View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Organism groups follow NCBI Taxonomy: the spellings of one organism are merged, a claim naming several organisms sits in each group, and claims whose value names no organism are under “not stated”.
Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Abiotic assaults decrease plant yield .
Treatmentabiotic assaults e0 Verbatim
e0 “Plants are exposed continuously in their natural environment to diverse abiotic assaults throughout life, which leads to a decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–140 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The other mixture component usually has lower yield than its monoculture.
Comparatortheir own monoculture e0 Verbatim
e0 “Plants of the other component usually show a decrease , relative to their own monoculture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–237 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At 25 lb P/acre, flooded field grain yield was 32 bu/acre lower than nonflooded field yield .
Comparatornonflooded field e0 Verbatim
e0 “32 bu/acre yield decrease in the flooded field, compared with the nonflooded field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7306–7388 e1 “plants with the lowest rate of 25 lb P/acre ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7219–7262 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
The combined 10% rainfall decrease and 2°C temperature increase gives a total yield reduction of 20%.
TreatmentRainfall decrease of 10% from present coupled with 2°C increase in temperature e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “pigeonpea crop at Gulbarga ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–68 e2 “Rainfall decrease of 10% from present coupled with 2°C increase in temperature could reduce yield s further by 4% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1149 e3 “making the total reduction to be at 20% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1190 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Low rainfall moisture stress decrease d dry matter yield in 2007.
TreatmentMoisture stress from low rainfall e0 Verbatim
e0 “Moisture stress from low rainfall decrease DM yield in 2007 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–762 t0 “pigeon pea (T3) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–376 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Available soil nitrogen after pigeonpea harvest decrease d with decrease in row spacing.
Treatmentdecrease in row spacing e6 Outcomeavailable nitrogen content in soil e6 Verbatim
e6 “The available nitrogen content in soil after harvest of pigeonpea decrease d with decrease in row spacing from 150 x 90 cm (218.75 kg/ha) to 90 x 10 cm (202.04 kg/ha) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–961 t0 “Effect of planting geometry on the yield , nutrient availability and economics of pigeonpea genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Cocoa with cassava had a slight yield decrease .
Treatmentcocoa/cassava combination e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “cocoa/cassava combination where there was a slight decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1589 Other claims from this paper (7) Recommendation author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Excessive shade was concluded to decrease cocoa yield .
Treatmentexcessive shade e0 Verbatim
e0 “excessive shade decrease s yield of cocoa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1873–1913 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
For cocoa agroforestry adopters, a one-millimeter rainfall decrease reduced yield by 2.17 kg/ha.
Treatmentone-millimeter decrease in rainfall e0 Verbatim
e0 “A one-millimeter decrease in rainfall significantly reduces yield by 2.17 kg/ha for adopters and 2.84 kg/ha for non-adopters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1128 t0 “cocoa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In Rhizobium -treated cluster bean, 10,000 Meloidogyne javanica juveniles per kg soil were associated with a significant decrease in yield .
Treatment10,000 second stage juveniles/kg soil e1 Verbatim
e1 “In cluster bean, a significant decrease in yield was associated with 10,000 second stage juveniles/kg soil in Rhizobium -treated plants, whereas 1,000 juveniles decrease d the yield , fresh shoot weight and length significantly in untreated plants over the check ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–448 t0 “PATHOGENICITY OF MELOIDOGYNE JAVANICA IN MUNG AND CLUSTER BEANS AS AFFECTED BY RHIZOBIUM ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity significantly decrease d pod length, test weight and grain yield .
Outcomepod length, test weight, grain yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Salinity was found to decrease significantly the photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, relative water content, chlorophyll stability index, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, plant height, pod length, test weight, grain yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–798 t0 “cluster bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity significantly decrease d grain yield in clusterbean.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Salinity was found to decrease significantly the photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate (at flowering stage), stomatal conductance, relative water content, chlorophyll stability index, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, plant height, pod length, leaf area index, test weight, grain yield , biological yield , harvest index and K+ and Na+ content in grain ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–876 t0 “clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–101 Other claims from this paper (16) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Fruit yield tended to decrease as budding height increased.
Treatmentbudding height e2 Verbatim
e0 “orange ( Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–228 e1 “Fruit yield was highest from trees budded at 15 cm height above the ground ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–359 e2 “tended to decrease as budding height increased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–410 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
When N and P were applied together without K, a severe antagonism resulted, with a large yield decrease .
TreatmentN and P were applied together without K e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Valencia orange trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–92 e1 “When N and P were applied together without K, a severe antagonism resulted with large yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–798 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect Applied individually, N fertilizer gave a response of 6 per cent in Valencia orange. Intervention effect Applied individually, P fertilizer gave a response of 5 per cent in Valencia orange. Intervention effect Applied individually, K fertilizer gave a response of 23 per cent in Valencia orange. Intervention effect The total response to N, P and K applied simultaneously was 40 per cent, compared with 37 per cent predicted by sequential additivity and 34 per cent by simple addition. Intervention effect When N, P and K were applied together, the individual response to N was 8 in Valencia orange. Intervention effect When N, P and K were applied together, the individual response to P was 7 in Valencia orange. Intervention effect When N, P and K were applied together, the individual response to K was 26 in Valencia orange. Observation The interactions of K with P and of K with N were also sequentially additive. Intervention effect Adding K to the N plus P treatment resulted in a 69 per cent yield increase. Observation Potassium was a limiting factor only for N and P together, not for N or P individually. Recommendation The authors suggest an alternative procedure to DRIS analysis. Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in yield was attributed to fewer fruits being matured
Outcomedecrease in yield e4 Qualifierfewer fruits being matured e4 Verbatim
e0 “navel orange trees were grown in outdoor solution cultures for a period of 11 years to measure the effect of iron deficiency on fruit production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–157 e4 “The decrease in yield was due to fewer fruits being matured ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–734 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Ozone exposure decrease d economic yield .
Verbatim
e0 “Various degrees of decrease in leaf area, net photosynthesis rate, biomass and economic yield were observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–716 t0 “spinach ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–75 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Continued digestion inhibited saturated Hill reaction rates and decrease d quantum yield .
TreatmentContinued digestion e0 Outcomesaturated rates of Hill reaction activity and a decrease in quantum yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Continued digestion led to inhibition of saturated rates of Hill reaction activity and a decrease in quantum yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–224 t0 “spinach chloroplasts ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–33 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Variable fluorescence yield decrease d, reflecting lower photosystem II quantum yield .
Outcomevariable fluorescence yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “A decrease in variable fluorescence yield reflects a lowering of photosystem II quantum yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1121 e1 “intact spinach leaves with SO 2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–82 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Further decrease in plant spacing in broccoli caused an abrupt reduction in yield .
TreatmentFurther decrease in the space between plants e4 Directionabrupt reduction e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Plant spacing in broccoli ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 e4 “Further decrease in the space between plants results in an abrupt reduction in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–526 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
GA did not decrease yield .
Directionwithout decreasing e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Broccoli ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–106 e0 “without decreasing yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–967 e1 “GA elongated stem length ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–832 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The 100 mg·L-1 GA3 spray decrease d yield .
Treatment100 mg·L-1 treatment e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “100 mg·L-1 treatment could decrease the yield ,tight degree and quality of broccoli obviously ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–419 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Decreasing spacing did not decrease yield per plant in 1989.
TreatmentA decrease of in-row plant spacing e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A decrease of in-row plant spacing decrease d yield per plant in 1990, but not in 1989 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–646 t0 “Basil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The traditional method without growth stimulators led to a decrease in basil yield .
Treatmenttraditional crop protection method e0 Comparatorapplication of the growth stimulators e0 Verbatim
e0 “The traditional crop protection method used in the basil crop, without the application of the growth stimulators ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1533 e1 “This caused higher weed infestation of the crop and a decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1610–1681 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Decreasing spacing decrease d yield per plant in 1990.
TreatmentA decrease of in-row plant spacing e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A decrease of in-row plant spacing decrease d yield per plant in 1990, but not in 1989 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–646 t0 “Basil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Projected yield decrease s from 2040 to 2090 at an average rate of 10.19-14.17%.
Qualifierfrom 2040 to 2090 e0 Verbatim
e0 “Biomass and yield would also decrease gradually from 2040 to 2090 with an average rate of 7.60-11.70% and 10.19-14.17% respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–968 t0 “green gram ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–63 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress decrease d test weight and grain yield of green gram.
Outcometest weight and grain yield e1 Comparatornormal condition e0 Verbatim
e0 “physiology, growth and yield of green gram under normal condition till anthesis stage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–207 e1 “Water stress was found to decrease significantly in the respect of photosynthetic and transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, relative water content, chlorophyll stability index, leaf area, plant height, number of pods per plant, number of grains per pod, test weight and grain yield with a significant increase in leaf temperature ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–668 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Brassinolide decrease d leaf temperature of green gram under water stress.
Outcomeleaf temperature e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “physiology, growth and yield of green gram under normal condition till anthesis stage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–207 e3 “The effect of Brassinolide was found to increase in the value of these parameters significantly with a decrease in leaf temperature ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–867 Other claims from this paper (8) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in panicle number is the main reason for the yield reduction of japonica rice under TCB stress.
QualifierThe decrease in panicle number is the main reason t1 Verbatim
t1 “The decrease in panicle number is the main reason for the yield reduction of japonica rice caused by 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–130 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease did not differ among varieties.
Outcomerate of decrease e0 Directionnot observed difference e0 Verbatim
e0 “Therefore, rice yield , can be reduced in proportion to the shading density is apparent, the rate of decrease was not observed difference between varieties, when protected from light 70%, and decrease d to less than 50%. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2053–2271 t0 “japonica rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–103 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Decreasing mid-stage nitrogen share could increase japonica rice yield .
Treatmentdecrease the ratio of amount of nitrogen at MS e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “decrease the ratio of amount of nitrogen at MS was also can improve yield of japonica rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1444 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.