View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Delayed sowing led to a slight initial yield undulation, then a decrease in yield , with a significant difference.
delayed sowing e1 began to decrease e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The kind of rice Wanxian 98 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 e1 “The results indicated that delayed sowing would lead to slightly undulated yield firstly, and then began to decrease and the difference was significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–301 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Removal of panicles with four leaves caused an even more significant decrease in yield .
removal of panicles with four leaves e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “seed maize inbred lines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–38 e0 “an even more significant decrease in yield was determined with treatment removal of panicles with four leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1346 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Planting a portfolio of soybean varieties can decrease soybean yield variability in Arkansas.
planting a portfolio of soybean varieties e1 yield variability e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “The results showed that there are significant advantages in planting a portfolio of soybean varieties that can enhance profits and decrease yield variability for soybean producers in Arkansas ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–843 Other claims from this paper (1) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in kernels per ear was associated with the decrease in grain yield (r2 = 0.88, P < 0.001).
Verbatim
t0 “Differential responses of maize yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–37 e4 “The decrease in grain yield was largely caused by the decrease in kernels per ear (r2 = 0.88, P < 0.001) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1013 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
TBRV caused a significant yield decrease .
Merlot and Cabernet franc t0 Verbatim
e0 “The major impact of TBRV was a significant yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1655–1712 t0 “Merlot and Cabernet franc ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–98 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
TBRV caused a significant yield decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “The major impact of TBRV was a significant yield decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1643–1701 e1 “The major impact of TBRV was a significant yield decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1643–1701 t0 “Quantitative and qualitative impact of Tomato Black Ring Virus (TBRV) on Merlot and Cabernet franc ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The cultivar had a significant decrease in grain yield .
Verbatim
e0 “which resulted in a significant decrease in its grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–940 t0 “triticale ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–108 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
UA4805 showed a significant yield decrease in 2023 due to stink bug damage.
stink bug e1 pest Verbatim
e0 “A new soybean cultivar ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 e1 “a significant yield decrease in ‘UA4805’ in 2023 due to stink bug damage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–664 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The disease led to a significant yield decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “leads to a significant decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1041 t1 “cherry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 e2 “virulent bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens Conn. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–229 e3 “the incubation period of the disease begins ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–743 Other claims from this paper (7) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in MNAR after densification is attributed as the cause of a significant decrease in grains per ear.
平均净同化率(MNAR)降低 e0 Verbatim
t0 “Spring Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 e0 “增密后平均净同化率(MNAR)降低导致穗粒数显著降低 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–603 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation Ear number and grains per ear are the main factors determining population yield above 15 t per hm2 in high-yield spring maize. Observation The yield structure for populations above 15 t per hm2 has an ear number of (7.08-9.60)x10^4 ears. Observation The yield structure for populations above 15 t per hm2 has 477-654 grains per ear. Observation The yield structure for populations above 15 t per hm2 has a thousand-grain weight of 324.7-388.7 g. Observation The yield structure for populations above 15 t per hm2 has a grain weight per ear of 168.9-234.0 g. Observation A reasonable population structure has LAImax above 6.5. Observation A reasonable population structure has mean LAI of about 5. Observation A reasonable population structure has LAI at harvest above 3.5. Recommendation The ideal yield structure for tall large-ear cultivars is 67,500-75,000 ears per hm2, 610-640 grains per ear, thousand-grain weight about 380 g, 220-240 g grain weight per ear and yield above 15 t per hm2. Recommendation The ideal yield structure for medium-height small-to-medium-ear cultivars is 75,000-97,500 ears per hm2, 520-600 grains per ear, thousand-grain weight 340-355 g, 180-220 g grain weight per ear and yield above 16.5 t per hm2. Intervention effect Increased planting density increased mean crop growth rate and total grain number per unit area. Intervention effect Increased planting density thereby raised yield. Intervention effect After densification, mean net assimilation rate (MNAR) decreased. Mechanism Structural potential tapping mainly through densification, where population gains exceed the loss in individual performance, achieves high yield above 15 t per hm2 (gain-loss compensation yield increase). Recommendation The authors identify functional potential tapping, giving combined gain in population structure and individual function (differential compensation yield increase), as an important route to further raise yield. Mechanism author interpretation original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield reduction was attributed to fewer effective panicles, lower seed setting rate and lower 1000-grain weight.
reduction in yield e0 decrease in the number of effective panicles, the seed setting rate, and a decrease in the 1000-grains weight e0 Verbatim
e0 “The main reasons for the reduction in yield was the significant decrease in the number of effective panicles, the seed setting rate, and a decrease in the 1000-grains weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1445 t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 Other claims from this paper (14) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Reduced growth led to a significant decrease in inulin production.
inulin production e0 Verbatim
e0 “growth, which in turn led to a significant decrease in inulin production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1441 e1 “Root chicory displayed resistance to water stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1316 Other claims from this paper (11) Method / resource observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Field testing found a significant decrease in bird numbers in targeted areas.
number of birds in the targeted areas e0 Verbatim
e0 “the result of the prototype field-testing showed a significant effect in decreasing the number of birds in the targeted areas ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1407 e1 “Filipino rice farmers, resulting in losses in annual harvest yield . Farmers suffer the challenge of crop damage by birds ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 45–165 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The stacked ensemble model significantly decrease s RMSE compared with traditional machine learning models.
traditional machine learning models e1 Verbatim
e0 “Predicting crop yield s remains a crucial challenge in agriculture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–74 e1 “The proposed stacked ensemble model achieves superior crop yield prediction performance, evidenced by a notable enhancement in accuracy and a significant decrease in RMSE, surpassing the predictive capabilities of traditional machine learning models ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1374 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The percentage decline in Δ F / Fm ′ 14s after dehydration correlated with cultivar drought susceptibility index at r = 0·72.
percentage decrease of Δ F / Fm ′ 14s e0 drought susceptibility index (DSI) e0 Not reported Taxon Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The percentage decrease of Δ F / Fm ′ 14s after dehydration was correlated with the drought susceptibility index (DSI) of the cultivars, evaluated on a yield basis and a significant correlation ( r = 0·72, P < 0·001) was found. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1193 Other claims from this paper (4) Recommendation author interpretation original result negative significant (as stated) basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors concluded that henbit interference with stand loss may significantly reduce wheat yield and profitability.
henbit interference coupled with crop stand loss e0 Verbatim
e0 “henbit interference coupled with crop stand loss may significantly decrease crop yield and profitability of wheat production systems ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–1017 Other claims from this paper (6) Recommendation author interpretation original result positive significant (as stated) basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Single-antagonist use of strain Th5cc with three applications (coated seed plus sprays at tillering and heading) is recommended to decrease pycnidial coverage until heading.
use of the strain Th5cc e4 pycnidial coverage e4 Verbatim
e0 “Field experiments were conducted to analyze the effect of Trichoderma harzianum as natural biofungicide of Septoria tritici in wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132 e4 “When applying the single antagonist the use of the strain Th5cc is recommended with 3 applications( coated seed and two spray applications at tillering and heading) that decreas the pycnidial coverage until heading (p 0.05) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1705 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Oryza sativae0
Zea mays
Glycine max
Agrobacterium tumefaciens
Triticum aestivum
Lamium amplexicaule
Zymoseptoria tritici
Trichoderma harzianum