View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Organism groups follow NCBI Taxonomy: the spellings of one organism are merged, a claim naming several organisms sits in each group, and claims whose value names no organism are under “not stated”.
not stated 3366 Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
KCl tended to decrease yield in all cultivars.
Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In KCl treatment yield tended to decrease in all cultivars. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1030 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Smoke exposure can decrease vineyard yield .
Verbatim
e0 “decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1167 t0 “vineyards and grapes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–91 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield tended to decrease with later planting dates.
later planting dates e0 Not reported Taxon Setting
Verbatim
e0 “yield tended to decrease with later planting dates ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–63 t0 “Short Staple Planting Dates ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–41 Other claims from this paper (6) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in growth ultimately caused a decrease in wheat yield .
This decrease in growth e5 Verbatim
t0 “Wheat Germplasm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–29 e5 “This decrease in growth ultimately caused a decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–735 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Wheat yield is projected to decrease across locations.
Verbatim
e0 “wheat yield would decrease across locations. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1291 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Cultivars with the largest yield had the largest yield decrease from waterlogging.
Cultivars with the largest yield e0 largest decrease e0 Verbatim
t0 “UK wheat cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–48 e0 “Cultivars with the largest yield suffered the largest decrease due to waterlogging ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1176 Other claims from this paper (10) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decrease at the tillering stage is mainly caused by a decrease in biological yield .
tillering stage e4 decrease in the yield of the rice e4 decrease in its biological yield e4 Verbatim
e4 “The decrease in the yield of the rice at tillering stage is maily caused by the decrease in its biological yield while that at ear primordial stage is due to the decrease in its harvest index(HI) ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 576–773 Other claims from this paper (5) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decrease at the ear primordial stage is due to a decrease in harvest index.
ear primordial stage e4 decrease in the yield of the rice e4 decrease in its harvest index(HI) e4 Verbatim
e4 “The decrease in the yield of the rice at tillering stage is maily caused by the decrease in its biological yield while that at ear primordial stage is due to the decrease in its harvest index(HI) ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 576–773 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Late-rice yield tended to decrease with time compared with early-rice yield .
early-rice yield e0 Not reported Treatment
Verbatim
t0 “Rice Field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 e0 “late-rice yield tended to decrease , compared with early-rice yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–440 Other claims from this paper (8) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in kernels per ear largely caused the decrease in maize grain yield .
decrease in grain yield e4 largely caused by the decrease in kernels per ear e4 Verbatim
t0 “Differential responses of maize yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–37 e4 “The decrease in grain yield was largely caused by the decrease in kernels per ear (r2 = 0.88, P < 0.001) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1013 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource author interpretation original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Isareg was judged appropriate for estimating grain yield decrease .
appropriate to estimate the grain yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “The Isareg model is appropriate to estimate the grain yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1028 t0 “WATER DEFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE GRAIN YIELD DECREASE IN THE CATARINENSE FAR WEST ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
The Isareg model estimated average maize grain yield decrease of 25.1%.
Verbatim
e0 “The model estimated an average grain yield decrease of 25.1%. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–755 t0 “WATER DEFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE GRAIN YIELD DECREASE IN THE CATARINENSE FAR WEST ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A 58% population decrease caused only a 12% soybean yield decrease .
58% population decrease e0 164 000 plants ha −l e0 Verbatim
e0 “A 58% population decrease from 164 000 plants ha −l resulted in a yield decrease of only 12% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–972 e1 “Soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Glyphosate formulation did not interact with yield decrease .
formulation interaction with yield decrease e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “There was not found any formulation interaction with yield decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1313 e1 “glyphosate-tolerant soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–659 Other claims from this paper (1) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in redistributed seed N correlated strongly with increased yield .
Verbatim
t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–117 e0 “this decrease strongly correlated with increased yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1218 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Cluster pruning did not decrease total yield across cultivars.
unpruned control e0 Verbatim
e0 “There was no decrease in total yield , across all cultivars, between treatments and the unpruned control. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1976–2080 t0 “Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing substrate volume per plant by one third did not considerably decrease tomato yield .
Reduction of substrate volume per plant by 1/3 e0 without considerable yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Reduction of substrate volume per plant by 1/3 without considerable yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–82 t0 “TOMATO YIELD ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 Other claims from this paper (2) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Neang Tamm had minimal yield decrease at high temperature.
Verbatim
e0 “yield decrease under high temperature condition was minimal ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1096 t0 “Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 t1 “Although the local genotype, Neang Tamm, had lower yield under optimal conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–928 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
cotton yield decrease decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “For cotton, a rising water table from 2–3 m to 1–2 m and less than 1 m gave a yield decrease of about 11 and 60% respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–943 e1 “Fordwah Eastern Sadiqia South (FESS) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–207 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
cotton yield decrease decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “For cotton, a rising water table from 2–3 m to 1–2 m and less than 1 m gave a yield decrease of about 11 and 60% respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–943 e1 “Fordwah Eastern Sadiqia South (FESS) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–207 Other claims from this paper (14) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Seed cotton yield tended to decrease as weed density increased.
Goosegrass t1 weed Seed cotton yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “Seed cotton yield tended to decrease with the increase in weed density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–449 t0 “cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 t1 “Goosegrass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Early ethephon application caused less yield decrease than later application.
Early application e0 less yield decrease e0 later timings e0 Verbatim
e0 “Early application showed less yield decrease than later timings. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1185 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–51 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Larger fertilizer applications can decrease plant yield in seasons of poor rainfall.
larger applications e0 seasons of poor rainfall e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “larger applications can even decrease the plant yield in seasons of poor rainfall ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2217–2298 e1 “corn acreage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2044–2056 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In 2023 there was a decrease in yield compared with near-normal precipitation in 2021.
Verbatim
e1 “there was a decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1322 t0 “corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–39 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Combined drought and heat gave the largest tuber yield decrease .
largest decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The largest decrease was recorded in the case of applying both stresses simultaneously ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–998 t0 “potato plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–40 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Captafol did not decrease potato yield .
did not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The most effective chemical was captafol, which was as effective as quintozene and, unlike quintozene, did not decrease yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–692 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The average yield decrease rate was -13.9% in the 1980s.
average yield decrease rate e0 Verbatim
e0 “The average yield decrease rate in the 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s was -13.9%, -15.4%, -9.1%, and -7.3%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1340 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 Other claims from this paper (14) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At high populations, the decrease in barley grain yield was accompanied by a comparable decrease in grains per unit area.
high populations e1 number of grains per unit area e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 e1 “a decrease in grain yield at high populations was associated with a comparable decrease in the number of grains per unit area ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1397 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The largest barley monoculture yield decrease occurred in years three to five.
3rd to 5th year e0 Verbatim
e0 “Experiments have further shown that the biggest yield decrease occurs in the 3rd to 5th year of barley monoculture. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1578 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Delayed autumn ploughing did not decrease grain yield .
delayed autumn ploughing e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Because delayed autumn ploughing did not decrease the grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–967 e1 “grain yield of spring barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–656 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivum
Oryza sativa
Zea mays
Glycine max
Solanum lycopersicum
Gossypium hirsutum
Zea mays subsp. mays
Solanum tuberosum.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Hordeum vulgare