View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Organism groups follow NCBI Taxonomy: the spellings of one organism are merged, a claim naming several organisms sits in each group, and claims whose value names no organism are under “not stated”.
not stated 47 Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The polynomial model could not calculate a salinity yield decrease value.
Taxonvegetables, and ornamentals e1 Outcomecalculation of the salinity yield decrease (SYD) value is not possible e0 Comparatorpolynomial model e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The polynomial model has the drawback that calculation of the salinity yield decrease (SYD) value is not possible. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–790 e1 “various vegetables, and ornamentals were grown in a substrate system ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–163 Other claims from this paper (8) Method / resource observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
No nitrogen application decrease d simulated yield by 8%.
Treatmentno N is applied e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “8% yield decrease when no N is applied ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3036–3074 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
AquaCrop simulated well the decrease of silage maize biomass yield under drought, as happened in the field.
Comparatoras happened in the field e1 Verbatim
e1 “AquaCrop simulated well the decrease of the biomass yield (B- yield ) of silage maize in response to drought as happened in the field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–726 t0 “Silage Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Goodness of fit of relative yield decrease with mean CWSI was r 2 = 0.78 for the combined plantings.
Outcomerelative Y decrease with mean CWSI e5 Verbatim
t0 “Spring Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 e5 “for relative Y decrease with mean CWSI, r 2 = 0.78 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1467 Other claims from this paper (8) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Estimates from images before harvest showed only a slight decrease in performance compared with the statistic obtained just before harvest.
Directionslight decrease e1 Comparatorthe statistic obtained just before the harvest e1 Verbatim
t0 “Wheat Yield Estimates ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–88 e1 “only a slight decrease in performance is observed compared to the statistic obtained just before the harvest ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1450 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
A seedling infection index permitted estimates of subsequent yield decrease .
Value1.4 × (SH+LA+LL)+18 e0 Verbatim
e0 “Symptoms of seedling infection incorporated into an index of infection permit estimates to be made o eventual decrease s in yield by applying the formula DY = 1.4 × (SH+LA+LL)+18. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–859 t0 “varieties of wheat, oats and barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 43–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource author interpretation original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Isareg was judged appropriate for estimating grain yield decrease .
Outcomeappropriate to estimate the grain yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “The Isareg model is appropriate to estimate the grain yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1028 t0 “WATER DEFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE GRAIN YIELD DECREASE IN THE CATARINENSE FAR WEST ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
The 4M model predicted a considerable future decrease in maize yield safety.
Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “4M predicted a considerable decrease of maize yield s as well as yield safety for the future. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1025 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Isareg overestimated yield decrease when relative evapotranspiration exceeded 0.8.
Outcomeoverestimates its value e0 Qualifierrelative evapotranspiration is above 0.8 e0 Verbatim
e0 “however it overestimates its value when the relative evapotranspiration is above 0.8. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1115 t0 “WATER DEFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE GRAIN YIELD DECREASE IN THE CATARINENSE FAR WEST ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
At the warmest Brazilian location, simulated yield losses reached 38% under 3 °C warming.
Treatment+ 3 °C temperature rise e0 Verbatim
e0 “In our warmest location in Brazil, the models simulated a yield reduction ranging from a 38% decrease under + 3 °C temperature rise to no effect on yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1262 t0 “soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 4–11 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The reparameterized t-Student distribution decrease d the influence of discrepant values in soybean yield data.
Outcomeinfluence of these points e0 Qualifierdata with discrepant values e0 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “The reparameterized t-Student distribution is an alternative in studying data with discrepant values, showing the ability to decrease the influence of these points. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–955 t0 “SOYBEAN ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–30 Other claims from this paper (1) Method / resource observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Modeled UAN concentrations of 1, 3 and 12% corresponded to 5, 10 and 20% soybean yield reductions.
Verbatim
e0 “The predicted percent UAN concentration that caused a 5, 10, and 20% decrease in soybean yield was 1, 3, and 12%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1449 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect Glyphosate, 2,4-D and UAN caused no soybean injury. Intervention effect Adding UAN reduced resistant Canada fleabane control, particularly at higher rates. Method / resource At four weeks, modeled UAN concentrations of 12, 17, 25 and 52% corresponded to 5, 10, 20 and 50% reductions in fleabane control. Method / resource At eight weeks, modeled UAN concentrations of 10, 13, 18 and 33% corresponded to 5, 10, 20 and 50% reductions in fleabane control. Method / resource At eight weeks, modeled UAN concentrations of 36 and 73% corresponded to 5 and 10% increases in fleabane density. Method / resource At eight weeks, modeled UAN concentrations of 2, 4, 8 and 19% corresponded to 5, 10, 20 and 50% increases in fleabane biomass. Method / resource observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Field testing found a significant decrease in bird numbers in targeted areas.
Outcomenumber of birds in the targeted areas e0 Verbatim
e0 “the result of the prototype field-testing showed a significant effect in decreasing the number of birds in the targeted areas ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1407 e1 “Filipino rice farmers, resulting in losses in annual harvest yield . Farmers suffer the challenge of crop damage by birds ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 45–165 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Calculated dry matter yield agreed acceptably with experiments when stand closure and growth decline dates were known.
Qualifierprovided that the dates when a closed stand was obtained and when the growth rate started to decrease were known e0 Comparatorexperimental results e0 Verbatim
e0 “Calculated total DM yield s, grain yield s and grain:straw ratios were in acceptable agreement with the experimental results, provided that the dates when a closed stand was obtained and when the growth rate started to decrease were known ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–587 t0 “rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–31 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
P700 oxidation did not directly detect drought responsible for lower grain yield .
Outcomedetected by P700 oxidation e0 Directioncould not be directly detected e0 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “drought stress responsible for a decrease in grain yield s could not be directly detected by P700 oxidation in paddy-field-grown rice plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1128 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
EPIC projected a corn yield decrease under the coarse scenario.
Comparatorcoarse scenario e0 Not reported Outcome Value
Verbatim
e0 “EPIC simulated a decrease for the coarse scenario but no change for the fine scale scenario ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–659 t0 “for wheat and corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–79 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
The SDI models indicated a linear decline in relative yield with increasing wetness.
Directionlinear decrease e0 Comparatorincreasing wetness (SDI values) e0 Verbatim
e0 “The SDI models indicated a linear decrease in the relative yield with increasing wetness (SDI values) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–924 t0 “CORN ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 Other claims from this paper (9) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Adding APSIM variables reduced corn yield prediction RMSE by 7 to 20%.
Treatmentadding simulation crop model variables (APSIM) as input features to ML models e0 Outcomeyield prediction root mean squared error (RMSE) e0 Verbatim
e0 “adding simulation crop model variables (APSIM) as input features to ML models can decrease yield prediction root mean squared error (RMSE) from 7 to 20% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–799 t0 “Coupling machine learning and crop modeling improves crop yield prediction in the US Corn Belt ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
At harvest, inflorescence and bunch detection error fell slightly to 46%.
Organ / stageInflorescences and bunches e1 Directionslight decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “with a slight decrease at harvest (MA%E=46%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1546 e1 “Inflorescences and bunches showed the highest MA%E ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1446 t0 “Grapevine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Mortality rate was an earlier indicator of decline than yield loss.
Verbatim
e0 “mortality rate and the normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) indicators were shown to be earlier indicators of grapevine decline than yield loss ( yield achievement ratio, YAR) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1619 t0 “grapevine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 Other claims from this paper (9) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
NDVI was an earlier indicator of decline than yield loss.
Outcomenormalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) indicators e0 Verbatim
e0 “mortality rate and the normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) indicators were shown to be earlier indicators of grapevine decline than yield loss ( yield achievement ratio, YAR) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1619 t0 “grapevine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 Other claims from this paper (9) Method / resource observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
OCS predicted mean cooking time reduction of 9.3%.
Verbatim
e0 “Progeny were predicted by OCS to increase in mean GY by 12.4%, decrease in mean CKT by 9.3%, and increase in mean Fe and Zn content by 6.9 and 4.6%, respectively, with low achieved coancestry of 0.032. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1431 t0 “common beans ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 142–154 Other claims from this paper (13) Method / resource observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
OCS predicted mean grain yield gain of 12.4%.
Verbatim
e0 “Progeny were predicted by OCS to increase in mean GY by 12.4%, decrease in mean CKT by 9.3%, and increase in mean Fe and Zn content by 6.9 and 4.6%, respectively, with low achieved coancestry of 0.032. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1431 t0 “common beans ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 142–154 Other claims from this paper (13) Method / resource observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
OCS predicted mean iron content gain of 6.9%.
Outcomemean Fe and Zn content e0 Verbatim
e0 “Progeny were predicted by OCS to increase in mean GY by 12.4%, decrease in mean CKT by 9.3%, and increase in mean Fe and Zn content by 6.9 and 4.6%, respectively, with low achieved coancestry of 0.032. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1431 t0 “common beans ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 142–154 Other claims from this paper (13) Method / resource author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The FAO-based methodology used to assess the risk of cotton yield decrease was considered efficient after validation.
Outcomerisk of yield decrease e3 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “The objective of this work was to develop the zoning of the risk estimation of cotton yield reduction in the state of Mato Grosso, using the FAO method ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–366 e3 “Trough the validation of the obtained results, it can be considered that the methodology adopted in this work to verify the risk of yield decrease proved to be efficient ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–1033 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Regression analyses described the ozone and yield relationship.
Outcomemodels describing this relationship e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “regression analyses provided models describing this relationship ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1071 e1 “Stoneville 213 was sensitive to O 3 ‐induced yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1002 e2 “cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–399 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The asymmetric elastic support decrease d impurities by 8.8 %.
Directiondecrease inferred e2 Verbatim
t0 “cotton gin saw cylinders ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–115 e2 “Mechanical seed damage decrease d by 16 %, impurities by 8.8 %, and fiber yield increased by 1.2 % ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–792 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The model accurately predicted reduced cucumber fruit yield under shading.
Treatmentshading treatments e0 Outcomecucumber fruit yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The model also accurately predicted the decrease in cucumber fruit yield under low-sunlight conditions (shading treatments) and the increase in yield due to supplemental lighting. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1428 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The model accurately predicted increased cucumber fruit yield with supplemental lighting.
Treatmentsupplemental lighting e0 Verbatim
e0 “The model also accurately predicted the decrease in cucumber fruit yield under low-sunlight conditions (shading treatments) and the increase in yield due to supplemental lighting. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1428 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Micropropagation efficiently produced in vitro Cucumber rootstocks.
Outcomeproduce in vitro rootstocks e0 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “The results showed that the micropropagation technique can be used efficiently to produce in vitro rootstocks, especially for tomato rootstocks, in order to decrease the high cost of the interspecific rootstocks for commercial production of grafted vegetables. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–1036 t0 “Cucumber ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–39 Other claims from this paper (2) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.