View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Organism groups follow NCBI Taxonomy: the spellings of one organism are merged, a claim naming several organisms sits in each group, and claims whose value names no organism are under “not stated”.
Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Maryot2 showed the highest seed yield decrease (21.51) under water deficit in the first season.
decrease in seed yield e1 in the first season e1 Verbatim
t0 “SOME FABA BEAN CULTIVARS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–72 e1 “Maryot2 cultivar recorded the highest decrease in seed yield (21.51) in the first season ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1529 Other claims from this paper (14) Association observed original result projected Claim · model-written summary
Yield of the Tumsa variety is projected to decrease by up to 24.19% under RCP 8.5 in mid-century.
Verbatim
t0 “faba bean (Vicia faba L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–68 e5 “The yield of Tumsa variety will decrease by up to 24.19% under RCP8.5 in mid-century ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1593 Other claims from this paper (12) Association author interpretation original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Rust severity greater than 5% during the critical stage would substantially decrease final yield .
Rust severity greater than 5% e6 Uromyces viciae‐fabae e0 pathogen during that critical stage e6 Verbatim
e0 “Epidemics of faba bean rust (Uromyces viciae‐fabae ) differing in duration and final severity were induced by a point inoculation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–128 e6 “Rust severity greater than 5% during that critical stage would substantially decrease final yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1109 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Hercules close relatives had no significant decrease in oat grain yield .
no significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The cultivar Hercules enhanced the test weight of its close relatives, with no significant decrease in grain yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1346 e1 “oat ( Avena saliva L.) genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–262 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Mogilev oats had a climate-induced yield decrease of 35–36%.
climate-induced e1 Verbatim
e0 “In Mogilev region, this decrease was lower: spring wheat – 17–30 %, spring barley – 22–33 %, oats – 35–36 %. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–732 e1 “most of them were characterized by a climate-induced decrease in their yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–448 Other claims from this paper (13) Association observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield enhancement coincided with a relative decrease in oat grain protein content of 11.3 to 12.4%.
Yield enhancement e0 protein content of oat grains e0 Verbatim
e0 “Yield enhancement was accompanied by a relative decrease of protein content of oat grains ranging from 11.3 to 12.4 % ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–955 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A 1 mm decrease in seasonal precipitation corresponded to a 0.736 kg/ha decrease in pea yield .
total precipitation for the growing season e0 Verbatim
e0 “The 1 mm decrease in the total precipitation for the growing season will lead to a decrease in pea yield s by an average of 0.736 kg/ha. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2051–2186 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Pod number per plant was reduced with water deficit and mainly accounted for the yield decrease .
pod number per plant e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease was mainly due to reduced pod number per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–818 t0 “pea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–15 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
With a decrease in tilling depth, the yield of peas and chickpeas decrease d: for plowing - by 0.32 and 0.35 t/ha
decrease in tilling depth e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “With a decrease in tilling depth, the yield of peas and chickpeas decrease d: for plowing - by 0.32 and 0.35 t/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–976 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect The highest yield of legumes was noted after plowing by 20-22 cm, so when cultivating peas, it was higher than after loosening to a similar depth, by 0.39 t/ha Intervention effect The highest yield of legumes was noted after plowing by 20-22 cm, so when cultivating peas, it was higher than after loosening to a similar depth, by 0.39 t/ha, chickpea - by 0.53 t/ha, compared with the option of alternating plowing and loosening in crop rotation Intervention effect With a decrease in tilling depth, the yield of peas and chickpeas decreased: for plowing - by 0.32 and 0.35 t/ha Intervention effect The lowest yield in the experiment was noted without basic tillage Observation The best results after plowing at 20-22 cm were due to the highest yield, as well as the highest mass of 1000 grains, the yield of fodder and grain units in this variant Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Fomesafen did not injure strawberry or decrease yield .
injure strawberry or decrease yield e2 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “provides PRE weed control in strawberry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–150 e2 “Fomesafen did not injure strawberry or decrease yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–830 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil-treated strawberry plants showed a decrease in yield in 2009.
strawberry yield e7 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e7 “Soil-treated strawberry plants, however, showed a decrease in leaf number in 2008 and in strawberry yield in 2009 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1609 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Selection for early yield would cost an 8% decrease in soluble solids, shown by a simulation.
Verbatim
e0 “The University of Florida strawberry ( Fragaria × ananassa ) breeding population ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–80 e1 “at the expense of an 8% decrease in soluble solids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1862–1912 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Se100 tended to decrease yield .
Se100 treatment e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The Se100 treatment had a tendency to decrease bulb size and yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–629 e1 “applied to onion ‘Hercules’ ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–267 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Beyond about 943 mm, onion biomass yield is projected to decrease with additional water application.
additional water application e3 Verbatim
e0 “effect of different irrigation depths on onion (Allium cepa L.) yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–234 e3 “beyond that, the biomass yield will decrease with additional water application ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1220 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Phoma terrestris did not decrease onion yield .
did not decrease e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “When onions were grown in organic field soil, the addition of P. terrestris increased average levels of pink root at harvest from 40% (control) to 52% (amended) in the greenhouse ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–435 e1 “yield did not decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–468 Other claims from this paper (1) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The in vitro decrease matched the decrease in vivo during auxin-induced growth acceleration.
yield threshold obtained in vivo ( Y ) e0 auxin‐induced growth acceleration e0 Verbatim
e0 “to the same extent as the decrease of the yield threshold obtained in vivo ( Y ) with auxin‐induced growth acceleration of hypocotyl segments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–647 t0 “cowpea hypocotyl ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–121 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Heat treatment completely inhibited the acidification-induced decrease in yield threshold.
Heat treatment e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Heat treatment of the glycerinated hollow cylinder completely inhibited the decrease in y with acidification ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–757 t0 “cowpea hypocotyl ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–121 Other claims from this paper (5) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in seed yield under stress was largely due to fewer pods and seeds per pod.
The decrease in seed yield e1 largely due to reductions in pods plant −1 and seeds pod −1 e1 Verbatim
e0 “three cowpea [ Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–189 e1 “The decrease in seed yield was largely due to reductions in pods plant −1 and seeds pod −1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1921–2011 Other claims from this paper (17) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Fruit growth tended to decrease over years, probably because of higher yield loads.
fruit growth to decrease over years e0 increased yield loads e0 Verbatim
e0 “The tendency for fruit growth to decrease over years was probably due to increased yield loads. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–765 t0 “apples ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–28 Other claims from this paper (14) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
ARD caused greater yield decrease at low temperature.
greater decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The occurrence of ARD caused a greater decrease in the yield of trees due to low temperature. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1348 e1 “replanted apple trees of the `Najdared` cultivar ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–380 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Living mulch did not decrease apple yield compared with herbicide fallow.
did not decrease e1 herbicide fallow e1 Verbatim
e0 “fruit of Malus domestica Borkh. cv. ‘Sampion’ ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 114–159 e1 “Compared to herbicide fallow, living mulch did not decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–372 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Varsha had a 13% yield decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “the minimum decrease in yield of 8 and 13% was recorded in BO-1 and Varsha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1241 t0 “okra ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–37 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
BO-1 had an 8% yield decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “the minimum decrease in yield of 8 and 13% was recorded in BO-1 and Varsha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1241 t0 “okra ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–37 Other claims from this paper (12) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The lower water use efficiency under high irrigation frequency resulted mainly from the decrease in fresh fruit yield .
high irrigation frequency e0 water use efficiency e0 decrease in fresh fruit yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “The reduction in water use efficiency under high irrigation frequency as compared to low irrigation frequency resulted primarily from decrease in fresh fruit yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1297 t0 “Okra ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–22 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Grapevine decline was accompanied by a decrease in fruit yield quality.
fruit yield quality e2 Verbatim
e2 “Syndromes of declined grapevine plants included growth retardant of shoot system and root-rot as well as decrease of grapevine fruit yield quality ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–307 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Phytoplasma infection was accompanied by a large final yield decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “The phytoplasma infection also stimulated significant reductions in mRWC of the symptomatic leaves, with a final large decrease in yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1498 t0 “grapevine (Vitis vinifera ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–130 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Rizoplan can be used without a significant decrease in biological efficiency and yield indicators.
biological efficiency and yield indicators e3 without a significant e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “GRAPEVINE RESISTANCE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–78 e3 “The possibility of using Rizoplan without a significant decrease in biological efficiency and yield indicators was established ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–661 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The evaluated herbicides did not decrease durum wheat yield .
herbicides evaluated e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “There was no decrease in durum wheat yield with the herbicides evaluated. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1294 Other claims from this paper (13) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in grain yield under water deficit was over expressed in durum wheat.
decrease in grain yield e0 over expressed e0 Verbatim
e0 “Generally, grain yield was higher in genotypes of bread wheat than that of durum wheat, but a decrease in grain yield was over expressed in durum wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1188 Other claims from this paper (14) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The no-till yield decrease was more pronounced in GAL than SMA.
Yield differences e2 more pronounced decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “with a more pronounced decrease in GAL than in SMA ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–896 e1 “a clay-loam (GAL) and a sandy-clay-loam soil (SMA) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–622 e2 “Yield differences ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–915 t0 “Durum Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–43 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Vicia faba
Avena sativa
Lathyrus oleraceus_single2.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Fragaria
Allium cepa_3-DLR-NW-jk.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Setophoma terrestris
Vigna unguiculata
Malus domestica.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Abelmoschus esculentus
Vitis
Candidatus Phytoplasma
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum