at S2.

Taxon: potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment: S2e1
Outcome: ψwe0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 12.69e0
Qualifier: second year of experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The corresponding trend for the second year of experiment was 20.11, 25.21 and 26.06% increase for LPC, 7.46, 12.69 and 18.66 decrease for ψw, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1145

t0
“potato”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–134

e1
“Leaf proline content (LPC) increased by 38.87, 51.93 and 41.54% and leaf water potential (ψw) decreased by 20.95, 31.43 and 59.05% at S1, S2 and S3 compared with S0 in the first year of experiment, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–988

Title

Effects of different irrigation regimes and two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on some physiological characteristics and yield of potato under field conditions

Saman Khosravifar; Farhad Farahvash; Nasser Aliasgharzad; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2020. doi:10.1080/01904167.2020.1758133

Other claims from this paper (18)

Intervention effect First-year leaf proline increased 38.87% at S1 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf proline increased 51.93% at S2 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf proline increased 41.54% at S3 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf water potential decreased 20.95% at S1 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf water potential decreased 31.43% at S2 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf water potential decreased 59.05% at S3 versus S0.
Intervention effect Second-year LPC increased 20.11% at S1.
Intervention effect Second-year LPC increased 25.21% at S2.
Intervention effect Second-year LPC increased 26.06% at S3.
Intervention effect Second-year ψw decreased 7.46 at S1.
Intervention effect Second-year ψw decreased 18.66 at S3.
Intervention effect Mean two-year tuber yield loss was 20.78% at S1 versus S0.
Intervention effect Mean two-year tuber yield loss was 36.46% at S2 versus S0.
Intervention effect Mean two-year tuber yield loss was 50.36% at S3 versus S0.
Intervention effect C. etunicatum treated plants had minimum LPC of 4.16 μmol g−1 FW.
Intervention effect R. intraradices inoculation increased tuber yield 36.00% in 2013.
Intervention effect R. intraradices inoculation increased tuber yield 32.48% in 2014.
Intervention effect R. intraradices inoculated plants had maximum root colonization of 54.20%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Second-year ψw decreased 18.66 at S3.

Taxon: potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment: S3e1
Outcome: ψwe0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 18.66e0
Qualifier: second year of experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The corresponding trend for the second year of experiment was 20.11, 25.21 and 26.06% increase for LPC, 7.46, 12.69 and 18.66 decrease for ψw, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1145

t0
“potato”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–134

e1
“Leaf proline content (LPC) increased by 38.87, 51.93 and 41.54% and leaf water potential (ψw) decreased by 20.95, 31.43 and 59.05% at S1, S2 and S3 compared with S0 in the first year of experiment, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–988

Title

Effects of different irrigation regimes and two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on some physiological characteristics and yield of potato under field conditions

Saman Khosravifar; Farhad Farahvash; Nasser Aliasgharzad; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2020. doi:10.1080/01904167.2020.1758133

Other claims from this paper (18)

Intervention effect First-year leaf proline increased 38.87% at S1 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf proline increased 51.93% at S2 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf proline increased 41.54% at S3 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf water potential decreased 20.95% at S1 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf water potential decreased 31.43% at S2 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf water potential decreased 59.05% at S3 versus S0.
Intervention effect Second-year LPC increased 20.11% at S1.
Intervention effect Second-year LPC increased 25.21% at S2.
Intervention effect Second-year LPC increased 26.06% at S3.
Intervention effect Second-year ψw decreased 7.46 at S1.
Intervention effect Second-year ψw decreased 12.69 at S2.
Intervention effect Mean two-year tuber yield loss was 20.78% at S1 versus S0.
Intervention effect Mean two-year tuber yield loss was 36.46% at S2 versus S0.
Intervention effect Mean two-year tuber yield loss was 50.36% at S3 versus S0.
Intervention effect C. etunicatum treated plants had minimum LPC of 4.16 μmol g−1 FW.
Intervention effect R. intraradices inoculation increased tuber yield 36.00% in 2013.
Intervention effect R. intraradices inoculation increased tuber yield 32.48% in 2014.
Intervention effect R. intraradices inoculated plants had maximum root colonization of 54.20%.

EFFECT OF SPECIFIC IONS, SALINITY AND ALKALINITY ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SOME EGYPTIAN COTTON GENOTYPES 6

Show all 6 →

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed cotton yield was negatively correlated with each of Na+, Ca++ and Mg++.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutume3
Compound: Na+, Ca++ and Mg++e3
Outcome: seed cotton yielde3
Direction: decreaseinferrede3

Verbatim

e3
“Negative correlations were observed between seed cotton yield, and each of Na+, Ca++ and Mg++”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–832

Title

EFFECT OF SPECIFIC IONS, SALINITY AND ALKALINITY ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SOME EGYPTIAN COTTON GENOTYPES

Farouk Zein; Esaid Gaiza; Hamida EL-Sanafawy; et al. Egyptian Journal of Soil Science 2020. doi:10.21608/ejss.2020.21065.1334

Other claims from this paper (9)

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed cotton yield was negatively correlated with each of Cl- and SO--4.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutume1
Compound: Cl- and SO--4e1
Outcome: seed cotton yielde1
Direction: decreaseinferrede1

Verbatim

e1
“Negative correlations were shown between seed cotton yield, and each of Cl- and SO--4”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1093

Title

EFFECT OF SPECIFIC IONS, SALINITY AND ALKALINITY ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SOME EGYPTIAN COTTON GENOTYPES

Farouk Zein; Esaid Gaiza; Hamida EL-Sanafawy; et al. Egyptian Journal of Soil Science 2020. doi:10.21608/ejss.2020.21065.1334

Other claims from this paper (9)

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Negative correlation between exchangeable sodium percentage and seed cotton yield was found in some studied cotton genotypes.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutume1
Material: some studied cotton genotypese1
Compound: exchangeable sodium percentagese1
Outcome: seed cotton yielde1
Direction: decreaseinferrede1

Verbatim

e1
“Data revealed negative correlation between exchangeable sodium percentages, and seed cotton yield of some studied cotton genotypes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1343

Title

EFFECT OF SPECIFIC IONS, SALINITY AND ALKALINITY ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SOME EGYPTIAN COTTON GENOTYPES

Farouk Zein; Esaid Gaiza; Hamida EL-Sanafawy; et al. Egyptian Journal of Soil Science 2020. doi:10.21608/ejss.2020.21065.1334

Other claims from this paper (9)

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

Evaluation of dry matter production and yield in early-sown wheat using near-isogenic lines for the vernalization locus Vrn-D1 6

Customization of DNDC Model: Simulation of Yield and Nitrogen Balance in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) in Relation to Climate Change, Soil and Management Interventions 6

Maize-crotalaria intercropping systems 6

Investogations on the crop losses in maize caused by European corn borer ( Ostrinia nubilalis Hbn.). 6

Effect of climate change on field crop production and greenhouse gas emissions in California's Central Valley. 6

Interactive Impacts of Rice Water Weevil1 and Sheath Blight Pathogen on Rice Yield 6

Ripening Indices, Olive Yield and Oil Quality in Response to Irrigation With Saline Reclaimed Water and Deficit Strategies 6

[Effects of atmospheric CO2 concentration enhancement and nitrogen application rate on wheat grain yield and quality]. 6

Effects of different irrigation regimes and two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on some physiological characteristics and yield of potato under field conditions 6

EFFECT OF SPECIFIC IONS, SALINITY AND ALKALINITY ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SOME EGYPTIAN COTTON GENOTYPES 6