View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Organism groups follow NCBI Taxonomy: the spellings of one organism are merged, a claim naming several organisms sits in each group, and claims whose value names no organism are under “not stated”.
not stated 470 Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
TBRV caused a significant yield decrease .
TaxonMerlot and Cabernet franc t0 Verbatim
e0 “The major impact of TBRV was a significant yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1655–1712 t0 “Merlot and Cabernet franc ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–98 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
TBRV caused a significant yield decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “The major impact of TBRV was a significant yield decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1643–1701 e1 “The major impact of TBRV was a significant yield decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1643–1701 t0 “Quantitative and qualitative impact of Tomato Black Ring Virus (TBRV) on Merlot and Cabernet franc ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The disease led to a significant yield decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “leads to a significant decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1041 t1 “cherry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 e2 “virulent bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens Conn. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–229 e3 “the incubation period of the disease begins ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–743 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease was associated with lower grain weight.
ComparatorYield decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Yield decrease was associated to a significant reduction in the number of grains per spike and in grain weight. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–425 t0 “different wheat varieties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–56 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease was associated with fewer grains per spike.
Outcomenumber of grains per spike e0 ComparatorYield decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Yield decrease was associated to a significant reduction in the number of grains per spike and in grain weight. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–425 t0 “different wheat varieties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–56 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Uninoculated resistant lines had a small but significant yield decrease relative to susceptible lines.
Materialresistant lines e0 Comparatorsusceptible lines e0 Verbatim
e0 “A small but significant decrease in yield was observed for noninoculated resistant lines in contrast to susceptible lines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1174 t0 “Spring Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in kernels per ear was associated with the decrease in grain yield (r2 = 0.88, P < 0.001).
Verbatim
t0 “Differential responses of maize yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–37 e4 “The decrease in grain yield was largely caused by the decrease in kernels per ear (r2 = 0.88, P < 0.001) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1013 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Removal of panicles with four leaves caused an even more significant decrease in yield .
Treatmentremoval of panicles with four leaves e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “seed maize inbred lines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–38 e0 “an even more significant decrease in yield was determined with treatment removal of panicles with four leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1346 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease was more significant when weed was in rows of maize, in both seasons.
Treatmentweed in rows of maize e3 Qualifierin both seasons e3 Verbatim
e3 “Yield was significantly affected by the weed position in both seasons and the decrease was more significant in variants with weed in rows of maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–977 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Delayed sowing led to a slight initial yield undulation, then a decrease in yield , with a significant difference.
Treatmentdelayed sowing e1 Directionbegan to decrease e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The kind of rice Wanxian 98 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 e1 “The results indicated that delayed sowing would lead to slightly undulated yield firstly, and then began to decrease and the difference was significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–301 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect author interpretation original result positive significant (as stated) simulated Claim · model-written summary
Proper nutrient management can significantly mitigate the overall decrease in rice yield under future climatic conditions
Treatmentproper nutrient management e1 Outcomeoverall decrease in yield under future climatic conditions e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “The overall decrease in yield under future climatic conditions can be mitigated significantly by proper nutrient management and altering planting dates ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1168 e2 “rice production in Northeast Thailand ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–245 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect author interpretation original result positive significant (as stated) simulated Claim · model-written summary
Altering planting dates can significantly mitigate the overall decrease in rice yield under future climatic conditions
Treatmentaltering planting dates e1 Outcomeoverall decrease in yield under future climatic conditions e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “The overall decrease in yield under future climatic conditions can be mitigated significantly by proper nutrient management and altering planting dates ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1168 e2 “rice production in Northeast Thailand ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–245 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
UA4805 showed a significant yield decrease in 2023 due to stink bug damage.
Interactorstink bug e1 pest Verbatim
e0 “A new soybean cultivar ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 e1 “a significant yield decrease in ‘UA4805’ in 2023 due to stink bug damage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–664 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Planting a portfolio of soybean varieties can decrease soybean yield variability in Arkansas.
Treatmentplanting a portfolio of soybean varieties e1 Outcomeyield variability e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “The results showed that there are significant advantages in planting a portfolio of soybean varieties that can enhance profits and decrease yield variability for soybean producers in Arkansas ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–843 Other claims from this paper (1) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The linear pH component showed a significant yield decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “The linear component of pH treatment differences showed a highly significant decrease in yield (p < 0.001) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–632 e1 “Seed yield s were determined from field‐grown soybeans ( Glycine max L .) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–207 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Climate change was associated with a significant average cotton yield efficiency decrease of 515 kg/ha.
Treatmentclimate change e1 Outcomeyield efficiency e0 Verbatim
t0 “Cotton Production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–45 e0 “on the yield efficiency with an average decrease of 515 kg/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–884 e1 “climate change has a significant negative impact at 1% level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–744 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing nutsedge density was associated with a significant linear decrease in seed cotton yield
TreatmentIncreasing nutsedge density e0 Outcomeseed cotton yield e0 Verbatim
t0 “yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus ) density on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–104 e0 “Increasing nutsedge density caused a significant linear decrease in seed cotton yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–315 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
A combined analysis found that 20 to 30% terminal bud destruction was required to produce a significant decrease in total yield in cotton.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Larvae on Cotton Plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–64 e4 “20 to 30% TBD was required to produce a significant decrease in total yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–687 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Treatment with 150 mM NaCl led to a significant decrease in tomato yield .
Verbatim
t0 “tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–134 e0 “plants treated with 150Mm NaCl also produced much smaller fruits than control leading to significant decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1159 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
High ambient ozone caused a significant decrease in tomato fruit size over time.
TreatmentHigh ambient ozone e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Reduction of Tomato Fruit Size and Yield by Ozone1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 e2 “High ambient ozone depressed production and caused a significant decrease in fruit size over time ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–558 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation author interpretation original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The authors concluded the heat-induced changes could significantly decrease economic benefit.
Verbatim
e0 “All of these could induce significant decrease of economy benefit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1089 t0 “Tomato in Greenhouse ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–112 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower precipitation was associated with a decrease in oil yield .
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in the amount of precipitation between research years caused a significant decrease in the plant height (16.57%), head diameter (18.90%), 1000 seed weight (20.00%), oil yield (29.70%) and seed yield (30.59%) of cultivars. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1089 t0 “Sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower precipitation was associated with a decrease in seed yield .
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in the amount of precipitation between research years caused a significant decrease in the plant height (16.57%), head diameter (18.90%), 1000 seed weight (20.00%), oil yield (29.70%) and seed yield (30.59%) of cultivars. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1089 t0 “Sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower precipitation was associated with a decrease in plant height.
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in the amount of precipitation between research years caused a significant decrease in the plant height (16.57%), head diameter (18.90%), 1000 seed weight (20.00%), oil yield (29.70%) and seed yield (30.59%) of cultivars. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1089 t0 “Sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress significantly decrease d marketable potato yield .
Outcomemarketable yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Exposing potato plants to water stress caused a significant decrease in marketable yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1234 t0 “POTATO ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–128 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) simulated Claim · model-written summary
Climate and phenology changes significantly decrease d potato yield at six other stations.
Settingother 6 meteorological stations e0 Verbatim
e0 “a significant decrease in other 6 meteorological stations. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1493 t0 “Potato Growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–63 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought significantly decrease d potato tuber yield .
TreatmentDrought stress e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Drought stress caused a significant decrease in tuber yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–720 t0 “Potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Economic yield significantly decrease d by four weeks after heavy mite infestation.
Treatmentheavy mite infestations e0 Qualifieras early as 4 wk e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The economic yield of cucumber began to significantly decrease as early as 4 wk after heavy mite infestations. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–951 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cucumber economic yield significantly decrease d as early as four weeks after heavy mite infestation.
Treatmentheavy mite infestations e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The economic yield of cucumber began to significantly decrease as early as 4 wk after heavy mite infestations. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–951 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in infection ratio from NPK and Urea additions was associated with a yield elevation to 4.8 t/d in the first addition.
Treatment( NPK ) and ( Urea ) additions e1 Qualifierfor once and twice additions, respectively e1 Verbatim
e0 “infection ratio of cucumber with root rot caused by the fungus (Pythium aphanidermatium) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–263 e1 “a significant effect was found for ( NPK ) and ( Urea ) additions interaction in reducing the infection ratios which were ( 28 and 16 % ) for once and twice additions, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1056 e2 “The decrease in infection ratio led to elevate yield significantly ( 4.8 and 6.5 t/d , respectively ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1160 Other claims from this paper (13) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.