Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effect 317

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lara yield decrease on optimal sowing dates was not significant.

Taxon: Sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Material: Larae0
Outcome: decreasee0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0
“while with the other two cultivars (Lara and Sara), the decrease was not significant.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1046

t0
“Sugar beet”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10

t1
“decrease of yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–898

Title

Sugar beet root yield and quality as affected by sowing date

Branko Marinković; Jovan Crnobarać; Goran Jačimović; et al. Zbornik radova Instituta za ratarstvo i povrtarstvo 2005

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect The first sowing date gave the highest root yield across cultivars and years.
Intervention effect First-date yield exceeded other sowing dates by 8.11 tha'1 (12.2%).
Intervention effect Mara yield decreased significantly on optimal sowing dates.
Intervention effect Sara yield decrease on optimal sowing dates was not significant.
Association Sugar content variation was uncorrelated with sowing dates.
Association Root yield was the dominant contributor to sugar yield.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

One cluster had a nonsignificant yield decrease with narrower rows.

Taxon: SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: RS narrowede0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“one had a nonsignificant yield decrease as RS narrowed.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1183

t0
“Soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–32

Title

Row Spacing in the Early Soybean Production System

Glenn R. Bowers; James L. Rabb; Lanny O. Ashlock; et al. Agronomy Journal 2000. doi:10.2134/agronj2000.923524x

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Five environmental clusters had significant yield gains of 17–36% as rows narrowed.
Intervention effect Three other clusters had nonsignificant yield increases with narrower rows.
Intervention effect One cluster had virtually no yield change with narrower rows.
Association Yield responded most to row spacing at 100 to 270 mm July and August rainfall.
Recommendation The authors recommend rows at most 40 cm to optimize ESPS yields in the midsouthern USA.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea tended to decrease straw yield nonsignificantly.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: application of TUe0
Outcome: straw yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“While the straw yield showed a decrease trend with the application of TU. Decrease in straw yield, although marginal was statistically insignificant.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1217

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44

Title

Genetic Expression of Yield Ability in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Sulphydryl Enriched Biophysio-Environment

PC Gupta; Shiv Narayan; PS Shekhawat; et al. INROADS- An International Journal of Jaipur National University 2013. doi:10.5958/j.2277-4912.2.1.004

Other claims from this paper (8)

Observation The four wheat varieties differed significantly in yield and yield attributes.
Association Variety by thiourea dose interaction was nonsignificant.
Observation Thiourea at 5 and 10 kg/ha tended to increase wheat yield components.
Intervention effect Thiourea at 10 kg/ha increased harvest index by 10.11%.
Observation Thiourea at 20 kg/ha raised harvest index only marginally by 4.75.
Intervention effect Thiourea at 10 kg/ha significantly increased grain yield by 8.0%.
Intervention effect Thiourea at 5 kg/ha slightly increased grain yield over control.
Intervention effect Thiourea at 20 kg/ha slightly increased grain yield over control but reduced it versus 10 kg/ha.

Association 53

Show all 53 →

Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The maize yield decrease from delayed emergence was not statistically related to yield stability zones.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Outcome: maize yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Setting: yield stability zonese0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The decrease in maize yield caused by the delay in emergence was not statistically related to yield stability zones”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2129–2244

Title

Plant emergence and maize (Zea mays L.) yield across multiple farmers’ fields

S. Albarenque; B. Basso; O. Davidson; et al. Field Crops Research 2023. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2023.109090

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observation Individual maize emergence occurred 3 to 31 days after planting.
Association Emergence timing variation affected yield and yield components more than within-row spacing variation.
Association The impact of emergence variation was generally larger in stable low-yield areas.
Association Plant yield fell by 7% per day of emergence delay.
Association Grain number fell by 6% per day of emergence delay.
Association Final crop yield fell by 8.5% per day of emergence delay.
Association Delayed emergence tended to have a more negative impact in low yield stability zones.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The flour-yield decrease in Bayraktar 2000 was not significant.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: Bayraktar 2000e0
Organ / stage: kernelt0
Outcome: flour yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“the decrease in flour yield was not significant for cv Bayraktar 2000”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–926

t0
“wheat kernel size”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–28

Title

Effects of wheat kernel size on hardness and various quality characteristics

O. Acar; T. Sanal; H. Köksel Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops & Foods 2019. doi:10.3920/qas2019.1552

Other claims from this paper (9)

Association Thousand-kernel weight decreased as kernel size decreased.
Method / resource Three hardness tests gave parallel results.
Association Kernel hardness increased as kernel size decreased.
Association Smaller kernels generally had lower flour yields.
Association Protein content decreased with decreasing kernel size in two cultivars.
Association Wet gluten decreased with decreasing kernel size in two cultivars.
Association Protein content and wet gluten in the third cultivar were unaffected by kernel size.
Association Sedimentation values were unaffected by kernel size.
Association Small kernels did not seem to influence flour quality overall.

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hercules close relatives had no significant decrease in oat grain yield.

Taxon: oatAvena sativae1
Material: Herculese0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: no significant decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“The cultivar Hercules enhanced the test weight of its close relatives, with no significant decrease in grain yield.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1346

e1
“oat ( Avena saliva L.) genotypes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–262

Title

Prediction of Genotype Performance from Ancestral Relationship in Oat

S. C. Beer; E. Souza; M. E. Sorrells Crop Science 1995. doi:10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183x003500010012x

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observation 39

Show all 39 →

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

These combinations did not significantly decrease yield.

Taxon: grapet0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“without a significant decrease in yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1025

t0
“Isabella grape variety”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–510

Title

Impact of combination application of herbicides and mineral fertilizers on the chemical composition of must and wine

Madina B. Khokonova Izvestiya of Kabardino-Balkarian State Agrarian University named after V M Kokov 2022. doi:10.55196/2411-3492-2022-3-37-26-30

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Combined herbicides and fertilizers generally left must sugar at control level.
Intervention effect Nitrate fertilizers with simazine increased wort sugar.
Intervention effect Nitrate fertilizers with atrazine increased wort sugar.
Observation Wort titratable acids did not differ significantly.
Intervention effect Atrazine plus NP slightly lowered wine titratable acids.
Intervention effect Atrazine plus NRK slightly lowered wine titratable acids.
Observation Coloring substances and total phenols tended to increase in all variants.
Observation Simazine with mineral fertilizers caused no sharp deviation in main must and wine components.
Observation Atrazine with mineral fertilizers caused no sharp deviation in main must and wine components.
Observation These herbicides and fertilizers did not negatively affect wine organoleptic properties.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lara showed a statistically insignificant straw yield decrease.

Material: Larae0
Outcome: straw yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0
“The Lara variety showed an insignificant decrease in the straw yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1207

Title

Features of forming the productivity of modern hemp varieties using organic cultivation technology

Andriy Pylypchenko; Mykola Marenych; Volodymyr Hanhur; et al. Scientific Horizons 2023. doi:10.48077/scihor7.2023.54

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Organic cultivation increased crop productivity overall.
Intervention effect Organic cultivation increased Hliana straw yield by 0.07-0.11 t/ha, without statistical significance.
Intervention effect Organic cultivation increased Hloba straw yield within the stated 0.07-0.11 t/ha range, without statistical significance.
Intervention effect Organic cultivation increased Zolotoniski 15 straw yield by 0.14 t/ha.
Intervention effect Organic cultivation increased Sula straw yield by 0.14 t/ha.
Observation Lara had the best fibre-yield suitability for organic cultivation.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thinning treatments did not significantly decrease yield per tree.

Taxon: ‘Wilking’ mandarinst0
Outcome: yield in kg per treee0
Direction: without significant decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“without significant decrease of yield in kg per tree.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–296

t0
“‘Wilking’ Mandarins”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–74

Title

Improving Fruit Size and Breaking Alternate Bearing in ‘Wilking’ Mandarins by Ethephon and Other Agents1

S. Galliani; S. P. Monselise; R. Goren HortScience 1975. doi:10.21273/hortsci.10.1.68

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Ethephon caused satisfactory thinning in heavily loaded mandarin trees.
Intervention effect NAA caused satisfactory thinning in heavily loaded mandarin trees.
Intervention effect Ethephon increased individual fruit size by 64% versus hand thinning.
Intervention effect NAA increased individual fruit size by 48% versus hand thinning.
Intervention effect Ethephon increased profit by about 30% versus hand thinning.
Intervention effect NAA increased profit by about 30% versus hand thinning.
Intervention effect Summer pruning had similar effects but a smaller fruit size increase.
Intervention effect Ethephon reduced alternate bearing.
Observation After ethephon, 57% of treated trees had satisfactory yields the following year.

Method / resource 5

Show all 5 →

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)simulated

Claim · model-written summary

The controller caused no significant decrease in simulated maize yield relative to constant irrigation.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse1
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: without any significant decreasee0
Comparator: constant irrigation method of the DSSAT modele0

Verbatim

t0
“Precision Irrigation”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–64

e0
“almost 40% decrease in water consumption is achieved in comparison to constant irrigation method of the DSSAT model without any significant decrease in yield and leaf area index.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2249–2427

e1
“DSSAT (Decision Support System for Agro-technology Transfer) maize crop simulation model”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1911–1999

Title

Reinforcement Learning Based Controller For Precision Irrigation

Shivaram Irukula OakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries) 2015

Other claims from this paper (2)

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Using SNP subsets based on functional annotation did not significantly decrease chickpea grain-yield prediction accuracy.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Outcome: prediction accuracy for grain yielde0
Direction: did not significantly decreasee0
Comparator: whole SNP datasete0

Not reportedValue

Verbatim

e0
“Compared with the whole SNP dataset, a subset of SNPs did not significantly decrease prediction accuracy for grain yield despite consisting of a smaller number of SNPs.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1840

e1
“chickpea breeding lines”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–356

Title

Genomic prediction of preliminary yield trials in chickpea: Effect of functional annotation of SNPs and environment

Yongle Li; Pradeep Ruperao; Jacqueline Batley; et al. The Plant Genome 2021. doi:10.1002/tpg2.20166

Other claims from this paper (7)

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)simulated

Claim · model-written summary

The controller caused no significant decrease in simulated maize leaf area index relative to constant irrigation.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse1
Outcome: leaf area indexe0
Direction: without any significant decreasee0
Comparator: constant irrigation method of the DSSAT modele0

Verbatim

e0
“almost 40% decrease in water consumption is achieved in comparison to constant irrigation method of the DSSAT model without any significant decrease in yield and leaf area index.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2249–2427

e1
“DSSAT (Decision Support System for Agro-technology Transfer) maize crop simulation model”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1911–1999

Title

Reinforcement Learning Based Controller For Precision Irrigation

Shivaram Irukula OakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries) 2015

Other claims from this paper (2)

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

Intervention effect 317

Association 53

Observation 39

Method / resource 5