Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

12,432 matchesgrouped into 6,306 categories

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 1,248 non-evaluative

Over time

1950 ’60 ’70 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

plus 13 earlier · 1920s–1940s

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

ACC-Deaminase, Phosphate-Solubilizing Pseudomonas fluorescens Increase Phosphorus and Decrease Cadmium Concentration to Enhance Wheat Yield 20

Show all 20 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P0, with a reported range of 24-132%.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: P90e0
Outcome: 1000-grain weight (TGW), yield and P concentratione0
Direction: Increasede0
Value: 24-132%e0
Comparator: P0e0

Verbatim

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133

e0
“Increased 1000-grain weight (TGW), yield and P concentration of wheat was noted at P90 over P0 (24-132%) and P45 (3.7-37%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–774

Title

ACC-Deaminase, Phosphate-Solubilizing Pseudomonas fluorescens Increase Phosphorus and Decrease Cadmium Concentration to Enhance Wheat Yield

Zia-ul-Hassan; S. Khokhar; I. Rajpar; et al. Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences 2016. doi:10.6000/1927-5129.2016.12.48

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P45, with a reported range of 3.7-37%.
Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 13-57%.
Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 5.4-34%.
Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM1, with a reported range of 1.4 to 2.4-fold.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 34%.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P45 by 17%.
Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 21%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 22%.
Intervention effect SM1 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 8%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM1 by 2.7-fold.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 25%.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P45 by 18%.
Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 8%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 18%.
Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 9%.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat TGW over SM0 by 8.6.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat straw-P over SM0 by 29%.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat Grain-Cd over SM0 by 30.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat straw-Cd over SM0 by 23%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P45, with a reported range of 3.7-37%.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: P90e0
Outcome: 1000-grain weight (TGW), yield and P concentratione0
Direction: Increasede0
Value: 3.7-37%e0
Comparator: P45e0

Verbatim

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133

e0
“Increased 1000-grain weight (TGW), yield and P concentration of wheat was noted at P90 over P0 (24-132%) and P45 (3.7-37%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–774

Title

ACC-Deaminase, Phosphate-Solubilizing Pseudomonas fluorescens Increase Phosphorus and Decrease Cadmium Concentration to Enhance Wheat Yield

Zia-ul-Hassan; S. Khokhar; I. Rajpar; et al. Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences 2016. doi:10.6000/1927-5129.2016.12.48

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P0, with a reported range of 24-132%.
Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 13-57%.
Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 5.4-34%.
Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM1, with a reported range of 1.4 to 2.4-fold.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 34%.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P45 by 17%.
Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 21%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 22%.
Intervention effect SM1 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 8%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM1 by 2.7-fold.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 25%.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P45 by 18%.
Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 8%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 18%.
Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 9%.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat TGW over SM0 by 8.6.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat straw-P over SM0 by 29%.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat Grain-Cd over SM0 by 30.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat straw-Cd over SM0 by 23%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 34%.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: P90e0
Outcome: Grain-Cd concentratione0
Direction: decreasede0
Value: 34%e0
Comparator: P0e0

Verbatim

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133

e0
“Grain-Cd concentration decreased at P90 over P0 (34%) and P45 (17%), and at P45 over P0 (21%).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–966

Title

ACC-Deaminase, Phosphate-Solubilizing Pseudomonas fluorescens Increase Phosphorus and Decrease Cadmium Concentration to Enhance Wheat Yield

Zia-ul-Hassan; S. Khokhar; I. Rajpar; et al. Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences 2016. doi:10.6000/1927-5129.2016.12.48

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P0, with a reported range of 24-132%.
Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P45, with a reported range of 3.7-37%.
Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 13-57%.
Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 5.4-34%.
Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM1, with a reported range of 1.4 to 2.4-fold.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P45 by 17%.
Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 21%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 22%.
Intervention effect SM1 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 8%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM1 by 2.7-fold.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 25%.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P45 by 18%.
Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 8%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 18%.
Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 9%.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat TGW over SM0 by 8.6.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat straw-P over SM0 by 29%.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat Grain-Cd over SM0 by 30.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat straw-Cd over SM0 by 23%.

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system 20

Show all 20 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS22e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Organ / stage: inferior grainse0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: grain weighte0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: decreasee0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 23.19%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR4e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS44e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Organ / stage: inferior grainse0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: grain weighte0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: decreasee0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 7.78%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR4e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS22e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Organ / stage: inferior grainse0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: average grain-filling rate (AGFR)e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: decreasee0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 13.97%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR4e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

ESTIMATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN 18

Show all 18 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides did not decrease weed number.

Taxon: CORNZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment: herbicides were applied together with PGR Zeastimuline0
Outcome: number of weedse0
Direction: no decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“where herbicides were applied together with PGR Zeastimulin, no decrease in the number of weeds was observed”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1758

t0
“CORN”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–93

t1
“HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–93

e1
“the length of maize cobs increased from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm in the version of weed control by Laudis (0,5 kg/ha)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2146–2257

e2
“which gave a grain yield increase of 2,9 t/ha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2611–2656

e3
“Stellar herbicide (1,1 l/ha) - for 3,1 t/ha.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2662–2706

e4
“where herbicides were applied together with PGR Zeastimulin, no decrease in the number of weeds was observed”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1758

Title

ESTIMATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN

Svitlana Okrushko Agriculture and Forestry 2020. doi:10.37128/2707-5826-2020-2-9

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed numbers by 89,7% versus control after treatment.
Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed quantity by 94,7% at harvest.
Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed mass by 655 g/m2 at harvest.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 93,5% at the first survey.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,0% at the second survey.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,9% at the third survey.
Intervention effect Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides slightly decreased dry weed biomass.
Intervention effect Maize height was 17,3% higher on herbicidal variant 2 than control.
Intervention effect Maize height was 19,8% higher on herbicidal variant 4 than control.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin further increased maize height by 2 cm.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm with Laudis.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 18,3 cm to 19,4 cm with Stellar.
Intervention effect Weed reduction and Zeastimulin increased maize cob diameter.
Intervention effect Laudis increased maize grain yield by 2,9 t/ha.
Intervention effect Stellar increased maize grain yield by 3,1 t/ha.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,5% with Laudis.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,2% with Stellar.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides slightly decreased dry weed biomass.

Taxon: CORNZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment: PGR Zeastimuline4
Outcome: above-ground air-dry mass of weed plantse0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“only a slight decrease in the above-ground air-dry mass of weed plants was observed.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1764–1848

t0
“CORN”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–93

t1
“HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–93

e1
“the length of maize cobs increased from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm in the version of weed control by Laudis (0,5 kg/ha)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2146–2257

e2
“which gave a grain yield increase of 2,9 t/ha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2611–2656

e3
“Stellar herbicide (1,1 l/ha) - for 3,1 t/ha.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2662–2706

e4
“where herbicides were applied together with PGR Zeastimulin, no decrease in the number of weeds was observed”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1758

Title

ESTIMATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN

Svitlana Okrushko Agriculture and Forestry 2020. doi:10.37128/2707-5826-2020-2-9

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed numbers by 89,7% versus control after treatment.
Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed quantity by 94,7% at harvest.
Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed mass by 655 g/m2 at harvest.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 93,5% at the first survey.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,0% at the second survey.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,9% at the third survey.
Intervention effect Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides did not decrease weed number.
Intervention effect Maize height was 17,3% higher on herbicidal variant 2 than control.
Intervention effect Maize height was 19,8% higher on herbicidal variant 4 than control.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin further increased maize height by 2 cm.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm with Laudis.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 18,3 cm to 19,4 cm with Stellar.
Intervention effect Weed reduction and Zeastimulin increased maize cob diameter.
Intervention effect Laudis increased maize grain yield by 2,9 t/ha.
Intervention effect Stellar increased maize grain yield by 3,1 t/ha.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,5% with Laudis.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,2% with Stellar.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,0% at the second survey.

Taxon: CORNZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment: Stellar herbicidee3
Outcome: weed numberse0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 97,0%e0
Qualifier: seconde0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The decrease in weed numbers was 93,5% during the first survey, 97,0% during the second and 97,9% during the third.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1619

t0
“CORN”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–93

t1
“HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–93

e1
“the length of maize cobs increased from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm in the version of weed control by Laudis (0,5 kg/ha)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2146–2257

e2
“which gave a grain yield increase of 2,9 t/ha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2611–2656

e3
“Stellar herbicide (1,1 l/ha) - for 3,1 t/ha.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2662–2706

e4
“where herbicides were applied together with PGR Zeastimulin, no decrease in the number of weeds was observed”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1758

Title

ESTIMATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN

Svitlana Okrushko Agriculture and Forestry 2020. doi:10.37128/2707-5826-2020-2-9

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed numbers by 89,7% versus control after treatment.
Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed quantity by 94,7% at harvest.
Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed mass by 655 g/m2 at harvest.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 93,5% at the first survey.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,9% at the third survey.
Intervention effect Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides did not decrease weed number.
Intervention effect Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides slightly decreased dry weed biomass.
Intervention effect Maize height was 17,3% higher on herbicidal variant 2 than control.
Intervention effect Maize height was 19,8% higher on herbicidal variant 4 than control.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin further increased maize height by 2 cm.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm with Laudis.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 18,3 cm to 19,4 cm with Stellar.
Intervention effect Weed reduction and Zeastimulin increased maize cob diameter.
Intervention effect Laudis increased maize grain yield by 2,9 t/ha.
Intervention effect Stellar increased maize grain yield by 3,1 t/ha.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,5% with Laudis.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,2% with Stellar.

Effects of Subsoiling at Jointing Stage on Dry Matter Production and Photosynthesis of Summer Maize 15

Show all 15 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained grain yield by 1 662.0 kg/ha.

Taxon: Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Material: Zhendan958e1
Treatment: subsoiling at jointing stagee0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: reducede0
Value: 1 662.0 kg/hae0
Comparator: non-subsoilinge0

Verbatim

t0
“Summer Maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–99

e0
“compared with non-subsoiling,subsoiling at jointing stage achieved the following characters: plant height and ear height decreased by 17.3 cm and 9.0 cm,stem diameter decreased by 2.7 mm,and one leaf less;the increase of LAI before silking was limited,while decrease of LAI after silking was slow;stomatal conductance,intercellular CO2 concentration,transpiration rate,net photosynthetic rate of ear leaves decreased 38%…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–1013

e1
“Zhendan958 was applied in the field experiment.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–47

Title

Effects of Subsoiling at Jointing Stage on Dry Matter Production and Photosynthesis of Summer Maize

Dongxing Zhang Yumi kexue 2013

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained plant height by 17.3 cm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained ear height by 9.0 cm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained stem diameter by 2.7 mm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained leaf by one leaf.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained LAI before silking.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained LAI after silking.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained stomatal conductance by 38%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained intercellular CO2 concentration by 25.3%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained transpiration rate by 42.5%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained net photosynthetic rate by 2.0%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained dry matter production by 1 519.5 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained dry matter production by 168.8 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained grain number by 100.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained economic index by 7 percentage.
Intervention effect The two nitrogen regimes did not differ significantly for the studied outcomes.
Association No subsoiling by nitrogen regime interaction was observed.
Recommendation The authors conclude that jointing-stage subsoiling is unsuitable.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained LAI before silking.

Taxon: Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Material: Zhendan958e1
Treatment: subsoiling at jointing stagee0
Outcome: LAI before silkinge0
Direction: limitede0
Comparator: non-subsoilinge0

Verbatim

t0
“Summer Maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–99

e0
“compared with non-subsoiling,subsoiling at jointing stage achieved the following characters: plant height and ear height decreased by 17.3 cm and 9.0 cm,stem diameter decreased by 2.7 mm,and one leaf less;the increase of LAI before silking was limited,while decrease of LAI after silking was slow;stomatal conductance,intercellular CO2 concentration,transpiration rate,net photosynthetic rate of ear leaves decreased 38%…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–1013

e1
“Zhendan958 was applied in the field experiment.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–47

Title

Effects of Subsoiling at Jointing Stage on Dry Matter Production and Photosynthesis of Summer Maize

Dongxing Zhang Yumi kexue 2013

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained plant height by 17.3 cm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained ear height by 9.0 cm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained stem diameter by 2.7 mm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained leaf by one leaf.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained LAI after silking.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained stomatal conductance by 38%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained intercellular CO2 concentration by 25.3%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained transpiration rate by 42.5%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained net photosynthetic rate by 2.0%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained dry matter production by 1 519.5 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained dry matter production by 168.8 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained grain number by 100.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained economic index by 7 percentage.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained grain yield by 1 662.0 kg/ha.
Intervention effect The two nitrogen regimes did not differ significantly for the studied outcomes.
Association No subsoiling by nitrogen regime interaction was observed.
Recommendation The authors conclude that jointing-stage subsoiling is unsuitable.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained LAI after silking.

Taxon: Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Material: Zhendan958e1
Treatment: subsoiling at jointing stagee0
Outcome: LAI after silkinge0
Direction: slowe0
Comparator: non-subsoilinge0

Verbatim

t0
“Summer Maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–99

e0
“compared with non-subsoiling,subsoiling at jointing stage achieved the following characters: plant height and ear height decreased by 17.3 cm and 9.0 cm,stem diameter decreased by 2.7 mm,and one leaf less;the increase of LAI before silking was limited,while decrease of LAI after silking was slow;stomatal conductance,intercellular CO2 concentration,transpiration rate,net photosynthetic rate of ear leaves decreased 38%…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–1013

e1
“Zhendan958 was applied in the field experiment.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–47

Title

Effects of Subsoiling at Jointing Stage on Dry Matter Production and Photosynthesis of Summer Maize

Dongxing Zhang Yumi kexue 2013

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained plant height by 17.3 cm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained ear height by 9.0 cm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained stem diameter by 2.7 mm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained leaf by one leaf.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained LAI before silking.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained stomatal conductance by 38%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained intercellular CO2 concentration by 25.3%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained transpiration rate by 42.5%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained net photosynthetic rate by 2.0%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained dry matter production by 1 519.5 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained dry matter production by 168.8 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained grain number by 100.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained economic index by 7 percentage.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained grain yield by 1 662.0 kg/ha.
Intervention effect The two nitrogen regimes did not differ significantly for the studied outcomes.
Association No subsoiling by nitrogen regime interaction was observed.
Recommendation The authors conclude that jointing-stage subsoiling is unsuitable.

Effects of integrated fertilization and tillage technologies on cassava yield and physical and chemical properties of soil 15

Show all 15 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integration method decreased soil bulk density by 5.63 % versus the control.

Taxon: cassavaManihot esculentat0
Treatment: integration methode0
Outcome: soil bulk densitye0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 5.63 %e0
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

t0
“cassava”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71

e0
“Compared with the control,integration method brought about the increase of 11.14%,15.06%,12.44%,21.43%,32.39%,23.04% and 7697.90 yuan/ha on cassava stem diameter,tuberous root diameter,tuberous root length,tuberous root number per plant,tuberous root weight per plant,fresh weight of tuberous root per hectare and benefit,increase of 8.84%,8.73%,5.22%,7.56%,3.08%,15.51% and 9.86% on available nitrogen,phosphorus,potass…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–1258

Title

Effects of integrated fertilization and tillage technologies on cassava yield and physical and chemical properties of soil

HE Yong-qu Nanfang nongye xuebao 2014

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect The integration method increased cassava stem diameter by 11.14% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root diameter by 15.06% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root length by 12.44% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root number per plant by 21.43% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root weight per plant by 32.39% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased fresh weight of tuberous root per hectare by 23.04% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased benefit by 7697.90 yuan/ha versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased available nitrogen by 8.84% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased phosphorus by 8.73% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased potassium by 5.22% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased organic matter by 7.56% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased pH by 3.08% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased moisture content by 15.51% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased total porosity by 9.86% versus the control.
Recommendation The authors recommend the integrated fertilization and tillage method for cassava production.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integration method increased phosphorus by 8.73% versus the control.

Taxon: cassavaManihot esculentat0
Treatment: integration methode0
Outcome: phosphoruse0
Direction: increasee0
Value: 8.73%e0
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

t0
“cassava”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71

e0
“Compared with the control,integration method brought about the increase of 11.14%,15.06%,12.44%,21.43%,32.39%,23.04% and 7697.90 yuan/ha on cassava stem diameter,tuberous root diameter,tuberous root length,tuberous root number per plant,tuberous root weight per plant,fresh weight of tuberous root per hectare and benefit,increase of 8.84%,8.73%,5.22%,7.56%,3.08%,15.51% and 9.86% on available nitrogen,phosphorus,potass…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–1258

Title

Effects of integrated fertilization and tillage technologies on cassava yield and physical and chemical properties of soil

HE Yong-qu Nanfang nongye xuebao 2014

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect The integration method increased cassava stem diameter by 11.14% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root diameter by 15.06% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root length by 12.44% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root number per plant by 21.43% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root weight per plant by 32.39% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased fresh weight of tuberous root per hectare by 23.04% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased benefit by 7697.90 yuan/ha versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased available nitrogen by 8.84% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased potassium by 5.22% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased organic matter by 7.56% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased pH by 3.08% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased moisture content by 15.51% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased total porosity by 9.86% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method decreased soil bulk density by 5.63 % versus the control.
Recommendation The authors recommend the integrated fertilization and tillage method for cassava production.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integration method increased potassium by 5.22% versus the control.

Taxon: cassavaManihot esculentat0
Treatment: integration methode0
Outcome: potassiume0
Direction: increasee0
Value: 5.22%e0
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

t0
“cassava”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71

e0
“Compared with the control,integration method brought about the increase of 11.14%,15.06%,12.44%,21.43%,32.39%,23.04% and 7697.90 yuan/ha on cassava stem diameter,tuberous root diameter,tuberous root length,tuberous root number per plant,tuberous root weight per plant,fresh weight of tuberous root per hectare and benefit,increase of 8.84%,8.73%,5.22%,7.56%,3.08%,15.51% and 9.86% on available nitrogen,phosphorus,potass…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–1258

Title

Effects of integrated fertilization and tillage technologies on cassava yield and physical and chemical properties of soil

HE Yong-qu Nanfang nongye xuebao 2014

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect The integration method increased cassava stem diameter by 11.14% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root diameter by 15.06% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root length by 12.44% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root number per plant by 21.43% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root weight per plant by 32.39% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased fresh weight of tuberous root per hectare by 23.04% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased benefit by 7697.90 yuan/ha versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased available nitrogen by 8.84% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased phosphorus by 8.73% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased organic matter by 7.56% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased pH by 3.08% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased moisture content by 15.51% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased total porosity by 9.86% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method decreased soil bulk density by 5.63 % versus the control.
Recommendation The authors recommend the integrated fertilization and tillage method for cassava production.

Mitigation of salinity induced effects using brassinolide in clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.) 15

Show all 15 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly decreased grain yield in clusterbean.

Taxon: clusterbeanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment: Salinitye0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Salinity was found to decrease significantly the photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate (at flowering stage), stomatal conductance, relative water content, chlorophyll stability index, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, plant height, pod length, leaf area index, test weight, grain yield, biological yield, harvest index and K+ and Na+ content in grain”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–876

t0
“clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–101

Title

Mitigation of salinity induced effects using brassinolide in clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.)

Gograj Jat; DL Bagdi; BL Kakralya; et al. Crop Research 2012

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased photosynthesis rate in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased transpiration rate in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased stomatal conductance in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased relative water content in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased chlorophyll stability index in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased number of pods per plant in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased number of seeds per pod in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased plant height in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased pod length in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased leaf area index in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased test weight in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased biological yield in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased harvest index in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased K+ and Na+ content in grain in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Brassinolide up to 1.0 ppm significantly increased the listed physiological and yield variables in clusterbean.
Observation RGC-1018 had higher measured parameters than RGC-936.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly decreased biological yield in clusterbean.

Taxon: clusterbeanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment: Salinitye0
Outcome: biological yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Salinity was found to decrease significantly the photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate (at flowering stage), stomatal conductance, relative water content, chlorophyll stability index, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, plant height, pod length, leaf area index, test weight, grain yield, biological yield, harvest index and K+ and Na+ content in grain”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–876

t0
“clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–101

Title

Mitigation of salinity induced effects using brassinolide in clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.)

Gograj Jat; DL Bagdi; BL Kakralya; et al. Crop Research 2012

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased photosynthesis rate in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased transpiration rate in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased stomatal conductance in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased relative water content in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased chlorophyll stability index in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased number of pods per plant in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased number of seeds per pod in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased plant height in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased pod length in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased leaf area index in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased test weight in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased grain yield in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased harvest index in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased K+ and Na+ content in grain in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Brassinolide up to 1.0 ppm significantly increased the listed physiological and yield variables in clusterbean.
Observation RGC-1018 had higher measured parameters than RGC-936.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly decreased photosynthesis rate in clusterbean.

Taxon: clusterbeanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment: Salinitye0
Outcome: photosynthesis ratee0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Salinity was found to decrease significantly the photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate (at flowering stage), stomatal conductance, relative water content, chlorophyll stability index, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, plant height, pod length, leaf area index, test weight, grain yield, biological yield, harvest index and K+ and Na+ content in grain”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–876

t0
“clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–101

Title

Mitigation of salinity induced effects using brassinolide in clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.)

Gograj Jat; DL Bagdi; BL Kakralya; et al. Crop Research 2012

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased transpiration rate in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased stomatal conductance in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased relative water content in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased chlorophyll stability index in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased number of pods per plant in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased number of seeds per pod in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased plant height in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased pod length in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased leaf area index in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased test weight in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased grain yield in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased biological yield in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased harvest index in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly decreased K+ and Na+ content in grain in clusterbean.
Intervention effect Brassinolide up to 1.0 ppm significantly increased the listed physiological and yield variables in clusterbean.
Observation RGC-1018 had higher measured parameters than RGC-936.

Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth, Yield and Quality of French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) c.v. Pant Anupama under Valley Conditions of Dehradun 15

Show all 15 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrients significantly reduced days of germination to 7.00 versus control.

Taxon: French BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment: 100% RDF + Vermicompost + FYMe0
Outcome: days of germinatione0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 7.00e0
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

t0
“French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–108

e0
“application of 100% RDF + Vermicompost + FYM significantly decrease the days of germination (7.00), growth, yield and quality increased significantly over control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–814

Title

Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth, Yield and Quality of French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) c.v. Pant Anupama under Valley Conditions of Dehradun

Chandan Kumar; J.K. Meena; C.S. Pandey; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2019. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2019.810.227

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest plant height, 31.12 cm at flowering stage, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest plant height, 33.08 cm at maturity stage, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest number of primary branches plant-1, 6.33, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest days to 50% germination, 38.66, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest number of plants bed-1, 66.00, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest pod length, 15.06 cm, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest pod width, 0.90 cm, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest number of pods plant-1, 38.66, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest average pod weight, 5.79 g, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest fresh pod yield plant-1, 227.99 g, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest fresh pod yield bed-1, 15.04 kg, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest fresh pod yield hectare-1, 37.60 t, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest dry matter content, 9.67%, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest protein content, 6.76%, versus control.
Recommendation The authors recommend integrated organic and inorganic nutrient sources to improve growth, yield and quality.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrients produced the highest fresh pod yield plant-1, 227.99 g, versus control.

Taxon: French BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment: 100% RDF + Vermicompost + FYMe0
Outcome: fresh pod yield plant-1e1
Direction: higheste2
Value: 227.99 ge1
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

t0
“French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–108

e0
“application of 100% RDF + Vermicompost + FYM significantly decrease the days of germination (7.00), growth, yield and quality increased significantly over control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–814

e1
“fresh pod yield plant-1 (227.99 g)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1147

e2
“highest plant height”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–839

Title

Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth, Yield and Quality of French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) c.v. Pant Anupama under Valley Conditions of Dehradun

Chandan Kumar; J.K. Meena; C.S. Pandey; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2019. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2019.810.227

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Integrated nutrients significantly reduced days of germination to 7.00 versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest plant height, 31.12 cm at flowering stage, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest plant height, 33.08 cm at maturity stage, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest number of primary branches plant-1, 6.33, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest days to 50% germination, 38.66, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest number of plants bed-1, 66.00, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest pod length, 15.06 cm, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest pod width, 0.90 cm, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest number of pods plant-1, 38.66, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest average pod weight, 5.79 g, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest fresh pod yield bed-1, 15.04 kg, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest fresh pod yield hectare-1, 37.60 t, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest dry matter content, 9.67%, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest protein content, 6.76%, versus control.
Recommendation The authors recommend integrated organic and inorganic nutrient sources to improve growth, yield and quality.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrients produced the highest fresh pod yield bed-1, 15.04 kg, versus control.

Taxon: French BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment: 100% RDF + Vermicompost + FYMe0
Outcome: fresh pod yield bed-1e1
Direction: higheste2
Value: 15.04 kge1
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

t0
“French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–108

e0
“application of 100% RDF + Vermicompost + FYM significantly decrease the days of germination (7.00), growth, yield and quality increased significantly over control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–814

e1
“fresh pod yield bed-1 (15.04 kg)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1181

e2
“highest plant height”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–839

Title

Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth, Yield and Quality of French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) c.v. Pant Anupama under Valley Conditions of Dehradun

Chandan Kumar; J.K. Meena; C.S. Pandey; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2019. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2019.810.227

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Integrated nutrients significantly reduced days of germination to 7.00 versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest plant height, 31.12 cm at flowering stage, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest plant height, 33.08 cm at maturity stage, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest number of primary branches plant-1, 6.33, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest days to 50% germination, 38.66, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest number of plants bed-1, 66.00, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest pod length, 15.06 cm, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest pod width, 0.90 cm, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest number of pods plant-1, 38.66, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest average pod weight, 5.79 g, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest fresh pod yield plant-1, 227.99 g, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest fresh pod yield hectare-1, 37.60 t, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest dry matter content, 9.67%, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest protein content, 6.76%, versus control.
Recommendation The authors recommend integrated organic and inorganic nutrient sources to improve growth, yield and quality.

Influence of bio-humus on soil fertility, productivity and environmental safety of spring wheat grain 15

Show all 15 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-humus increased wheat yield by 10.2 hwt ha-1.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: bio humuse0
Outcome: wheat yielde0
Direction: increasee0
Value: 10.2 hwt ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The introduction of bio humus in the tilth top soil before sowing and during tillering of spring wheat contributed to the increase in humus composition by 1.88 times, the change in acidity to pH = 6.9–7.0, reduction of lead and cadmium concentrations in 1.63 and 1.20 times against the background of increased zinc and cobalt levels by 15.62% and 7.98%; increase of field germination of spring wheat from 75.0 ± 0.4 to 8…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1932

Title

Influence of bio-humus on soil fertility, productivity and environmental safety of spring wheat grain

Muhamedyarova, L.G.; Derkho, M.A.; Meshcheriakova, G.V.; et al. Eesti Maaülikool. EMU Dspace 2020. doi:10.15159/ar.20.152

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observation The study soil had low humus content of 4.58–4.60%.
Observation The study soil had a weak acid reaction at pH 6.1–6.5.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil humus composition 1.88-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus changed soil acidity to pH 6.9–7.0.
Intervention effect Bio-humus reduced soil lead concentration 1.63-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus reduced soil cadmium concentration 1.20-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil zinc level by 15.62%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil cobalt level by 7.98%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased spring wheat field germination from 75.0 ± 0.4 to 82.0 ± 0.9%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased developed harvestable stems per square metre by 10.15%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased productive tilling capacity by 8.33%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased spikes per ear by 20%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased grain per ear by 7.69%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased thousand-grain mass by 16.12%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus decreased spring wheat grain lead concentration by 14%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus decreased spring wheat grain cadmium concentration by 16%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-humus decreased spring wheat grain lead concentration by 14%.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: bio humuse0
Outcome: spring wheat grain concentration of leade0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 14.00e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The introduction of bio humus in the tilth top soil before sowing and during tillering of spring wheat contributed to the increase in humus composition by 1.88 times, the change in acidity to pH = 6.9–7.0, reduction of lead and cadmium concentrations in 1.63 and 1.20 times against the background of increased zinc and cobalt levels by 15.62% and 7.98%; increase of field germination of spring wheat from 75.0 ± 0.4 to 8…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1932

Title

Influence of bio-humus on soil fertility, productivity and environmental safety of spring wheat grain

Muhamedyarova, L.G.; Derkho, M.A.; Meshcheriakova, G.V.; et al. Eesti Maaülikool. EMU Dspace 2020. doi:10.15159/ar.20.152

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observation The study soil had low humus content of 4.58–4.60%.
Observation The study soil had a weak acid reaction at pH 6.1–6.5.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil humus composition 1.88-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus changed soil acidity to pH 6.9–7.0.
Intervention effect Bio-humus reduced soil lead concentration 1.63-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus reduced soil cadmium concentration 1.20-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil zinc level by 15.62%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil cobalt level by 7.98%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased spring wheat field germination from 75.0 ± 0.4 to 82.0 ± 0.9%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased developed harvestable stems per square metre by 10.15%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased productive tilling capacity by 8.33%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased spikes per ear by 20%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased grain per ear by 7.69%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased thousand-grain mass by 16.12%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased wheat yield by 10.2 hwt ha-1.
Intervention effect Bio-humus decreased spring wheat grain cadmium concentration by 16%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-humus decreased spring wheat grain cadmium concentration by 16%.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: bio humuse0
Outcome: spring wheat grain concentration of lead and cadmiume0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 16.00%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The introduction of bio humus in the tilth top soil before sowing and during tillering of spring wheat contributed to the increase in humus composition by 1.88 times, the change in acidity to pH = 6.9–7.0, reduction of lead and cadmium concentrations in 1.63 and 1.20 times against the background of increased zinc and cobalt levels by 15.62% and 7.98%; increase of field germination of spring wheat from 75.0 ± 0.4 to 8…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1932

Title

Influence of bio-humus on soil fertility, productivity and environmental safety of spring wheat grain

Muhamedyarova, L.G.; Derkho, M.A.; Meshcheriakova, G.V.; et al. Eesti Maaülikool. EMU Dspace 2020. doi:10.15159/ar.20.152

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observation The study soil had low humus content of 4.58–4.60%.
Observation The study soil had a weak acid reaction at pH 6.1–6.5.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil humus composition 1.88-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus changed soil acidity to pH 6.9–7.0.
Intervention effect Bio-humus reduced soil lead concentration 1.63-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus reduced soil cadmium concentration 1.20-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil zinc level by 15.62%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil cobalt level by 7.98%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased spring wheat field germination from 75.0 ± 0.4 to 82.0 ± 0.9%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased developed harvestable stems per square metre by 10.15%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased productive tilling capacity by 8.33%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased spikes per ear by 20%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased grain per ear by 7.69%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased thousand-grain mass by 16.12%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased wheat yield by 10.2 hwt ha-1.
Intervention effect Bio-humus decreased spring wheat grain lead concentration by 14%.

Formation of yield of hybrid corn Khorol SV depends on the application of chemical protective measures during hybridization 15

Show all 15 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maternal component disease prevalence decreased by 43.3–50% across castration forms.

Taxon: cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment: all forms of castratione0
Outcome: prevalencee0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: –43.3-50%e0
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

e0
“The decrease in the prevalence (–43.3-50%) and the development of the disease from the control occurred with all forms of castration”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1629

t0
“corn”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–33

Title

Formation of yield of hybrid corn Khorol SV depends on the application of chemical protective measures during hybridization

L.M. Holyk; O.S. Levchenko; S.F. Ivashchenko Agriculture and plant sciences theory and practice 2025. doi:10.54651/agri.2025.02.11

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Under double Acanto+ and Biogel treatment, maternal UkPg 103 C had lower vesicular smut prevalence with manual castration.
Intervention effect Maternal UkPg 103 C showed the reported vesicular smut development under manual castration.
Intervention effect Maternal UkPg 103 C showed the reported vesicular smut prevalence under mechanical castration.
Intervention effect Maternal UkPg 103 C showed the reported vesicular smut development under mechanical castration.
Intervention effect Maternal UkPg 103 C showed the reported vesicular smut prevalence under without castration castration.
Intervention effect Maternal UkPg 103 C showed the reported vesicular smut development under without castration castration.
Intervention effect Maternal disease development decreased by –2.43% with manual castration relative to control.
Intervention effect Maternal disease development decreased by –2.23% with mechanical castration relative to control.
Intervention effect Maternal disease development decreased by –0.7% with without castration castration relative to control.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV vesicular smut prevalence and development declined under manual castration.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV vesicular smut prevalence and development declined under mechanical castration.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV vesicular smut prevalence and development declined under without castration castration.
Observation Parent Uk 26 SV vesicular smut prevalence was lower by 40–50%.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV disease development decreased with manual castration.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV disease development decreased with mechanical castration.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV disease development decreased with without castration castration.
Intervention effect Mechanical castration increased seed yield by 1.3 t/ha or 10.8% relative to no castration.
Intervention effect Manual castration increased seed yield by 1.2 t/ha or 10.1% relative to no castration.
Intervention effect Two treatments with Akanto+ and Biogel around castration gave the largest yield increase, 1.99 t/ha or 15.9%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maternal disease development decreased by –2.43% with manual castration relative to control.

Taxon: cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment: manuale0
Outcome: development of the diseaset1
Direction: decreaset1
Value: –2.43%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“all forms of castration (manual –2.43%, mechanical –2.23%, without castration –0.7%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1606–1690

t0
“corn”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–33

t1
“The decrease in the prevalence (–43.3-50%) and the development of the disease from the control occurred”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1600

Title

Formation of yield of hybrid corn Khorol SV depends on the application of chemical protective measures during hybridization

L.M. Holyk; O.S. Levchenko; S.F. Ivashchenko Agriculture and plant sciences theory and practice 2025. doi:10.54651/agri.2025.02.11

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Under double Acanto+ and Biogel treatment, maternal UkPg 103 C had lower vesicular smut prevalence with manual castration.
Intervention effect Maternal UkPg 103 C showed the reported vesicular smut development under manual castration.
Intervention effect Maternal UkPg 103 C showed the reported vesicular smut prevalence under mechanical castration.
Intervention effect Maternal UkPg 103 C showed the reported vesicular smut development under mechanical castration.
Intervention effect Maternal UkPg 103 C showed the reported vesicular smut prevalence under without castration castration.
Intervention effect Maternal UkPg 103 C showed the reported vesicular smut development under without castration castration.
Intervention effect Maternal component disease prevalence decreased by 43.3–50% across castration forms.
Intervention effect Maternal disease development decreased by –2.23% with mechanical castration relative to control.
Intervention effect Maternal disease development decreased by –0.7% with without castration castration relative to control.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV vesicular smut prevalence and development declined under manual castration.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV vesicular smut prevalence and development declined under mechanical castration.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV vesicular smut prevalence and development declined under without castration castration.
Observation Parent Uk 26 SV vesicular smut prevalence was lower by 40–50%.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV disease development decreased with manual castration.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV disease development decreased with mechanical castration.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV disease development decreased with without castration castration.
Intervention effect Mechanical castration increased seed yield by 1.3 t/ha or 10.8% relative to no castration.
Intervention effect Manual castration increased seed yield by 1.2 t/ha or 10.1% relative to no castration.
Intervention effect Two treatments with Akanto+ and Biogel around castration gave the largest yield increase, 1.99 t/ha or 15.9%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maternal disease development decreased by –2.23% with mechanical castration relative to control.

Taxon: cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment: mechanicale0
Outcome: development of the diseaset1
Direction: decreaset1
Value: –2.23%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“all forms of castration (manual –2.43%, mechanical –2.23%, without castration –0.7%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1606–1690

t0
“corn”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–33

t1
“The decrease in the prevalence (–43.3-50%) and the development of the disease from the control occurred”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1600

Title

Formation of yield of hybrid corn Khorol SV depends on the application of chemical protective measures during hybridization

L.M. Holyk; O.S. Levchenko; S.F. Ivashchenko Agriculture and plant sciences theory and practice 2025. doi:10.54651/agri.2025.02.11

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Under double Acanto+ and Biogel treatment, maternal UkPg 103 C had lower vesicular smut prevalence with manual castration.
Intervention effect Maternal UkPg 103 C showed the reported vesicular smut development under manual castration.
Intervention effect Maternal UkPg 103 C showed the reported vesicular smut prevalence under mechanical castration.
Intervention effect Maternal UkPg 103 C showed the reported vesicular smut development under mechanical castration.
Intervention effect Maternal UkPg 103 C showed the reported vesicular smut prevalence under without castration castration.
Intervention effect Maternal UkPg 103 C showed the reported vesicular smut development under without castration castration.
Intervention effect Maternal component disease prevalence decreased by 43.3–50% across castration forms.
Intervention effect Maternal disease development decreased by –2.43% with manual castration relative to control.
Intervention effect Maternal disease development decreased by –0.7% with without castration castration relative to control.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV vesicular smut prevalence and development declined under manual castration.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV vesicular smut prevalence and development declined under mechanical castration.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV vesicular smut prevalence and development declined under without castration castration.
Observation Parent Uk 26 SV vesicular smut prevalence was lower by 40–50%.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV disease development decreased with manual castration.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV disease development decreased with mechanical castration.
Intervention effect Parent Uk 26 SV disease development decreased with without castration castration.
Intervention effect Mechanical castration increased seed yield by 1.3 t/ha or 10.8% relative to no castration.
Intervention effect Manual castration increased seed yield by 1.2 t/ha or 10.1% relative to no castration.
Intervention effect Two treatments with Akanto+ and Biogel around castration gave the largest yield increase, 1.99 t/ha or 15.9%.

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PRODUCTION FACTORS ON PRODUCTIVITY, NPK UPTAKE AND QUALITY OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.) 14

Show all 14 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control grain yield was 48.0% below the full package.

Taxon: pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment: controle0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 48.0e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0
“caused a decrease in grain yield by 32.8, 12.2, 7.7, 16.7, 30.1, 20.2 and 48.0 (control), per cent”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1030

t0
“pearl millet”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–94

Title

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PRODUCTION FACTORS ON PRODUCTIVITY, NPK UPTAKE AND QUALITY OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.)

Arun Kumar; Anil Kumar; L. K. Midha; et al. 2015

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Omitting recommended fertilizer reduced grain yield 32.8% versus the full package.
Intervention effect Omitting ZnSO4 reduced grain yield 12.2%.
Intervention effect Omitting biomix reduced grain yield 7.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting thinning and gap filling reduced grain yield 16.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting weeding and hoeing reduced grain yield 30.1%.
Intervention effect Omitting irrigation reduced grain yield 20.2%.
Intervention effect Omitting fertilizer reduced stover yield 22.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting ZnSO4 reduced stover yield 7.9%.
Intervention effect Omitting biomix reduced stover yield 4.0%.
Intervention effect Omitting thinning reduced stover yield 10.0%.
Intervention effect Omitting weeding reduced stover yield 18.9%.
Intervention effect Omitting irrigation reduced stover yield 16.0%.
Intervention effect Control stover yield was 32.2% below the full package.
Intervention effect Full package significantly increased N, P, K and protein contents and uptake in grain and stover.
Intervention effect Grain nitrogen content rose from 1.66% under control to 1.84% under T1.
Intervention effect Grain phosphorus content rose from 0.24% under control to 0.31% under T1.
Intervention effect Grain potassium content was highest under T1 at 0.60% versus 0.53% under T8.
Observation Full package yielded highest total N, P and K uptake at 129.78, 26.47 and 308.77 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Grain protein content increased from 10.4% under control to 11.5% under T1.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting ZnSO4 reduced stover yield 7.9%.

Taxon: pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Outcome: stover yielde0
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 7.9e0
Comparator: T 1 (FPP)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleTreatmentSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0
“stover yield by 22.7, 7.9, 4.0, 10.0, 18.9, 16.0 and 32.2 per cent (control) than T 1 (FPP)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1126

t0
“pearl millet”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–94

e1
“caused a decrease in grain yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–964

Title

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PRODUCTION FACTORS ON PRODUCTIVITY, NPK UPTAKE AND QUALITY OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.)

Arun Kumar; Anil Kumar; L. K. Midha; et al. 2015

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Omitting recommended fertilizer reduced grain yield 32.8% versus the full package.
Intervention effect Omitting ZnSO4 reduced grain yield 12.2%.
Intervention effect Omitting biomix reduced grain yield 7.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting thinning and gap filling reduced grain yield 16.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting weeding and hoeing reduced grain yield 30.1%.
Intervention effect Omitting irrigation reduced grain yield 20.2%.
Intervention effect Control grain yield was 48.0% below the full package.
Intervention effect Omitting fertilizer reduced stover yield 22.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting biomix reduced stover yield 4.0%.
Intervention effect Omitting thinning reduced stover yield 10.0%.
Intervention effect Omitting weeding reduced stover yield 18.9%.
Intervention effect Omitting irrigation reduced stover yield 16.0%.
Intervention effect Control stover yield was 32.2% below the full package.
Intervention effect Full package significantly increased N, P, K and protein contents and uptake in grain and stover.
Intervention effect Grain nitrogen content rose from 1.66% under control to 1.84% under T1.
Intervention effect Grain phosphorus content rose from 0.24% under control to 0.31% under T1.
Intervention effect Grain potassium content was highest under T1 at 0.60% versus 0.53% under T8.
Observation Full package yielded highest total N, P and K uptake at 129.78, 26.47 and 308.77 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Grain protein content increased from 10.4% under control to 11.5% under T1.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting biomix reduced stover yield 4.0%.

Taxon: pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Outcome: stover yielde0
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 4.0e0
Comparator: T 1 (FPP)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleTreatmentSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0
“stover yield by 22.7, 7.9, 4.0, 10.0, 18.9, 16.0 and 32.2 per cent (control) than T 1 (FPP)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1126

t0
“pearl millet”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–94

e1
“caused a decrease in grain yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–964

Title

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PRODUCTION FACTORS ON PRODUCTIVITY, NPK UPTAKE AND QUALITY OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.)

Arun Kumar; Anil Kumar; L. K. Midha; et al. 2015

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Omitting recommended fertilizer reduced grain yield 32.8% versus the full package.
Intervention effect Omitting ZnSO4 reduced grain yield 12.2%.
Intervention effect Omitting biomix reduced grain yield 7.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting thinning and gap filling reduced grain yield 16.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting weeding and hoeing reduced grain yield 30.1%.
Intervention effect Omitting irrigation reduced grain yield 20.2%.
Intervention effect Control grain yield was 48.0% below the full package.
Intervention effect Omitting fertilizer reduced stover yield 22.7%.
Intervention effect Omitting ZnSO4 reduced stover yield 7.9%.
Intervention effect Omitting thinning reduced stover yield 10.0%.
Intervention effect Omitting weeding reduced stover yield 18.9%.
Intervention effect Omitting irrigation reduced stover yield 16.0%.
Intervention effect Control stover yield was 32.2% below the full package.
Intervention effect Full package significantly increased N, P, K and protein contents and uptake in grain and stover.
Intervention effect Grain nitrogen content rose from 1.66% under control to 1.84% under T1.
Intervention effect Grain phosphorus content rose from 0.24% under control to 0.31% under T1.
Intervention effect Grain potassium content was highest under T1 at 0.60% versus 0.53% under T8.
Observation Full package yielded highest total N, P and K uptake at 129.78, 26.47 and 308.77 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Grain protein content increased from 10.4% under control to 11.5% under T1.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

ACC-Deaminase, Phosphate-Solubilizing Pseudomonas fluorescens Increase Phosphorus and Decrease Cadmium Concentration to Enhance Wheat Yield 20

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system 20

ESTIMATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN 18

Effects of Subsoiling at Jointing Stage on Dry Matter Production and Photosynthesis of Summer Maize 15

Effects of integrated fertilization and tillage technologies on cassava yield and physical and chemical properties of soil 15

Mitigation of salinity induced effects using brassinolide in clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.) 15

Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth, Yield and Quality of French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) c.v. Pant Anupama under Valley Conditions of Dehradun 15

Influence of bio-humus on soil fertility, productivity and environmental safety of spring wheat grain 15

Formation of yield of hybrid corn Khorol SV depends on the application of chemical protective measures during hybridization 15

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PRODUCTION FACTORS ON PRODUCTIVITY, NPK UPTAKE AND QUALITY OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.) 14